Lurker > banananor

Jesus christ what is wrong with people's brains?

I'm sure it's a fine game, just don't know what possesses people to spend money on cosmetics
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

The game list is fine, not sure what the issue is

I'm just not in the market for any classic consoles. Ain't enough shelf space in the world for this kind of stuff
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

O nice, good luck with swtor

I liked the slight degree of agency the story structure allowed. I played a light aligned imperial agent, which is apparently the best one narratively
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Met someone the other day that swore up and down that runescape is the best mmo today
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

People have to process the things they experience. I'm glad I'm (and the rest of the board is) a part of that for you, Rock.

You just had a weird experience. You got a glimpse into another person's darker urges, insecurity, weirdness, and desire to role-play her script. She may have been (and probably was) lying about the situation and any number of other things, so don't think about it too much. That probably wasn't her mother, this definitely wasn't the first time she's done this, and her actual relationship situation could be any number of things.

Some people go to the internet to lie, and some people go to the bar. It can be exciting to escape your normal reality.

The weirdest part is that we can do any of this at any time. Go somewhere else, pretend to be someone else, behave a different way, claim to be the inventor of angry birds and just roll with it

If someone's that far out the door their relationship is already dead. I personally break up with someone long before it gets anywhere near that point, but some dumbasses are too afraid of being single to actually sever the tie until much later.

To me it's more important that someone loves me than whether they are physically faithful. Does it honestly feel much better if your s.o. goes to the bar every weekend to pick up a stranger, and happens to fail this time?

As long as you can accept your own emotional reactions I would say make as many poor decisions as you want. I personally would not advise helping her out with any favors or trying to take the interaction anywhere outside of the script- unless you have a burning desire to work something strange out of yourself. Understand you're being used as a prop, and I say this without positive or negative connotations- sometimes people need props. Proceed at your own desire for self-harm, because your needs will not be looked out for by anyone but you

The people infantilizing her and saying you need to be the adult in the situation don't know what they're talking about
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

wuts the reference?

and what denomination of x-ian is the heaven
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

TheRock1525 posted...

Nelson_Mandela posted...

I'm pretty sure most of your topics have been about banging dudes but its ok

There's literally been zero topics about me in relationships with men and only one topic where I came out as bi-sexual.

This is some of the most pathetic trolling I've ever seen.

Damn, I didn't know rock banged so many dudes. Hey everybody, look over here
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

starcow posted...

19 y/o gamefaqs poster posts like an old man... does he???

---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Dels posted...

you are on the wrong board if you don't care about ranking anything and everything in your life

Haha, fair enough. I think I enjoy ranking similar characters from different series, or pointing out when characters just don't work, which is pretty common

Like, I love ff7, but a lot of the cast was not executed all that well
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Yeah, I have issues ranking characters in almost anything good- they all play a role. It's not like Seinfeld would be more enjoyable if Jerry, Kramer and Elaine were replaced by three copies of George

It's like taking a hammer and asking if you like the hammer head or the hammer handle better, when it fits in your hand comfortably and puts the nail in the wall just fine
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Nelson_Mandela posted...

Let me educate you on how racists think:

Why do you consider yourself an expert on how racists think?
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

It's been so long that I can't remember anything aside from George being the most important character

But, similar to iasip, prior to the start of the series they literally said 'oh, yeah, I guess we should have a woman' and added a woman

Also friends is just terrible iirc, and I watched very little of it
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Happy birthday!
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Yeah, that makes sense.

I really think that the main benefits of creating Israel were more related to having a safe land where the government wouldn't randomly decide to go on a pogrom against the jews

Living on a holy site should've been secondary to that
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

I'm interested in what you think about the more important part of my post

Theoretically, if some random ass chunk of land nobody was living in in north Dakota (or, funny trivia, there were only 100,000 people in all of Nevada in 1940) was turned into Israel, would that have been good? Bad?

---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

I wasn't specifically talking about who deserves what, but rather on a more practical level
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Honestly speaking, the world would be a much more peaceful place if the victors of ww1/2 had just carved off a piece of their own countries for a Jewish state instead of plopping it in the center of the middle east

Theoretically, if some random ass chunk of land nobody was living in in north Dakota (or, funny trivia, there were only 100,000 people in all of Nevada in 1940) was turned into Israel, would that have been good? Bad?

If you don't think that would go over well, why do you think it would go over more smoothly in a land actually holy to the previous residents?

Living where I do, I know a lot of Israeli citizens. I also know a lot of anti Zionist jews. Sometimes they are the same people. I generally listen to their arguments and let them argue amongst themselves

It's just a shitty situation now and the state needs to be defended. The question is how shitty and aggressive the country should be
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Oh you know what, I did always get crummy cases when I bought used, but I didn't care at all. It's the game that counts, and cheaper was better

I always assumed whoever traded the games in had lost the case
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Corrik posted...

No idea how you guys don't understand lawful/chaotic in terms of good/evil.

