Lurker > GreenKnight127

For the sake of this poll, let's assume this is a person you don't know. Or barely know. Someone who is NOT a friend or a family member. This is someone who has no relationship with you whatsoever, so they have absolutely no ground to walk on, and no justification for the insult as "I was only kidding" etc. There's no reason this person should "just be kidding" with you. They don't know you. You don't know them.

This might be a person you see at a bar. Or a party. Maybe they are a friend of a friend. A total stranger to you. A waiter at a restaurant. A cashier at a gas station.

Upon interacting with you....before any formalities or "hellos" have taken place, they skip straight into insulting you. Pointing out a physical flaw you have. A quick little jab out of nowhere.

A comment about your weight. Your height. Your nose. Your hairline. Your skin. The car you drive. Your ears. The shoes you are wearing. The way you are holding your drink in your hand. Something. Anything.

I know this poll is kinda stupid, and I know it's extremely vague....as no specific insult is given. I also know that such things don't happen very often. 99% of people are nice and non-confrontational.

But over the course of my life....it has happened. Many times. And I've seen it happen to others...many times. And it's a fascinating phenomenon. And it's so weird when trying to process how to react while still maintaining your pride, your dignity, your sanity....and maybe not escalating the situation.

And then a lot of people try to say "You just gotta have thick skin!"

But I also think the people who say such things.....just havent been properly insulted yet. LOL

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

The_tall_midget posted...

It has been demonstrated that women have more successes on those sites, but mostly because a LOT of the men there are thirsty simps. I've seen some praises thrown toward some ham beats that I wouldn't touch with a 50 foot pole that would make you question some people's sanity.

Have you ever met a genuinely thirsty female that would take whatever she could get?

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

One can only hope.

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

Probably collecting period blood.

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

I thought there would actually be content to this topic. Like examples. Screenshots. Links. Stories. Jiners.

The disappointment is palpable.

Have you tried bending over and FUCKING YOUR OWN FACE?

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

Zangulus posted...

The incel is strong in this topic.

Deflection

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

Girls don't believe in God anymore. They only believe in the Self.

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

(mild spoilers about a particular supporting character)

It's weird how much the sister-in-law character bothered me. Like, I watched the movie almost week ago....and I'm still disturbed by what she represented. It just seemed so random. So out of place. So unnecessary.

What it says about how society views men and how many movies rely on the bashing of husbands/boyfriends for comedic value.

Her character was essentially just there to be a bitch. To constantly try to convince her sister to divorce her husband....with absolutely ZERO justification.

If he was an abusive, neglectful jerk.....and was always lying to her, etc....I could understand. But there was no evidence of that happening.

He was a genuinely nice guy! And he worked a second job wile she was going to school to support her. Because he loved her so much. He's a cop! He cares about his town. He loves his wife. What exactly isn't to like about the guy??? But his sister-in-law would always try to convince her sister to divorce him. She even spells it out, "D-I-V-O-R-C-E." like it's some kind of empowering chant or something.

And this was before the lies on TV about him when he kinda had to go on the run.

WTF?

It just bothered me how she viewed him with such venom for no good reason. Didn't seem necessary at all.

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

I am EXTREMELY sexist when it comes to this, I will admit.

Dark Souls series, for instance.

I always start with a male character. Usually go all melee.

Then on the second playthrough I always make a beautiful woman. And go pure magic.

LOL

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

Shonen just kinda annoys me after a while. I wish they'd make more anime series with mature characters.

Anime isn't just for middle school and high school kids anymore. A LOT of grown ass adults are getting into it these days. So why not make more series geared around that age range?

We need more Berserks. Castlevanias. Cowboy Bebops. Moribito Guardian of the Spirits. Ergo Proxys. Technolyzes. Ghost in the Shells.

They only seem to come around every 5 years or so.

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

Attack on Titan is solid good fun.

One Punch Man Season 1 was incredible (maybe avoid season 2)

Never saw the other two. I hear a lot of people RAVING about My Hero Acadamia....but I saw some trailers and clips for it....and it seems a bit too immature for me. Kinda tired of the middle school whine fests.

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

Panzer Dragoon
Legacy of Kain
Einhander
Silent Bomber
Gunstar Heroes
Nightmare Creatures
Nightshade (PS2 Shinobi sequel)
Shinobi franchise in general.
A good side-scrolling X-Men game like X-Men 2 Clone Wars for sega genesis.

