Lurker > lordloki12

Looks like you skipped over me on the spreadsheet. Post 64 still riding with the Bills.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

That is pretty damn shady.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

In what way?
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

On a more serious note, the older villagers in that article have a pretty depressing outlook after watching their village shrink to a population of 13. Feeling lonely and totally abandoned by a government they believe is only out for themselves. They know their village won't survive this.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Inviso posted...

Still globalism. Any change that Vlado doesn't like is globalism. I know because he said so while posting from Bulgaria on an American website that rose to prominence on the backs of Japanese video games.

That's a shame. I was hoping this was some kind of slippery slope deal where people left the village for the cities then left the cities and headed to other countries thus reaching the level of globalist scum.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

What is the village to city equivalent of globalism?
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

It's a shame Allen is going to have to read through all that conservative persecution complex bs to get any decent feedback on possible changes to the mod system.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Corrik posted...

xp1337 posted...

Corrik posted...

If you think sonething should be done then its on Congress.

It should have years ago. Republicans in Congress acting upset now is largely hypocritical given they had plenty of opportunity to act before.

That said, this administration doesn't get to just shift the blame off themselves when they have instigated this by ending DACA. They can both be at fault!

Maybe the president shouldn't have a say over it and it should have a law regardjng it from the lawnaking body of the government?

That could have happened without Donald upending their lives.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Bills
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Yeah letting kids go to school and get jobs in the only place they have ever known without the threat of deportation hanging over them was such a terrible solution right.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

velocycloraptor posted...

lordloki12 posted...

velocycloraptor posted...

How anyone can read the shit in that tantrum of a book and think anything but "please go away forever Hillary" is a mystery to me. People say Bernie people are why there's no unity in the party but Bernie endorsed her and campaigned for her and was far more mild in his criticism the entire time than the Clinton/Obama match up in 08, and he never wrote a fucking book whining about her. The centrist Democrats go on about unity but they only mean it one way - the left has to bow to their whims and never want anything for it. So ridiculously entitled to, but in no way wanting to earn people's support. Ralph Nader just had a great interview with the intercept spelling out a lot of the failings of the Democratic party in the last several decades that's worth a read for anyone interested in the subject.

It doesnt matter that Bernie endorsed her when his supporters refused to follow him down that path.

Obama managed to beat McCain despite more Hillary primary voters going for McCain than Sanders voters going for Trump. And regardless, she is blaming Bernie, not his supporters.

and lol@ the idea that bernies campaign "helped no one" his campaign got millions of people involved in politics that previously were dormant, and has vastly strengthened organizations dedicated to fighting for many of his campaign issues, or the DSA, etc. you would not believe the amount of people who credit him for finally getting involved, and blaming him for daring to win is the same incredible kind of shit I was talking about in re: left must unify toward center without expecting anything, never the other way around.

Yeah now imagine how much more could have been done for his causes if the Bernie or bust people had helped elect the democrat instead of protesting and walking out during the convention. Now it is all defense all the time for the foreseeable future on pretty much any cause his side would want.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

velocycloraptor posted...

How anyone can read the shit in that tantrum of a book and think anything but "please go away forever Hillary" is a mystery to me. People say Bernie people are why there's no unity in the party but Bernie endorsed her and campaigned for her and was far more mild in his criticism the entire time than the Clinton/Obama match up in 08, and he never wrote a fucking book whining about her. The centrist Democrats go on about unity but they only mean it one way - the left has to bow to their whims and never want anything for it. So ridiculously entitled to, but in no way wanting to earn people's support. Ralph Nader just had a great interview with the intercept spelling out a lot of the failings of the Democratic party in the last several decades that's worth a read for anyone interested in the subject.

It doesnt matter that Bernie endorsed her when his supporters refused to follow him down that path.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Yeah plus the potential of future job growth when people die off due to the poison now in their water supply.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

The orange icon might just be a holdover from last weeks introduction of the chateau stage. I really have no idea at this point.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Jakyl25 posted...

lordloki12 posted...

People just have a hard on for blaming Hillary because if it isn't all her fault then they would have to take some responsibility for the shit show currently in office. I know this is hard to believe but it can be more than one persons fault.

I know. I'm partially to blame for her losing Michigan. I accept and regret that now.

If I wrote a book about why I just couldn't resist voting for Stein I would expect mockery

If your reasons included things like Russian interference, fake news stories, voter's getting purged from the registration rolls, lopsided news coverage, and a bunch of racists who saw a man obsessed with undoing everything Obama it would be a book worth writing. Not to mention the people who got duped by the promise of jobs or those who would literally never vote for a woman.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

People just have a hard on for blaming Hillary because if it isn't all her fault then they would have to take some responsibility for the shit show currently in office. I know this is hard to believe but it can be more than one persons fault.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

I got a free lootbox when I place second in FFA deathmatch even though the icon said it was supposed to be for winning. Then when I placed first I didn't get a box and the icon is still there. So yeah seems super fudged right now.


