Poll of the Day > Did Jesus have kids?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
minervo 12/09/18 9:35:48 AM #1:	Question - Results (6 votes) No (Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, etc.) 16.67% (1 vote) 1 Yes (Mormons, Protestants, etc.) 16.67% (1 vote) 1 Jesus never existed 33.33% (2 votes) 2 Other / Not sure 33.33% (2 votes) 2 Topic --- "how hard is it for people to understand that not everything you read will be something you agree with?" - Awesome <cite>minervo posted [p:913816574] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote> Question - Results (6 votes) No (Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, etc.) 16.67% (1 vote) 1 Yes (Mormons, Protestants, etc.) 16.67% (1 vote) 1 Jesus never existed 33.33% (2 votes) 2 Other / Not sure 33.33% (2 votes) 2 Topic</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
rogerskg1979 12/09/18 10:10:22 AM #2:	Humperdoo! <cite>rogerskg1979 posted [p:913817590] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote>Humperdoo!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 12/09/18 2:02:21 PM #3:	Idk if he had any. It apparently, he was good at killing them... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:913827737] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote>Idk if he had any. It apparently, he was good at killing them...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Far-Queue 12/09/18 2:03:52 PM #4:	Pretty sure he was gay. He hung around with 12 dudes all of the time. --- https://imgur.com/ZwO4qO2 Bluer than velvet was the night... Softer than satin was the light... From the stars... <cite>Far-Queue posted [p:913827815] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote>Pretty sure he was gay. He hung around with 12 dudes all of the time.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 12/09/18 2:07:25 PM #5:	Does the #MeToo movement have a stated opinion on the immaculate conception --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:913827997] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote>Does the #MeToo movement have a stated opinion on the immaculate conception</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 12/09/18 2:13:35 PM #6:	Impossible to know. And I don't mean this in a "I personally don't know", I mean this in a literal no one could possibly know... the records of the time don't suggest it, but that's not evidence of absence. --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:913828319] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote>Impossible to know. And I don't mean this in a "I personally don't know", I mean this in a literal no one could possibly know... the records of the time don't suggest it, but that's not evidence of absence.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pastyD 12/09/18 2:38:56 PM #7:	Why are Protestants listed next to Yes? The vast majority of protestants would agree that Jesus never had children. --- Xbox Live: Reborn Raisin <cite>pastyD posted [p:913829763] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote>Why are Protestants listed next to Yes? The vast majority of protestants would agree that Jesus never had children.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
brestugo 12/09/18 2:43:57 PM #8:	According to the Davinci Code: ~~yes~~ --- "Everything in the game is designed to kill you." - Hidetaka Miyazaki <cite>brestugo posted [p:913830025] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote>According to the Davinci Code: yes</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CacciatoPart3 12/09/18 2:49:44 PM #9:	pastyD posted... Why are Protestants listed next to Yes? The vast majority of protestants would agree that Jesus never had children. This. How do you fuck up a poll that badly? --- "Why the f* do you think I'm gay bro I'm not fing gay. I love p***, I'm in deep love with the female anatomy" - Nomak54/-Komaiko54- <cite>CacciatoPart3 posted [p:913830338] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>pastyD posted...</cite> <quote>Why are Protestants listed next to Yes? The vast majority of protestants would agree that Jesus never had children.</quote> This. How do you fuck up a poll that badly?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Krazy_Kirby 12/09/18 3:11:19 PM #10:	nowadays when someone claims to be the son of god we call them crazy. the first guy who did it was believed --- Kill From The Shadows. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot <cite>Krazy_Kirby posted [p:913831432] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote>nowadays when someone claims to be the son of god we call them crazy. the first guy who did it was believed</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 12/09/18 3:12:51 PM #11:	Krazy_Kirby posted... nowadays when someone claims to be the son of god we call them crazy. the first guy who did it was believed You really think he was the first? --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:913831524] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote>nowadays when someone claims to be the son of god we call them crazy. the first guy who did it was believed</quote> You really think he was the first?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CHROM6 12/09/18 3:22:03 PM #12:	Jesus exists. --- Super Smash Bros. Ultimate Nintendo's fighting adventure! <cite>CHROM6 posted [p:913832011] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote>Jesus exists.