Current Events > Supreme Court upholds a law banning sex offenders from being in public parks.

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3
thelovefist 04/19/18 5:12:48 PM #52:	FreedomEtrtment posted... https://qz.com/869499/new-evidence-says-us-sex-offender-policies-dont-work-and-are-are-actually-causing-more-crime/ Interesting to see that only a very small minority of developed countries have public sex offender registry. I am perfectly fine with doing away with it entirely provided that pedophiles are never released from prison --- N/A <cite>thelovefist posted [p:899951032] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>FreedomEtrtment posted...</cite> <quote>https://qz.com/869499/new-evidence-says-us-sex-offender-policies-dont-work-and-are-are-actually-causing-more-crime/ Interesting to see that only a very small minority of developed countries have public sex offender registry.</quote> I am perfectly fine with doing away with it entirely provided that pedophiles are never released from prison</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NibeIungsnarf 04/19/18 5:14:08 PM #53:	thelovefist posted... Pedophiles should not be considered humans the same way normal people are. They are monsters. What are you overcompensating for with this pathetic rhetoric? <cite>NibeIungsnarf posted [p:899951097] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote>Pedophiles should not be considered humans the same way normal people are. They are monsters.</quote> What are you overcompensating for with this pathetic rhetoric?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#54	Post #54 was unavailable or deleted.
#55	Post #55 was unavailable or deleted.
thelovefist 04/19/18 5:17:06 PM #56:	fenderbender321 posted... thelovefist posted... FreedomEtrtment posted... https://qz.com/869499/new-evidence-says-us-sex-offender-policies-dont-work-and-are-are-actually-causing-more-crime/ Interesting to see that only a very small minority of developed countries have public sex offender registry. I am perfectly fine with doing away with it entirely provided that pedophiles are never released from prison You'll gladly pay more in taxes to keep them locked up? Yes --- N/A <cite>thelovefist posted [p:899951258] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>fenderbender321 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FreedomEtrtment posted...</cite> <quote>https://qz.com/869499/new-evidence-says-us-sex-offender-policies-dont-work-and-are-are-actually-causing-more-crime/ Interesting to see that only a very small minority of developed countries have public sex offender registry.</quote> I am perfectly fine with doing away with it entirely provided that pedophiles are never released from prison</quote> You'll gladly pay more in taxes to keep them locked up?</quote> Yes</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thelovefist 04/19/18 5:17:40 PM #57:	Th3Truth posted... thelovefist posted... Th3Truth posted... thelovefist posted... Aristoph posted... thelovefist posted... Zanzenburger posted... The issue with this is that the bar for getting put on the sex offenders registry list is pretty low. People can get on that list for peeing outside, having consensual sex in a car, etc. They really need to tighten the leash on who gets on that list if they are making the restrictions more severe. Oh look this bullshit argument again. Oh look this complete lack of a counter-argument again. Imagine arguing for pedophiles. Imagine defending human right violations. Which is ultra funny since Canada also routinely lets murderers out and give much more lenient sentences overall than the US. Pedophiles should not be considered humans the same way normal people are. They are monsters. Imagine spewing Nazi rhetoric. Imagine associating contempt for pedophiles with Nazism... --- N/A <cite>thelovefist posted [p:899951290] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>Th3Truth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Th3Truth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Aristoph posted...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zanzenburger posted...</cite> <quote>The issue with this is that the bar for getting put on the sex offenders registry list is pretty low. People can get on that list for peeing outside, having consensual sex in a car, etc. They really need to tighten the leash on who gets on that list if they are making the restrictions more severe.</quote> Oh look this bullshit argument again.</quote> Oh look this complete lack of a counter-argument again.</quote> Imagine arguing for pedophiles.</quote> Imagine defending human right violations. Which is ultra funny since Canada also routinely lets murderers out and give much more lenient sentences overall than the US.</quote> Pedophiles should not be considered humans the same way normal people are. They are monsters.</quote> Imagine spewing Nazi rhetoric.</quote> Imagine associating contempt for pedophiles with Nazism...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