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

Moon

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

FrozenBananas posted...

Holy fuck I havent played kh3 yet

You aren't missing anything.

One of the most disappointing and forgettable gaming experiences in recent memory. Mostly because I don't remember it.

Very sad.

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

Does him being a conservative play an integral role in the story? LMAO

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

Do you think men or women have more success with things like Tinder?

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

The only games I'm interested in this year are:

-Final Fantasy 7 remake
-Persona 5 Royal
-Cyberpunk
-Dreams
-Silksong: Hollow Knight

All for of those are quite massive and could easily gobble up 2020 for me.

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

The 3 movies on Netflix are fucking incredible. They kinda jampack the more extensive anime series from the 80's or 90's into all 3 movies.

It basically just goes up to the point where stuff all goes to crap, and Guts becomes a demon hunter. Then bam.....abrupt ending. Kinda painful.

There is an anime series that continues after these events, but the animation is so terrible, it's honestly not even worth watching. The animation is cheap 3D garbage. It's kinda offensive, to be honest.

The MANGA is where it's at. One if the best mangas of all time. And still on-going to this day (sadly, an issue only comes out like every 5 months or so....which is literal torture).


---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

Lots of secrets. It was kinda overwhelming after a while. Many things I would have never figured out without guides. Such a beautiful game. Can't wait for the sequel!!!!

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

wwinterj25 posted...

You're wrong.

Nah. LinkPizza is just butthurt. Can't even explain his own stance on things, but wants to say others are wrong. I have no time for that BS. Why are you getting involved? Begone.

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

Are there more male or female incels?

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

LinkPizza posted...

That's because I never tried to elaborate on it. I've never been good at describing stuff. So I don't try when it's not needed.

Well, if you want to have a justifiable position on something while calling others wrong....then yeah. It is kinda needed. Otherwise you are just being disagreeable for the sake of being disagreeable. With no justification or explanation of your own position.

So I'll just assume it's because you know in your heart that you offer your friends things and they offer you things, and that's what makes the friendship a friendship. You are just scared to death of acknowledging my point because pride is a helluva drug ;)

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

LinkPizza posted...

I, unlike you, don't require people to give me something to be friends with them, though. To me, that's not what friendship is about.

Then why are you friends with someone? What is friendship about, in your opinion? Because you haven't elaborated on that at all. You've just been criticizing my viewpoint this entire time, but never explaining your own.

If you don't think friendship is about mutual offerings....then what is it?

You see....I think what the problem is.....is that your friends do offer you something. And you offer them something as well. But you don't want to see it that way because it makes you feel.....dirty(?) I guess? Selfish? I'm not sure.

But I think you are interpreting what I am saying as a cold, sociopathic, and evil thing. When it's not. It's simply recognizing the finer details to a relationship.

Do you think a husband and wife would remain together if they weren't giving each other something in some way?

Does that mean their marriage is built upon a foundation of parasitic selfishness?

You could see it that way. But that's being pessimistic.

;)

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

Revelation34 posted...

Nah I remember weeaboos saying Aerith even back in the 90s.

Weird. I don't recall a single person saying "Aerith" until years after Kingdom Hearts released in 2002.

The internet was a MUCH smaller place in the 90's, and stuff like this didn't make the rounds unless you actively searched for it. And not many people searched for it, because they were too busy looking up porn, and [SPOILERS FOR A GAME THAT IS OVER TWO DECADES OLD AND ONE OF THE MOST TALKED ABOUT TITLES EVER MADE WITH MANY SPOILERS ABOUT THIS EXACT THING IN TOPIC HEADLINES THAT GAMEFAQS DOESN'T MODERATE]ways to revive Aeris[END SPOILERS, FOR THE TWO PEOPLE IN THE WORLD WHO HAVEN'T HEARD ABOUT THIS MOMENT IN GAMING!]

Kingdom Hearts is what exposed people to the translation error. And that was almost 5 years after FF7 released. So that was 5 years for most gamers to get attached to "Aeris" since it was the default name given to her within the game itself. I mean, all the other names checked out, why would anyone be doubtful about Aeris? They accepted it. It was canon for all intents and purposes.

It is what it is.

Many people prefer Aeris. Even if it's "wrong". It's "right" in their hearts and minds.

Kinda like how some people prefer to pronounce Cait Sith. LOL

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

LinkPizza posted...

My friends are actual, real friends.