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 12/09/18 3:22:06 PM #13:	Mead posted... Krazy_Kirby posted... nowadays when someone claims to be the son of god we call them crazy. the first guy who did it was believed You really think he was the first? He might have been, actually. Most deified historical figures claimed to BE God. --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:913832016] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote>nowadays when someone claims to be the son of god we call them crazy. the first guy who did it was believed</quote> You really think he was the first?</quote> He might have been, actually. Most deified historical figures claimed to BE God.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Krazy_Kirby 12/09/18 3:26:09 PM #14:	CHROM6 posted... Jesus exists. ofc, it's a very common name. --- Kill From The Shadows. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot <cite>Krazy_Kirby posted [p:913832245] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>CHROM6 posted...</cite> <quote>Jesus exists.</quote> ofc, it's a very common name.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
rogerskg1979 12/09/18 3:26:49 PM #15:	Mead posted... Krazy_Kirby posted... nowadays when someone claims to be the son of god we call them crazy. the first guy who did it was believed You really think he was the first? Yeah, he definitely wasn't the first. There are religions older than Christianity. The Greek gods are older, for example, and Hercules was the son of Zeus and a mortal human woman. Jesus, therefore, isn't unique in that regard. <cite>rogerskg1979 posted [p:913832278] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote>nowadays when someone claims to be the son of god we call them crazy. the first guy who did it was believed</quote> You really think he was the first?</quote> Yeah, he definitely wasn't the first. There are religions older than Christianity. The Greek gods are older, for example, and Hercules was the son of Zeus and a mortal human woman. Jesus, therefore, isn't unique in that regard.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 12/09/18 3:28:43 PM #16:	Lokarin posted... Mead posted... Krazy_Kirby posted... nowadays when someone claims to be the son of god we call them crazy. the first guy who did it was believed You really think he was the first? He might have been, actually. Most deified historical figures claimed to BE God. If were talking historical figures that actually excludes Jesus then He could have existed but there isnt any actual historical evidence that he did --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:913832372] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote>nowadays when someone claims to be the son of god we call them crazy. the first guy who did it was believed</quote> You really think he was the first?</quote> He might have been, actually. Most deified historical figures claimed to BE God.</quote> If were talking historical figures that actually excludes Jesus then He could have existed but there isnt any actual historical evidence that he did</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 12/09/18 3:31:23 PM #17:	Mead posted... Lokarin posted... Mead posted... Krazy_Kirby posted... nowadays when someone claims to be the son of god we call them crazy. the first guy who did it was believed You really think he was the first? He might have been, actually. Most deified historical figures claimed to BE God. If were talking historical figures that actually excludes Jesus then He could have existed but there isnt any actual historical evidence that he did Right, I wasn't really caring about the historicity... just that it's weird to claim to be the son of god instead of god. --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:913832496] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote>nowadays when someone claims to be the son of god we call them crazy. the first guy who did it was believed</quote> You really think he was the first?</quote> He might have been, actually. Most deified historical figures claimed to BE God.</quote> If were talking historical figures that actually excludes Jesus then He could have existed but there isnt any actual historical evidence that he did</quote> Right, I wasn't really caring about the historicity... just that it's weird to claim to be the son of god instead of god.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
minervo 12/09/18 3:35:07 PM #18:	CacciatoPart3 posted... pastyD posted... Why are Protestants listed next to Yes? The vast majority of protestants would agree that Jesus never had children. This. How do you fuck up a poll that badly? Then why do Protestant pastors marry and have kids? --- "how hard is it for people to understand that not everything you read will be something you agree with?" - Awesome <cite>minervo posted [p:913832694] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>CacciatoPart3 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pastyD posted...</cite> <quote>Why are Protestants listed next to Yes? The vast majority of protestants would agree that Jesus never had children.</quote> This. How do you fuck up a poll that badly?</quote> Then why do Protestant pastors marry and have kids?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 12/09/18 3:37:21 PM #19:	minervo posted... Then why do Protestant pastors marry and have kids? Because pastors aren't Jesus? --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:913832827] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>minervo posted...</cite> <quote>Then why do Protestant pastors marry and have kids?</quote> Because pastors aren't Jesus?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