bover_87 04/19/18 5:18:26 PM #58:	I don't think lovefist understands that pedophiles are a small subset of 'sex offenders.' For pedos, fine, ban them from playgrounds and shit. Some guy who pissed on the street one night? Fuck that. --- I...I shall consume. Consume...consume everything. ~ [FFRK] rcr6 - Chosen Traveler/Forbidden Power/Divine Combo <cite>bover_87 posted [p:899951328] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote>I don't think lovefist understands that pedophiles are a small subset of 'sex offenders.' For pedos, fine, ban them from playgrounds and shit. Some guy who pissed on the street one night? Fuck that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FreedomEtrtment 04/19/18 5:18:43 PM #59:	thelovefist posted... FreedomEtrtment posted... https://qz.com/869499/new-evidence-says-us-sex-offender-policies-dont-work-and-are-are-actually-causing-more-crime/ Interesting to see that only a very small minority of developed countries have public sex offender registry. I am perfectly fine with doing away with it entirely provided that pedophiles are never released from prison What's stopping them from killing the kid to get rid of witnesses then? There's a reason why practically every judicial system in the world treats sexual molestation less harsh than murder and unlawful killings. Your personal knee-jerk reaction is your problem. <cite>FreedomEtrtment posted [p:899951343] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FreedomEtrtment posted...</cite> <quote>https://qz.com/869499/new-evidence-says-us-sex-offender-policies-dont-work-and-are-are-actually-causing-more-crime/ Interesting to see that only a very small minority of developed countries have public sex offender registry.</quote> I am perfectly fine with doing away with it entirely provided that pedophiles are never released from prison</quote> What's stopping them from killing the kid to get rid of witnesses then? There's a reason why practically every judicial system in the world treats sexual molestation less harsh than murder and unlawful killings. Your personal knee-jerk reaction is your problem.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thelovefist 04/19/18 5:20:16 PM #60:	bover_87 posted... I don't think lovefist understands that pedophiles are a small subset of 'sex offenders.' Citation needed --- N/A <cite>thelovefist posted [p:899951444] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>bover_87 posted...</cite> <quote>I don't think lovefist understands that pedophiles are a small subset of 'sex offenders.'</quote> Citation needed</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#61	Post #61 was unavailable or deleted.
ImTheMacheteGuy 04/19/18 5:23:52 PM #62:	thelovefist posted... bover_87 posted... I don't think lovefist understands that pedophiles are a small subset of 'sex offenders.' Citation needed Haha wtf? Are you suggesting all sex offenders are pedophiles? That would be some next level ignorance. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:899951624] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>bover_87 posted...</cite> <quote>I don't think lovefist understands that pedophiles are a small subset of 'sex offenders.'</quote> Citation needed</quote> Haha wtf? Are you suggesting all sex offenders are pedophiles? That would be some next level ignorance.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thelovefist 04/19/18 5:24:38 PM #63:	ImTheMacheteGuy posted... thelovefist posted... bover_87 posted... I don't think lovefist understands that pedophiles are a small subset of 'sex offenders.' Citation needed Haha wtf? Are you suggesting all sex offenders are pedophiles? That would be some next level ignorance. Citation needed --- N/A <cite>thelovefist posted [p:899951651] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>bover_87 posted...</cite> <quote>I don't think lovefist understands that pedophiles are a small subset of 'sex offenders.'</quote> Citation needed</quote> Haha wtf? Are you suggesting all sex offenders are pedophiles? That would be some next level ignorance.</quote> Citation needed</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
daftpunk_mk5 04/19/18 5:25:28 PM #64:	Hey look! A person who's served time and payed the price for a crime they committed! What should we do next? I know! Make it completely impossible for them to integrate back into society and remind them every day of their life that we think they're subhuman! --- Some say that his voice can only be heard by cats, and that he has two sets of knees... all we know is, he's called the Stig. <cite>daftpunk_mk5 posted [p:899951696] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote>Hey look! A person who's served time and payed the price for a crime they committed! What should we do next? I know! Make it completely impossible for them to integrate back into society and remind them every day of their life that we think they're subhuman!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ChopinList 04/19/18 5:27:47 PM #65:	Youngster_Joey_ posted... Sucks for Dawkins Yep. He already got kicked off facebook for being a sex offender. --- I for one welcome our new computer overlords <cite>ChopinList posted [p:899951807] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>Youngster_Joey_ posted...</cite> <quote>Sucks for Dawkins</quote> Yep. He already got kicked off facebook for being a sex offender.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Volkswagen_Bros 04/19/18 5:29:18 PM #66:	There goes Brother lovefist, mistaking pedophiles with child molesters again. --- Look! my foot is on the rope! My FOOT is on the rope. If it weren't for that ref, I would've been champion! - Alexa Bliss <cite>Volkswagen_Bros posted [p:899951891] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote>There goes Brother lovefist, mistaking pedophiles with child molesters again.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#67	Post #67 was unavailable or deleted.