That box may have been for the weekly arcade boxes. I guess I dont know what counts as a win since I am up to 5 on the week and I know I havent placed 1st 5 times in FFA.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

People want those gold weapon skins yo
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

In previous seasons they were intentionally holding your SR down some so you felt like you were making progress as it climbed back up post placement. It was a pretty bad idea made even worse when people got wise to it.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

I'll be in but I am too lazy to make a pick right now.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Brink

Might be the only game I ever sold back because it was so disappointing.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

I can't really think of anything from the atari or nes era but I remember my cousin teaching me scorpion's fatality in the first mortal kombat. That was so cool back then.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

ChaosTonyV4 posted...

UltiXX posted...

Liberals getting mad over a one million dollar donation when most of them haven't given shit is proof of why liberal hysteria has cost them the culture war.

Never forget that liberals are ten times more likely to steal and far more likely to lie about donating to charity. Linda Sarsour redirecting Harvey donations to her own political groups are amazing proof.

The only bait I'll take today but it's worth reminding the non-disingenuous trolls in this topic about the time Donald Trump literally collected donations and then lied about giving those donations to FUCKING VETERANS.

Yeah the man had trouble giving other peoples money to charity and and we aren't supposed to have some doubt about him following through on a pledge to give away his own money? Hell the coauthor of his Art of the Deal book doesnt think he will follow through on that pledge.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

UltiXX posted...

HaRRicH posted...

I know this isn't the most important part, but that pissing incident's gonna be proven real one day. If this scandal was a movie, the pee-tape would be the bonus ending after credits roll.

You know Buzzfeed admitted it was a fake, right

You got a link for that? Preferably one you have read.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Ashethan posted...

To be fair, a lot of those voting probably are white supremacists. I doubt they see themselves as a threat.

Yeah I would imagine the overlap to be pretty significant.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

I would be shocked if that hat doesnt already exist and we just havent seen him break it out yet.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Yeah the USA hat might make him look a little more like someone's grandpa at the family barbecue, but I want to know why the FLOTUS hat even exists? Were people somehow not going to recognize her without it or were they just not paying the proper respect?
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

I think the patch i just downloaded was 6ish and then a very minor ptr patch. Haven't seen any patch notes yet though.

I guess patch sizes are different between console and pc.


Deathmatch is now in the arcade mode. 4v4 team and 8 person free for all versions. I guess there are some character changes as well.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

The ending time for the events has been mystery for as long as I have played. The best advice I can give is to buy the stuff you just have to have a little early on that last day just in case. Then look at any boxes you can earn from the arcade or exp after the ending time as a bonus because no one really knows when anything ends.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Seems like a good way to end up with a box of phone books or an empty shell of a console with some weights super glued to the inside. How are you going to check if it works? What recourse would you have if it didnt?
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

My experience both with and against him has seen him become a pretty easy kill. The hook is easy to dance around most of the time and his fatass makes him too easy to hit.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

I understand using the Friday night news dump routine for something that might be embarrassing like the Gorka resignation. But using it for the pardon and the transgender ban basically reads like "I know this is wrong and I know we will get blasted for it but I want to do it anyway". Him leaving again is just him sticking his fingers in his ears as he runs out of the room before anyone can criticize it.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Roadhog really hasn't been fun to play at all since the nerf.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

So did he sign all this stuff on a Friday right before a hurricane makes landfall and then leave on another vacation hoping to have this all blow over while he is gone?
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

So did he think the drug was so old that they didn't test for it anymore?
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

If you wanted to make this a thing the issue wouldnt be his eyesight. It would be his inability to follow the simplest of instructions.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Raisin bran is not bad at all.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Ulti drinking that kool-aid again.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Not_an_Owl posted...

pjbasis posted...

Kinglicious posted...

Calling for an assasination, apart from incredibly immortal,

Assassination is the oldest profession they say

I thought that was prostitution?

Probably the first assassins.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Corrik posted...

LapisLazuli posted...

Corrik posted...

Think he genuinely loves America and is doing what he feels is the right thing to do.

Then I am depressed by your naivety.

You have to be really out there imo to feel that he isn't doing what he feels best. Your best just isn't what his best is.

We know he is doing what he feels is best. The problem is he only cares about what is best for him.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Corrik posted...

lordloki12 posted...

Corrik posted...

lordloki12 posted...

Corrik posted...