minervo 12/09/18 3:41:20 PM #20:	Lokarin posted... minervo posted... Then why do Protestant pastors marry and have kids? Because pastors aren't Jesus? Pastors are supposed to be Christ's representatives on earth. --- "how hard is it for people to understand that not everything you read will be something you agree with?" - Awesome <cite>minervo posted [p:913833045] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>minervo posted...</cite> <quote>Then why do Protestant pastors marry and have kids?</quote> Because pastors aren't Jesus?</quote> Pastors are supposed to be Christ's representatives on earth.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 12/09/18 3:44:02 PM #21:	minervo posted... Lokarin posted... minervo posted... Then why do Protestant pastors marry and have kids? Because pastors aren't Jesus? Pastors are supposed to be Christ's representatives on earth. No, cuz that would be idolatry. --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:913833204] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>minervo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>minervo posted...</cite> <quote>Then why do Protestant pastors marry and have kids?</quote> Because pastors aren't Jesus?</quote> Pastors are supposed to be Christ's representatives on earth.</quote> No, cuz that would be idolatry.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
minervo 12/09/18 3:45:25 PM #22:	Lokarin posted... minervo posted... Lokarin posted... minervo posted... Then why do Protestant pastors marry and have kids? Because pastors aren't Jesus? Pastors are supposed to be Christ's representatives on earth. No, cuz that would be idolatry. Only if they made statues about said pastors. A man can be an idol and be good under the eyes of God, but once he dies, he must not be praised any longer. --- "how hard is it for people to understand that not everything you read will be something you agree with?" - Awesome <cite>minervo posted [p:913833283] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>minervo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>minervo posted...</cite> <quote>Then why do Protestant pastors marry and have kids?</quote> Because pastors aren't Jesus?</quote> Pastors are supposed to be Christ's representatives on earth.</quote> No, cuz that would be idolatry.</quote> Only if they made statues about said pastors. A man can be an idol and be good under the eyes of God, but once he dies, he must not be praised any longer.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ParanoidObsessive 12/09/18 3:46:17 PM #23:	minervo posted... Lokarin posted... minervo posted... Then why do Protestant pastors marry and have kids? Because pastors aren't Jesus? Pastors are supposed to be Christ's representatives on earth. Being someone's representative doesn't mean you have to deliberately mirror every facet of their lives. This is the same reason why we don't nail every pastor to a cross when they turn 33. --- "Wall of Text'D!" --- oldskoolplayr76 "POwned again." --- blight family <cite>ParanoidObsessive posted [p:913833340] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>minervo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>minervo posted...</cite> <quote>Then why do Protestant pastors marry and have kids?</quote> Because pastors aren't Jesus?</quote> Pastors are supposed to be Christ's representatives on earth.</quote> Being someone's representative doesn't mean you have to deliberately mirror every facet of their lives. This is the same reason why we don't nail every pastor to a cross when they turn 33. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 12/09/18 3:46:37 PM #24:	minervo posted... Lokarin posted... minervo posted... Lokarin posted... minervo posted... Then why do Protestant pastors marry and have kids? Because pastors aren't Jesus? Pastors are supposed to be Christ's representatives on earth. No, cuz that would be idolatry. Only if they made statues about said pastors. A man can be an idol and be good under the eyes of God, but once he dies, he must not be praised any longer. Lol --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:913833362] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>minervo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>minervo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>minervo posted...</cite> <quote>Then why do Protestant pastors marry and have kids?</quote> Because pastors aren't Jesus?</quote> Pastors are supposed to be Christ's representatives on earth.</quote> No, cuz that would be idolatry.</quote> Only if they made statues about said pastors. A man can be an idol and be good under the eyes of God, but once he dies, he must not be praised any longer.</quote> Lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
minervo 12/09/18 3:50:02 PM #25:	ParanoidObsessive posted... minervo posted... Lokarin posted... minervo posted... Then why do Protestant pastors marry and have kids? Because pastors aren't Jesus? Pastors are supposed to be Christ's representatives on earth. Being someone's representative doesn't mean you have to deliberately mirror every facet of their lives. This is the same reason why we don't nail every pastor to a cross when they turn 33. I'm not a protestant so I don't agree with the religion whatsoever, but martyrdom is purely a Catholic thing. --- "how hard is it for people to understand that not everything you read will be something you agree with?" - Awesome <cite>minervo posted [p:913833521] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>ParanoidObsessive posted...</cite> <quote><cite>minervo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>minervo posted...</cite> <quote>Then why do Protestant pastors marry and have kids?</quote> Because pastors aren't Jesus?</quote> Pastors are supposed to be Christ's representatives on earth.