Lurker > VintageGin

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Board List
Page List: 1, 2
Topiceighty tabletop games, ranked
VintageGin
02/16/18 5:10:58 PM
#217
Cosmic Encounter is mostly fun due to the unique interactions that you have. There are a few aliens that are drastically overpowered and worth removing (Virus was one, if I remember correctly), but for the most part the diplomacy of the game allows it to self-balance.

I think it's fun going into a game and knowing the base rules but having it play out very differently each time. It's not my favorite game of all time, but I do enjoy it quite a bit.
---
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 161: Elephants On Parade
VintageGin
02/15/18 12:00:15 PM
#400
foolm0r0n posted...
The fundamental question is this: after we successfully ban all civilian gun ownership, when shootings still happen, what will you do?

Say "welp, we tried!" and just accept it? Add more regulations? Become Batman?

If you haven't even thought about this question, you are absolutely unqualified to say another word on this topic.


So is your solution just to maintain the status quo?
---
Topiceighty tabletop games, ranked
VintageGin
02/15/18 2:25:40 AM
#143
SeabassDebeste posted...
Bonus question - This might be the only programming game that I played enough to make the list, though the others I tried a bit I generally liked more - what are your favorites?


I've only played it once, but Robo Rally is probably the most I've laughed during a board game
---
Topiceighty tabletop games, ranked
VintageGin
02/14/18 4:01:26 PM
#125
SeabassDebeste posted...
Hint for #72 - Everyone got a plan til they get punched in the face. Or shot.


Gotta be Colt Express
---
TopicAnyone want to pitch their city to me to move to?
VintageGin
02/13/18 9:41:46 PM
#92
Berkeley is pretty neat. SF and Oakland are both accessible, and you don't have you deal with the high cost of living and other unpleasantness that comes with actually living in SF.

The cost of living is still higher than average, but it's not to the exorbitant levels found in SF.

Also the food's pretty decent and there's so much fresh produce around.
---
Topiceighty tabletop games, ranked
VintageGin
02/13/18 6:28:34 PM
#74
Dead of Winter is decent but every time I've played it the game ends up moving very slowly for one reason or another. For some reason it's like something about the game doesn't click with certain people and turns take longer than they should.
---
Topiceighty tabletop games, ranked
VintageGin
02/13/18 2:32:50 PM
#58
Yeah, I've never heard of or played this one either!

As for the engagement/game design question...I feel like Colt Express falls into this category. There's potentially a lot to keep track of, but because of all the hidden information and the somewhat random changes, it all feels pretty random in terms of what unfolds.
---
Topiceighty tabletop games, ranked
VintageGin
02/12/18 10:49:17 PM
#16
Great_Paul posted...
trdl23 posted...
Is "SH's parent game" referring to Werewolf/Mafia?


I'm guessing The Resistance/Avalon.


I figured it was Two Rooms and a Boom
---
TopicWho else filed 2 weeks ago and is still waiting on their tax return?
VintageGin
02/07/18 7:24:34 PM
#3
Filed mime in early Jan and got my return before Feb
---
TopicDescribe a film poorly, others guess what it is
VintageGin
02/07/18 2:41:05 AM
#169
StartTheMachine posted...
A woman swallows a disfigured man's cum and it means something.


Vanilla Sky
---
TopicDescribe a film poorly, others guess what it is
VintageGin
02/06/18 11:42:08 PM
#164
A man is manipulated into becoming a serial killer who only targets people with a certain name
---
Topicdigi definitively ranks the users with short writeups and or tiers maybe
VintageGin
01/30/18 3:04:19 AM
#16
TopicJust beat Cuphead (spoilers, I guess)
VintageGin
01/29/18 8:25:12 PM
#5
Part of me wants to try to clear expert mode, but I'm not sure I have the patience for that.
---
TopicJust beat Cuphead (spoilers, I guess)
VintageGin
01/29/18 6:11:47 AM
#4
Hard to choose, honestly! I liked Wally Warbles and Werner Werman's designs (although I was less a fan of the baby bird portion for Wally...but the being carried in a stretcher made up for it). Cala Maria was also great, design-wise, as was Sally Stageplay.

