Lurker > KamenRiderBlade

Ever heard of the disaster called FO76?

Yeah was just reading their wiki. Martin Sheen was born 7th son to Spanish and Irish Immigrants. Changed his name to have an easier time pursing acting since he already looked anglo.

I saw some of it a few years ago. Seemed pretty good.

Changing the maid into a super beefy secret agent was a weird change or direction, but it was kinda funny.

I despise this pen because of that tip.
I prefer the Jetstream from Uni which is very smooth but does require a lighter touch so if you press hard when writing then it probably isn't a good recommendation either.

I always liked their cajun rice. Glad they're bringing it back, even if it is for a limited time.

I'm 100% better. Thanks for the support guys!

I'm very particular with what pens I write with, as I tend to press a bit harder than I should. What's unfortunate is that the .8mm thickness isn't as easy to get where I live, but the .3mm is everywhere.

...I hate thin writing pens, I nearly poke a hole in my paper every time I use them.

Fountain pen master race

I tend to use only one type of pen. These
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/8/2/7/AARNb5AADXiL.jpg
I like that they are thick black lines. They don't last long, maybe a month of constant writing, but they last me.

Pencils? Im an adult, thank you.

bruh

It does, actually, yes. But the EU made it silly by giving him a whole bunch of ridiculous combat feats. The whole notion of sending him out to fight the First Order and knock over a bunch of walkers sounds cool, but in the end, it's dark side shit. Using the force to nonviolently buy time for the Resistance to escape is 100% the most Jedi thing to do in that situation. I think that moment is what solidifies Luke as a proper Jedi Master. He used the force for defense--not for attack. I think that's very cool.

So the whole idea of debating whether or not he could beat this Sith, or that Jedi, 1v1...or saying he could have beaten all the walkers if he was as powerful as his EU counterpart...misses the point of becoming a Jedi Master.

I think it's cool that such a feat could kill even a Jedi as strong as Luke. Obviously he wasn't in his prime, but I don't think that's why he died, necessarily. The projection is an abnormal power and looks physically taxing no matter who you are. If it didn't kill him, I bet even a young Luke would have been out of commission for weeks following the event.

Yes, seriously. In the books he can destroy planets and pull the engines from Star Destroyers.

In the Disney films he dies from being kinda tired.

I thought climbing back up onto that giant rock and looking very relaxed and healthy sitting up on it while watching the sunset was what exhausted and killed him.

Luke was never on any kind of brand new level, force-wise, in the original trilogy. He was a competent force user and decent with a lightsaber, but that was always the extent of it. If Vader had been fighting seriously the whole time in RotJ, he almost certainly would have bodied Luke.

Then, Luke stood up to the Emperor only to immediately get clowned onto the floor by force lightning. It was like he took a chair to the back of the head, WWE style, and had absolutely no chance of recovering. He was toast. He didn't win the day by being stronger than Vader OR Palpatine...he won by expressing love for his father and refusing to surrender to the dark side. Which turned Anakin back to the light, thus enabling Anakin to be the one who hucked the Emperor down a reactor tube.

Luke basically did nothing but get his ass kicked by Vader and Palpatine, except for the brief moment when he nearly succumbed to the dark side in a fit of rage. The whole "Luke is the most powerful Jedi" thing just doesn't add up outside of the EU novels.

Sequel Trilogy Luke is not very smart

In the Post-Jedi books, Luke could pull engines out of Star Destroyers -- yet in the Disney films he dies to some AT-AT blastfire and some force projection. What a joke.

The book canon of Luke would have destroyed all those AT-ATs

Oh. When I saw you say iFixit, I thought it was for iPhone lol

Ok I get it now. Thanks I'll look at that

The quality of the animation is so, so good.

Galaxy Note 10

I haven't confirmed if it's possible but I will look into it. Might need my brother's help. It's an android though. If that matters

Almost 3 years I think. It still works fine except the battery isn't as good as it used to be.

Yeah, it's not nice.
i have the og 2011 model and the 3.5 inch screen feels pretty small (but at least the pixel density is not as bad as the XL models). The worst aspect of it is how uncomfortable it feels as I hold it.

I kinda get nostalgic over the SD graphics though. I like the look and audio of the 3ds games.

In the true historical records, Liu Bei could at very best be described as a typical Warlord, serving only himself and willing to pretty much sacrifice anyone to escape. In fact, Cao Cao was basically the only one of the major warlords featured in the book who, in real life, made any attempt at all to establish normalcy and return imperial stability.

One of the more common arguments made lately is that the well-deserved admiration for his strategist, Zhuge Liang (who by nearly every account was considered a legitimate genius), somehow retroactively made Liu Bei more admired than he deserved.

Guess who was in charge of the Federal Government in October 2021

So it is now confirmed: $TSLA has been including used cars in its "delivery" reports each quarter for years. The numbers are not new vehicle sales. It's not even clear what they are because the definition keeps on changing, and $TSLA has never defined it

The documents we received cover much, much more than just deliveries. They also cover $TSLA's accounting software, general ledger, safety issues, Autopilot, and more. Read Documents 178 and 179 (link above) in full to fully understand the scope of these revelations.

CEO Tania Constable's remarks accompanied the MCA's launch of Small Modular Reactors in the Australian Context, a discussion paper authored by Australian nuclear expert Ben Heard which provides an overview of SMRs, their potential role in Australia and likely operating costs. The 33-page document considers three of the "most advanced" SMR designs that are currently undergoing regulatory approval - NuScale's Power Module, GE-Hitachi's BWRX-300 and Terrestrial Energy's Integral Molten Salt Reactor - and their potential use in Australia. By 2030 and beyond, the levelised costs of electricity for those three SMR designs are estimated to be between AUD64 and AUD77 (USD46 and USD56) per MWh.

SMRs are an "ideal fit" for the Australian energy market, the report finds, citing their enhanced safety, lower cost than large-scale nuclear reactors or equivalent energy production methods, configurability, and lower waste production than current reactors. Furthermore, SMR modules have a similar capacity to many of the existing generator units that make up Australia's coal and gas-fired power plants so could easily replace ageing coal or gas-powered turbines without the need for additional grid investment, it says.

"Even with conservative assumptions that include higher than expected construction costs, SMRs could be Australia's lowest cost 24/7 zero emission power source that underpins reliable and secure electricity supplies," Constable said.

I agree. Your best bet is to attack me when your argument is that indefensible.

Which is why I pointed out the two huge red mistakes in your argument.

You mean the two parts of the map that comprise most of the red?

You should have posted a list if you didnt want people to comment based on the colored map you provided.

Japans not great on legal ethics either. I wouldnt want to comment on the others since I dont know what their situation is.

My point stands though. Using Russia and Africa to bolster a scientific or legality argument is ridiculous.

Historically speaking it's been illegal for less time than it's been legal.

Labor managed to do that in a single month?

Generally Russia and Africa are the last two places you want to ise as examples for accurate science and ethical legal behavior.