</quote> Being someone's representative doesn't mean you have to deliberately mirror every facet of their lives. This is the same reason why we don't nail every pastor to a cross when they turn 33. </quote> I'm not a protestant so I don't agree with the religion whatsoever, but martyrdom is purely a Catholic thing.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ParanoidObsessive 12/09/18 3:54:46 PM #26:	minervo posted... I'm not a protestant so I don't agree with the religion whatsoever, but martyrdom is purely a Catholic thing. No it isn't. Martyrdom is distinct from the concept of saints and achieving sainthood via martyrdom. And even then, there are branches of Christianity that technically count as Protestant that acknowledge saints anyway. --- "Wall of Text'D!" --- oldskoolplayr76 "POwned again." --- blight family <cite>ParanoidObsessive posted [p:913833754] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>minervo posted...</cite> <quote>I'm not a protestant so I don't agree with the religion whatsoever, but martyrdom is purely a Catholic thing.</quote> No it isn't. Martyrdom is distinct from the concept of saints and achieving sainthood via martyrdom. And even then, there are branches of Christianity that technically count as Protestant that acknowledge saints anyway. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
minervo 12/09/18 3:58:24 PM #27:	ParanoidObsessive posted... minervo posted... I'm not a protestant so I don't agree with the religion whatsoever, but martyrdom is purely a Catholic thing. No it isn't. Martyrdom is distinct from the concept of saints and achieving sainthood via martyrdom. And even then, there are branches of Christianity that technically count as Protestant that acknowledge saints anyway. Catholics believe sainthood is achieved through suffering. Protestants, through praise. Catholics believe in sacrifice, Protestants in joy. --- "how hard is it for people to understand that not everything you read will be something you agree with?" - Awesome <cite>minervo posted [p:913833948] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>ParanoidObsessive posted...</cite> <quote><cite>minervo posted...</cite> <quote>I'm not a protestant so I don't agree with the religion whatsoever, but martyrdom is purely a Catholic thing.</quote> No it isn't. Martyrdom is distinct from the concept of saints and achieving sainthood via martyrdom. And even then, there are branches of Christianity that technically count as Protestant that acknowledge saints anyway. </quote> Catholics believe sainthood is achieved through suffering. Protestants, through praise. Catholics believe in sacrifice, Protestants in joy.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GanglyKhan 12/09/18 4:09:42 PM #28:	Krazy_Kirby posted... nowadays when someone claims to be the son of god we call them crazy. the first guy who did it was believed So who will be the first to claim that they're the son of Satan? --- Now Playing: Persona 3:FES, Morrowind SFV: Ed \| Kolin SCVI: Groh \| Taki <cite>GanglyKhan posted [p:913834548] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote>nowadays when someone claims to be the son of god we call them crazy. the first guy who did it was believed</quote> So who will be the first to claim that they're the son of Satan?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
minervo 12/09/18 4:18:58 PM #29:	GanglyKhan posted... Krazy_Kirby posted... nowadays when someone claims to be the son of god we call them crazy. the first guy who did it was believed So who will be the first to claim that they're the son of Satan? Lol it's been done more times that the other. --- "how hard is it for people to understand that not everything you read will be something you agree with?" - Awesome <cite>minervo posted [p:913835114] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>GanglyKhan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote>nowadays when someone claims to be the son of god we call them crazy. the first guy who did it was believed</quote> So who will be the first to claim that they're the son of Satan?</quote> Lol it's been done more times that the other.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 12/09/18 4:39:55 PM #30:	minervo posted... ParanoidObsessive posted... minervo posted... I'm not a protestant so I don't agree with the religion whatsoever, but martyrdom is purely a Catholic thing. No it isn't. Martyrdom is distinct from the concept of saints and achieving sainthood via martyrdom. And even then, there are branches of Christianity that technically count as Protestant that acknowledge saints anyway. Catholics believe sainthood is achieved through suffering. Protestants, through praise. Catholics believe in sacrifice, Protestants in joy. Some muslims praise Jihadis as martyrs. --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:913836324] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>minervo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ParanoidObsessive posted...</cite> <quote><cite>minervo posted...</cite> <quote>I'm not a protestant so I don't agree with the religion whatsoever, but martyrdom is purely a Catholic thing.</quote> No it isn't. Martyrdom is distinct from the concept of saints and achieving sainthood via martyrdom. And even then, there are branches of Christianity that technically count as Protestant that acknowledge saints anyway. </quote> Catholics believe sainthood is achieved through suffering. Protestants, through praise. Catholics believe in sacrifice, Protestants in joy.</quote> Some muslims praise Jihadis as martyrs.