Poll of the Day > This 29 y/o Blonde Teacher gets 2 YEARS for having Sex with an 18 YEAR OLD!!!

(+) Yeah! (+)

29 y/o Dirty Birdy, Jessica Storer, a Substitute Teacher at in Ohio gets 2 YEARS in Prison after she had Sex with an 18 YEAR OLD student, whom her HUSBAND gave alcohol to!!

She had sex with the adult student inside their home whom she shared with her husband, 33 y/o Derrick after they invited a group of students to come over to their house!

Judge Randall BAsinger sentenced her to 2 years after the mother of 2 plead guilty to sexual battery as the MALE student said he attempted SUICIDE because of the harassment he got from others at Pandora Gilboa High School and was bullied online for it!

The male teen said "I should have been able to trust her. I'm trying to get my life together Jessica Storer has really made the last 6 months a living hell for me. I hated it and i hated myself for doing it. She destroyed me and i'm in pain everyday"

His father also spoke about his son's attempted suicide and said "He is trying to make his way out of this. Our son is going to have to live with this for the rest of his life"

The victim said Jessica manipulated him when he spoke to her about a bad break up he was going through and he was given alcohol by the duo before he had sex with her and slept over

Jessica admits to having sex with him but said that the male teen helped himself to get alcohol and said the sexual relationship between them was a "one time thing" and fully accepted her responsibility for him drinking and not to stop him.

But said "I do feel it was consensual. It was not forced. That's where i came in saying this should be between my husband and i, and my priest and God"

Her lawyer also tried to ask to review her mental health as she was taking medication for bipolar disordr and depression..

Jessica will now have to register as a sex offender for the rest of her life and her husband plead guilty to first degree misdemeanor furnishing alcohol to a minor and he now faces up to 2 years in prison!!

Do you think this sentence was fair? let's see what people think.

Jessica and Derrick -

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/05/16/14/40636A5700000578-4511068-image-m-4_1494941453842.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/05/16/14/406386F700000578-4511068-image-a-2_1494941373674.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/05/16/14/40636A6600000578-4511068-image-a-1_1494941317403.jpg
---

She should get fired, but since he's 18 it should not be illegal. However, your title says she's going to jail while the write-up says her husband is going to jail...

If it's just a student-teacher issue then she shouldn't be a teacher any more. I don't see how this is a criminal matter.
---

should be fired, but an 18 year old is legal and is not a crime.

why is she registering as a sex offender if he was 18?
---

Why is everyone ignoring the obvious? Even if it isn't statutory rape, it is still rape.
---

SKARDAVNELNATE posted...

If it's just a student-teacher issue then she shouldn't be a teacher any more. I don't see how this is a criminal matter.

Pretty much.
---

Nichtcrawler X posted...

Why is everyone ignoring the obvious? Even if it isn't statutory rape, it is still rape.

i mean that's speculative at best based on the info in the topic. obviously that's not the full article and it is from the dailymail but it appears to be a he said, she said dispute.
---

Nichtcrawler X posted...

Even if it isn't statutory rape, it is still rape.

Where did you get that information? The write up says it was consensual.
---

SKARDAVNELNATE posted...

Nichtcrawler X posted...

Even if it isn't statutory rape, it is still rape.

Where did you get that information? The write up says it was consensual.

yeah it really seems that he was upset about the bullying that happened afterward
---

SKARDAVNELNATE posted...

Where did you get that information? The write up says it was consensual.

Sex is not a crime and therefore in itself not punished, various forms of rape are.
---

Nichtcrawler X posted...

Sex is not a crime and therefore in itself not punished, various forms of rape are.

well she was charged with sexual battery, not rape.
---

Jen0125 posted...

well she was charged with sexual battery, not rape.

Ah, legal nitpicking. What is then the difference between sexual battery and rape?
---

It's not legal nitpicking. It's legal definition.

"Sexual battery is generally defined as the non-consensual touching of another with intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of the offender. Many states will consider any sexual conduct, such as groping, touching genitals over or under clothing, etc., to be sexual battery."

"Rape is unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim." Or statutory rape.

One involves penetration. One does not.
---

Nichtcrawler X posted...

Sex is not a crime and therefore in itself not punished, various forms of rape are.

That's why I don't understand how this is a criminal matter.
---

Jen0125 posted...

It's not legal nitpicking. It's legal definition.

"Sexual battery is generally defined as the non-consensual touching of another with intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of the offender. Many states will consider any sexual conduct, such as groping, touching genitals over or under clothing, etc., to be sexual battery."