Robin hood is the classic example of chaotic good

He's good, but constantly defies laws to right perceived wrongs
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Oh, my 'screw gamestop' story is this

When I was a teenager I would buy used games, beat them within the return period (5 or 7 days, I'm not sure) then return them for full price

I do feel bad for anyone that tried to return games for store credit. It's just not a good choice
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Hey, where's the third poll option?
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Yeah, as long as you're polite it's no big deal. It's just business

Demeanor makes a big difference. It's not even like you're complaining about an employee's performance, you're just deciding whether to return a product
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

I'm so confused by the punch out rule that says "there are no illegal moves or punches"
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Nanis, I think maybe you just employed a poor turn of phrase

You seemed to imply that if anything features feminist themes at all, that makes it automatically bad

I haven't seen the most recent season, but I do think that as claire's character became more popular and prominent it would only be natural for issues related to women in leadership to come up. In fact, it would be unrealistic to ignore them

Maybe you mean you felt the quick advancement of female characters in politics was distracting?

It's personally hard for me to write off unexpected cabinet choices as unrealistic in 2018
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

I got a metric crapton of clothes, some ps4 gamez, and a phone stylus

Good stuff
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Does lag benefit the lagger, the host, the low ping people, or what in this game?
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

pjbasis posted...

Dels posted...

it's been a while since i watched seasons 1 and 2 but i remember being a bit disappointed when he killed people because i liked the idea that we were watching a show about someone who has to politically manipulate everything, not someone who can just resort to saying "well ok, can't get this with psychological tactics, guess i'll just kill"

I couldn't put my finger on it but this is it. I'm usually a proponent of killing off your characters but this is why the show died to me even during S1, though I really gave it a good try for another two seasons.

I thought season one was totally fine and interesting because it was the buildup of the entire season, felt like it had gravity and consequences, everyone was careful, and the character was going to be playing cover up for the rest of his life.

The series was ruined in a few ways- first, when they got rid of consequences, and people could just kill whimsically. In season 1 they had to build this bullet proof background of alcoholism and depression. In season 2 they just walk past some security cameras, push someone into a train and hope the police never check her text messages. That one incident could've been sort of okay, and was a neat subversion of expextations, but they just kept getting zanier from there

Second, the whole series was predicated on the somehow special relationship between Frank and claire. In season 3 I think it was revealed they were just poor communicators, and that ruined any mystique that was left. It just became a normal drama
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Honestly, it depends.

It's not a regular practice of mine, but I could totally see using it as an excuse not to buy a game I was on the fence about
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

bowser
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

did you have fun?
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Samus
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

samus
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

i should add that it's up to the individual DM as far as where the line between neutrality and the other alignments really lies.

how saintly does one have to be to be considered good? good people don't all throw away everything they have to the first person in need they see. evil people don't all follow their id every time they think they won't be caught.

It's a sliding scale, mostly designed to say on average how someone will behave, or rules about actions to make deities pissed at their clerics/paladins
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

good: altruistic, self-sacrificing with regards to individual people

evil: selfish, puts own desires far above others' needs

lawful: values society and works to keep it and trust in it running

chaotic: doesn't value society, and actively works to prevent it from restricting individuals

neutrality has been described as a few things, but in general it's the following: when you're somewhere in the middle. you're not self-sacrificing enough to give away your paycheck to the sick, but you're not selfish enough to steal from them when you need the money. you're not lawful enough to report a theft committed by your best friend, but you're not chaotic enough to submit false reports to mess with the law enforcement system

there are other definitions of neutrality, but when you get clever about it it takes the whole system down.

and in general, it's an ad-hoc system. acts can be good/evil, but it's up to the individual DM as far as what percentage or severity of acts change a character's alignment
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

good topic
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

FinaIFantasyV posted...

banananor posted...

what is light in the context of KH, exactly?

what is darkness in the context of KH, exactly?

They are just forces.

And also realms.

Contrary to what everyone thinks Light isnt good, dark isnt evil. The revelation had by Mickey at the end of II.

But darkness is more corruptible.

When light & dark are forces, are they sentient? If so, what do they want? If they're more like gravity or magnets, what makes them different? Are they mostly symbolism for positive and negative emotions, or are they just palette swaps of each other?

When you say dark is more corruptible... corruptible by what? Do you mean dark is more likely to directly control people?
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Wolf
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Pretty good, but where are the trips from brawl? Seems to be missing that feature
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

what is light in the context of KH, exactly?

what is darkness in the context of KH, exactly?
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

The film was too long and lacked emotional direction

It was just scene after scene of things happening. Rlm's video about it being structured as a comedy was pretty on point
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

i've never watched more than an hour of any let's play series- except for one. that would be their resident evil 4 LP, which I guess is at least 7 years old now. holy shit!

they just knew everything about the game and had infectious enthusiasm and rapport. i'm glad they've been successful in the interim. it's a bit sad that it's ending on a sour note, but i'm glad they're able to move on to whatever they really want to do
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

i liked the system this year, but yeah i could see giving link and even bigger 'bye' than all the other characters
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

spoilers below

light! darkness! friendship! waaaaa!
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

played a few games

it feels like the big characters have been super buffed and/or the small ones nerfed. either that or maybe my playgroup hasn't figured out the kill moves for the lighter guys yet
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

bro this is worse than super vague facebook posts, i'm reporting u 4 language
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

i'm sure this topic is fine but you should stop making new accounts to get around ignore lists
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

i'm not particularly excited about zelda vs. mario again
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Snake
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

Vivi
Magus
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.

ExThaNemesis posted...

more like PWNED nine!

ROLF!

LOLL!!! GOOD 1 somebody put it on the wiki
---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.