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Entity13 12/09/18 4:39:59 PM #31:	The man behind the myth might have, or might not. --- http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb179/EntityXIII/entityfn7.jpg <cite>Entity13 posted [p:913836328] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote>The man behind the myth might have, or might not.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dedbus 12/09/18 5:23:04 PM #32:	I heard he did allot of nailing so probably. <cite>dedbus posted [p:913838733] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote>I heard he did allot of nailing so probably.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 12/09/18 5:25:01 PM #33:	dedbus posted... I heard he did allot of nailing so probably. No no no... he was nailed a lot. Theres a difference... Well, technically both... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:913838835] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>dedbus posted...</cite> <quote>I heard he did allot of nailing so probably.</quote> No no no... he was nailed a lot. Theres a difference... Well, technically both...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Cacciato 12/09/18 5:35:40 PM #34:	minervo posted... CacciatoPart3 posted... pastyD posted... Why are Protestants listed next to Yes? The vast majority of protestants would agree that Jesus never had children. This. How do you fuck up a poll that badly? Then why do Protestant pastors marry and have kids? What? What the fuck does that have to do with anything? Stop sounding like a dumbass. --- "Why the f* do you think I'm gay bro I'm not fing gay. I love p***, I'm in deep love with the female anatomy" - Nomak54/-Komaiko54- <cite>Cacciato posted [p:913839412] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>minervo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CacciatoPart3 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pastyD posted...</cite> <quote>Why are Protestants listed next to Yes? The vast majority of protestants would agree that Jesus never had children.</quote> This. How do you fuck up a poll that badly?</quote> Then why do Protestant pastors marry and have kids?</quote> What? What the fuck does that have to do with anything? Stop sounding like a dumbass.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 12/09/18 5:36:45 PM #35:	Was it minervo who got kicked off all the religious chat sites? --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:913839491] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote>Was it minervo who got kicked off all the religious chat sites?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ParanoidObsessive 12/09/18 6:27:11 PM #36:	minervo posted... Catholics believe sainthood is achieved through suffering. Protestants, through praise. Catholics believe in sacrifice, Protestants in joy. The Protestant sects that believe in sainthood tend to view the requirements for sainthood being almost entirely the same as Catholics do (minus the specific organizational body dedicated to confirming saints). So that statement is also incorrect. (And none of this even getting into other religions that technically have "saints", like Buddhism.) For someone who has openly admitted to not being a member of the religions we're discussing, you certainly seem to be making a lot of definitive claims about faiths you clearly don't understand very well. --- "Wall of Text'D!" --- oldskoolplayr76 "POwned again." --- blight family <cite>ParanoidObsessive posted [p:913842609] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>minervo posted...</cite> <quote>Catholics believe sainthood is achieved through suffering. Protestants, through praise. Catholics believe in sacrifice, Protestants in joy.</quote> The Protestant sects that believe in sainthood tend to view the requirements for sainthood being almost entirely the same as Catholics do (minus the specific organizational body dedicated to confirming saints). So that statement is also incorrect. (And none of this even getting into other religions that technically have "saints", like Buddhism.) For someone who has openly admitted to not being a member of the religions we're discussing, you certainly seem to be making a lot of definitive claims about faiths you clearly don't understand very well. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bugmeat 12/09/18 6:29:34 PM #37:	rogerskg1979 posted... Humperdoo! I was not disappointed to see this as the first response. --- John Mellencamp said it best "Life goes on long after the thrill of living is gone." <cite>Bugmeat posted [p:913842764] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>rogerskg1979 posted...</cite> <quote>Humperdoo!</quote> I was not disappointed to see this as the first response. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 12/09/18 6:36:45 PM #38:	LinkPizza posted... dedbus posted... I heard he did allot of nailing so probably. No no no... he was nailed a lot. Theres a difference... Well, technically both... Jesus partook in much pegging. --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:913843242] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote><cite>dedbus posted...</cite> <quote>I heard he did allot of nailing so probably.</quote> No no no... he was nailed a lot. Theres a difference... Well, technically both...</quote> Jesus partook in much pegging.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Unbridled9 12/10/18 1:50:36 AM #39:	ParanoidObsessive posted... minervo posted... Lokarin posted... minervo posted... Then why do Protestant pastors marry and have kids? Because pastors aren't Jesus? Pastors are supposed to be Christ's representatives on earth. Being someone's representative doesn't mean you have to deliberately mirror every facet of their lives. This is the same reason why we don't nail every pastor to a cross when they turn 33. You have to admit though, it would be nice if you had a pastor who could turn water into wine for you. --- I am the gentle hand who heals, the happy smile who shields, and the foot that will kick your ***! - White Mage <cite>Unbridled9 posted [p:913864525] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>ParanoidObsessive posted...