Lurker > Nemu

I do that all the time. I have probably no less than fifty games that are 30%-70% done that I want to go back and finish but never do.

The sentiment seems fine, but I'm really not sure if the application is going to be good or not. This could very easily turn into a slippery slope mess if applied incorrectly. Guess we'll need to wait and see the first few cases charged for it.

They really should have made it so he was affected by some kind of outside force because the whole scene makes so little sense. I can't think of any real person who would like their rage doom the entire universe when there are six other people yelling at them to stop being a moron for literally just two seconds.

This is the kind of thing where it's really not a big deal, but it's really stupid. The people it's trying to pander to are either so small that it doesn't matter or simply nonexistent (as in the only people asking for it are people unrelated to the issue for social brownie points). While there is nobody hurt from this particular action, it is just one more stupid block in this wall of nonsense.

Copyright law is good. We are out of the old days where intellectual property was pretty much always limited to an individual, and then little is done with it after their death. I feel it's more important Disney keep making money with Mickey than some random dude who would just use their popularity to make a quick buck like unregulated Chinese knockoffs.

The start is pretty good, but it gets really stupid. It's definitely a "turn your brain off to enjoy" series.

Even if the person is the most insulting prick in the world, nothing justifies a violent outburst if only words are the problem. If the words are legitimately meant to demean, there are venues to voice complaints. The employee is at worst a minor asshole, and most likely just a confused kid caught up in a dumb situation.

Do they force you to put down info when giving up a dog at a shelter? Maybe it wasn't his dog but he hated it enough to never be around it, so he wanted to dump it without it being tracked back to him.

It's quite fun. I've honestly had very few issues with online lag so far in well over 200 matches over wireless, so it might depend on your area.

If the people are scum and damage the house, you'd lose quite a bit of your profit repairing things. Security deposits rarely cover the extent of damages if they're human trash. If you have good renters, then it's pretty much something you rarely have to think about. Natural wear and tear will happen, but it's easily workable.

Looks like they just meant to say having an inflammatory sign doesn't allow for a good atmosphere on campus but fucked up the delivery with the usual inclusivity and diversity rhetoric. Seems like a non story.

Not really. I plan on getting it eventually, but it won't be a day one buy for me. They really should have thrown in a KH3 in the previous generation instead of so many spin-offs, and had this one coming out be KH4. That would have been more engaging than having to binge a collection eight years later to understand the convoluted plot.

I think it would be quite physically impossible.

I dont want kids in the first place, but I doubly would not want to care for a child who is severely
Impaired. Minor impairments wouldnt be a big issue, but something where life expectancy is less than 20 years, bedridden their whole life, or mentally impaired would be too much to handle.

It depends what you mean by problem. They are a minority, but they are a very vocal minority. They gunk up things with their rhetoric, and few people want to tell them off lest thei become labeled as bigots. There are times where people are mislabeled simply for fighting for a proper cause, but the Twitter mobs rarely ever fight for a proper cause. It's nearly always just bunk.

No, that guy has probably put thousands and thousands of hours into that game.

VipaGTS posted...

nemu posted...

VipaGTS posted...

nemu posted...

Its scary how many people are ok with things like this. The idea that its a good thing for people to be beaten up because of disgusting ideologies is a couple steps away from saying it is OK for people to be killed for it. This guy may have very well initiated the fight, so retaliatory violence would have been fine if that turns out to be the case. But Im sure the hypocritical assholes beat on him more than necessary because theyre just as disgusting as him.

There is a difference between being ok with it and feeling little or no sympathy for it. Do I advocate for it? Of course not. I dont think you should go out of your way to fight people like that. But if someone happens to get fucked up over an argument that likely stemmed from them spouting off racist, offensive or terrible comments about genocide, etc...guess what? I wont feel sorry for them. What a concept. Womp Womp.

There's nothing wrong with saying you don't feel bad for someone like this. The problem is those who say it was a good thing, being sympathetic to the antifa shitbags. Like, I'd laugh at a video of such a guy being sucker punched while preaching his shit like Spencer, but that doesn't make it right.

Or we can be against them both. Just because I dont care that a nazi got his doesnt mean Im being sympathetic to Antifa.

I don't know about your views specifically, but I'm talking about the people who say without a doubt that it's a good thing. I'm also worried about people that are erroneously labeled nazis because they're one millimeter too far right for someone's viewpoints or they say the "wrong thing."

Trigger is better. Cross is a horrible sequel, but a great game.

It's a necessary evil on a plane, but people who bring them restaurants, theaters, or anything like that can go to hell.

VipaGTS posted...

nemu posted...