So are mine. The only difference between us is that I'm honest and perceptive enough to acknowledge the fact that we are all friends because we are offering something to one another.

Whether that be the basic joys of "company" and "camaraderie", or just the joys of having someone to share an experience with. Whether a movie, a video game, a joke, a conversation. Something is there. Something that gives the friendship meaning and value. We are giving something to one another.

If they offered you nothing.....how exactly are they your friend?

Like I said before: you are simply caught up in the semantics of it.

You disagree with my "tone" or something, and you are putting me into some kind of negative bubble because that's easier for your mind to comprehend. And probably because you just like to be disagreeable. LOL


---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

LinkPizza posted...

Whatever. I just disagree with your pessimistic view of what friendship is and with having to be getting something from my friends for me to be friends with them...

Realistic is often confused with pessimistic.

Every friend you have is offering you something. And you are offering them something. Otherwise you wouldn't be friends. You'd probably just be acquaintances or something.

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

LinkPizza posted...

I just disagree.

K.

Sounds like you are just caught up in the semantics of it, to be honest.


---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

Who said they don't watch movies or buy games?

They are humans just like anyone else. And many of them loooove consuming movies and games.

And they go out of their way to be offended by all of them so they can go online and whine about them.

lulz.

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

LinkPizza posted...

How about friendship

You can't just offer someone friendship. Friendship entails things. Actions.

Hanging out with them, for starters. That is offering them company. A sense of belonging. That is you offering them something. That is substance. That is what they are getting out of their friendship with you.

LinkPizza posted...

But it also sounds like you don't have actual friends.

You are assuming I have no friends simply because I can acknowledge out loud that people need to have something to offer you in order to be friends with them?

But it's true.

I don't understand why some of you feel compelled to turn this into an argument, or make pessimistic assumptions about me just because of what I'm saying.

Everything I have said is true. Apparently you just don't like the sound of it.

That's kinda your problem, not mine. Just sayin'.

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

SunWuKung420 posted...

Terrible outlook and wrong while being sociopathic.

Common interests.

Common interests help validate each other. That is having something to offer them.

Nothing sociopathic about it.

Nobody would be friends with someone if they didn't offer them something to some extent.

It's acknowledging that fact that sometimes leaves a bitter taste in your mouth. But it's ultimately true.

Even if you can't immediately see it, you are offering something to each other. Even if it's basic company and sense of belonging. Friends have something to offer.

If you want friends: make yourself marketable in some way. Have something to offer.

It's really that simple.

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

darcandkharg31 posted...

Maybe not with you lulz

I have many things to offer those around me. Which is why they are my friend.

*beep*, for instance.

What do you offer your friends? Because I highly doubt they just enjoy sitting next to you doing nothing.

LULZOEOZOERSRSZZ!!!! lmao LOrlel rotfllmaosplo lololo durr hurr

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

Mutual benefit.

If you have nothing to offer them, people don't want to be friends with you.

It's basic supply and demand.

Do something that makes you valuable. Like, be that guy who always has *beep* on him. People love that guy.

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

Does anyone else find it incredibly ironic how in their desperation to make movies as "woke" as possible, they are being paradoxically more racist and sexist than ever before?

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

How many other guys do you think she was with this month?

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

And the best game they ever made was called Einhander.

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

Aerith sounds like the lispy equivalent of Aeris. Which bothers me. A lot. And makes me naturally prefer Aeris.

Plus, I played it back in 1997 and the game itself had her listed as "Aeris" so that's what I got attached to. (And can you blame me?)

I didn't get internet until 1999, and it was slow. Werent a lot of good gaming websites that talked about stuff.

Wasn't until Kingdom Hearts that people saw her called Aerith....and people wondered why. Then we learned about the translation error. But the damage was already done by then.

Millions of gamers had experienced her as "Aeris" in their hearts and minds. Got attached to her. Made those memories. [SPOILERS FOR ALL TWO PEOPLE ON GAMEFAQS WHO NEVER PLAYED ONE OF THE MOST CRITICALLY ACCLAIMED GAMES OF ALL TIME THAT IS OVER 20 YEARS OLD]Saw her die. Felt the pain.[END SPOILERS]

And then to find out that her name was actually supposed to sound like the same thing....but with a lisp? It was kinda ridiculous. Hard to accept.

And even in 2020....many refuse to accept it.

She is "Aeris" for many of us. And always will be.