</cite> <quote><cite>minervo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>minervo posted...</cite> <quote>Then why do Protestant pastors marry and have kids?</quote> Because pastors aren't Jesus?</quote> Pastors are supposed to be Christ's representatives on earth.</quote> Being someone's representative doesn't mean you have to deliberately mirror every facet of their lives. This is the same reason why we don't nail every pastor to a cross when they turn 33. </quote> You have to admit though, it would be nice if you had a pastor who could turn water into wine for you.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 12/10/18 12:43:43 PM #40:	Jesus may have had 12 bros but he also ran around with a woman named Mary Magdalene (not to be confused with his mom) and some think that they were dating <cite>Zikten posted [p:913884379] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote>Jesus may have had 12 bros but he also ran around with a woman named Mary Magdalene (not to be confused with his mom) and some think that they were dating</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Moonjay 12/10/18 1:01:22 PM #41:	Pretty sure he had siblings at least. Like his mom was never gonna bang her husband after he was born. --- `Twas brillig, and the slithy toves did gyre and gimble in the wabe; All mimsy were the borogoves, and the mome raths outgrabe. <cite>Moonjay posted [p:913885286] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote>Pretty sure he had siblings at least. Like his mom was never gonna bang her husband after he was born.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 12/10/18 1:02:30 PM #42:	It wouldnt surprise me at all to learn that he was in fact a gay man --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:913885352] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote>It wouldnt surprise me at all to learn that he was in fact a gay man</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Muscles 12/10/18 1:15:42 PM #43:	As someone who grew up protestant, I never heard anyone say jesus had kids --- Muscles Chicago Bears \| Chicago Blackhawks \| Chicago Bulls \| Chicago Cubs \| NIU Huskies <cite>Muscles posted [p:913886062] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote>As someone who grew up protestant, I never heard anyone say jesus had kids</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ernieforss 12/10/18 2:02:28 PM #44:	Mead posted... It wouldnt surprise me at all to learn that he was in fact a gay man I thought he and the whore mary were a thing (not the virigin mary.. the other mary that slept around) --- I'm always 50% right all the time <cite>ernieforss posted [p:913888766] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>It wouldnt surprise me at all to learn that he was in fact a gay man</quote> I thought he and the whore mary were a thing (not the virigin mary.. the other mary that slept around)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
rogerskg1979 12/10/18 2:07:33 PM #45:	Zikten posted... Jesus may have had 12 bros but he also ran around with a woman named Mary Magdalene (not to be confused with his mom) and some think that they were dating Mary may have been like Smurfette in Smurf Village. She may have got it on with all the bros. <cite>rogerskg1979 posted [p:913889059] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote>Jesus may have had 12 bros but he also ran around with a woman named Mary Magdalene (not to be confused with his mom) and some think that they were dating</quote> Mary may have been like Smurfette in Smurf Village. She may have got it on with all the bros.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
StoneRevolver 12/10/18 2:10:53 PM #46:	Moonjay posted... Pretty sure he had siblings at least. Like his mom was never gonna bang her husband after he was born. He did. Joseph had a son. --- My dreams are all dead and buried. Sometimes I wish the Sun would just explode. <cite>StoneRevolver posted [p:913889241] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>Moonjay posted...</cite> <quote>Pretty sure he had siblings at least. Like his mom was never gonna bang her husband after he was born.</quote> He did. Joseph had a son.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 12/10/18 5:30:11 PM #47:	omg what if jesus got cloned --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:913899797] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote>omg what if jesus got cloned </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 12/10/18 6:40:17 PM #48:	Mead posted... He could have existed but there isnt any actual historical evidence that he did Roman history isn't historical now? --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:913903926] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>He could have existed but there isnt any actual historical evidence that he did</quote> Roman history isn't historical now?