Its scary how many people are ok with things like this. The idea that its a good thing for people to be beaten up because of disgusting ideologies is a couple steps away from saying it is OK for people to be killed for it. This guy may have very well initiated the fight, so retaliatory violence would have been fine if that turns out to be the case. But Im sure the hypocritical assholes beat on him more than necessary because theyre just as disgusting as him.

There is a difference between being ok with it and feeling little or no sympathy for it. Do I advocate for it? Of course not. I dont think you should go out of your way to fight people like that. But if someone happens to get fucked up over an argument that likely stemmed from them spouting off racist, offensive or terrible comments about genocide, etc...guess what? I wont feel sorry for them. What a concept. Womp Womp.

There's nothing wrong with saying you don't feel bad for someone like this. The problem is those who say it was a good thing, being sympathetic to the antifa shitbags. Like, I'd laugh at a video of such a guy being sucker punched while preaching his shit like Spencer, but that doesn't make it right.

I really never liked classic Sonic at all. As bad as Adventure has aged, I'd honestly play those games over Mania. Classic is just not fun after the first level. Once you get to precise platforming, it just becomes shit.

As long as it's done with tact, it's just a thing that happens. There are times and places where it would be awkward, so hopefully the person doing the feeding takes that into account.

I feel like someone should not be allowed to adopt someone less than ten years younger than them. The age gap is far too small for them to actually be a proper parent.

SchoolForAnts posted...

nemu posted...

SchoolForAnts posted...

nemu posted...

SchoolForAnts posted...

nemu posted...

Its scary how many people are ok with things like this. The idea that its a good thing for people to be beaten up because of disgusting ideologies is a couple steps away from saying it is OK for people to be killed for it. This guy may have very well initiated the fight, so retaliatory violence would have been fine if that turns out to be the case. But Im sure the hypocritical assholes beat on him more than necessary because theyre just as disgusting as him.

*person gets beaten for the color of his skin*
Nemu: ...

*person gets beaten for their sexual orientation*
Nemu: ...

*confrontational Nazi gets beaten*
Nemu: you guys are monsters! We must feel bad for him! He was beaten for his ideas!

What a joke lol

I'm assuming you're just shitposting, but are you basing that on some previous post I've made? I don't think I've ever condoned violence against anyone.

Since when does dot dot dot (...) equal he said he digs it? No, it just means silence

You're implying that I somehow condone those ideas. Unless you've somehow fervently followed every post I've made, there is no way you can state that about me without having made it up.

So you HAVE made posts condemning it? Show examples please

You do realize this board doesn't archive right? The most recent racial thing I can remember commenting on is the black guy who acted in self defense against the sickly white guy who died as a result of his retaliation. It's easy enough to state right here that any violence based on any aspect of any person is a bad thing. My particular interest in topics like this is the normalization of violence based purely on beliefs. I don't agree with this guy's beliefs at all, and retaliation may have well be initially justified in this case. The problem is the very real slippery slope where these same people assault those who hold non-nazi views, justified by calling them nazis.

SchoolForAnts posted...

nemu posted...

SchoolForAnts posted...

nemu posted...

Its scary how many people are ok with things like this. The idea that its a good thing for people to be beaten up because of disgusting ideologies is a couple steps away from saying it is OK for people to be killed for it. This guy may have very well initiated the fight, so retaliatory violence would have been fine if that turns out to be the case. But Im sure the hypocritical assholes beat on him more than necessary because theyre just as disgusting as him.

*person gets beaten for the color of his skin*
Nemu: ...

*person gets beaten for their sexual orientation*
Nemu: ...

*confrontational Nazi gets beaten*
Nemu: you guys are monsters! We must feel bad for him! He was beaten for his ideas!

What a joke lol

I'm assuming you're just shitposting, but are you basing that on some previous post I've made? I don't think I've ever condoned violence against anyone.

Since when does dot dot dot (...) equal he said he digs it? No, it just means silence

You're implying that I somehow condone those ideas. Unless you've somehow fervently followed every post I've made, there is no way you can state that about me without having made it up.

SchoolForAnts posted...

nemu posted...

Its scary how many people are ok with things like this. The idea that its a good thing for people to be beaten up because of disgusting ideologies is a couple steps away from saying it is OK for people to be killed for it. This guy may have very well initiated the fight, so retaliatory violence would have been fine if that turns out to be the case. But Im sure the hypocritical assholes beat on him more than necessary because theyre just as disgusting as him.

*person gets beaten for the color of his skin*
Nemu: ...

*person gets beaten for their sexual orientation*
Nemu: ...

*confrontational Nazi gets beaten*
Nemu: you guys are monsters! We must feel bad for him! He was beaten for his ideas!

What a joke lol

I'm assuming you're just shitposting, but are you basing that on some previous post I've made? I don't think I've ever condoned violence against anyone.

Its scary how many people are ok with things like this. The idea that its a good thing for people to be beaten up because of disgusting ideologies is a couple steps away from saying it is OK for people to be killed for it. This guy may have very well initiated the fight, so retaliatory violence would have been fine if that turns out to be the case. But Im sure the hypocritical assholes beat on him more than necessary because theyre just as disgusting as him.

That argument would only work if it was a real person. If we had a race of legal age immortals who look like human children, there would be no need for this argument at all.

Yeah. If it's literally just a bowl cut, that might be a bit eh, but there are ways it can be styled to look really nice.

There are a few styles of channel that bring in a lot of money with little work, but those a few in number and peter out like the fads they are. Most channels will take the same amount of time as a full time job.

You don't waste food man, number one rule.

As long as it's legal, I don't care. Only reason to think anything of it if it seems like child grooming, which is illegal even if the target becomes of age. The rest of society will judge them anyway, regardless if it's a healthy relationship or not. 26 and 36 wouldn't be seen as particularly weird, so it should be fine as long as the 16 year old is mature enough.

Yeah, it's pretty bullshit. It's not a problem if there are clear and concise guidelines, but they're literally going against what their guidelines and CEO have said to headhunt people who don't have a certain set of values at the slightest offense ever.

VR right now is like in the NES equivalent stage. Some gems, but mostly gimmicky shit limited by hardware that won't be fun in 30 years. It will definitely continue to improve and be a mainstay in gaming.

It's so weird that people think he's racist. Do people not understand that the majority of obscenity spewing morons in online gaming are just saying the most hateful shit they can think of with no actual motivation behind it? He can rightfully be criticized for what he did, but it in no way makes him a racist.

The perma death adds stress to the battles, which can be a positive or negative depending on the person, but the fact that there is no incentive to play with dead characters is the biggest problem. There is no positive you can get out of it unless you're just playing with the notion of never restarting no matter who you lose. If they added different branches or scenarios depending on who lived, that might be more interesting, but who wants to go through a 15-30 hour game gimped the whole time.

Nothing wrong with it, but I feel like the kind of person who does it has a super skewed view of politics where everyone who doesn't agree with them is literally an evil person.

I loved it as a kid, but I don't really think I could go back to it for more than an hour of nostalgia. On the other hand, I'd kill to have a port or Eshop version of Sunshine.

She's obviously not really your friend if she expects you to bend over backwards for something that has nothing to do with you. It's her own problem.

It depends entirely how you're playing it. If you're playing it to win, gimmicky stages and items can be quite annoying. If you're playing for chaotic fun, then they're fun. I kind of wish there was a mode that didn't have any stats attached to it. It completely discourages fun item matches.

Depends entirely on the context. Diversity is such a loaded word that it has become worthless.

People who get too preachy about it on either side are weird. The people who act like everyone should seek to create children as soon as possible seem like they regret it, while the people who are extremely outspoken about never ever having a kid seem jealous of those who do have kids.

No. I don't think once a cheater always a cheater, but I couldn't allow myself to stay in such a relationship.

The idea of encouraging people to speak out is good. The idea of instantly believing them and casting everyone into oblivion is not good. Each needs to be a case by case basis where people are judged on actual facts and not just the words of people. You cannot stop an employer from distancing themselves from the accused, but it would be much better if the Twitter mob didn't demand their heads and nuts on a platter within ten minutes.

No, I've never had any interest after seeing what a moron my father was during his drinking and drug abuse period when I was a kid.

Chicken bacon ranch all the way.

Because the cast being of a certain race has no particular impact for the vast majority of people. Only the weirdos who identify everything based on race will care.

No, I'd need billions so I can make everything come to me. I would probably never go anywhere because fuck moving into a busy city.

I'd say that's true in a sense, but it's not currently a giant problem. It's more of a large bias that people pass off as minor bitching because "it's not as bad as group X had it." The problem is you have the "white genocide" fuckwits on one side clouding the issue with their bullshit, and then you have the racists of the other side who truly hate white people acting like there is no such thing as racism against white people.

It has a higher barrier of entry if you want the best of the best. It's more costly than consoles unless you settle for the mediocre. It's easier for incompatibilities to screw things up depending on the game and computer specs. It's not simply plug and play. Not every game will be better on PC if they were built for console. It's better in terms graphical potential and power, but it's not better for everyone.