Poll of the Day > Watching this guy's podcast and youtube took it down while it was going on.

Topic List	Page List: 1
Judgmenl 11/10/19 9:40:57 PM #1:	This guy: https://www.youtube.com/user/LibraryOfCODRage/videos He has a 150+ Episode podcast and youtube just cut the feed mid-podcast. And they removed the previous week's podcast. What a fucking world we live in. I don't believe in 100% of what they say but at least let them say it. thousands of people watch the podcast every week. --- You're a regular Jack Kerouac <cite>Judgmenl posted [p:929955734] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>This guy: https://www.youtube.com/user/LibraryOfCODRage/videos He has a 150+ Episode podcast and youtube just cut the feed mid-podcast. And they removed the previous week's podcast. What a fucking world we live in. I don't believe in 100% of what they say but at least let them say it. thousands of people watch the podcast every week.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wwinterj25 11/10/19 9:47:38 PM #2:	Pity post. --- One who knows nothing can understand nothing. http://psnprofiles.com/wwinterj - https://imgur.com/YvP6isz <cite>wwinterj25 posted [p:929955990] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>Pity post.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 11/10/19 9:57:42 PM #3:	The Vetinari method of being an essential tyrant --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:929956397] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>The Vetinari method of being an essential tyrant</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 11/10/19 10:03:46 PM #4:	Well, looking through his videos, it's obvious why he's targeted. He's very anti establishment <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:929956656] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>Well, looking through his videos, it's obvious why he's targeted. He's very anti establishment</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GMArcturus 11/10/19 11:15:02 PM #5:	OhhhJa posted... Well, looking through his videos, it's obvious why he's targeted. He's very anti establishment You're point? Freedom of speech, motherfucker. --- Rock Me Like A Hurricane <cite>GMArcturus posted [p:929959477] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Well, looking through his videos, it's obvious why he's targeted. He's very anti establishment</quote> You're point? Freedom of speech, motherfucker.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dedbus 11/10/19 11:18:25 PM #6:	GMArcturus posted... OhhhJa posted... Well, looking through his videos, it's obvious why he's targeted. He's very anti establishment You're point? Freedom of speech, motherfucker. Now now private organization. If you don't like it surely there is another alternative. Somewhere? Anywhere? Oh. <cite>dedbus posted [p:929959614] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>GMArcturus posted...</cite> <quote>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Well, looking through his videos, it's obvious why he's targeted. He's very anti establishment</quote> You're point? Freedom of speech, motherfucker.</quote> Now now private organization. If you don't like it surely there is another alternative. Somewhere? Anywhere? Oh.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 11/10/19 11:19:28 PM #7:	dedbus posted... GMArcturus posted... OhhhJa posted... Well, looking through his videos, it's obvious why he's targeted. He's very anti establishment You're point? Freedom of speech, motherfucker. Now now private organization. If you don't like it surely there is another alternative. Somewhere? Anywhere? Oh. Doesn't apply - a publisher cannot take platform protections and vice-versa --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:929959661] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>dedbus posted...</cite> <quote>GMArcturus posted...</cite> <quote>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Well, looking through his videos, it's obvious why he's targeted. He's very anti establishment</quote> You're point? Freedom of speech, motherfucker.</quote> Now now private organization. If you don't like it surely there is another alternative. Somewhere? Anywhere? Oh.</quote> Doesn't apply - a publisher cannot take platform protections and vice-versa</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Krazy_Kirby 11/10/19 11:25:23 PM #8:	GMArcturus posted... OhhhJa posted... Well, looking through his videos, it's obvious why he's targeted. He's very anti establishment You're point? Freedom of speech, motherfucker. on a private website... --- Kill From The Shadows. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot <cite>Krazy_Kirby posted [p:929959926] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>GMArcturus posted...</cite> <quote>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Well, looking through his videos, it's obvious why he's targeted. He's very anti establishment</quote> You're point? Freedom of speech, motherfucker.</quote> on a private website...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 11/10/19 11:40:28 PM #9:	Krazy_Kirby posted... GMArcturus posted... OhhhJa posted... Well, looking through his videos, it's obvious why he's targeted. He's very anti establishment You're point? Freedom of speech, motherfucker. on a private website... This. You have no freedom of speech on a private platform. The only thing that "freedom of speech" guarentees you is that the government won't punish you for what you say and cannot compel speech from you (and even those have exceptions). Private entities, including corporation, can react to your speech however they please within the bounds of the law (including banning you from their platform). --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:929960430] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote>GMArcturus posted...