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ParanoidObsessive 12/10/18 6:44:46 PM #49:	ernieforss posted... Mead posted... It wouldnt surprise me at all to learn that he was in fact a gay man I thought he and the whore mary were a thing (not the virigin mary.. the other mary that slept around) A common line of thought is that she wasn't a whore, she was his wife. It wasn't until later that Christian writers who had a vested interest in minimizing his life as a man to emphasize his life as some sort of divine magical being decided to rewrite her narrative to demonize her and minimize her importance. The early Church spent a few hundred years fighting over whether Jesus was a man or a god in man form or a god who just looked like a man, and whether or not he was the literal son of god or a manifestation of god or some sort of complicated multifaceted avatar of god that simultaneously coexisted with the other aspects of god, to the point where people were pretty much ready to kill over different interpretations. So once one faction basically won the argument, there was a vested interested in eliminating any evidence that supported any position but your own. It's actually one of the theories why there's currently no physical evidence that Jesus existed (that we know of) - because in the centuries that followed, especially after Rome converted, there was ample opportunity for them to find and destroy any evidence that existed. Because it might have supported the idea that Jesus was just a man who firmly considered himself a Jew, and rather than coming forward to present an entirely new religious philosophy in his own name he just claimed to be a descendant of King David who was thus rightful heir to the Jewish kingdom on Earth, who encouraged resistance to Roman rule (for which they killed him as a political rebel). It also doesn't help that the legitimate lines of descent would have stayed in Jerusalem or the same general area, so any direct evidence of him or his siblings or his potential wife and children and the actual Jewish sect he theoretically founded (which would have been run by his brother James and Peter, NOT Paul) would have been pretty much annihilated 40 years later when Vespasian and Titus burned Jerusalem, or 50 years after that when Rome leveled Jerusalem and the Jewish diaspora started. Christianity as it currently exists basically stems from the leadership of a man who never met Jesus at any point in his life, only knew his teaching second or third-hand, and which mostly succeeded because the only direct opposition to it was wiped out in the first hundred years or so. --- "Wall of Text'D!" --- oldskoolplayr76 "POwned again." --- blight family <cite>ParanoidObsessive posted [p:913904210] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>ernieforss posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>It wouldnt surprise me at all to learn that he was in fact a gay man</quote> I thought he and the whore mary were a thing (not the virigin mary.. the other mary that slept around)</quote> A common line of thought is that she wasn't a whore, she was his wife. It wasn't until later that Christian writers who had a vested interest in minimizing his life as a man to emphasize his life as some sort of divine magical being decided to rewrite her narrative to demonize her and minimize her importance. The early Church spent a few hundred years fighting over whether Jesus was a man or a god in man form or a god who just looked like a man, and whether or not he was the literal son of god or a manifestation of god or some sort of complicated multifaceted avatar of god that simultaneously coexisted with the other aspects of god, to the point where people were pretty much ready to kill over different interpretations. So once one faction basically won the argument, there was a vested interested in eliminating any evidence that supported any position but your own. It's actually one of the theories why there's currently no physical evidence that Jesus existed (that we know of) - because in the centuries that followed, especially after Rome converted, there was ample opportunity for them to find and destroy any evidence that existed. Because it might have supported the idea that Jesus was just a man who firmly considered himself a Jew, and rather than coming forward to present an entirely new religious philosophy in his own name he just claimed to be a descendant of King David who was thus rightful heir to the Jewish kingdom on Earth, who encouraged resistance to Roman rule (for which they killed him as a political rebel). It also doesn't help that the legitimate lines of descent would have stayed in Jerusalem or the same general area, so any direct evidence of him or his siblings or his potential wife and children and the actual Jewish sect he theoretically founded (which would have been run by his brother James and Peter, NOT Paul) would have been pretty much annihilated 40 years later when Vespasian and Titus burned Jerusalem, or 50 years after that when Rome leveled Jerusalem and the Jewish diaspora started. Christianity as it currently exists basically stems from the leadership of a man who never met Jesus at any point in his life, only knew his teaching second or third-hand, and which mostly succeeded because the only direct opposition to it was wiped out in the first hundred years or so. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
