He's terrible with Josh and Booker, because neither of them ever bother to reign him in and he turns into Mark Madden. "HAW HAW LOOK AT HOW CLEVER I AM AND HOW MUCH EVERYTHING SUCKS HAW"
--
We are thought, and reality, and concept, and the unimaginable
Haguile posted... That's why he's great with them. Instead of fighting a losing battle like Lawler does, they let him do his thing then they do their thing.
But his thing is so distracting and he never shuts the **** up long enough for anyone to really put anything over the way it needs to.
Josh could be a good announcer if he weren't so timid and Booker gets lost without direction. Cole overpowers Josh at every turn and he gives Booker nothing.
My problem with Booker is that he says things that are patently false ("John Cena has really managed to get this crowd behind him now" at MITB2011, shortly after the crowd did the "Booo! Yaaaay!" punch sequence, booing Cena's punches), and gives the stupidest kayfabe explanations to things ever (one that has been particularly bothering me is his insistence whenever a young worker doesn't hook both legs that it's a rookie mistake when even the older guys don't hook both legs).
-- Ace Detective in Sir Chris' Police I assure you, my dear, all Ace Detectives are perfect gentlemen!
What is Sheamus doing at EC? I don't understand why they don't just put him in there. Seriously, who the hell should be put in that match? Who the hell else would Sheamus fight at EC anyway besides a jobber? Play it off like he's gonna go for the WHC Title at EC, and then if he wins, the WWE Title at WM and be duel champ. Obviously he won't win at EC, but it could help set up a feud to go after the WHC champ at WM.
Or is Sheamus too precious to have lose a match, even if it's a 6-man Elimination Chamber and say he randomly drew one of the opening spots?
Josh Matthews isn't timid, he just doesn't get caught up in the BS commentator arguments, so he ignores it or pays attention to what he should: the match. That's why Josh is so good, because he doesn't get caught up in that crap.
Lawler is atrocious because he is too tired by the time the shows is about 3/4 of the way down, and he has nothing amusing or interesting to say, and he can't hype up anything worth s***.
--
Xbox GT: PrivateBiscuit1 Down with Zhang. Let there be Biscuit!
- Word is that WWE has decided to put the Brodus Clay "Funkasaurus" gimmick on hold for now. While Clay was getting a positive reaction, the feeling is that Clay's wrestling was not where it needed to be to be on WWE TV. Clay had a match on Smackdown a few weeks ago with Heath Slater, which was cut from the show. It was then that the call was made that Clay needed to improve his in ring skills.
D'oh!
--
Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. http://bryandanielson.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/photo3.jpg
CM Punk dominated Miz more than the scoreboard perhaps indicated.
That's an awesome way to describe what happened in that match without completely exposing the business. Wake the **** up Miz.
Do the IC and US titles need more focus and to be featured more? If you ask the question then, to you, the answer is yes. I personally agree that both these respected titles could use some shine. Both their champions are excellent and are expected to be a significant part of WWE's future...Rhodes and Ziggler.
I think you just unintentionally said everything that needed to be said there, Jim. <______<
LOL then he went back and corrected it.
--
Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. http://bryandanielson.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/photo3.jpg
From: Lopen | #043 So I guess he was in character stasis to not expose his "bad wrestling" in hopes that he'd show improvements and he didn't in time, huh?
Kinda dumb. You'd think you'd have a good idea of the wrestling skills before redebuting a guy.
YOu'd think. But then if you can't put on a passable match with Heath Slater, king of the jobbers, that's a real problem.
--
http://img.imgcake.com/nio/81edpngej.png edwardsdv and swordz9 are basically the comedy heel tag team of this topic, why would people be taking them seriously?
From: PrivateBiscuit1 | #037 Lawler is atrocious because he is too tired by the time the shows is about 3/4 of the way down, and he has nothing amusing or interesting to say, and he can't hype up anything worth s***.
Lawler's problem is that he just doesn't care. He hasn't cared about the product in years. I mean he's got to be the highest paid commentator on the staff, so you'd think he could pretend to care, but he doesn't even do that anymore.
From: JaKyL25 | #039 - Word is that WWE has decided to put the Brodus Clay "Funkasaurus" gimmick on hold for now. While Clay was getting a positive reaction, the feeling is that Clay's wrestling was not where it needed to be to be on WWE TV. Clay had a match on Smackdown a few weeks ago with Heath Slater, which was cut from the show. It was then that the call was made that Clay needed to improve his in ring skills.
Yeah, don't bring him back until he's got talent on the same level of guys like Great Khali.
This is absolute bs. I've watched his FCW matches. There are much worse workers on the staff today. Probably whoever tried to bury him with the Funkasaurus gimmick wasn't happy that it was actually getting over.
-- Ace Detective in Sir Chris' Police http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/5299/jackiekungfu1.gif