Poll of the Day > Joe Biden says Voters don't deserve to know if he'll Pack the Court

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
Wanded 10/10/20 1:03:18 PM #1:	https://twitter.com/thejcoop/status/1314929793524215808?s=20 https://www.dailywire.com/news/democrat-joe-biden-voters-dont-deserve-to-know-if-im-going-to-pack-supreme-court I wonder what more don't we deserve to know... --- Puss in Boots was a good movie and it deserves more recognition <cite>Wanded posted [p:945693934] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>https://twitter.com/thejcoop/status/1314929793524215808?s=20 https://www.dailywire.com/news/democrat-joe-biden-voters-dont-deserve-to-know-if-im-going-to-pack-supreme-court I wonder what more don't we deserve to know... </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 10/10/20 1:09:38 PM #2:	Now we wait for the Dem shills to come out and explain how we're actually worthless paypigs and should be grateful for what we get from our overlords (as long as they're blue) --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:945694144] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>Now we wait for the Dem shills to come out and explain how we're actually worthless paypigs and should be grateful for what we get from our overlords (as long as they're blue)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 10/10/20 1:09:58 PM #3:	He didn't say that, he started saying that before he realized what a rabblerouser said and then corrected himself and made the statement he intended. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:945694155] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>He didn't say that, he started saying that before he realized what a rabblerouser said and then corrected himself and made the statement he intended. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FatalAccident 10/10/20 1:17:04 PM #4:	lol american politics is literally the funniest thing i have ever seen in my life --- walks away <cite>FatalAccident posted [p:945694399] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>lol american politics is literally the funniest thing i have ever seen in my life </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Wanded 10/10/20 1:17:22 PM #5:	BlackScythe0 posted... He didn't say that, he started saying that before he realized what a rabblerouser said and then corrected himself and made the statement he intended. brah --- Puss in Boots was a good movie and it deserves more recognition <cite>Wanded posted [p:945694405] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>BlackScythe0 posted... </cite> <quote>He didn't say that, he started saying that before he realized what a rabblerouser said and then corrected himself and made the statement he intended.</quote>brah </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kind9 10/10/20 1:19:16 PM #6:	Wanded posted... brah What does that mean? What's wrong with that answer? --- https://imgur.com/NkZUeFd <cite>kind9 posted [p:945694471] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>Wanded posted... </cite> <quote>brah</quote>What does that mean? What's wrong with that answer? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NeoSioType 10/10/20 1:22:43 PM #7:	But we have to vote to find out though. /s <cite>NeoSioType posted [p:945694578] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>But we have to vote to find out though. /s </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SunWuKung420 10/10/20 1:23:01 PM #8:	kind9 posted... What does that mean? What's wrong with that answer? It means his 'out of context' quoting of Biden is a false flag but he doesn't want to see it properly. --- Society is built on a mass hallucination. <cite>SunWuKung420 posted [p:945694593] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>kind9 posted... </cite> <quote>What does that mean? What's wrong with that answer?</quote> It means his 'out of context' quoting of Biden is a false flag but he doesn't want to see it properly. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 10/10/20 1:27:05 PM #9:	kind9 posted... What does that mean? What's wrong with that answer? It means he left out the part where Biden was saying "Yea I'm sure republicans want you asking me these questions to cover up what they are doing" immediately before the interviewer interrupted him with the question and he answered rapidly without fully processing what was asked and stopped before he finished the statement. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:945694701] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>kind9 posted... </cite> <quote>What does that mean? What's wrong with that answer?</quote> It means he left out the part where Biden was saying "Yea I'm sure republicans want you asking me these questions to cover up what they are doing" immediately before the interviewer interrupted him with the question and he answered rapidly without fully processing what was asked and stopped before he finished the statement. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
argonautweakend 10/10/20 1:29:01 PM #10:	Conservatives will pack the court if given the chance(see: their 180 on justices in an election year even though RBG died much closer to the election[making it more apt in 2020] than Scalia). Am I supposed to care Joe will either do what the republicans are already trying to do or not? <cite>argonautweakend posted [p:945694751] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>Conservatives will pack the court if given the chance(see: their 180 on justices in an election year even though RBG died much closer to the election[making it more apt in 2020] than Scalia). Am I supposed to care Joe will either do what the republicans are already trying to do or not? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Cacciato 10/10/20 1:31:29 PM #11:	Kyuubi4269 posted... Now we wait for the Dem shills to come out and explain how we're actually worthless paypigs and should be grateful for what we get from our overlords (as long as they're blue) Kind of a weird thing for a British person to say but okay. <cite>Cacciato posted [p:945694823] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>Kyuubi4269 posted... </cite> <quote>Now we wait for the Dem shills to come out and explain how we're actually worthless paypigs and should be grateful for what we get from our overlords (as long as they're blue)</quote>Kind of a weird thing for a British person to say but okay. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 10/10/20 1:42:23 PM #12:	BlackScythe0 posted... It means he left out the part where Biden was saying "Yea I'm sure republicans want you asking me these questions to cover up what they are doing" immediately before the interviewer interrupted him with the question and he answered rapidly without fully processing what was asked and stopped before he finished the statement. That's what you want from your President, another old man with alzheimer's who speaks quicker than he can think. Cacciato posted... Kind of a weird thing for a British person to say but okay. We literally told an overarching political force to go fuck themselves and went independent. --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:945695143] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>It means he left out the part where Biden was saying "Yea I'm sure republicans want you asking me these questions to cover up what they are doing" immediately before the interviewer interrupted him with the question and he answered rapidly without fully processing what was asked and stopped before he finished the statement.</quote> That's what you want from your President, another old man with alzheimer's who speaks quicker than he can think. Cacciato posted...</cite> <quote>Kind of a weird thing for a British person to say but okay.</quote> We literally told an overarching political force to go fuck themselves and went independent.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 10/10/20 1:44:12 PM #13:	Kyuubi4269 posted... That's what you want from your President, another old man with alzheimer's who speaks quicker than he can think. Maybe you can claim you've never done that but I have gotten heated and said things before correcting myself. I suppose you could blame Biden for letting a guy there with disingenuous questions allow him to get heated, but I imagine that is a situation we have all been. (minus the national politics stage of course) <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:945695193] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>Kyuubi4269 posted... </cite> <quote>That's what you want from your President, another old man with alzheimer's who speaks quicker than he can think.</quote> Maybe you can claim you've never done that but I have gotten heated and said things before correcting myself. I suppose you could blame Biden for letting a guy there with disingenuous questions allow him to get heated, but I imagine that is a situation we have all been. (minus the national politics stage of course) </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#14	Post #14 was unavailable or deleted.
Clench281 10/10/20 1:51:46 PM #15:	Because the answer is no and he doesn't want to piss liberal voters off. --- Take me for what I am -- who I was meant to be. And if you give a damn, take me baby, or leave me. <cite>Clench281 posted [p:945695447] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>Because the answer is no and he doesn't want to piss liberal voters off. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The_tall_midget 10/10/20 2:58:11 PM #16:	BlackScythe0 posted... Maybe you can claim you've never done that but I have gotten heated and said things before correcting myself. Funny, since this board regressives, ESPECIALLY YOU, would jump down Trump's throat if he dared to mispoke and say something of the sort if he said it. Lol, hypocrisy. --- Lol, peaceful protesters. <cite>The_tall_midget posted [p:945697627] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>BlackScythe0 posted... </cite> <quote>Maybe you can claim you've never done that but I have gotten heated and said things before correcting myself. </quote> Funny, since this board regressives, ESPECIALLY YOU, would jump down Trump's throat if he dared to mispoke and say something of the sort if he said it. Lol, hypocrisy. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Wanded 10/10/20 3:14:53 PM #17:	argonautweakend posted... Conservatives will pack the court if given the chance(see: their 180 on justices in an election year even though RBG died much closer to the election[making it more apt in 2020] than Scalia). Am I supposed to care Joe will either do what the republicans are already trying to do or not? what do you think "packing the court" means? not trying to do a gotcha i just really think that is an issue here kind9 posted... What does that mean? What's wrong with that answer? BlackScythe0 posted... It means he left out the part where Biden was saying "Yea I'm sure republicans want you asking me these questions to cover up what they are doing" immediately before the interviewer interrupted him with the question and he answered rapidly without fully processing what was asked and stopped before he finished the statement. are you people seriously this dense or are you just dishonest? Guess i'll have to break down the video as if to explain it to toddlers, which i find is a reoccurring task when talking with liberals due to common liberal traits 0:07 Interviewer says he has to ask about packing the court because that is the number 1 question he is getting 0:17 Biden asserts based on no data whatsoever that those viewers are republicans and not anyone else in order to once again run away from the question 0:24 BIDEN STOPS TALKING 0:24 Interviewer asks and i quote "well sir, don't the voters deserve to know..." 0:25 Biden INTERRUPTS the interviewer angrily with "no they don't" 0:27 Biden continues to run away from the question with whataboutism about trump which is democrats go to fallacy for the whole election apparently your claim that he interrupted biden with a question is false, anyone watching the video can clearly see he finished his non answer he was asked about voters and he answered, you saying "he was talking about republicans" is you inserting what you want to be true to save face based on nothing at all your take which is "biden is too slow for such a fast and complicated exchange, so he made a boo boo", actually means you admit biden is stupid and suffers from cognitive decline and/or dementia, you can[t eat the cake and leave it whole even if we indulge your take on it that biden is just stupid and suffers from cognitive decline (in which case he is unfit to be president anyway), ARE REPUBLICANS NOT VOTERS?lol According to polls 80% of the population disagrees with packing the court, you wanna tell me 80% of the population are republicans?....well now i know why you won't bet on the election with me lol democrat voters also wanna know the answer to that, his "it's what republicans want me to do" is a lame excuse and i can't believe you people are eating is up let alone actively shilling for it, i mean...i know you're liberals...but still also a question for you, why are you supporting and defending him not answering about what exactly he is going to do as president? isn't that important? or does that not matter? --- Puss in Boots was a good movie and it deserves more recognition <cite>Wanded posted [p:945698186] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>argonautweakend posted... </cite> <quote>Conservatives will pack the court if given the chance(see: their 180 on justices in an election year even though RBG died much closer to the election[making it more apt in 2020] than Scalia). Am I supposed to care Joe will either do what the republicans are already trying to do or not?</quote>what do you think "packing the court" means? not trying to do a gotcha i just really think that is an issue here kind9 posted... </cite> <quote>What does that mean? What's wrong with that answer?</quote> BlackScythe0 posted... </cite> <quote>It means he left out the part where Biden was saying "Yea I'm sure republicans want you asking me these questions to cover up what they are doing" immediately before the interviewer interrupted him with the question and he answered rapidly without fully processing what was asked and stopped before he finished the statement.</quote>are you people seriously this dense or are you just dishonest? Guess i'll have to break down the video as if to explain it to toddlers, which i find is a reoccurring task when talking with liberals due to common liberal traits 0:07 Interviewer says he has to ask about packing the court because that is the number 1 question he is getting 0:17 Biden asserts based on no data whatsoever that those viewers are republicans and not anyone else in order to once again run away from the question 0:24 BIDEN STOPS TALKING 0:24 Interviewer asks and i quote "well sir, don't the voters deserve to know..." 0:25 Biden INTERRUPTS the interviewer angrily with "no they don't" 0:27 Biden continues to run away from the question with whataboutism about trump which is democrats go to fallacy for the whole election apparently your claim that he interrupted biden with a question is false, anyone watching the video can clearly see he finished his non answerhe was asked about voters and he answered, you saying "he was talking about republicans" is you inserting what you want to be true to save face based on nothing at all your take which is "biden is too slow for such a fast and complicated exchange, so he made a boo boo", actually means you admit biden is stupid and suffers from cognitive decline and/or dementia, you can[t eat the cake and leave it wholeeven if we indulge your take on it that biden is just stupid and suffers from cognitive decline (in which case he is unfit to be president anyway), ARE REPUBLICANS NOT VOTERS?lolAccording to polls 80% of the population disagrees with packing the court, you wanna tell me 80% of the population are republicans?....well now i know why you won't bet on the election with me loldemocrat voters also wanna know the answer to that, his "it's what republicans want me to do" is a lame excuse and i can't believe you people are eating is up let alone actively shilling for it, i mean...i know you're liberals...but still also a question for you, why are you supporting and defending him not answering about what exactly he is going to do as president? isn't that important? or does that not matter? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Wanded 10/10/20 3:25:09 PM #18:	BlackScythe0 posted... I suppose you could blame Biden for letting a guy there with disingenuous questions allow him to get heated lol wait what, you are actually advocating that people with "questions biden doesn't like" shouldn't be there asking questions???? it's rich how you're the ones calling us "anti press authoritarians" He's done that by the way, he usually has a list of "chosen people" to ask "chosen questions" and he was giving people questions which were prepared up front to ask him another day, another case of "imma accuse republicans of what democrats are actually doing" --- Puss in Boots was a good movie and it deserves more recognition <cite>Wanded posted [p:945698516] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>BlackScythe0 posted... </cite> <quote>I suppose you could blame Biden for letting a guy there with disingenuous questions allow him to get heated</quote>lol wait what, you are actually advocating that people with "questions biden doesn't like" shouldn't be there asking questions???? it's rich how you're the ones calling us "anti press authoritarians" He's done that by the way, he usually has a list of "chosen people" to ask "chosen questions" and he was giving people questions which were prepared up front to ask him another day, another case of "imma accuse republicans of what democrats are actually doing" </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Cacciato 10/10/20 3:44:19 PM #19:	The_tall_midget posted... Funny, since this board regressives, ESPECIALLY YOU, would jump down Trump's throat if he dared to mispoke and say something of the sort if he said it. Lol, hypocrisy. But Trump doesnt do that. He just says stupid shit and then doubles down on it. <cite>Cacciato posted [p:945699141] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>The_tall_midget posted... </cite> <quote>Funny, since this board regressives, ESPECIALLY YOU, would jump down Trump's throat if he dared to mispoke and say something of the sort if he said it. Lol, hypocrisy.