Dice Power 04/19/18 5:31:24 PM #68:	thelovefist posted... fenderbender321 posted... So wait is this about pedophiles or just sex offenders? Why does everbody think sex offender = kid diddler? Because they are. The whole "I peed in a park and got put on the sex offender list!" is a red herring used by people who consistently are apologists for pedophiles. Ad hominem attacks are red herrings used by people who consistently attempt to dodge challenges to their views. You're asserting that two groups are identical. This would be false if there are people who fall into one group but not the other. Whether or not we agree with the views of the individual who suggests such a counterexample isn't particularly helpful in pondering their suggestion. <cite>Dice Power posted [p:899952003] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>fenderbender321 posted...</cite> <quote>So wait is this about pedophiles or just sex offenders? Why does everbody think sex offender = kid diddler?</quote> Because they are. The whole "I peed in a park and got put on the sex offender list!" is a red herring used by people who consistently are apologists for pedophiles.</quote> Ad hominem attacks are red herrings used by people who consistently attempt to dodge challenges to their views. You're asserting that two groups are identical. This would be false if there are people who fall into one group but not the other. Whether or not we agree with the views of the individual who suggests such a counterexample isn't particularly helpful in pondering their suggestion.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FreedomEtrtment 04/19/18 5:33:10 PM #69:	fenderbender321 posted... FreedomEtrtment posted... What's stopping them from killing the kid to get rid of witnesses then? There's a reason why practically every judicial system in the world treats sexual molestation less harsh than murder and unlawful killings. Your personal knee-jerk reaction is your problem. Great point. Criminal justice isn't so simple. If some guy decided to molest a child, then afterwards he's gonna be like "oh man, I don't wanna go to prison for life...I know, I'll just murder the child so that he can't snitch on me." Don't reply to me <cite>FreedomEtrtment posted [p:899952119] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>fenderbender321 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FreedomEtrtment posted...</cite> <quote>What's stopping them from killing the kid to get rid of witnesses then? There's a reason why practically every judicial system in the world treats sexual molestation less harsh than murder and unlawful killings. Your personal knee-jerk reaction is your problem.</quote> Great point. Criminal justice isn't so simple. If some guy decided to molest a child, then afterwards he's gonna be like "oh man, I don't wanna go to prison for life...I know, I'll just murder the child so that he can't snitch on me."</quote> Don't reply to me</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#70	Post #70 was unavailable or deleted.
FreedomEtrtment 04/19/18 5:40:27 PM #71:	Nice over the top reaction and ad hominem. You're no better than lovefist. <cite>FreedomEtrtment posted [p:899952522] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote>Nice over the top reaction and ad hominem. You're no better than lovefist.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thelovefist 04/19/18 5:42:03 PM #72:	daftpunk_mk5 posted... Hey look! A person who's served time and payed the price for a crime they committed! What should we do next? I know! Make it completely impossible for them to integrate back into society and remind them every day of their life that we think they're subhuman! Pedophiles are subhuman --- N/A <cite>thelovefist posted [p:899952624] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>daftpunk_mk5 posted...</cite> <quote>Hey look! A person who's served time and payed the price for a crime they committed! What should we do next? I know! Make it completely impossible for them to integrate back into society and remind them every day of their life that we think they're subhuman!</quote> Pedophiles are subhuman</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 04/19/18 5:42:38 PM #73:	fenderbender321 posted... Trigg3rH4ppy posted... fenderbender321 posted... As long as they are exempt from paying taxes for parks, I'm fine with this. Nah you shouldn't get a discount for diddling kids. It's not a discount for diddling kids. It's a discount for not being able to use something your taxes are paying for. Or do you just think sex offenders should be punished in every way imaginable in all aspects of their life? Most convicted sex offenders are likely to re-offend - level-3 sex offenders have a 99% recidivism rate. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:899952650] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>fenderbender321 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Trigg3rH4ppy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>fenderbender321 posted...</cite> <quote>As long as they are exempt from paying taxes for parks, I'm fine with this.</quote> Nah you shouldn't get a discount for diddling kids.</quote> It's not a discount for diddling kids. It's a discount for not being able to use something your taxes are paying for. Or do you just think sex offenders should be punished in every way imaginable in all aspects of their life?</quote> Most convicted sex offenders are likely to re-offend - level-3 sex offenders have a 99% recidivism rate.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#74	Post #74 was unavailable or deleted.