That American guy in Germany who got punched for doing Nazi Salutes in a bar. Did he deserve it? Probably. Sounds like a real douchebag. Does the guy who did it deserve to be arrested and booked for the crime? Yes. It is not that guys discretion to punch someone. He could have called the cops on the guy and had it taken care of. Did not have the right to take that into his own hands.


I mean, when I was younger, I was different. I felt invincible and had a fair share of brawls. It took a few years and too many times seeing the right person taking things into their own hands and ending up left in hospitals for trying to do the right thing.

The world can be scary and the legal system is there for a reason.

Nowadays if someone wants to fight with me... I just leave or ignore them. It isn't worth it. If they want to do something stupid, the cops can take care of it. That is their jobs.

And if those same people wanted to recruit people to exterminate you and your family would you leave them unchecked until they had enough people to do it?

So you are arguing they are a terrorist organization? That is for the government and enforcement to handle. If they can bag them for conspiracy to murder, that is great. You have just gotten rid of them. If you think punching or being violent with someone like that is going to make a difference or even help state their case, you are wrong. You are fueling the sensationalized fire so to speak.

I'm just asking if you would allow a group of people to talk as freely as they wan't while they recruit people to exterminate you and your family? Would you ignore them and walk away like in your brawling days analogy or would you try to convince the people around you that these people who want you dead are wrong? We already know the government will let them speak as much as they want in order to protect the first amendment. So are you going to ignore them until they kill you or maybe start a counter protest? If it were me I might hope for the counter protest.

If you are recruiting people to kill people, you are a terrorist organization. That should be dealt with by enforcement and the government. Cut and dry.

Yet the government still allows nazis and white supremacists to openly recruit. But since the government doesn't care we should just ignore them and walk away right?
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Kinglicious posted...

lordloki12 posted...

You were arguing that the people run down with a car were not innocent because they didnt go through the proper channels and had no business being in the street.

Did you also miss the part where I explicitly said I was wrong there and that those people were totally innocent?

Then you shouldnt be trying to tell ChaosTony you never posted about permits because that was damn near the top of the list when you wanted to take blame off the killer and dump it on the victim.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Kinglicious posted...

ChaosTonyV4 posted...

And calling "they didn't get the proper permit for their counter protest" "bad stuff" in the same paragraph

What are you talking about, I never once posted about permits. And the rest of your complaint is like you just stopped reading the post right there.

You were arguing that the people run down with a car were not innocent because they didnt go through the proper channels and had no business being in the street.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Corrik posted...

lordloki12 posted...

Corrik posted...

That American guy in Germany who got punched for doing Nazi Salutes in a bar. Did he deserve it? Probably. Sounds like a real douchebag. Does the guy who did it deserve to be arrested and booked for the crime? Yes. It is not that guys discretion to punch someone. He could have called the cops on the guy and had it taken care of. Did not have the right to take that into his own hands.


I mean, when I was younger, I was different. I felt invincible and had a fair share of brawls. It took a few years and too many times seeing the right person taking things into their own hands and ending up left in hospitals for trying to do the right thing.

The world can be scary and the legal system is there for a reason.

Nowadays if someone wants to fight with me... I just leave or ignore them. It isn't worth it. If they want to do something stupid, the cops can take care of it. That is their jobs.

And if those same people wanted to recruit people to exterminate you and your family would you leave them unchecked until they had enough people to do it?

So you are arguing they are a terrorist organization? That is for the government and enforcement to handle. If they can bag them for conspiracy to murder, that is great. You have just gotten rid of them. If you think punching or being violent with someone like that is going to make a difference or even help state their case, you are wrong. You are fueling the sensationalized fire so to speak.

I'm just asking if you would allow a group of people to talk as freely as they wan't while they recruit people to exterminate you and your family? Would you ignore them and walk away like in your brawling days analogy or would you try to convince the people around you that these people who want you dead are wrong? We already know the government will let them speak as much as they want in order to protect the first amendment. So are you going to ignore them until they kill you or maybe start a counter protest? If it were me I might hope for the counter protest.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Corrik posted...

That American guy in Germany who got punched for doing Nazi Salutes in a bar. Did he deserve it? Probably. Sounds like a real douchebag. Does the guy who did it deserve to be arrested and booked for the crime? Yes. It is not that guys discretion to punch someone. He could have called the cops on the guy and had it taken care of. Did not have the right to take that into his own hands.


I mean, when I was younger, I was different. I felt invincible and had a fair share of brawls. It took a few years and too many times seeing the right person taking things into their own hands and ending up left in hospitals for trying to do the right thing.

The world can be scary and the legal system is there for a reason.

Nowadays if someone wants to fight with me... I just leave or ignore them. It isn't worth it. If they want to do something stupid, the cops can take care of it. That is their jobs.

And if those same people wanted to recruit people to exterminate you and your family would you leave them unchecked until they had enough people to do it?
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Corrik posted...