In terms of fun, I think I had fun with most of them. The world 1 bosses were a bit too easy to be too memorable, but they were still nice. Dr Kahl's Robot and King Dice ended up being a little more stressful/frustrating than fun.
---
TopicJust beat Cuphead (spoilers, I guess)
VintageGin
01/29/18 5:21:59 AM
#1
245 deaths. Wish there was a way to see how many restarts.

Overall, pretty good game. I feel like the Devil fight could have been harder, and I kind of hated the miniboss gauntlet for King Dice.

Hardest boss was probably the dragon or the robot, though I feel like the dragon was only hard because it was a difficulty spike relative to world 2.

Only ever used the Peashooter, Spreadshot and Chaser as weapons. Not sure if I missed out here. I hear the the lobber is pretty good against certain bosses and that the charge shot got nerfed at some point.

Also, I completely forgot about the fact that the plane has bombs as an alt-weapon until after the last real plane boss fight.
---
TopicFreedom, Liberty, Ron Paul - In Case You Weren't Sure About Crypto... [dwmf]
VintageGin
01/26/18 3:19:52 PM
#407
This topic made me realize that the industry I work in (ad tech) provides an interesting parallel for minimum wage stuff (among other things).

The way companies buy ad space is through an open auction, and there's an option to set minimums on bids that will actually be allowed. You'd think that the best approach would be to leave these minimums out since you maximize the amount of bids received, but in practice this creates a race to the bottom and lower overall money flowing through.

And the minimums also provide an important signal to the buyer algorithms, which will adjust so that they can win more often (so long as the minimum isn't too high).

Although the most effective way of implementing these minimums is dynamically rather than static values so \_()_/
---
TopicApparently that Celeste game is pretty awesome.
VintageGin
01/26/18 2:55:42 PM
#15
It's made by the creator of Towerfall, so I'm not surprised!

Looking forward to picking this up, though I might wait until or sale or when I have more time.
---
TopicProject Veritas expose Twitter censorship!
VintageGin
01/12/18 4:06:00 PM
#90
isn't this the conservative twitter

https://gab.ai/
---
Topici hate this
VintageGin
01/09/18 3:07:41 AM
#82
I beat this last night and I have to say

fuck you for linking this I went to bed at like 3 goddamnit
---
TopicI need help from someone who knows about dyeing hair.
VintageGin
01/04/18 8:45:03 PM
#4
Try doing it a 2nd time. Dye harder.
---
Topicso what did you get in the steam sale
VintageGin
01/04/18 12:38:30 PM
#55
Cuphead
Pyre
OneShot
---
TopicCryptocurrency topic 2: Shoot for the moon
VintageGin
01/01/18 10:04:05 PM
#3
My most recent buys were ICX and REQ. Sadly I got the REQ when it was around ~0.64 or so because I jumped on it too late, but I wouldn't be surprised if it continues to climb.
It's one of the few coins that I feel could see legitimate use after all the rampant speculation dies down.

I'm also not really dumping huge amounts of money into this, though.
---
TopicCryptocurrency topic 2: Shoot for the moon
VintageGin
01/01/18 6:28:52 PM
#1
Just curious how everyone's feeling about crypto now. We had pretty big drops on BTC and LTC after the hype died while ETH has pretty much held steady.