deupd_u 04/19/18 5:44:26 PM #75:	*State supreme court --- Snipers don't shoot at paper, they shoot watermelons. http://i.imgur.com/jo511lG.jpg <cite>deupd_u posted [p:899952750] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>*State supreme court</cite></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zanzenburger 04/19/18 5:44:50 PM #76:	FreedomEtrtment posted... fenderbender321 posted... FreedomEtrtment posted... What's stopping them from killing the kid to get rid of witnesses then? There's a reason why practically every judicial system in the world treats sexual molestation less harsh than murder and unlawful killings. Your personal knee-jerk reaction is your problem. Great point. Criminal justice isn't so simple. If some guy decided to molest a child, then afterwards he's gonna be like "oh man, I don't wanna go to prison for life...I know, I'll just murder the child so that he can't snitch on me." Don't reply to me This made me laugh for some reason. --- Congratulations! Your post was deemed response-worthy. <cite>Zanzenburger posted [p:899952775] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>FreedomEtrtment posted...</cite> <quote><cite>fenderbender321 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FreedomEtrtment posted...</cite> <quote>What's stopping them from killing the kid to get rid of witnesses then? There's a reason why practically every judicial system in the world treats sexual molestation less harsh than murder and unlawful killings. Your personal knee-jerk reaction is your problem.</quote> Great point. Criminal justice isn't so simple. If some guy decided to molest a child, then afterwards he's gonna be like "oh man, I don't wanna go to prison for life...I know, I'll just murder the child so that he can't snitch on me."</quote> Don't reply to me</quote> This made me laugh for some reason.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius 04/19/18 5:45:49 PM #77:	deupd_u posted... **State supreme court Ah... So there's still a chance of this going* to SCOTUS, and providing an excuse for talk-radio firehoses (and Nancy Grace) to meltdown spectacularly. That's going to be fun. <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:899952835] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>deupd_u posted...</cite> <quote><cite>***State supreme court</cite></quote> Ah... So there's still a chance of this going to SCOTUS, and providing an excuse for talk-radio firehoses (and Nancy Grace) to meltdown spectacularly. That's going to be fun.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#78	Post #78 was unavailable or deleted.
FreedomEtrtment 04/19/18 5:51:58 PM #79:	fenderbender321 posted... FreedomEtrtment posted... Nice over the top reaction and ad hominem. You're no better than lovefist. You started it with your "Dont' reply to me" bullshit. Who the fuck says that to somebody on a literal message board? Especially when that person is agreeing with you and posting an example that illustrates your point. And it's not "replying" to you anyway. It's quoting you and then adding my own thoughts. There's a difference. So I don't know, man, that's some weird behavior on your part. "He started it". Yeah, someone who is as childish and has such awful debate skills as you only hinders my point. And you're doing it intentionally too so I'm just going put you on the ignore list. <cite>FreedomEtrtment posted [p:899953193] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>fenderbender321 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FreedomEtrtment posted...</cite> <quote>Nice over the top reaction and ad hominem. You're no better than lovefist.</quote> You started it with your "Dont' reply to me" bullshit. Who the fuck says that to somebody on a literal message board? Especially when that person is agreeing with you and posting an example that illustrates your point. And it's not "replying" to you anyway. It's quoting you and then adding my own thoughts. There's a difference. So I don't know, man, that's some weird behavior on your part.</quote> "He started it". Yeah, someone who is as childish and has such awful debate skills as you only hinders my point. And you're doing it intentionally too so I'm just going put you on the ignore list.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#80	Post #80 was unavailable or deleted.