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

Aerith sounds like the lispy equivalent of Aeris. Which bothers me. A lot. And makes me naturally prefer Aeris.

Plus, I played it back in 1997 and the game itself had her listed as "Aeris" so that's what I got attached to. (And can you blame me?)

I didn't get internet until 1999, and it was slow. Werent a lot of good gaming websites that talked about stuff.

Wasn't until Kingdom Hearts that people saw her called Aerith....and people wondered why. Then we learned about the translation error. But the damage was already done by then.

Millions of gamers had experienced her as "Aeris" in their hearts and minds. Got attached to her. Saw her die. Felt the pain. Made those memories.

And then to find out that her name was actually supposed to sound like the same thing....but with a lisp? It was kinda ridiculous. Hard to accept.

And even in 2020....many refuse to accept it.

She is "Aeris" for many of us. And always will be.

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

InfestedAdam posted...

I can agree with that. Being in my mid 30's, I'd imagine my hormones are dwindling so there is less of a drive as well compared to how I was in my 20's.

The really weird thing I find with my situation is if someone actually ask if I wanna get under the sheets, and said person is likable, I honestly would not know how to respond. Knowing me, I'd refuse since the life I have now is the "norm" for me. Anyway, four more years till the 40-Year-Old Virgin film is more of a documentary than fiction.

As long as you're happy, and not being dishonest with yourself.

There is a subtle grace to being single. Not a lot of people like to talk about it, though. It goes against nature. It's a violation of all our social constructs.

But I'm always at peace during those periods when I don't have a romantic interest. Only accountable to myself. No one to distract me. To judge or be judged by. To disappoint. To hog the sheets. To worry about.

It's nice to just be me, and not feel like I have to hold back from doing the things I want to do because it might conflict with someone else's desires.

But I also love sex and intimacy and making someone laugh. And giving pleasure just as much as getting it.

Humans are so awkward and complex. It drives me crazy sometimes.

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

InfestedAdam posted...

As a 36 years old virgin who have never dated anyone, honestly this does not bother me at all and I do not know why it does not as it would for others. Perhaps there is no disappointment from failing because I never truly tried. Perhaps it is because I have other single family and friends, who are probably also virgins, that I do not feel alone.

It could also be because there is no actual pressure from my family to find someone. My cousins and mother have occasionally asked if I will ever marry and I always tell em I will probably die single and surrounded by cats. They leave it at that or when they do ask it is just in a joking manner.

Regardless of what society might think about "wizards" like me, I simply have too many other concerns in life (i.e. maintaining my health, dealing with my finances, expanding my career, etc.) to be concern with losing my virginity.

You sound like you are voluntarily celibate. I bet you have an interesting story to tell.

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

Noop_Noop posted...

thing its, it has always been pretty much the standard for guys to be encouraged to bang as many broads as possible

Very true. However.....due to the advent of social media, the rise in STDs, and people being trained to actually communicate more and be decent human beings.....that trend is starting to change.

Don't get me wrong, there are still TONS of animal asshole men out there slaying as much vagina as physically possible.....but they are becoming a minority. And are usually hated by their peers.

A lot of guys have turned into idiosyncratic dorks who love games, movies, books, and music. They aren't slaying vagina. They are slaying demons in Dark Souls, and maybe trying to date when they can find a girl who is willing to tolerate them.

Noop_Noop posted...

while ladies are encouraged to be more chaste

And, oddly enough, due to the advent of social media and the Feminist movement....this is also starting to change. Women aren't chaste at all. They are sexually empowered with all the options and power in the world. They have caught up to men in their pursuit of sex for validation. I might even be willing to go so far as to say they have surpassed men (in Westernized societies).

Noop_Noop posted...

the problem i have is where the fuck were all of the incels throughout the rest of human history if this is the cause? ive never read shit in any sort of historical record that mentions anything even close to 'incel culture'

They've always existed. They just weren't branded as a "bad thing" the way they are now. Just the "gentlemen" of history. Writing books and going about their day. Not making history, because they weren't passing on their genes like all the "winners". Social media didn't exist then....so they didn't have much of a voice, or have legions of people to bully them, brand them, encapsulate them into some kind of title.

Just a thought.

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

InfestedAdam posted...

Would any "nice guy" even label himself as "involuntary celibate"? I feel like there is a fine line between being unrealistic with losing ones virginity and being in a situation where losing it simply is not feasible. How many "incels" fall under the former instead of the latter?