There's been quite a few altcoins that have started to take off over the past few days. Any favorites?
---
TopicLordy Lordy looks who is 40
VintageGin
01/01/18 3:47:21 PM
#15
you're old, man
---
TopicStar Wars TLJ Spoilers for entire SW Topic 4
VintageGin
12/28/17 12:42:49 AM
#2
I have to say that I laughed at how aggressive a start this is for the new topic.
---
TopicStar Wars: The Last Jedi: Spoiler Thread Episode III
VintageGin
12/27/17 6:24:06 PM
#483
SmartMuffin posted...
VintageGin posted...
By the way, did anyone discuss the logistics of the 18 hour slow space chase? That's the one thing I don't understand...why were they pacing at exactly the same speed for that long.


My best understanding is that top-speed (non-warp) was essentially equal between the two fleets, and there was enough range between them that weapons were basically ineffective. The Empire had to close the distance between themselves and the rebels for their weapons to work, which was only going to happen if they ran out of fuel.


Yeah, that was my understanding too. But it seems silly that that they had the exact same top speed so that the distance remained the same.

And thinking back, I thought maybe it made sense if the rebels had a faster top speed but decided to keep the distance the same to conserve fuel...but I'm pretty sure at some point they explicitly say something about increasing to max speed.
---
TopicStar Wars: The Last Jedi: Spoiler Thread Episode III
VintageGin
12/27/17 5:59:45 PM
#480
By the way, did anyone discuss the logistics of the 18 hour slow space chase? That's the one thing I don't understand...why were they pacing at exactly the same speed for that long.
---
TopicStar Wars: The Last Jedi: Spoiler Thread Episode III
VintageGin
12/27/17 4:04:04 PM
#456
Corrik posted...
AquaArcane posted...
Lopen posted...
My argument is that we're thinking about it way more than the writers did, because they don't really understand Luke Skywalker or Star Wars all that well.


They understand Star Wars a lot better than Lucas did

This is the dumbest comment ever. No one can understand star wars better than the guy who thought it up and created it.


They can understand what makes it good better than he does. That's the entire point of editing after all-- to bring out the best of what's there.

I don't think Lucas understands why Star Wars was good, and I think midichlorians prove that point pretty easily.
---
TopicStar Wars: The Last Jedi: Spoiler Thread Episode III
VintageGin
12/27/17 3:47:02 PM
#449
Lopen posted...
My argument was never Luke's lying

My argument is that we're thinking about it way more than the writers did, because they don't really understand Luke Skywalker or Star Wars all that well.


Your argument is based on the idea that we should see the exact same character we saw many years ago with no change.

So 30 years from now, I fully expect you to be advocating for spy clones to fix plot points.
---
TopicStar Wars: The Last Jedi: Spoiler Thread Episode III
VintageGin
12/27/17 3:16:38 PM
#432
Lopen posted...
I guess Kylo Ren just got universe destroying darkness the day Luke realized it, literally out of nowhere. Makes sense!


What. Dude, he said that he had sensed it during training. He saw it building up inside him.

Then he goes for a more thorough look while he's asleep and can't keep his thoughts hidden and sees the full extent of it.

I feel like you're being deliberately obtuse here.
---
TopicStar Wars: The Last Jedi: Spoiler Thread Episode III
VintageGin
12/27/17 2:47:25 PM
#425
Lopen posted...
I dunno, man. Not really to me-- just doesn't really profile as the kinda thing to create that "crime of passion" reaction given how Jedi have historically reacted to "sensing darkness" in the series but agree to disagree I guess


I mean, he literally hasn't had to deal with this for years and is the last Jedi who also didn't receive the full training a Jedi normally would.

He's been unpracticed against the dark side for all this time, and he see darkness in Kylo that scares him...so for just a second he reverts to that Luke that cut off the fake Vader's head in Dagobah.

He realizes his mistake because of his training, but it's too late.
---
TopicStar Wars: The Last Jedi: Spoiler Thread Episode III
VintageGin
12/27/17 2:37:22 PM
#420
Yeah, I was under the impression that he sensed darkness in him, went to check on this when Kylo was asleep, went "oh fuck it's even worse than I thought" and instinctively grabbed his lightsaber before really reflecting on it.