Laserion 04/19/18 6:09:23 PM #81:	@thelovefist posted... Aristoph posted... thelovefist posted... Zanzenburger posted... The issue with this is that the bar for getting put on the sex offenders registry list is pretty low. People can get on that list for peeing outside, having consensual sex in a car, etc. They really need to tighten the leash on who gets on that list if they are making the restrictions more severe. Oh look this bullshit argument again. Oh look this complete lack of a counter-argument again. Imagine arguing for pedophiles. This part was not arguing for pedophiles. It was arguing for other people put on the list of sex offenders, like two adults that were caught having sex in a car, or someone who had to pee outside. Those shouldn't be put in the same punished category as pedophiles. --- There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of". There is "would've", "should've" and "could've". <cite>Laserion posted [p:899954136] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>@thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Aristoph posted...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zanzenburger posted...</cite> <quote>The issue with this is that the bar for getting put on the sex offenders registry list is pretty low. People can get on that list for peeing outside, having consensual sex in a car, etc. They really need to tighten the leash on who gets on that list if they are making the restrictions more severe.</quote> Oh look this bullshit argument again.</quote> Oh look this complete lack of a counter-argument again.</quote> Imagine arguing for pedophiles.</quote> This part was not arguing for pedophiles. It was arguing for other people put on the list of sex offenders, like two adults that were caught having sex in a car, or someone who had to pee outside. Those shouldn't be put in the same punished category as pedophiles.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 04/19/18 6:38:29 PM #82:	thelovefist posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... thelovefist posted... bover_87 posted... I don't think lovefist understands that pedophiles are a small subset of 'sex offenders.' Citation needed Haha wtf? Are you suggesting all sex offenders are pedophiles? That would be some next level ignorance. Citation needed You need a citation to prove that not all sex offenders are pedophiles? Either you are beyond help or you're just acting like a kid who keeps saying "prove it" after every statement just to be annoying. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:899955581] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>bover_87 posted...</cite> <quote>I don't think lovefist understands that pedophiles are a small subset of 'sex offenders.'</quote> Citation needed</quote> Haha wtf? Are you suggesting all sex offenders are pedophiles? That would be some next level ignorance.</quote> Citation needed</quote> You need a citation to prove that not all sex offenders are pedophiles? Either you are beyond help or you're just acting like a kid who keeps saying "prove it" after every statement just to be annoying.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 04/19/18 6:43:39 PM #83:	Laserion posted... @thelovefist posted... Aristoph posted... thelovefist posted... Zanzenburger posted... The issue with this is that the bar for getting put on the sex offenders registry list is pretty low. People can get on that list for peeing outside, having consensual sex in a car, etc. They really need to tighten the leash on who gets on that list if they are making the restrictions more severe. Oh look this bullshit argument again. Oh look this complete lack of a counter-argument again. Imagine arguing for pedophiles. This part was not arguing for pedophiles. It was arguing for other people put on the list of sex offenders, like two adults that were caught having sex in a car, or someone who had to pee outside. Those shouldn't be put in the same punished category as pedophiles. But do you have a citation that proves those people aren't pedophiles? --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:899955860] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>Laserion posted...</cite> <quote><cite>@thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Aristoph posted...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zanzenburger posted...</cite> <quote>The issue with this is that the bar for getting put on the sex offenders registry list is pretty low. People can get on that list for peeing outside, having consensual sex in a car, etc. They really need to tighten the leash on who gets on that list if they are making the restrictions more severe.</quote> Oh look this bullshit argument again.</quote> Oh look this complete lack of a counter-argument again.</quote> Imagine arguing for pedophiles.</quote> This part was not arguing for pedophiles. It was arguing for other people put on the list of sex offenders, like two adults that were caught having sex in a car, or someone who had to pee outside. Those shouldn't be put in the same punished category as pedophiles.</quote> But do you have a citation that proves those people aren't pedophiles?