minervo 12/10/18 8:01:56 PM #50:	ParanoidObsessive posted... ernieforss posted... Mead posted... It wouldnt surprise me at all to learn that he was in fact a gay man I thought he and the whore mary were a thing (not the virigin mary.. the other mary that slept around) A common line of thought is that she wasn't a whore, she was his wife. It wasn't until later that Christian writers who had a vested interest in minimizing his life as a man to emphasize his life as some sort of divine magical being decided to rewrite her narrative to demonize her and minimize her importance. The early Church spent a few hundred years fighting over whether Jesus was a man or a god in man form or a god who just looked like a man, and whether or not he was the literal son of god or a manifestation of god or some sort of complicated multifaceted avatar of god that simultaneously coexisted with the other aspects of god, to the point where people were pretty much ready to kill over different interpretations. So once one faction basically won the argument, there was a vested interested in eliminating any evidence that supported any position but your own. It's actually one of the theories why there's currently no physical evidence that Jesus existed (that we know of) - because in the centuries that followed, especially after Rome converted, there was ample opportunity for them to find and destroy any evidence that existed. Because it might have supported the idea that Jesus was just a man who firmly considered himself a Jew, and rather than coming forward to present an entirely new religious philosophy in his own name he just claimed to be a descendant of King David who was thus rightful heir to the Jewish kingdom on Earth, who encouraged resistance to Roman rule (for which they killed him as a political rebel). It also doesn't help that the legitimate lines of descent would have stayed in Jerusalem or the same general area, so any direct evidence of him or his siblings or his potential wife and children and the actual Jewish sect he theoretically founded (which would have been run by his brother James and Peter, NOT Paul) would have been pretty much annihilated 40 years later when Vespasian and Titus burned Jerusalem, or 50 years after that when Rome leveled Jerusalem and the Jewish diaspora started. Christianity as it currently exists basically stems from the leadership of a man who never met Jesus at any point in his life, only knew his teaching second or third-hand, and which mostly succeeded because the only direct opposition to it was wiped out in the first hundred years or so. Well said, but you cannot expect Jesus to toot his own horn. The fact that it was other people who wrote about him is more proof that he ascended to heaven, and it is said that once in heaven no one returns in the flesh. This is where reincarnation plays a part, I believe we are all given many chances to go back to earth, or if earth is destroyed, another planet all together. --- "how hard is it for people to understand that not everything you read will be something you agree with?" - Awesome <cite>minervo posted [p:913908868] in Did Jesus ... [t:77284589]...</cite> <quote><cite>ParanoidObsessive posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ernieforss posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>It wouldnt surprise me at all to learn that he was in fact a gay man</quote> I thought he and the whore mary were a thing (not the virigin mary.. the other mary that slept around)</quote> A common line of thought is that she wasn't a whore, she was his wife. It wasn't until later that Christian writers who had a vested interest in minimizing his life as a man to emphasize his life as some sort of divine magical being decided to rewrite her narrative to demonize her and minimize her importance. The early Church spent a few hundred years fighting over whether Jesus was a man or a god in man form or a god who just looked like a man, and whether or not he was the literal son of god or a manifestation of god or some sort of complicated multifaceted avatar of god that simultaneously coexisted with the other aspects of god, to the point where people were pretty much ready to kill over different interpretations. So once one faction basically won the argument, there was a vested interested in eliminating any evidence that supported any position but your own. It's actually one of the theories why there's currently no physical evidence that Jesus existed (that we know of) - because in the centuries that followed, especially after Rome converted, there was ample opportunity for them to find and destroy any evidence that existed. Because it might have supported the idea that Jesus was just a man who firmly considered himself a Jew, and rather than coming forward to present an entirely new religious philosophy in his own name he just claimed to be a descendant of King David who was thus rightful heir to the Jewish kingdom on Earth, who encouraged resistance to Roman rule (for which they killed him as a political rebel). It also doesn't help that the legitimate lines of descent would have stayed in Jerusalem or the same general area, so any direct evidence of him or his siblings or his potential wife and children and the actual Jewish sect he theoretically founded (which would have been run by his brother James and Peter, NOT Paul) would have been pretty much annihilated 40 years later when Vespasian and Titus burned Jerusalem, or 50 years after that when Rome leveled Jerusalem and the Jewish diaspora started. Christianity as it currently exists basically stems from the leadership of a man who never met Jesus at any point in his life, only knew his teaching second or third-hand, and which mostly succeeded because the only direct opposition to it was wiped out in the first hundred years or so. </quote> Well said, but you cannot expect Jesus to toot his own horn. The fact that it was other people who wrote about him is more proof that he ascended to heaven, and it is said that once in heaven no one returns in the flesh. This is where reincarnation plays a part, I believe we are all given many chances to go back to earth, or if earth is destroyed, another planet all together.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Poll of the Day > Did Jesus have kids? (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Did Jesus have kids?