"Rape is unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim." Or statutory rape.

One involves penetration. One does not.

Penetration is not required for it to be rape. Get out of the 19th century.

If a woman knocks a guy out w/ drugs and date rapes him w/ vaginal intercourse, that is rape.
If she restrains him against his will and forces sex on him, that is rape.
If she holds a knife to his throat and forces him to have sex with her, that is rape.

As for the story, it sounds like he got inebriated and she took advantage of him. Reverse the genders, and every news story would be screaming "rape!" I see nothing about it being consensual other than her saying she "felt" it was. There's plenty of college dudes who slept w/ a drunk girl and probably "felt" it was consensual, too.
Pretty messed up that the husband could get an equivalent sentence as the rapist just for supplying alcohol, but up to 2 years seems fair. It's her sentence that's too short.

streamofthesky posted...

Jen0125 posted...

It's not legal nitpicking. It's legal definition.

"Sexual battery is generally defined as the non-consensual touching of another with intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of the offender. Many states will consider any sexual conduct, such as groping, touching genitals over or under clothing, etc., to be sexual battery."

"Rape is unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim." Or statutory rape.

One involves penetration. One does not.

Penetration is not required for it to be rape. Get out of the 19th century.

If a woman knocks a guy out w/ drugs and date rapes him w/ vaginal intercourse, that is rape.
If she restrains him against his will and forces sex on him, that is rape.
If she holds a knife to his throat and forces him to have sex with her, that is rape.

All of those include penetration? She is forcing him to penetrate her? Am I missing something?

If she doesn't force him to penetrate her it'd be sexual assault or battery because he's not being raped he's being assaulted.
---

But regardless she may have gotten convicted of sexual battery in a plea deal because it was a he said, she said scenario where they couldn't determine what factually happened by evidence.
---

Nightcrawler kills me every time he posts.

streamofthesky posted...

As for the story, it sounds like he got inebriated and she took advantage of him. Reverse the genders, and every news story would be screaming "rape!"

It's stupid regardless of gender, drink doesn't make you make stupid decisions, he made the decision willingly so he should be arrested for trying to get somebody else arrested for his own choices.

Also I like how the US has a crime of using minors as drinks cabinets.
---

Kyuubi4269 posted...

streamofthesky posted...

As for the story, it sounds like he got inebriated and she took advantage of him. Reverse the genders, and every news story would be screaming "rape!"

It's stupid regardless of gender, drink doesn't make you make stupid decisions, he made the decision willingly so he should be arrested for trying to get somebody else arrested for his own choices.

Also I like how the US has a crime of using minors as drinks cabinets.

I don't drink nor do I have any interest in someone who's plastered, and agree drinking to excess is a choice, and have no sympathy for someone who chooses to get very drunk. But the law and sensational news reports have been pretty consistent that willingly drunk college girls are victims, so the same should apply to a willingly drunk high school guy.

streamofthesky posted...

the law and sensational news reports have been pretty consistent that willingly drunk college girls are victims, so the same should apply to a willingly drunk high school guy.

The law and news are wrong, and by defending these ridiculous scenarios you are helping to embed this as acceptable instead of helping drag America in to the 21st century by not allowing blame shifting (whether religious or social).
---

Full Throttle posted...

Do you think this was fair?

Yeah been as she broke the law but it's a silly law to begin with as both are adults. Also he certainly isn't a victim. He is however a adult. Perhaps he should act like one and take some responsibility.
---

Kyuubi4269 posted...

streamofthesky posted...

the law and sensational news reports have been pretty consistent that willingly drunk college girls are victims, so the same should apply to a willingly drunk high school guy.

The law and news are wrong, and by defending these ridiculous scenarios you are helping to embed this as acceptable instead of helping drag America in to the 21st century by not allowing blame shifting (whether religious or social).

You seem awfully concerned about America when you're not American.

streamofthesky posted...

Jen0125 posted...

It's not legal nitpicking. It's legal definition.

"Sexual battery is generally defined as the non-consensual touching of another with intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of the offender. Many states will consider any sexual conduct, such as groping, touching genitals over or under clothing, etc., to be sexual battery."

"Rape is unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim." Or statutory rape.

One involves penetration. One does not.

Penetration is not required for it to be rape. Get out of the 19th century.

If a woman knocks a guy out w/ drugs and date rapes him w/ vaginal intercourse, that is rape.
If she restrains him against his will and forces sex on him, that is rape.
If she holds a knife to his throat and forces him to have sex with her, that is rape.