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thelovefist 04/19/18 7:43:36 PM #84:	ImTheMacheteGuy posted... Laserion posted... thelovefist posted... Aristoph posted... thelovefist posted... Zanzenburger posted... The issue with this is that the bar for getting put on the sex offenders registry list is pretty low. People can get on that list for peeing outside, having consensual sex in a car, etc. They really need to tighten the leash on who gets on that list if they are making the restrictions more severe. Oh look this bullshit argument again. Oh look this complete lack of a counter-argument again. Imagine arguing for pedophiles. This part was not arguing for pedophiles. It was arguing for other people put on the list of sex offenders, like two adults that were caught having sex in a car, or someone who had to pee outside. Those shouldn't be put in the same punished category as pedophiles. But do you have a citation that proves those people aren't pedophiles? Imagine having such a poor grasp of basic reasoning and such a desperate need for attention that you ask someone to prove a negative by mentioning them... --- N/A <cite>thelovefist posted [p:899959211] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Laserion posted...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Aristoph posted...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zanzenburger posted...</cite> <quote>The issue with this is that the bar for getting put on the sex offenders registry list is pretty low. People can get on that list for peeing outside, having consensual sex in a car, etc. They really need to tighten the leash on who gets on that list if they are making the restrictions more severe.</quote> Oh look this bullshit argument again.</quote> Oh look this complete lack of a counter-argument again.</quote> Imagine arguing for pedophiles.</quote> This part was not arguing for pedophiles. It was arguing for other people put on the list of sex offenders, like two adults that were caught having sex in a car, or someone who had to pee outside. Those shouldn't be put in the same punished category as pedophiles.</quote> But do you have a citation that proves those people aren't pedophiles?</quote> Imagine having such a poor grasp of basic reasoning and such a desperate need for attention that you ask someone to prove a negative by mentioning them...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 04/19/18 7:48:24 PM #85:	thelovefist posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... Laserion posted... thelovefist posted... Aristoph posted... thelovefist posted... Zanzenburger posted... The issue with this is that the bar for getting put on the sex offenders registry list is pretty low. People can get on that list for peeing outside, having consensual sex in a car, etc. They really need to tighten the leash on who gets on that list if they are making the restrictions more severe. Oh look this bullshit argument again. Oh look this complete lack of a counter-argument again. Imagine arguing for pedophiles. This part was not arguing for pedophiles. It was arguing for other people put on the list of sex offenders, like two adults that were caught having sex in a car, or someone who had to pee outside. Those shouldn't be put in the same punished category as pedophiles. But do you have a citation that proves those people aren't pedophiles? Imagine having such a poor grasp of basic reasoning and such a desperate need for attention that you ask someone to prove a negative by mentioning them... Huh? I didn't mention you. I wasn't even talking to you. I was actually mocking you to another user. Of course you would completely ignore the post where I was talking to you. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:899959446] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Laserion posted...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Aristoph posted...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zanzenburger posted...</cite> <quote>The issue with this is that the bar for getting put on the sex offenders registry list is pretty low. People can get on that list for peeing outside, having consensual sex in a car, etc. They really need to tighten the leash on who gets on that list if they are making the restrictions more severe.</quote> Oh look this bullshit argument again.</quote> Oh look this complete lack of a counter-argument again.</quote> Imagine arguing for pedophiles.</quote> This part was not arguing for pedophiles. It was arguing for other people put on the list of sex offenders, like two adults that were caught having sex in a car, or someone who had to pee outside. Those shouldn't be put in the same punished category as pedophiles.</quote> But do you have a citation that proves those people aren't pedophiles?</quote> Imagine having such a poor grasp of basic reasoning and such a desperate need for attention that you ask someone to prove a negative by mentioning them...</quote> Huh? I didn't mention you. I wasn't even talking to you. I was actually mocking you to another user. Of course you would completely ignore the post where I was talking to you.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HotMaladorianAI 04/19/18 7:49:53 PM #86:	OwlRammer posted... bad law, this is just moving them from standing idle in the open areas where you can see what they are doing to having them stand in alleys where it's harder to keep track of them Children would probably go to a park before venturing out to an alley. --- I find your lack of faith disturbing <cite>HotMaladorianAI posted [p:899959508] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>OwlRammer posted...</cite> <quote>bad law, this is just moving them from standing idle in the open areas where you can see what they are doing to having them stand in alleys where it's harder to keep track of them</quote> Children would probably go to a park before venturing out to an alley.