Dark Young Link posted...

What's cringeworthy about it corrik?

While a Riot is taking place because supposedly racist cops killed an innocent black man is being "explained" to have happened from desperation. When it in fact turns out that a Black Cop killed a Black man who was refusing to comply to cops orders while in possession of a weapon of deadly force, a gun.

1. How are you explaining something you do not know the facts of? You aren't. You are justifying it as being okay because that is the political idealogy you choose to have.

2. Why was this being explained as proper discourse during the riot? Why wasn't the riot and violent perpetrators being condemned as wrongful and such instead of that course of action? Why were some in this topic not taking the course of action they said we should be taking today?

I from the very onset of today upon reading this have condemned the rally and said it should have not been allowed to happen. I have said how it is embarassing. And, how ALL rallies, protests, and riots of this sort should not be allowed and put down when they occur.

3. You don't explain something without proper facts and analysis. Explaining something you do not have the facts to is just you using conjecture and assumptions to make the argument you want. That is not an explanation. That is trying to justify something in the way you wish to make sense of it from your viewpoint.

People were trying to explain the whole concept of why people riot in general to you. The fact that you think it was a result of that one specific incident shows how little you took away from that discussion.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Dark Young Link posted...

What's cringeworthy about it corrik?

He thinks that explaining why something is happening is the same as agreeing with the actions.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Dark Young Link posted...

Huh, apparently he got suspended.

Though considering some of the trash he posted... *sigh* what happened to him?




Corrik posted...

If you can't remember arguments that charlotte riots were justified because african americans are working from desperation and that beating a white man on video and stealing his car keys was understandable from a cornered aspect of society,

I recall at least one person saying the former. I personally disagreed with it, and I'd like to say the majority of people did as well.

The latter? I don't remember at all.

There is a difference between an explanation for why something is happening and justifying it. Corrik never seemed to understand that during those arguments.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Wanglicious posted...

Nelson_Mandela posted...

Is there any evidence that the driver was a white supremacist murderer and not some panicked passerby? Legitimately asking

the second vid is the main argument for it, the guy basically accelerates down almost a full city block into another car. it technically could explain why he'd do such a dumb thing but that's a lot of panicking to ask someone to believe over "this was intentional."

lordloki12 posted...

In your rush to defend Nazis

you don't know what he is, i don't know what he is. but it's a good idea to not accuse people of shit, especially of one of the lowest tiers a person can be, when you don't know anything about them.

seriously, one of you complains that that i'm not willing to label the guy and identify him with such a harsh label, then a couple of you come in and use it anyway fully knowing that you don't have a damn clue what he is but saying it anyway, actively proving my point that this is why you need to report on things properly.

lordloki12 posted...

you blamed the victims by deciding it was ok to run over pedestrians. You never mentioned these "proper channels" before but if that is now a requirement then I guess anyone who doesnt get across the street before the light changes is now free game for you?

so your complaint is that i wasn't specific enough? that you didn't assume i was talking about them illegal blocking traffic when i said these people were "walking in the middle of the street, blocking traffic, and chanting that they own the streets?" are you being petty to the point where you need me to specifically state that such things are generally talking about illegal activities, otherwise it's not people blocking traffic?

and when did you stop beating your wife?

My complaint is that you thought and seem to still think blaming the people who got run down by someone in a car was a valid option at all.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]

Wanglicious posted...

lordloki12 posted...

All of these would have them blocking my ability to use the street and by the logic you have used in this topic would make it their own fault if I ran them down.

don't know how logic works in your head but no, that doesn't follow. if you're illegally blocking traffic and one of the drivers that you were blocking just has enough of it, i'm not really feeling that sorry for you. you know you shouldn't be doing this, you know it's against the law, and you know he's not actively trying to hurt you. but if you keep pushing it and he doesn't care, well, okay. you were instigating this and relying on his goodwill to not put ten tons into you.

for none of those events you listed, any of that applies. proper channels were used, expectations to walk freely are had, and if anything spreads further it's, at the very least, not an intentional blockade. none of your scenarios there are comparable to illegally blocking traffic.

...but mind you, this situation doesn't really match up to that either since he wasn't blocked at all, he specifically went to attack them. they share no fault here, that's a different line crossed too.

In your rush to defend Nazis you blamed the victims by deciding it was ok to run over pedestrians. You never mentioned these "proper channels" before but if that is now a requirement then I guess anyone who doesnt get across the street before the light changes is now free game for you? Sorry grandma you should have been a little quicker.

I'll help you out a little bit here since this just doesn't seem to compute for you. Running down random people with you car is never going to be OK.
---

[ 1 ] [ 10 ] [ 7 ] [ 12 ] [ 9 ] [ 19 ] [ 5 ]