</quote>But Trump doesnt do that. He just says stupid shit and then doubles down on it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zareth 10/10/20 3:46:49 PM #20:	Imagine thinking Biden is left. Clench281 posted... Because the answer is no and he doesn't want to piss liberal voters off. Also this. --- It's okay, I have no idea who I am either. https://imgur.com/WOo6wcq <cite>Zareth posted [p:945699227] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>Imagine thinking Biden is left. <quote>Clench281 posted... </cite>Because the answer is no and he doesn't want to piss liberal voters off.</quote> Also this. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus_LLC 10/10/20 4:09:08 PM #21:	The fact that Biden and Harris adamantly haven't commented on it is a pretty clear indication that 9 justices are about to become 15 or 18. The only way that the government could prevent this unprecedented attack on the justice system -- excluding keeping Trump in office -- would be if the Senate refused to vote on the new picks or voted them all down. BlackScythe0 posted... He didn't say that, he started saying that before he realized what a rabblerouser said and then corrected himself and made the statement he intended. He could literally put the controversy to bed -- or mostly to bed -- if he actually stated he wouldn't do it. However, they've been asked point blank in TWO debates now and refused to answer the question. argonautweakend posted... Conservatives will pack the court if given the chance(see: their 180 on justices in an election year even though RBG died much closer to the election[making it more apt in 2020] than Scalia). Am I supposed to care Joe will either do what the republicans are already trying to do or not? That's not what packing the court is. And Republicans HAD the chance to pack the court, but they didn't. Zareth posted... Imagine thinking Biden is left. Imagine thinking Biden is anything but left, particularly when he's advocating for a good chunk of AOC's GND and proposing gun legislation changes that even BERNIE SANDERS criticized. Imagine being so far to the left on something that even Bernie Sanders is like, "Whoa, hold on a second, buddy!" Clench281 posted... Because the answer is no and he doesn't want to piss liberal voters off. With the exception of fringe extremists, liberals and leftists don't want to see it either. Even leftist propagandists like John Oliver have argued against the idea. And even the Atlantic, which heavily supports leftists, is calling them out: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/10/biden-harris-court-packing-vice-presidential-debate/616656/ --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| <cite>Zeus_LLC posted [p:945699979] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>The fact that Biden and Harris adamantly haven't commented on it is a pretty clear indication that 9 justices are about to become 15 or 18. The only way that the government could prevent this unprecedented attack on the justice system -- excluding keeping Trump in office -- would be if the Senate refused to vote on the new picks or voted them all down. BlackScythe0 posted... </cite> <quote>He didn't say that, he started saying that before he realized what a rabblerouser said and then corrected himself and made the statement he intended.</quote> He could literally put the controversy to bed -- or mostly to bed -- if he actually stated he wouldn't do it. However, they've been asked point blank in TWO debates now and refused to answer the question. argonautweakend posted... </cite> <quote>Conservatives will pack the court if given the chance(see: their 180 on justices in an election year even though RBG died much closer to the election[making it more apt in 2020] than Scalia). Am I supposed to care Joe will either do what the republicans are already trying to do or not?</quote> That's not what packing the court is. And Republicans HAD the chance to pack the court, but they didn't. Zareth posted... </cite> <quote>Imagine thinking Biden is left.</quote> Imagine thinking Biden is anything but left, particularly when he's advocating for a good chunk of AOC's GND and proposing gun legislation changes that even BERNIE SANDERS criticized. Imagine being so far to the left on something that even Bernie Sanders is like, "Whoa, hold on a second, buddy!" Clench281 posted... </cite> <quote>Because the answer is no and he doesn't want to piss liberal voters off.</quote> With the exception of fringe extremists, liberals and leftists don't want to see it either. Even leftist propagandists like John Oliver have argued against the idea. And even the Atlantic, which heavily supports leftists, is calling them out: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/10/biden-harris-court-packing-vice-presidential-debate/616656/ </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Judgmenl 10/10/20 5:52:16 PM #22:	The court-packing issue is a non-issue to try and "own the libs". Biden is right. --- You're a regular Jack Kerouac <cite>Judgmenl posted [p:945703300] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>The court-packing issue is a non-issue to try and "own the libs". Biden is right. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Clench281 10/10/20 7:18:35 PM #23:	Now, conservatives ignored Garland's nomination because 'it's an election year' while hypocritically pushing Barrett through at this point. The only defense is 'it's legally within the rules.' Expanding the court would be done legally, within the powers granted to the respective branches. --- Take me for what I am -- who I was meant to be. And if you give a damn, take me baby, or leave me. <cite>Clench281 posted [p:945705918] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>Now, conservatives ignored Garland's nomination because 'it's an election year' while hypocritically pushing Barrett through at this point. The only defense is 'it's legally within the rules.' Expanding the court would be done legally, within the powers granted to the respective branches. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus_LLC 10/10/20 7:26:31 PM #24:	Judgmenl posted... The court-packing issue is a non-issue to try and "own the libs". Biden is right. If he'd denied it even ONCE, it might be a non-issue. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| <cite>Zeus_LLC posted [p:945706160] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>Judgmenl posted... </cite> <quote>The court-packing issue is a non-issue to try and "own the libs". Biden is right.</quote> If he'd denied it even ONCE, it might be a non-issue. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The_tall_midget 10/10/20 8:09:03 PM #25:	Judgmenl posted... The court-packing issue is a non-issue to try and "own the libs". Yes, and Antifa doesn't exist, BLM aren't terrorists trash, and Biden never says the things he says. --- Lol, peaceful protesters. <cite>The_tall_midget posted [p:945707446] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>Judgmenl posted... </cite> <quote>The court-packing issue is a non-issue to try and "own the libs".</quote> Yes, and Antifa doesn't exist, BLM aren't terrorists trash, and Biden never says the things he says. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Yellow 10/10/20 8:37:49 PM #26:	I don't deserve Joe Biden. Or maybe I do. --- why am I even here <cite>Yellow posted [p:945708375] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>I don't deserve Joe Biden. Or maybe I do. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
argonautweakend 10/10/20 8:43:09 PM #27:	Well i guess i was wrong on the meaning of pack the court. Nevermind me then. <cite>argonautweakend posted [p:945708540] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>Well i guess i was wrong on the meaning of pack the court. Nevermind me then. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 10/10/20 11:39:03 PM #28:	argonautweakend posted... Well i guess i was wrong on the meaning of pack the court. Nevermind me then. Yea just to be clear there is no law dictating the number of justices. Packing the court means nominating additional justices rather than replacing retired/deceased justices as has been the norm for US history. Republicans open themselves to it being a legitimate discussion with them stealing seats. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:945713441] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>argonautweakend posted... </cite> <quote>Well i guess i was wrong on the meaning of pack the court. Nevermind me then.</quote> Yea just to be clear there is no law dictating the number of justices. Packing the court means nominating additional justices rather than replacing retired/deceased justices as has been the norm for US history. Republicans open themselves to it being a legitimate discussion with them stealing seats. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Wanded 10/10/20 11:42:27 PM #29:	BlackScythe0 posted... Republicans open themselves to it being a legitimate discussion with them stealing seats. i know you're salty and triggered but that's no reason to lie, no one is stealing anything, how are they stealing? --- Puss in Boots was a good movie and it deserves more recognition <cite>Wanded posted [p:945713527] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>BlackScythe0 posted... </cite> <quote>Republicans open themselves to it being a legitimate discussion with them stealing seats.</quote>i know you're salty and triggered but that's no reason to lie, no one is stealing anything, how are they stealing? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 10/10/20 11:47:13 PM #30:	Wanded posted... i know you're salty and triggered but that's no reason to lie, no one is stealing anything, how are they stealing? Either you can't appoint a justice in an election year in which case the current one would be stolen or you can and Gorsuch was stolen. Of the 3 Trump has had Kavanaugh the guy who did the dumbest lies (lol) will be his only legitimate pick. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:945713619] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>Wanded posted... </cite> <quote>i know you're salty and triggered but that's no reason to lie, no one is stealing anything, how are they stealing?</quote> Either you can't appoint a justice in an election year in which case the current one would be stolen or you can and Gorsuch was stolen. Of the 3 Trump has had Kavanaugh the guy who did the dumbest lies (lol) will be his only legitimate pick. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Clench281 10/10/20 11:51:54 PM #31:	BlackScythe0 posted... Either you can't appoint a justice in an election year in which case the current one would be stolen or you can and Gorsuch was stolen. Of the 3 Trump has had Kavanaugh the guy who did the dumbest lies (lol) will be his only legitimate pick. To be fair, only one would be considered stolen and the other would be considered consistent. Realistically both Garland and Barrett should both be on the bench (and Gorsuch should not) because the whole "can't replace in an election year" is silly nonsense. Nominations, so long as there's ample time to confirm with due diligence, should be allowed in all election years. That would make this appointment legitimate, but the holdup of Garland illegitimate. --- Take me for what I am -- who I was meant to be. And if you give a damn, take me baby, or leave me. <cite>Clench281 posted [p:945713732] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>BlackScythe0 posted... </cite> <quote>Either you can't appoint a justice in an election year in which case the current one would be stolen or you can and Gorsuch was stolen. Of the 3 Trump has had Kavanaugh the guy who did the dumbest lies (lol) will be his only legitimate pick.</quote> To be fair, only one would be considered stolen and the other would be considered consistent. Realistically both Garland and Barrett should both be on the bench (and Gorsuch should not) because the whole "can't replace in an election year" is silly nonsense. Nominations, so long as there's ample time to confirm with due diligence, should be allowed in all election years. That would make this appointment legitimate, but the holdup of Garland illegitimate. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 10/10/20 11:53:22 PM #32:	Clench281 posted... To be fair, only one would be considered stolen and the other would be considered consistent. Realistically both Garland and Barrett should both be on the bench (and Gorsuch should not) because the whole "can't replace in an election year" is silly nonsense. Nominations, so long as there's ample time to confirm with due diligence, should be allowed in all election years. That would make this appointment legitimate, but the holdup of Garland illegitimate. Yea thats why I said or, but I also agree the "don't replace in an election year is bull shit". Regardless if they take this 3rd seat and Biden wants to appoint 2 justices if democrats get the Senate he's got my support. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:945713775] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>Clench281 posted... </cite> <quote>To be fair, only one would be considered stolen and the other would be considered consistent. Realistically both Garland and Barrett should both be on the bench (and Gorsuch should not) because the whole "can't replace in an election year" is silly nonsense. Nominations, so long as there's ample time to confirm with due diligence, should be allowed in all election years. That would make this appointment legitimate, but the holdup of Garland illegitimate.</quote> Yea thats why I said or, but I also agree the "don't replace in an election year is bull shit". Regardless if they take this 3rd seat and Biden wants to appoint 2 justices if democrats get the Senate he's got my support. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
likehelly 10/10/20 11:56:34 PM #33:	Kyuubi4269 posted... We literally told an overarching political force to go fuck themselves and went independent. what do you think the revolutionary war was --- paint me as the villain <cite>likehelly posted [p:945713852] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>Kyuubi4269 posted... </cite> <quote>We literally told an overarching political force to go fuck themselves and went independent.</quote> what do you think the revolutionary war was </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Wanded 10/11/20 12:00:40 AM #34:	Clench281 posted... but the holdup of Garland illegitimate. why --- Puss in Boots was a good movie and it deserves more recognition <cite>Wanded posted [p:945713946] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>Clench281 posted... </cite> <quote>but the holdup of Garland illegitimate.</quote>why </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 10/11/20 1:11:06 AM #35:	BlackScythe0 posted... Either you can't appoint a justice in an election year in which case the current one would be stolen or you can and Gorsuch was stolen. Of the 3 Trump has had Kavanaugh the guy who did the dumbest lies (lol) will be his only legitimate pick. Which lies? --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:945715733] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote> Either you can't appoint a justice in an election year in which case the current one would be stolen or you can and Gorsuch was stolen. Of the 3 Trump has had Kavanaugh the guy who did the dumbest lies (lol) will be his only legitimate pick. </quote> Which lies?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fierce_Deity_08 10/11/20 10:41:08 AM #36:	FatalAccident posted... lol american politics is literally the funniest thing i have ever seen in my life Me too, and I live here! --- Official Fierce Deity in my own mind. GT: OnikaraStar, PSN: Onikara, NNID: OnikaraStar <cite>Fierce_Deity_08 posted [p:945724598] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>FatalAccident posted... </cite> <quote>lol american politics is literally the funniest thing i have ever seen in my life</quote>Me too, and I live here! </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 10/11/20 11:07:49 AM #37:	Revelation34 posted... Which lies? The lady who started a gofundme to get rich off of her Kavanaugh story and then immediately disappeared after the nomination was undoubtedly telling the truth <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:945725240] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>Revelation34 posted... </cite> <quote>Which lies?</quote>The lady who started a gofundme to get rich off of her Kavanaugh story and then immediately disappeared after the nomination was undoubtedly telling the truth </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The_tall_midget 10/11/20 1:59:07 PM #38:	OhhhJa posted... The lady who started a gofundme to get rich off of her Kavanaugh story and then immediately disappeared after the nomination was undoubtedly telling the truth But she totally proved that Kavanaugh has a temper and drank beer in college! Oh wait... Guess we'll just file another one in the Democrats "failures at proving anything worthwhile" drawer. --- It's almost like these "protests" are just an excuse for degenerates to act how they please and still think themselves to be morally superior. <cite>The_tall_midget posted [p:945730305] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>OhhhJa posted... </cite> <quote>The lady who started a gofundme to get rich off of her Kavanaugh story and then immediately disappeared after the nomination was undoubtedly telling the truth</quote> But she totally proved that Kavanaugh has a temper and drank beer in college! Oh wait... Guess we'll just file another one in the Democrats "failures at proving anything worthwhile" drawer. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kangolcone 10/11/20 2:28:40 PM #39:	Trump is literally in the process of actually doing it. Lmfao the fake outrage from the right is so laughable. --- Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi. <cite>kangolcone posted [p:945731306] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>Trump is literally in the process of actually doing it. Lmfao the fake outrage from the right is so laughable. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus_LLC 10/11/20 2:39:30 PM #40:	BlackScythe0 posted... Republicans open themselves to it being a legitimate discussion with them stealing seats. You can't pretend that blocking Merrick Garland AND nominating near the end of your term are both thefts, considering that your basis for calling the second one a theft relies on suggesting the first one was legitimate. More importantly, the process requires the president AND the senate. Contrary to what convoluted impressions you may have deluded into yourself into believing, Merrick Garland would have lost along party lines. And bear in mind that the senate has frequently factored into the judicial nomination process, including being used to keep other vacancies open for the next president. BlackScythe0 posted... Either you can't appoint a justice in an election year in which case the current one would be stolen or you can and Gorsuch was stolen. Oh, and now you're actually agreeing with me despite right before that claiming "seats" rather than a seat. BlackScythe0 posted... Of the 3 Trump has had Kavanaugh the guy who did the dumbest lies (lol) will be his only legitimate pick. ...and look, right after basically suggesting the same observation I did, you ignored your observation to double down on your wrong assertion. BlackScythe0 posted... Yea thats why I said or, but I also agree the "don't replace in an election year is bull shit". Regardless if they take this 3rd seat and Biden wants to appoint 2 justices if democrats get the Senate he's got my support. That makes no sense. Even you're essentially suggesting that only ONE seat was stolen, but you want to give Biden two seats? You're essentially making what your real argument was: You don't care whether or not anything was legit, you just want Democrats to hold sway in SCOTUS. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| <cite>Zeus_LLC posted [p:945731714] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>BlackScythe0 posted... </cite> <quote>Republicans open themselves to it being a legitimate discussion with them stealing seats.</quote> You can't pretend that blocking Merrick Garland AND nominating near the end of your term are both thefts, considering that your basis for calling the second one a theft relies on suggesting the first one was legitimate. More importantly, the process requires the president AND the senate. Contrary to what convoluted impressions you may have deluded into yourself into believing, Merrick Garland would have lost along party lines. And bear in mind that the senate has frequently factored into the judicial nomination process, including being used to keep other vacancies open for the next president. BlackScythe0 posted... </cite> <quote>Either you can't appoint a justice in an election year in which case the current one would be stolen or you can and Gorsuch was stolen.</quote> Oh, and now you're actually agreeing with me despite right before that claiming "seats" rather than a seat. BlackScythe0 posted... </cite> <quote>Of the 3 Trump has had Kavanaugh the guy who did the dumbest lies (lol) will be his only legitimate pick.</quote> ...and look, right after basically suggesting the same observation I did, you ignored your observation to double down on your wrong assertion. BlackScythe0 posted... </cite> <quote>Yea thats why I said or, but I also agree the "don't replace in an election year is bull shit". Regardless if they take this 3rd seat and Biden wants to appoint 2 justices if democrats get the Senate he's got my support.</quote> That makes no sense. Even you're essentially suggesting that only ONE seat was stolen, but you want to give Biden two seats? You're essentially making what your real argument was: You don't care whether or not anything was legit, you just want Democrats to hold sway in SCOTUS. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ClarkDuke 10/11/20 4:04:29 PM #41:	kangolcone posted... Trump is literally in the process of actually doing it. Lmfao the fake outrage from the right is so laughable. ohhja is zeus' lackey, he has to do what he he's told or else he gets the hose again, ok? --- https://imgur.com/qL0DHFI https://imgur.com/JL9rRLt https://youtu.be/dQw4w9WgXcQ <cite>ClarkDuke posted [p:945734776] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>kangolcone posted... </cite> <quote>Trump is literally in the process of actually doing it. Lmfao the fake outrage from the right is so laughable.</quote>ohhja is zeus' lackey, he has to do what he he's told or else he gets the hose again, ok? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
papercup 10/11/20 4:12:30 PM #42:	kangolcone posted... Trump is literally in the process of actually doing it. Lmfao the fake outrage from the right is so laughable. This, Trump has been packing the courts his entire presidency. Where's the outrage on the right? --- Nintendo Network ID: papercups 3DS FC: 4124 5916 9925 <cite>papercup posted [p:945735138] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>kangolcone posted... </cite> <quote>Trump is literally in the process of actually doing it. Lmfao the fake outrage from the right is so laughable.</quote> This, Trump has been packing the courts his entire presidency. Where's the outrage on the right? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 10/11/20 8:42:15 PM #43:	papercup posted... This, Trump has been packing the courts his entire presidency. Where's the outrage on the right? Citation needed. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:945745247] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>papercup posted...</cite> <quote> This, Trump has been packing the courts his entire presidency. Where's the outrage on the right? </quote> Citation needed.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 10/11/20 8:42:20 PM #44:	Zeus_LLC posted... That makes no sense. Even you're essentially suggesting that only ONE seat was stolen, but you want to give Biden two seats? You're essentially making what your real argument was: You don't care whether or not anything was legit, you just want Democrats to hold sway in SCOTUS. Play stupid games win stupid prizes. Revelation34 posted... Citation needed. Dude you're getting really fucking boring with this nonsense. They have absolutely flooded lower courts with appointments that were held up under Obama. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:945745252] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>Zeus_LLC posted... </cite> <quote>That makes no sense. Even you're essentially suggesting that only ONE seat was stolen, but you want to give Biden two seats? You're essentially making what your real argument was: You don't care whether or not anything was legit, you just want Democrats to hold sway in SCOTUS.</quote> Play stupid games win stupid prizes. Revelation34 posted... </cite> <quote>Citation needed.</quote> Dude you're getting really fucking boring with this nonsense. They have absolutely flooded lower courts with appointments that were held up under Obama. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 10/11/20 8:44:55 PM #45:	BlackScythe0 posted... Play stupid games win stupid prizes. Dude you're getting really fucking boring with this nonsense. They have absolutely flooded lower courts with appointments that were held up under Obama. This thread is specifically about the Supreme Court. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:945745369] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote> Play stupid games win stupid prizes. Dude you're getting really fucking boring with this nonsense. They have absolutely flooded lower courts with appointments that were held up under Obama. </quote> This thread is specifically about the Supreme Court.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 10/11/20 8:47:02 PM #46:	Revelation34 posted... This thread is specifically about the Supreme Court. You quoted someone saying courts. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:945745469] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>Revelation34 posted... </cite> <quote>This thread is specifically about the Supreme Court.</quote> You quoted someone saying courts. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SantaKhala 10/11/20 9:18:16 PM #47:	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ovGPYZ2dBI Pence to Harris: Are you and Biden gonna pack the court? Harris: Regurgitates an incorrect story about Abraham Lincoln. Pence: So are you going to pack the court? Harris: Let's talk about packing the court. Let's talk about packing the court. Pence: You gave me a non-answer. Biden gave me a non-answer. The answer is, yes, they are going to pack the court. Harris: Let's talk about packing the court. Trump nominated a bunch of judges and not one of them is black. Pence: Shakes head Harris: You wanna talk about packing the court, let's have that discussion. --- 'SantaKhala is the ruler, leader, and destroyer of the SC2 boards.' - ItsaMeMarioo. 'But all hail He, who destroyed the SC2 boards for some time.' - The_niblet. <cite>SantaKhala posted [p:945746627] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ovGPYZ2dBI Pence to Harris: Are you and Biden gonna pack the court? Harris: Regurgitates an incorrect story about Abraham Lincoln. Pence: So are you going to pack the court? Harris: Let's talk about packing the court. Let's talk about packing the court. Pence: You gave me a non-answer. Biden gave me a non-answer. The answer is, yes, they are going to pack the court. Harris: Let's talk about packing the court. Trump nominated a bunch of judges and not one of them is black. Pence: Shakes head Harris: You wanna talk about packing the court, let's have that discussion. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 10/11/20 9:33:17 PM #48:	SantaKhala posted... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ovGPYZ2dBI Pence to Harris: Are you and Biden gonna pack the court? Harris: Regurgitates an incorrect story about Abraham Lincoln. Pence: So are you going to pack the court? Harris: Let's talk about packing the court. Let's talk about packing the court. Pence: You gave me a non-answer. Biden gave me a non-answer. The answer is, yes, they are going to pack the court. Harris: Let's talk about packing the court. Trump nominated a bunch of judges and not one of them is black. Pence: Shakes head Harris: You wanna talk about packing the court, let's have that discussion. lol imagine trying to paint Pence in a positive light. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:945747165] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>SantaKhala posted... </cite> <quote>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ovGPYZ2dBI Pence to Harris: Are you and Biden gonna pack the court? Harris: Regurgitates an incorrect story about Abraham Lincoln. Pence: So are you going to pack the court? Harris: Let's talk about packing the court. Let's talk about packing the court. Pence: You gave me a non-answer. Biden gave me a non-answer. The answer is, yes, they are going to pack the court. Harris: Let's talk about packing the court. Trump nominated a bunch of judges and not one of them is black. Pence: Shakes head Harris: You wanna talk about packing the court, let's have that discussion.</quote> lol imagine trying to paint Pence in a positive light. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Cacciato 10/12/20 4:25:59 AM #49:	BlackScythe0 posted... You quoted someone saying courts. @Revelation34 i always enjoy seeing you bail from a topic when you get blatantly proven wrong. <cite>Cacciato posted [p:945757216] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>BlackScythe0 posted... </cite> <quote>You quoted someone saying courts.</quote>@Revelation34 i always enjoy seeing you bail from a topic when you get blatantly proven wrong. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FrndNhbrHdCEman 10/12/20 4:56:46 AM #50:	BlackScythe0 posted... lol imagine trying to paint Pence in a positive light. Thats like trying to make a dog turd with a fly on it sound appetizing. --- Official nosy neighbor and gossip https://imgur.com/uGKwGsK <cite>FrndNhbrHdCEman posted [p:945757555] in Joe Biden ... [t:79031994]...</cite> <quote>BlackScythe0 posted... </cite> <quote>lol imagine trying to paint Pence in a positive light.</quote>Thats like trying to make a dog turd with a fly on it sound appetizing. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Poll of the Day > Joe Biden says Voters don't deserve to know if he'll Pack the Court (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Joe Biden says Voters don't deserve to know if he'll Pack the Court