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 04/19/18 9:26:03 PM #87:	ImTheMacheteGuy posted... Laserion posted... @thelovefist posted... Aristoph posted... thelovefist posted... Zanzenburger posted... The issue with this is that the bar for getting put on the sex offenders registry list is pretty low. People can get on that list for peeing outside, having consensual sex in a car, etc. They really need to tighten the leash on who gets on that list if they are making the restrictions more severe. Oh look this bullshit argument again. Oh look this complete lack of a counter-argument again. Imagine arguing for pedophiles. This part was not arguing for pedophiles. It was arguing for other people put on the list of sex offenders, like two adults that were caught having sex in a car, or someone who had to pee outside. Those shouldn't be put in the same punished category as pedophiles. But do you have a citation that proves those people aren't pedophiles? I mean some of them are probably just regular rapists and not child rapists. --- https://puu.sh/tcLsT/24f4611235.png https://i.imgur.com/dQgC4kv.jpg <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:899964616] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Laserion posted...</cite> <quote><cite>@thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Aristoph posted...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zanzenburger posted...</cite> <quote>The issue with this is that the bar for getting put on the sex offenders registry list is pretty low. People can get on that list for peeing outside, having consensual sex in a car, etc. They really need to tighten the leash on who gets on that list if they are making the restrictions more severe.</quote> Oh look this bullshit argument again.</quote> Oh look this complete lack of a counter-argument again.</quote> Imagine arguing for pedophiles.</quote> This part was not arguing for pedophiles. It was arguing for other people put on the list of sex offenders, like two adults that were caught having sex in a car, or someone who had to pee outside. Those shouldn't be put in the same punished category as pedophiles.</quote> But do you have a citation that proves those people aren't pedophiles?</quote> I mean some of them are probably just regular rapists and not child rapists.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lil_Bit83 04/19/18 9:32:35 PM #88:	I halomonkey1_3_5 posted... why even let them out of jail at this point Good to hear. Also I agree with this 100% --- I'm a chick <cite>Lil_Bit83 posted [p:899964967] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote>I <cite>halomonkey1_3_5 posted...</cite> <quote>why even let them out of jail at this point</quote> Good to hear. Also I agree with this 100%</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sktgamer_13dude 04/19/18 9:35:00 PM #89:	People need to stop replying to lovefist and fender seriously. --- http://i.imgur.com/jWVrg9U.gif http://i.imgur.com/g2efUtT.jpg http://i.imgur.com/5dOwhaP.jpg http://i.imgur.com/LVdqu8J.gif Go Cougs and M's #DI4B <cite>sktgamer_13dude posted [p:899965093] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote>People need to stop replying to lovefist and fender seriously.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BarneyBosco 04/19/18 10:11:04 PM #90:	Youngster_Joey_ posted... Sucks for Dawkins He probably has a Chuck e cheese membership. --- http://celebmafia.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Ana-Ivanovic-5.jpg PSN J_Frost77 search my PSN to join the Divinity Original Sin Community <cite>BarneyBosco posted [p:899966908] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>Youngster_Joey_ posted...</cite> <quote>Sucks for Dawkins</quote> He probably has a Chuck e cheese membership.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pikachupwnage 04/19/18 10:15:44 PM #91:	bover_87 posted... I don't think lovefist understands that pedophiles are a small subset of 'sex offenders.' For pedos, fine, ban them from playgrounds and shit. Some guy who pissed on the street one night? Fuck that. This. There really should be a separate list for pedophiles from everything else. The stigma around the sex offender list is too high for how varied and sometimes trivial the things are that can get you on it. --- https://i.imgur.com/cfZmEFd.gif Even In sigs FOE! http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/665/328/d75.gif <cite>pikachupwnage posted [p:899967128] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>bover_87 posted...</cite> <quote>I don't think lovefist understands that pedophiles are a small subset of 'sex offenders.' For pedos, fine, ban them from playgrounds and shit. Some guy who pissed on the street one night? Fuck that.</quote> This. There really should be a separate list for pedophiles from everything else. The stigma around the sex offender list is too high for how varied and sometimes trivial the things are that can get you on it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SageHarpuia 04/19/18 10:20:45 PM #92:	fenderbender321 posted... SageHarpuia posted... fenderbender321 posted... Or do you just think sex offenders should be punished in every way imaginable in all aspects of their life? Yes. Why not just leave them in prison then? Why torture them? I'm not opposed to the death penalty for child molesters tbh --- "You will pay dearly for your futile resistance!" <cite>SageHarpuia posted [p:899967341] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>fenderbender321 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuia posted...</cite> <quote><cite>fenderbender321 posted...</cite> <quote>Or do you just think sex offenders should be punished in every way imaginable in all aspects of their life?</quote> Yes.</quote> Why not just leave them in prison then? Why torture them?</quote> I'm not opposed to the death penalty for child molesters tbh</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#93	Post #93 was unavailable or deleted.