All 3 of the acts described involve penetration.
---

streamofthesky posted...

Kyuubi4269 posted...

streamofthesky posted...

As for the story, it sounds like he got inebriated and she took advantage of him. Reverse the genders, and every news story would be screaming "rape!"

It's stupid regardless of gender, drink doesn't make you make stupid decisions, he made the decision willingly so he should be arrested for trying to get somebody else arrested for his own choices.

Also I like how the US has a crime of using minors as drinks cabinets.

I don't drink nor do I have any interest in someone who's plastered, and agree drinking to excess is a choice, and have no sympathy for someone who chooses to get very drunk. But the law and sensational news reports have been pretty consistent that willingly drunk college girls are victims, so the same should apply to a willingly drunk high school guy.

You don't drink so you don't understand the culture or the effects of alcohol.

Alcohol does make you make decisions you would not normally make. Alcohol can turn you into somebody you're not especially when you are new to it. Alcohol also makes it very difficult to tell when you are drinking excessively. It's not just "sensationalist news". It's reality.
---

Nordini posted...

streamofthesky posted...

Kyuubi4269 posted...

streamofthesky posted...

As for the story, it sounds like he got inebriated and she took advantage of him. Reverse the genders, and every news story would be screaming "rape!"

It's stupid regardless of gender, drink doesn't make you make stupid decisions, he made the decision willingly so he should be arrested for trying to get somebody else arrested for his own choices.

Also I like how the US has a crime of using minors as drinks cabinets.

I don't drink nor do I have any interest in someone who's plastered, and agree drinking to excess is a choice, and have no sympathy for someone who chooses to get very drunk. But the law and sensational news reports have been pretty consistent that willingly drunk college girls are victims, so the same should apply to a willingly drunk high school guy.

You don't drink so you don't understand the culture or the effects of alcohol.

Alcohol does make you make decisions you would not normally make. Alcohol can turn you into somebody you're not especially when you are new to it. Alcohol also makes it very difficult to tell when you are drinking excessively. It's not just "sensationalist news". It's reality.

Unless someone spikes your beverage or similar, drinking alcohol is a choice. I understand that one loses significant cognitive function when they're drunk. That's why one has to be responsible for being careful how much one drinks and erring on the side of caution BEFORE reaching that stage.
You make it sound like a drunk driver should be forgiven because "he had no way of thinking rationally at that point."

Nordini posted...

Alcohol does make you make decisions you would not normally make.

It doesn't with me.

Nordini posted...

Alcohol can turn you into somebody you're not especially when you are new to it.

Actually alcohol makes folk show their true self.

Nordini posted...

Alcohol also makes it very difficult to tell when you are drinking excessively.

Again folk are aware when they have had a lot to drink. Even more so when they are drunk.

Nordini posted...

It's reality.

The reality you're talking about doesn't seem very realistic too me. It makes me wonder if you've ever been on a night out drinking and seen real drunk people or indeed been drunk yourself. I'm aware alcohol effects some people differently and some folk can't recall what they have done the night before but most folk are very much aware of what they are doing when drunk. The thing is the alcohol makes them not care.
---

She's hot.

Whoa whoa wait.
Statutory rape carries the same sentence as giving alcohol to a minor? That seems wrong.
---

Zareth posted...

Whoa whoa wait.
Statutory rape carries the same sentence as giving alcohol to a minor? That seems wrong.

She didn't get charged with statutory rape. And then statutory rape sentencing is often dependent on the facts of each case.
---

I thought it clearly said the victim is 18?
---

This is one of those times where I feel it is important to get the actual story and not the duckbear regurgitation of it

There is a reason he stopped posting links to it.
---

Nichtcrawler X posted...

I thought it clearly said the victim is 18?

Well you also clearly thought it said she got charged with rape when she didn't so who knows what you know
---

Jen0125 posted...

Well you also clearly thought it said she got charged with rape when she didn't so who knows what you know

That's an assumption I made based on the text and title.
---

streamofthesky posted...

Unless someone spikes your beverage or similar, drinking alcohol is a choice. I understand that one loses significant cognitive function when they're drunk. That's why one has to be responsible for being careful how much one drinks and erring on the side of caution BEFORE reaching that stage.
You make it sound like a drunk driver should be forgiven because "he had no way of thinking rationally at that point."

A drunk driver is the only one making the choice to drive. That makes them responsible for their alcohol consumption and subsequent decision to drive. Sex takes two (or more) people, however. Somebody who is borderline passed out drunk is not responsible for what somebody else does to them while they're drunk,
---