Makes sense if he really hasn't seen anything like that in years.
---
TopicStar Wars: The Last Jedi: Spoiler Thread Episode III
VintageGin
12/27/17 1:39:48 AM
#390
Saw it today.

Had low expectations based on the mixed reception, but it was actually pretty good!

Floating space Leia was pretty silly though.

But I was just thinking, what if...and bear with me on this one...what if instead, she was an imperial spy clone?
---
Topicholy shit Die Hard is so good
VintageGin
12/25/17 4:25:25 PM
#28
Corrik posted...

4 is awesome. See it. Thanks.


Have seen 4. I meant that I haven't seen 5.

4 sucks. Thanks.
---
Topicholy shit Die Hard is so good
VintageGin
12/25/17 4:23:38 PM
#27
Also, what I love about the movie is that all the little details add up and contribute in some way to the story (like the "fists with your toes" conversation). Not to mention you actually see John and the tower get increasingly hurt/destroyed as the movie unfolds. And it's all just paced so well.
---
Topicholy shit Die Hard is so good
VintageGin
12/25/17 4:17:35 PM
#25
Die Hard is excellent.

2 and 3 are both good, but not as good.

4 and (I assume because I haven't seen it) 5 shouldn't exist.
---
TopicSo that Net Neutrality vote is happening now right?
VintageGin
12/20/17 3:28:38 PM
#172
foolm0r0n posted...
What is up with you guys and this "vague hypothetical" meme. I just showed you real examples of how ISP regulations stifle growth and that the FCC has control over these things under Title II and deals out exceptions to the highest bidder. It's concrete and real and has been going on for decades to get us to where we're at now.

You guys are out here crying about how the internet is destroyed and you're gonna have to pay $100000000 to make a facebook post, but I'm the one being vague and hypothetical?


"you guys"

damn dude, have a little more respect-- I don't lump you and smartmuffin together

I asked you for examples where the FCC policies you named had negatively impacted smaller ISPs. You provided an article with examples of local regulations doing this instead. You then went on to later say that regulations should be handled at the local/state level, even though the article you linked was about how that was the problem.

Duh because you have no issue with Comcast being the internet monopoly. In fact you WANT Comcast to be the internet monopoly of the US, as long as the FCC controls them through strong enough regulations.

You're arguing for Comcast to be in every home in America and Ajit Pai to be at the reigns. Can't I at least SUGGEST that that's a bit ridiculous?


My stance here is pretty simple: With the FCC regulations in place, the worst case scenario is that Comcast gets everything it wants. Your solution to this is apparently that we should get rid of the FCC's influence entirely, meaning that Comcast gets everything it wants by default.

Which companies? Can you list 1 example?

This is what I mean, we're already at the bottom of the hole and digging. How does your status quo fix that?


We have a local ISP called LMI. They share Sonic's infrastructure.

You keep assuming that I don't want any change when all I'm saying is I don't want this change.
---
TopicSo that Net Neutrality vote is happening now right?
VintageGin
12/20/17 3:12:53 PM
#170
SmartMuffin posted...
Comcast and everyone else have taken a "whatever, we just provide the pipe, if you don't like certain content don't view it" attitude.


Weird, I wonder if there was something that forced them to hold to that.

Facebook/Twitter occupy a middle-ground in terms of content/pipe, in part because the platform/framework they offer is unique-- it's not just upload and download speeds.

Also, you may be interested to note that Facebook/Twitter are not the whole of the internet. There's a lot of "real" content out there that accounts for a lot of the internet.
---
TopicSo that Net Neutrality vote is happening now right?
VintageGin
12/18/17 10:52:56 PM
#162
SmartMuffin posted...
Content-driven vs pipe-driven. Net neutrality at least enables competition among content creators.

Right, you like the good companies who control and manipulate what we see, not the bad ones.