Does ANY guy legitimately enjoy admitting to their friends that they aren't getting laid? Or (God forbid) admitting that they are having trouble managing the modern dating scene?

You are literally seen as a "loser" by even your own family members if you are a guy that isn't getting laid.

It's a very sexist social stigma that has existed for thousands of years.

Why aren't we addressing that?

Why are we taking almost sadistic pleasure in branding guys incels and then compartmentalizing their entire persona?

Seems like people are just trying to justify their hatred of men who lack "game".

Kinda fucked up.

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

GreenKnight127 posted...

If a guy is just struggling to find a decent girl to sleep with, and won't settle for empty, loveless booty calls....then of course he can still be a perfectly nice guy.

In fact, a lot of guys struggling to get laid ARE nice guys.

They aren't willing to settle for some temporary lust relationship.

They want a real relationship. Monogamy. A wife. Love.

And they won't settle for anything less, so it sadly makes them very lonely for prolonged periods of time.

By definition, they would be incels. Because they WANT a relationship, but struggle to find a decent one.

Some guys are severely limited in their options based on their geographical locations, and the availability of single women in their area.

Some guys just aren't attractive enough for many superficial women.

The fact that this even needs to be a question is kinda sad, and only highlights the problems that men face when being judged by the opposite sex.

"Oh, he's not getting laid, so that MUST mean he's racist/sexist/has a terrible personality, etc etc."

Wrong.

spoken like a true incel

hurr hrrr urrur dur dur hur!!! (beat ya to it, LMAO)

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

If a guy is just struggling to find a decent girl to sleep with, and won't settle for empty, loveless booty calls....then of course he can still be a perfectly nice guy.

In fact, a lot of guys struggling to get laid ARE nice guys.

They aren't willing to settle for some temporary lust relationship.

They want a real relationship. Monogamy. A wife. Love.

And they won't settle for anything less, so it sadly makes them very lonely for prolonged periods of time.

By definition, they would be incels. Because they WANT a relationship, but struggle to find a decent one.

Some guys are severely limited in their options based on their geographical locations, and the availability of single women in their area.

Some guys just aren't attractive enough for many superficial women.

The fact that this even needs to be a question is kinda sad, and only highlights the problems that men face when being judged by the opposite sex.

"Oh, he's not getting laid, so that MUST mean he's racist/sexist/has a terrible personality, etc etc."

Wrong.

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

DocDelicious posted...

Silent Bomber

I fucking LOVED Silent Bomber! I thought I was the only one in this world that actually played it!

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

Einhander.

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

FUCKyEAH!!!

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

The_tall_midget posted...

This.

You can easily find posts where lefties on this board directly insult people who aren't Marxists nutcases and zero moderations will take place.

But if you DARE to allude to something like : "The Dem party's candidates are a bunch of virtue signalers." Will get you moderated for, and wait for it, "insulting democratic voters."

The hypocrisy of the mod team is really impressive. Just admit that you're biased and we can just say we were right once again, and move on.

The_tall_midget posted...

This.

You can easily find posts where lefties on this board directly insult people who aren't Marxists nutcases and zero moderations will take place.

But if you DARE to allude to something like : "The Dem party's candidates are a bunch of virtue signalers." Will get you moderated for, and wait for it, "insulting democratic voters."

The hypocrisy of the mod team is really impressive. Just admit that you're biased and we can just say we were right once again, and move on.

Exactly!

It's so obvious, I don't understand how the moderators even get away with calling themselves "moderators". They aren't moderating anything. They are promoting one political agenda, and silencing another. They're more like activists than moderators.

There are easily 20-some topics within the past week on the Politics board where people openly bash Conservatives, Republicans, and Trump-supporters in general. In the topic headlines. Clearly troll topics. Clearly inciteful and baity bullshit. Just trying to upset people and start arguments.

None of them got moderated.

Do the same thing to the Democratic party, Liberals, Hillary Clinton, Obama, Biden, etc.....and you will quickly get moderated for trolling.

The bias is real.


---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

pastyD posted...

Different blood types can bring about complications later on (ex. Mother with a negative blood type carrying a child with a positive blood type can potentially cause issues if certain things occur) but as far as the initial conception goes I dont think it changes anything.

Hmmm, now THAT'S kinda interesting.


---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.

Off the top of your head, what do you think?

---

Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content.
Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements.