Lurker > Nemu

Because rape jokes can in fact be funny depending on context.

Nothing wrong with self identifying as anything. The only problem is when they try to dictate that reality must work like their delusions.

That feels more like a community bonding thing than anything. If it was one on one, I would say a bit creepy.

How much of their income is spent on cigarettes and alcohol? How many times a week do they buy $5 coffee for no reason. I've seen plenty of people who waste essential money on garbage they don't need while their kids haven't been able to take a bath in two weeks.

Nah, while I would easily prostitute myself for the right amount of money, it would have to be thousands of times of what I would actually be worth.

I don't think so, at least not in the same manner. The main thing for black people was that they could "justify" dehumanizing them by their skin color. I'm sure they might still have seen them as "uncivilized" enough to profit off them in some capacity, but I don't think things would have developed in the same way.

While I agree that he's a nutjob, something like this presents a real slippery slope. "First they came for X", etc

It's at minimum 10,000 years apart from any other entries, and it's likely even more thousands of years apart then that considering the insane technology present. So it sort of makes sense that any timeline could get to that point, maybe even a literal merger somehow with goddess intervention.

Nobody uses it in a way that is actually appropriate.

This is so dumb. It would be one thing if they were being ultra religious and wanted to refuse to serve adulterers, divorcees, etc, but I don't get why they are so particularly hung up on just gay people as if they solely are the antitheses of their religion.

So has she actually personally apologized for any of this? Only thing I've seen is that official statement by the Times which is a bundle of nothing unless it comes directly from her.

That's so dumb. If it was going into a trust account for the children, sure, but the kids will never see more than a percent of a percent of that.

It's crazy how some people hold cops to impossible standards.

When you no longer understand what the hell teens like about new things.

Only if I ever hire a service person who doesn't have a phone-app to process credit cards.

If she has publicly apologized and disavowed her past tweets, no problem. If she still stands by them, then she's nasty.

It's so weird how humans have been murderous assholes to each other since the beginning, but somehow the last 400 years of being murderous assholes is somehow the fault of people living today according to some people. We should consider those people to be wrong and uncultured, but it has no bearing at all on today's people.

Firewerx posted...

Milkman5 posted...

imagine being white and not leaving an imaginary country that wants to kill all white people

FTFY

They want to take all the white owned farmlands and will get violent over it if they resist. They're not yet in a state of "kill every white person", but they're not that far off at that rate.

If they have no way of leaving and they're stuck, feel super bad for them. If they're the kind with the means to leave who are instead being all "fight or die", then whatever. I get that it's basically telling them to start from scratch, but that is better than dying.

This stuff is so dumb. Diversity in sex, race, religion, etc is not inherently a good or bad thing. Forcing it does not actually help anything. The only thing that needs to be done is remove barriers keeping people from doing something, not giving them the fastpass in an attempt to be so progressive.

Open borders are the dumbest thing in the world. Every country needs to be a first world country before that can be a thing.

Eventually a more altruistic society could develop, but it's going to take hundreds of years to get there, and we have to avoid killing ourselves first.

Just offer some single stall gender neutral "family room" style room. Like, no shame on someone living how they want, but it doesn't change biological reality. There is a difference between making sure someone doesn't feel discriminated against and trying to change the whole world for a tiny fraction of the population. It would be like radically changing the manufacturing of all gloves for the small percentage of people with more or less fingers than the norm.

As long as her human form is a transformation and not an illusion, most likely, unless the moral compass thing means I'd wake up as some weird science experiment because she got bored.

It makes sense if the people like sexting, but just sending it off the bat makes no sense. Only circumstance I can think of if the guy knows the woman is a slut and has extreme confidence in his package.

What does higher death rates during child birth have to do with feminism? Do you think there is some conspiracy to give women lesser health care? It's probably because America is extremely fat so people as a whole have more health risks.

That's true in the sense that culture is not linked to race. There is no "black culture" or "Asian culture." There are regional cultures in areas in which predominantly black and Asian people live and have lived that are now tied to families throughout the world. The same goes for white people. This act of trying to unify everyone under race is dumb. I would have more in common with some black guy who grew up in a suburb than some random white person from the bible belt.

They need a cause, they need to be activists, they need to fight against some kind of evil. That's why complete falsehoods like the wage gap, pink tax, and completely false college rape statistics are still commonplace. There are real injustices to be fought, but the college course feminists don't actually care.

The problem with people like them is they want to bring everything in this world all the way to one extremely narrow viewpoint. There's no room for dialogue. There's no room for discussion. "The current way is bad. If you don't to it our way, you're X, Y, and Z."

I can get that Batman doesn't want to kill people. What I don't get is the easily escapable asylum instead of a death penalty.

It makes sense that it's more of a two person dynamic. Like, I would imagine there are some areas having a mother and father would help more due to the children of different genders likely better identifying with one over the other, but it's probably a fairly inconsequential percentage. It's probably more having two perspectives, having more time for the child, etc.

The major news organizations for quite a while have been overly biased garbage, so he's not particularly wrong. The only real problem is that Trump himself is overly biased garbage as well.

I buy them once in a while. I think of it more as a couple of bucks to have a fun, active imagination for a little bit. And there's still the OK chance to win a few bucks.

There is nothing wrong with it happening to a Weinstein, but the probably is that 99/100 are not a Weinstein.

Do these kinds of people not understand that "gender confusion" is a super small subset of people? The grand majority of people born into this world are going to be "normal." If their children do develop as such, then support them in everything they want to do. If not, congratulations, you have the standard child most people will have.

It makes sense from the perspective that they change so much through the series, but it's also sort of dumb when there are dozens of other characters that would be more interesting to have. That should have been a Fighterz 2 kind of thing.

Christ, that would probably be like having three erections at once 24/7 for a guy.

This stuff is so dumb. Unless it's something actually connecting someone to abusing children, go find something better to do. Save the witch hunts for something important.