If you're going to boil it down to picking a side because you don't understand nuance, then yes. But that's a pretty lame argument.
---
TopicSo that Net Neutrality vote is happening now right?
VintageGin
12/18/17 9:24:22 PM
#160
SmartMuffin posted...
http://babylonbee.com/news/internet-service-providers-not-able-decide-people-can-see-online-says-man-decides-people-can-see-online/

Seriously, if you favor net neutrality because you're against big corporations, you're doing it wrong. This isn't "the people vs big corporations", this is "some big corporations vs other big corporations"


Content-driven vs pipe-driven. Net neutrality at least enables competition among content creators.
---
TopicSo that Net Neutrality vote is happening now right?
VintageGin
12/18/17 9:22:13 PM
#159
foolm0r0n posted...
Last mile just refers to the part of the infrastructure that is the "last mile". That's where MOST of the infrastructure costs are, because you're digging around a city and underground and all that stuff. That's where new ISPs get blocked from coming into a city.

So that one regulation about sharing last mile infrastructure might be okay, but it's just one of many regulations that the FCC has control over via Title II which it can choose to enforce completely up to its own whim (which is not at all informed by democratic or market forces).

My whole point is that FCC controlling every single city and house in the country's wires from their 5-seat ivory tower undeniably dangerous and ridiculous. If you want those regulations which you think are beneficial, then do them at the state and local level and take the power away from the evil FCC. States are the ones who do the most cronyist monopoly deals with ISPs anyways if you look at the stats.


Yeah I know what last mile is. But you haven't given any examples of the FCC's last mile regulations stifling new ISP growth. You've just pointed to local and state regulations hampering growth and alluded to a vague hypothetical of what the FCC could do with Title 2 and last mile regulations. That's like, the exact opposite of your point.

Which is dumb as hell since the status quo regulations end up with the major ISPs having wide-spread monopolies, which is the supposed worst-case scenario of the latter option.

We're already in the worst place possible. Why are you fighting so hard to keep things like they are?


Because I would say that the issue is more to do with (certain, not all) regulations not going far enough rather than them obstructing competition. I think that a broad "free market" deregulation approach will just manage to dig us deeper into this hole (probably by first causing companies that depend on sharing infrastructure to go out of business or get acquired).
---
TopicEgg Nog
VintageGin
12/18/17 4:28:03 AM
#21
Homemade eggnog is great:

http://imbibemagazine.com/25-days-of-holiday-drinks-day-25-tequila-sherry-egg-nog/

Store-bought eggnog is alright, but it's completely different
---
TopicBest Dead or Alive girl?
VintageGin
12/17/17 9:45:54 PM
#21
Snrkiko posted...
honoka lovers might be worse than ayane fans


what do you have against ayane

maybe this friendship isn't worth it
---
TopicSo that Net Neutrality vote is happening now right?
VintageGin
12/17/17 2:09:59 PM
#151
foolm0r0n posted...
He's prob not reading the topic anymore but
VintageGin posted...
I actually couldn't find any good examples of this, which is why I asked. Maybe I wasn't searching for the right things.

This article is badly written but it pulls together a good amount of examples, and sources for how fees and regulations multiply the cost of building a local network way more than it should be
https://www.wired.com/2013/07/we-need-to-stop-focusing-on-just-cable-companies-and-blame-local-government-for-dismal-broadband-competition/

What the article is missing is that the FCC does have ultimate control over the city's internet regulations, under Title II. This is seen in places where the FCC forced cities to change their limits and last mile policies (ex: https://gizmodo.com/fcc-just-overruled-the-state-laws-that-blocked-municipa-1688200941) in certain cases (lobbying). That is what everyone wanted with Title II and for some reason they never thought about how just 5 dudes at the FCC having power over all this stuff could ever be a bad idea. Even after the net neutrality vote no one thinks the problem is that there's just 5 dudes in control, just that those dudes don't agree with them.


