Lurker > Punished_Blinx

the better lesson would be them moving and kids understanding that moving on is a part of life.

Yeah ok this is not at all how it was explained to me.

So it's just another show where the parents are always wrong; should've figured.

The problem with banning or even discouraging "political" discussion, is that nowadays one side can just take anything they don't want discussed and make it part of their "politics." Human rights, science, basic decency, etc. are all spun as "political" in certain contexts.

• Be TimmyQuivy
• Log into email
• Get an email from the boss to post an announcement on GameFAQs message board and then make a topic asking for feedback
• Make topics. Ctrl + C and then Ctrl V statements as per emailed instructions
• Close tab and continue on with my day

I think not being able to talk about Starship Troopers would be a sacrifice I'd be willing to make in exchange for not having to see the exact same "Are you voting for Trump or Biden?" poll topic five times every week from now until November.

it seems like it would speak to adults who have/have had kids

childless adults watching this blatant toddler show is weird af to me. there is stuff in there for adults and it's high quality entertainment for children, but it's not really all that different from sesame street in that respect imo

Just giving another perspective for a user that posted about it. They might be expecting like a Pixar-like appropriate for all ages thing. This isnt that. This is very squarely a show with a 2-5 year old intended audience, and their parents

Within a month, we won't even be the most popular social board on this website anymore

CE's endless bitterness killed this board, congratulations I hope you are happy with yourselves

90% of people would get banned within the first month..

People complain about getting moderations here is hilarious to me... This site is incredibly lax, and has been so for at least 10 years. I like the quality posts there, but you can't have your own opinion if it's against the grain. If it's controversial you will get banned. If you get banned, you can't contest it (last time I checked), and it's permanent.

This very statement has been said for over a decade

This dude who no one has ever seen before who holds a position that no would has ever heard of before drops in, neuters a community he doesn't understand at all, and then logs off for the rest of the day.

"Send us your feedback." As if you give two shits.

like 99% of gamefaqs users would get banned there, from what I hear

This site won't be making it to the days of gaming reaching its full potential. And that makes me sad.

See:

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/11-team-gamefaqs/80747428#33

I think you misunderstood it slightly. The discussion here is not the "healthy discussion" anyone is looking for, and this place is a quarantine zone, not an exclusive super cool club

How much is GameFAQs worth, ballpark range?

I need this information for when I become rich and famous

Way back in Daddy Dropoff, Bluey and Bandit had a philosophical thought on what would have happened of they didn't play wind up Bingo.
Without wind up Bingo being played:
* Bingo would not have met Lila
* Lila would not have come over to the Heeler home to play in the episode Slide
* Bingo would not have saved the caterpillar in the episode
* The butterfly would not have hatched and distracted Chilli, causing her to pull over and find the spot where Brandy was
* Muffin would not have accidentally put the coin that Bluey found earlier in the day into the binoculars
* The couple that bought the Heeler home would not have looked into the binoculars and find Winton's dads home that he just put up for sale and purchased that instead.
The Heeler family would have had to move away, causing each of them turmoil and hardship, had they not played Wind up Bingo during Daddy Dropoff.

Your reading comprehension is awful if you can't even remember what the dude you are referencing posted himself. When does "about half"=sold half?

All I said is was we have no idea how he is basing whatever numbers he came up with, and this other analyst used trophy data among others to come up with whatever they did.

How do you know? lol. I'm just taking a guess since he himself was never clear and this other analyst was using data like that. None of us know for sure, but this daniel dude never actually stated what data he was using.

So in short, the source has no concrete numbers. You could have simply said this from the start and saved yourself a whole lot of trouble, lol.

You are so emotionally invested in this that you are trying to twist what I said about some numbers not being known until later and making a durrr mega man comparison. You are so bad at this, lol.

.do I really need to explain why knowing the sales numbers for something would tell you if something sold bad or not?

Because its highly possible the game, in fact, did NOT sell half than its predecessors did since we do not know the sales numbers from a lot of regions (after all, he did say "about half", and not actually "sold half").

After all, this is still just a analyst taking a swing at various data like trophy numbers and things like that. (This trophy thing was in one of those other links, one of those 2 million click-bait ones. They were doing guesswork via data like trophies)

Yeah its his job as a analyst, but again this whole thing is still all still maybes, probables, hopefullys. Etc. since analysts aren't absolutely flawless.

Mega man 11 btw is one of these games. We straight up did not know that mega man 11 officially became the best selling mega man game in the entire series until like, 2 years later or something like that. Finally fantasy 7 obviously is a way more anticipated game, but its barely been over a month since it released. Give it time.

You made it clear already who the guy is. The rest of your post isn't needed. Where it the concrete numbers? Just say "there is none" and leave it at that. Why is this so hard?

Also posting the exact same guy you are using as a example of floundering sales posts saying "yeah nah, its not actually flopping and sales are not awful (confirmed and super verified by him by the way)" is pretty funny I can't lie*

Neither you nor the TC's ass is accurate information that is easily sourced. The problem is I looked up these sources and came up with a whole heaping pile of absolutely nothing thus me posting in this topic and the other one talking about it.

Geeeee, I dunno. What can I possibly do but WAIT ON SQUARE-ENIX's update, lmfao.

Says who? This is what I was debating from the beginning. Posters like you keep saying this but there is not a single source that has numbers for this.

Nah, it just legit annoys me when gamers do this typical thing where because they personally dislike something (Whether that is video games not being ported to the PC day one, more hate-boner towards sony doing things, or because muh FF turn based battle system, etc.) they keep doing this dishonest hate-posting thing and it just gets old. Its one thing if you just aren't into it....completely fine.

Posters doing this whole dishonest song and dance saying its doom and gloom game sold terribly see this is what they get, it shoulda' been on the peecee day one (despite having not a single clue how the game did in north america, the biggest region for video game sales)....it all comes off as pathetic coping.

There is no way the game sold well, because this is something this group of gamers do not want to hear, lol.

Ok, and if he is this reliable then you doing some mental gymnastics and trying to twist his "People have really bad reading comprehension if they think both games flopped and sales are awful." post since you yourself are emotionally invested and refuse to believe it as a "pshh, I don't speak in gamer extremes. Its just code for the game is unperforming" type of thing is completely unneeded. Just believe him in that sales or not awful, the game did not flop, and wait for square-enix to post about the game theirselves =/