</cite> <quote>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Well, looking through his videos, it's obvious why he's targeted. He's very anti establishment</quote> You're point? Freedom of speech, motherfucker.</quote> on a private website...</quote> This. You have no freedom of speech on a private platform. The only thing that "freedom of speech" guarentees you is that the government won't punish you for what you say and cannot compel speech from you (and even those have exceptions). Private entities, including corporation, can react to your speech however they please within the bounds of the law (including banning you from their platform).</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 11/10/19 11:48:38 PM #10:	How did he look exactly like I thought he would before I clicked the link --- More malicious than mischievous <cite>Mead posted [p:929960692] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>How did he look exactly like I thought he would before I clicked the link</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 11/10/19 11:49:22 PM #11:	GMArcturus posted... OhhhJa posted... Well, looking through his videos, it's obvious why he's targeted. He's very anti establishment You're point? Freedom of speech, motherfucker. Oh, you interpreted as them having my support. Not at all. Big tech and government work together to silence people and use media to validate it. I think we should all be fighting hard against big tech censorship <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:929960714] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>GMArcturus posted...</cite> <quote>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Well, looking through his videos, it's obvious why he's targeted. He's very anti establishment</quote> You're point? Freedom of speech, motherfucker.</quote> Oh, you interpreted as them having my support. Not at all. Big tech and government work together to silence people and use media to validate it. I think we should all be fighting hard against big tech censorship</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
aDirtyShisno 11/11/19 12:01:54 AM #12:	Lokarin posted... dedbus posted... GMArcturus posted... OhhhJa posted... Well, looking through his videos, it's obvious why he's targeted. He's very anti establishment You're point? Freedom of speech, motherfucker. Now now private organization. If you don't like it surely there is another alternative. Somewhere? Anywhere? Oh. Doesn't apply - a publisher cannot take platform protections and vice-versa Nobodys bothered responding to that argument since nobody seems to understand that, especially since the companies take both all the time whenever it suits them. --- Que sera, sera. Whatever happens, happens. ...and he was never heard from again. <cite>aDirtyShisno posted [p:929961092] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote>dedbus posted...</cite> <quote>GMArcturus posted...</cite> <quote>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Well, looking through his videos, it's obvious why he's targeted. He's very anti establishment</quote> You're point? Freedom of speech, motherfucker.</quote> Now now private organization. If you don't like it surely there is another alternative. Somewhere? Anywhere? Oh.</quote> Doesn't apply - a publisher cannot take platform protections and vice-versa</quote> Nobodys bothered responding to that argument since nobody seems to understand that, especially since the companies take both all the time whenever it suits them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Locke90 11/11/19 12:03:32 AM #13:	Lokarin posted... The Vetinari method of being an essential tyrant one man one vote hes one man and hes got the vote/ paraphrased of course. --- Friend code 3222-6836-6888 <cite>Locke90 posted [p:929961139] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote>The Vetinari method of being an essential tyrant</quote> one man one vote hes one man and hes got the vote/ paraphrased of course.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Destiny 11/11/19 1:57:26 AM #14:	this just sounds like artificial drama so he can get more views looking through his videos and youtube ought to just ban him because he really doesn't need to be in their platform --- it feels like someone took a crack pipe, lit it with a torch light, and threw it on a gas line there is fire everywhere. <cite>Destiny posted [p:929964048] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>this just sounds like artificial drama so he can get more views looking through his videos and youtube ought to just ban him because he really doesn't need to be in their platform</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sarcasthma 11/11/19 2:08:06 AM #15:	GMArcturus posted... OhhhJa posted... Well, looking through his videos, it's obvious why he's targeted. He's very anti establishment You're point? Freedom of speech, motherfucker. This fucking post. --- What's the difference between a pickpocket and a peeping tom? A pickpocket snatches your watch. <cite>Sarcasthma posted [p:929964292] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>GMArcturus posted...