I still don't see how last mile affects this. The last mile regulations are just about what ISPs are required to offer other competitors. Without them, they wouldn't be required to share any existing infrastructure. So how exactly would the removal of last mile benefit small ISPs?

And yeah, those local/municipal fees mentioned in the article you posted do suck-- I wouldn't be opposed to getting rid of things like that. I don't know if I believe that's the only issue with the cost, though.

I don't think anyone is arguing that having 5 guys on the FCC decide these regulations is the best system, only that it's better than the alternative of giving cable companies unregulated reign.
---
TopicWhat are the three best and three worst episodes of Lost, excluding the finale?
VintageGin
12/15/17 1:41:55 PM
#25
FFDragon posted...
I'm struggling to think of them. All I remember is bad Claire, bad zombie Sayid, bad Jin + Sun reunion, bad Jacob, bad MiB, bad temple storyline, bad flashsideways, always bad Locke. And that's just from memory.

Oh wait, S6 is "Gives zero fucks Jack" right? That's best Jack so okay there's one.


Yeah, Jack was the only thing that improved in S6
---
TopicSo that Net Neutrality vote is happening now right?
VintageGin
12/15/17 1:22:19 PM
#99
foolm0r0n posted...
I don't have time to research for you but if you really would be convinced by a couple of examples then definitely search yourself for recent examples of blocked local ISP (I think there's both municipal and private rural examples)


I actually couldn't find any good examples of this, which is why I asked. Maybe I wasn't searching for the right things.

Infrastructure costs are largely regulatory costs. It's expensive to follow the laundry list of rules, which is why only the megacorps can afford it.


The regulatory costs are also not really related to the FCC or the Title 2/last mile stuff you mentioned as things that were holding new ISPs back. It's just expensive to do stuff that involves digging up public/private property to lay cable.

Considering the major telecom companies were born out of mergers that resulted from it being more cost effective to merge with/buy other companies than create new infrastructure, I don't really see how the free market is the solution here.
---
TopicSo that Net Neutrality vote is happening now right?
VintageGin
12/15/17 4:17:24 AM
#95
foolm0r0n posted...
More broadly about how the FCC has control over who gets the last mile. Which they SAID would mean ISPs would have to share their infrastructure but in practice it's been used to come up with some reason to block last-mile usage and new infrastructure creation by competitors.

In general, take every single fear you have about ISPs and apply it to the FCC. It's not hard. All you need is to realize neither the FCC, nor any gov agency, is immune to the same incentives that inform the actions of evil mega corporations.


Can you provide examples of where the last mile stuff was used to block smaller ISPs?

Also, what would repealing/deregulating telecommunication standards do in terms of allowing new ISPs to overcome the infrastructure costs?
---
TopicSo that Net Neutrality vote is happening now right?
VintageGin
12/15/17 3:39:59 AM
#91
foolm0r0n posted...
VintageGin posted...
What regulations, specifically?

Title II common carrier and last mile stuff


The last mile stuff you're talking about is the regulation that forces ISPs to share infrastructure, right? How are these preventing new ISPs when the primary barrier to entry for new ISPs is the extreme infrastructure costs?
---
TopicWhat are the three best and three worst episodes of Lost, excluding the finale?
VintageGin
12/15/17 2:29:42 AM
#21
Can I just vote the entire last season as the worst?

...plus Stranger in a Strange Land

Greatest Hits, Walkabout, and The Constant were probably the best there I can think of
---
TopicSo that Net Neutrality vote is happening now right?
VintageGin
12/15/17 2:27:26 AM
#89
foolm0r0n posted...
Regaro posted...
Hey foolmo quick question. If the answer isn't giving the FCC more power, then do you believe that giving ISPs etc more power is the answer?

New ISPs yes. Current monopolized ISPs acquire a ton of power from FCC regulations which extend down to the local level, so depowering the FCC will depower those ISPs and actually allow new ones to be created.


What regulations, specifically?
---
Board List
Page List: 1, 2