Lurker > CyricZ

Billionaires

Collapse typically isn't a single day's event. It's a long slide. And we've been in it for decades. Basically ever since Reagan.

The perspective of this person struck me, in particular.

https://gen.medium.com/i-lived-through-collapse-america-is-already-there-ba1e4b54c5fc

One of my favorite reactions to that scene:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2rmk4kYkts

I cared about this one when I was challenging bkstunt for the top spot.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com./user.php?db=.11.user=%21/badges/78-select-faqs

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

JK Rowling is a TERF and the podcast titled "The Witch Trials of JK Rowling" is propaganda for her.

Also she's basically Anita Bryant.

As someone who, while I may not be a certified teacher, has at least the soul of one, Assassination Classroom is one of my favorite series, makes me cry every time I read it all the way through, and is probably one of the finest pieces of media I've ever consumed that focuses heavily on the values of the connection between a classroom of students and the best teacher they will likely ever have.

Cane's is the most delicious trash ever.

I remember going into Boston last year for PAX and they were going to put one up on Boylston St. Went to that same spot this year for PAX and the "Coming Soon" signs are STILL up in the window lol.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmT0i0xG6zg

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

*spit take*

https://twitter.com/ohgoditsranor/status/1647331128095698948

https://twitter.com/ohgoditsranor/status/1647331128095698948

Someone please tell me if the hooded guys and the "starving castaways" are the same people.

Crimson_Corsair posted...

It is a fun game. Quick tip, there are these starving dudes you find one on a beach in each zone, they ask for various fish to eat. The picky bastards can send you to areas you aren't even ready to fish in yet and they are all timed when you start them. They will starve to death within a few days I think and you can't complete their quests. So avoid them until end game.

You mean the robed guys?

Or are there different people?

Slayer does not let shit go. I can attest to that.

He wants me to apologize to him for the bad thing I said to someone else.

Slayer being like "It was the worst thing ever how come none of you can see this" is a hell of a melty.

DarkBuster22904 posted...

deliberately mosleading/misrepresenting information is explicitly mentioned within the ToS

I seem to recall this being used for stuff slightly more essential than mod history, but clearly I've been out of the game for a while.

Tyranthraxus posted...

Weird. I mean it's a rude offensive thing to say no doubt but Slayer here literally treating it like a fuckin Voldemort taboo makes it sound way worse than it actually was.

Yeah I thought so too.

Tyranthraxus posted...

Ah yes. Now I remember. It was sk8gamer or something like that saying callous shit about people dying and gunpla said something like "I thought you'd have more empathy since your girlfriend recently died"

Does that sound about right?

That's it.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Did she make the claim twice? I only saw the once.

Trumble posted...

Spoilers without warning has always been against the ToU. If you give a warning for one kind of spoiler but then give a different kind of spoiler behind the warning, you haven't actually given a warning for the spoilers.

I'm speaking of this account getting suspended, not her last one.

andel posted...

it would be like asking why admiral got more hate than others

Wow.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

It's certainly her take on the scenario.

But even if it were a flat out lie, is that against the TOS?

MarcyWarcy posted...

idk where you're going with this

My "going" is Post #8. That's the start and end of my argument, pretty much.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Which was apparently enough to get her suspended.

Wow this shit just keeps piling doesn't it.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Did say that.

But that's really my point. It so often comes back to that. Meanwhile what I said on the same subject was worse.

MarcyWarcy posted...

dude there have been like 10 threads at this point where people talk about stuff like sk8ers girlfriend

Why aren't people talking about them?

k1zzl3_82 posted...

click on your name. does it say suspended? Now look at gunplas name, what does that say

Post #8.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Didn't say that.

Jeff_AKA_Snoopy posted...

I've been hearing so much praise for that show I am just expecting to be disappointed

Dude.

Dude.

Look at me.

Watch this.

MarcyWarcy posted...

she posts aggressive arguments and fights with people all the time and gradually escalates

I do that too, given a certain cap on "escalation", but then I'd like to hear what you think is too much escalation.

MarcyWarcy posted...

cyric doesnt really post like gunpla so i dont see why he would get that, it would probably be people being confused

Honestly what is the difference?

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

She's vocal and stubborn. So am I.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

No one here is worth testing that theory.

Slayer_22 posted...

I feel like you're making stuff up here ngl.

I don't care if you deny it.

Akagami_Shanks posted...

Well you are regularly harassed, people have been on your ass for like 3 pages now.

No.

Not REMOTELY what she's dealt with.

Oshi no Ko

Oshi no Ko

OSHI NO KO

Literally bought a year of Hidive so I could watch and not disappointed.

Akagami_Shanks posted...

tbf cyric himself has also brought up the users gf so i believe it lol

Arguably what I said was worse.

Yet I'm not stalked and harassed off the site.

Wonder why that is.

Crimson_Corsair posted...

Shut the fuck up.

Make me, genocide denier.

Laws are being made.

We done?

DOOM-64 posted...

QUESTION 1: how come you couldnt bring yourself to criticize your dream girl when she spoiled hogwarts legacy?

If I'm going to criticize my friends, it's not going to be in public here where the drama divas will lap it up. It'll be in private with them directly. Neither you nor others need be involved.

QUESTION 2: why did you go into hiding after she got moderated for doing that?

I didn't. I was posting afterwards.

It was a topic about this if I recall:

https://www.washingtonblade.com/2022/06/01/former-va-tech-football-player-found-not-guilty-in-beating-death-of-gay-man/

The user in question was being callous about the death of the victim in this case, and gunplagirl's response was that, as someone who had recently lost their girlfriend, that user could stand to be a little more empathetic.

Now this is coming from me, so I understand if people think I'm sugarcoating it.

F1areaGaman posted...

lazy

You, or me?

F1areaGaman posted...

i think even trans people aren't sure about surgery on children tho

There is no advocating for surgery for kids.

its ok to not be sure about hormones and surgery for little kids.

Why did you just add hormones onto the latter half of the post like it's the same thing as surgery?

I said what I said and you're not inviting any kind of discussion here. Just being petty.

I know who my friends are.

youenjoymyself1 posted...

When you consider a suicides are around 60% of "gun violence" and a good chunk of those are self euthanasia then yeah, that's padding stats.

Why do suicides not count as violence?

Also, when you have a group of people who try to trivialize inner city gang violence at every corner EXCEPT when it helps ban guns it is sorta telling.

Who's doing that?

whitelytning posted...

Why get stuck on arguing about how the term genocide could or couldnt apply?

You tell us.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

The closest to a successful gotcha in this topic.

BurmesePenguin posted...

What exactly is rape by deception?

The thing is that it's not a flatly defined term, and for good reason. To hold someone accountable for "rape by deception" invites an extremely broad interpretation.

I personally disagree with Kloe's assertion that the underage woman in that topic should be prosecuted for rape by deception. Fraud, perhaps, but not rape.

Nor would I suggest anyone calling Kloe out on that as "promoting rape". That would be a childish and petty interpretation.