</cite> <quote>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Well, looking through his videos, it's obvious why he's targeted. He's very anti establishment</quote> You're point? Freedom of speech, motherfucker.</quote> This fucking post.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Destiny 11/11/19 2:13:21 AM #16:	it's super wrong and I bet that dude was like all "hah I fuckin GOT EM" smug --- it feels like someone took a crack pipe, lit it with a torch light, and threw it on a gas line there is fire everywhere. <cite>Destiny posted [p:929964422] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>it's super wrong and I bet that dude was like all "hah I fuckin GOT EM" smug</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kungfu Kenobi 11/11/19 3:56:25 AM #17:	darkknight109 posted... You have no freedom of speech on a private platform. For now. I can see this changing, and yes, that would be constitutional. As it is, you could never compel a platform to curate or not curate certain content. That's a constitutional non-starter. You can restrict their immunity to liability for content delivered through their service. Section 230 can be repealed or modified, and I see growing political will to do so. If we added a requirement that platforms must behave impartially to material that doesn't break the law in order to maintain their immunity from liability, we would see one of two things happen: freedom of expression would be the defacto standard on all internet platforms, or all platforms would become heavily curated "walled-gardens" with zero user content: which would be the end of all social media. I don't see the social media genie going back in the bottle. --- This album is not available to the public. Even if it were, you wouldn't wanna listen to it! <cite>Kungfu Kenobi posted [p:929966208] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>You have no freedom of speech on a private platform.</quote> For now. I can see this changing, and yes, that would be constitutional. As it is, you could never compel a platform to curate or not curate certain content. That's a constitutional non-starter. You can restrict their immunity to liability for content delivered through their service. Section 230 can be repealed or modified, and I see growing political will to do so. If we added a requirement that platforms must behave impartially to material that doesn't break the law in order to maintain their immunity from liability, we would see one of two things happen: freedom of expression would be the defacto standard on all internet platforms, or all platforms would become heavily curated "walled-gardens" with zero user content: which would be the end of all social media. I don't see the social media genie going back in the bottle.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bulbasaur 11/11/19 4:15:16 AM #18:	Kungfu Kenobi posted... For now. I can see this changing, and yes, that would be constitutional. no no it wouldn't be --- it's hard to read my thoughts i'm feeling guess they're not real then <cite>Bulbasaur posted [p:929966492] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>Kungfu Kenobi posted...</cite> <quote>For now. I can see this changing, and yes, that would be constitutional.</quote> no no it wouldn't be</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nichtcrawler X 11/11/19 6:02:34 AM #19:	Kungfu Kenobi posted... As it is, you could never compel a platform to curate or not curate certain content. I think the EU was changing that, which would inevitably suck for Youtube if the US explicitly forbids it. --- Official Teetotaller of PotD Dovie'andi se tovya sagain! <cite>Nichtcrawler X posted [p:929968026] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>Kungfu Kenobi posted...</cite> <quote>As it is, you could never compel a platform to curate or not curate certain content. </quote> I think the EU was changing that, which would inevitably suck for Youtube if the US explicitly forbids it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 11/11/19 6:42:45 AM #20:	OhhhJa posted... GMArcturus posted... OhhhJa posted... Well, looking through his videos, it's obvious why he's targeted. He's very anti establishment You're point? Freedom of speech, motherfucker. Oh, you interpreted as them having my support. Not at all. Big tech and government work together to silence people and use media to validate it. I think we should all be fighting hard against big tech censorship You don't have to fight it at all. Don't like Youtube's policies? You are completely free to start your own video sharing website and make up whatever rules you want for it. If Youtube's censorship is truly as onerous as you're implying, the free market should support you all the way. Kungfu Kenobi posted... For now. I can see this changing, and yes, that would be constitutional. No, it wouldn't be, because it would likely violate the First Amendment. Part of the First Amendment's protection is that the government cannot compel speech from you. If I do not want my platform used to magnify certain messages, the government cannot force me to air those messages over my own objections. Notably, this has business implications beyond the liability you're zeroing in on. Let's say I'm Google and I'm in a battle for eyeballs against other tech giants. Suddenly, a group of white supremacists start using my site to air their shitty views and word of that gets out to the media. At that point, I have two options - kick the fuckers off my site, or tolerate them and risk having the rest of my non-shitty users switch over to a different platform that is more willing to keep white supremacists and other forms of human trash away. If the government forces me to keep those people around, it's going to hurt my bottom line. As a business owner, I should not suffer because the government wants me to broadcast messages I do not support and which are actively harmful to my business. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:929968616] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>GMArcturus posted...</cite> <quote>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Well, looking through his videos, it's obvious why he's targeted. He's very anti establishment</quote> You're point? Freedom of speech, motherfucker.</quote> Oh, you interpreted as them having my support. Not at all. Big tech and government work together to silence people and use media to validate it. I think we should all be fighting hard against big tech censorship</quote> You don't have to fight it at all. Don't like Youtube's policies? You are completely free to start your own video sharing website and make up whatever rules you want for it. If Youtube's censorship is truly as onerous as you're implying, the free market should support you all the way. Kungfu Kenobi posted...</cite> <quote>For now. I can see this changing, and yes, that would be constitutional. </quote> No, it wouldn't be, because it would likely violate the First Amendment. Part of the First Amendment's protection is that the government cannot compel speech from you. If I do not want my platform used to magnify certain messages, the government cannot force me to air those messages over my own objections. Notably, this has business implications beyond the liability you're zeroing in on. Let's say I'm Google and I'm in a battle for eyeballs against other tech giants. Suddenly, a group of white supremacists start using my site to air their shitty views and word of that gets out to the media. At that point, I have two options - kick the fuckers off my site, or tolerate them and risk having the rest of my non-shitty users switch over to a different platform that is more willing to keep white supremacists and other forms of human trash away. If the government forces me to keep those people around, it's going to hurt my bottom line. As a business owner, I should not suffer because the government wants me to broadcast messages I do not support and which are actively harmful to my business.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#21	Post #21 was unavailable or deleted.
Mead 11/11/19 9:37:43 AM #22:	Zangulus posted... My favorite part about the OP is that he has lots of viewers so he should be heard. Fucking rofl. thousands of people cant be wrong --- More malicious than mischievous <cite>Mead posted [p:929972481] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>Zangulus posted...</cite> <quote>My favorite part about the OP is that he has lots of viewers so he should be heard. Fucking rofl.</quote> thousands of people cant be wrong</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 11/11/19 10:07:52 AM #23:	darkknight109 posted... You don't have to fight it at all. Don't like Youtube's policies? You are completely free to start your own video sharing website and make up whatever rules you want for it. If Youtube's censorship is truly as onerous as you're implying, the free market should support you all the way. Google is more than just a private company at this point. You'd have to be a fool to think it isnt <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:929973529] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>You don't have to fight it at all. Don't like Youtube's policies? You are completely free to start your own video sharing website and make up whatever rules you want for it. If Youtube's censorship is truly as onerous as you're implying, the free market should support you all the way.</quote> Google is more than just a private company at this point. You'd have to be a fool to think it isnt</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 11/11/19 10:17:45 AM #24:	The issue with Youtube is their size dominating the market creating a monopoly. Anti-consumer laws are designed to deal with companies that have too much control over their market. --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:929973883] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>The issue with Youtube is their size dominating the market creating a monopoly. Anti-consumer laws are designed to deal with companies that have too much control over their market.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 11/11/19 10:20:18 AM #25:	Google is more than just a private company at this point. Youre perfectly free to not use google or its services. --- More malicious than mischievous <cite>Mead posted [p:929973963] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote><quote> Google is more than just a private company at this point. </quote> Youre perfectly free to not use google or its services.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ParanoidObsessive 11/11/19 11:24:54 AM #26:	Mead posted... Google is more than just a private company at this point. Youre perfectly free to not use google or its services. While technically true, this also borders on being functionally bullshit. --- "Wall of Text'D!" --- oldskoolplayr76 "POwned again." --- blight family <cite>ParanoidObsessive posted [p:929976565] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted...</cite> <quote><quote> Google is more than just a private company at this point. </quote> Youre perfectly free to not use google or its services.</quote> While technically true, this also borders on being functionally bullshit.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 11/11/19 11:49:20 AM #27:	ParanoidObsessive posted... technically true The best kind of true --- More malicious than mischievous <cite>Mead posted [p:929977541] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>ParanoidObsessive posted...</cite> <quote>technically true</quote> The best kind of true </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hop103 11/11/19 12:48:14 PM #28:	Kyuubi4269 posted... The issue with Youtube is their size dominating the market creating a monopoly. Anti-consumer laws are designed to deal with companies that have too much control over their market. Not to mention Youtube breaking the law and thinking they can get away with it (violating COPPA for example). They are corporate tyrants. --- "In the name of the future moon I shall punish you"-Chibi Moon <cite>Hop103 posted [p:929980079] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>The issue with Youtube is their size dominating the market creating a monopoly. Anti-consumer laws are designed to deal with companies that have too much control over their market.</quote> Not to mention Youtube breaking the law and thinking they can get away with it (violating COPPA for example). They are corporate tyrants.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OrangeDawn 11/11/19 12:52:56 PM #29:	Mead posted... How did he look exactly like I thought he would before I clicked the link --- 3DS Friend Code: 3308-5843-0863 Town: Virginia <cite>OrangeDawn posted [p:929980287] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>How did he look exactly like I thought he would before I clicked the link</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 11/12/19 5:19:03 PM #30:	OhhhJa posted... darkknight109 posted... You don't have to fight it at all. Don't like Youtube's policies? You are completely free to start your own video sharing website and make up whatever rules you want for it. If Youtube's censorship is truly as onerous as you're implying, the free market should support you all the way. Google is more than just a private company at this point. You'd have to be a fool to think it isnt So you're saying they're a public utility then? Doesn't that mean the government's going to have to nationalize them? Sounds like an awfully left-wing idea coming from you. Anyways, unless and until that happens, yes, Google is a private company and nothing more. They owe no greater commitments to their consumers than any other private company. Their terms of service are quite clearly spelled out, and you clicked the "I agree" button when you scrolled past them while creating your account. I have absolutely zero sympathy for anyone who loses their Youtube privileges for ignoring those rules and getting the consequences that they were explicitly told about when they signed up for the 100% free service. Kyuubi4269 posted... The issue with Youtube is their size dominating the market creating a monopoly. They're not really a monopoly, though. There's plenty of other video sharing sites out there, including Facebook - not exactly a small company themselves. If you don't like Youtube, you're free to use any of the others. A massively successful company is not the same thing as a monopoly. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:930043086] in Watching t... [t:78150756]...</cite> <quote>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>You don't have to fight it at all. Don't like Youtube's policies? You are completely free to start your own video sharing website and make up whatever rules you want for it. If Youtube's censorship is truly as onerous as you're implying, the free market should support you all the way.</quote> Google is more than just a private company at this point. You'd have to be a fool to think it isnt</quote> So you're saying they're a public utility then? Doesn't that mean the government's going to have to nationalize them? Sounds like an awfully left-wing idea coming from you. Anyways, unless and until that happens, yes, Google is a private company and nothing more. They owe no greater commitments to their consumers than any other private company. Their terms of service are quite clearly spelled out, and you clicked the "I agree" button when you scrolled past them while creating your account. I have absolutely zero sympathy for anyone who loses their Youtube privileges for ignoring those rules and getting the consequences that they were explicitly told about when they signed up for the 100% free service. Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>The issue with Youtube is their size dominating the market creating a monopoly.</quote> They're not really a monopoly, though. There's plenty of other video sharing sites out there, including Facebook - not exactly a small company themselves. If you don't like Youtube, you're free to use any of the others. A massively successful company is not the same thing as a monopoly.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Poll of the Day > Watching this guy's podcast and youtube took it down while it was going on. (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Watching this guy's podcast and youtube took it down while it was going on.