ImTheMacheteGuy 04/20/18 1:02:53 AM #94:	Tyranthraxus posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... Laserion posted... @thelovefist posted... Aristoph posted... thelovefist posted... Zanzenburger posted... The issue with this is that the bar for getting put on the sex offenders registry list is pretty low. People can get on that list for peeing outside, having consensual sex in a car, etc. They really need to tighten the leash on who gets on that list if they are making the restrictions more severe. Oh look this bullshit argument again. Oh look this complete lack of a counter-argument again. Imagine arguing for pedophiles. This part was not arguing for pedophiles. It was arguing for other people put on the list of sex offenders, like two adults that were caught having sex in a car, or someone who had to pee outside. Those shouldn't be put in the same punished category as pedophiles. But do you have a citation that proves those people aren't pedophiles? I mean some of them are probably just regular rapists and not child rapists. Uhgh Whole citation .nevermind I did do thisbritght sorry :( Don't take the otbervseriously though. . --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:899973978] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Laserion posted...</cite> <quote><cite>@thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Aristoph posted...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zanzenburger posted...</cite> <quote>The issue with this is that the bar for getting put on the sex offenders registry list is pretty low. People can get on that list for peeing outside, having consensual sex in a car, etc. They really need to tighten the leash on who gets on that list if they are making the restrictions more severe.</quote> Oh look this bullshit argument again.</quote> Oh look this complete lack of a counter-argument again.</quote> Imagine arguing for pedophiles.</quote> This part was not arguing for pedophiles. It was arguing for other people put on the list of sex offenders, like two adults that were caught having sex in a car, or someone who had to pee outside. Those shouldn't be put in the same punished category as pedophiles.</quote> But do you have a citation that proves those people aren't pedophiles?</quote> I mean some of them are probably just regular rapists and not child rapists.</quote> Uhgh Whole citation .nevermind I did do thisbritght sorry :( Don't take the otbervseriously though. .</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 04/20/18 1:15:07 AM #95:	SuperMariano3 posted... Artaveus Lowe of Elgin Sounds like he'd be at home in a game of D&D. SuperMariano3 posted... Wow. 1-3 years in prison for just standing/sitting in a park that is fucked up. Yeah, never really liked the park restriction especially considering that children aren't allowed to be there unsupervised anyway and there are generally enough people that they can't get into mischief in the first place. inTaCtfuL posted... If it's true that you're seen as a sex offender for peeing in public (like behind a tree or something) and that you get all the punishments as someone who actually violated kids then that's a problem Yes, there are countless problems with the sex offender registry besides this. Granted, for certain offenders, there are a lot of great provisions since child sex offenders (ie, the ones going after the really young kids) are more dangerous than normal offenders for the simple reason that kids are less able to fend off abuse so publicly identifying them and restricting them from certain areas is a good idea. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:899974385] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>SuperMariano3 posted...</cite> <quote>Artaveus Lowe of Elgin</quote> Sounds like he'd be at home in a game of D&D. <cite>SuperMariano3 posted...</cite> <quote>Wow. 1-3 years in prison for just standing/sitting in a park that is fucked up.</quote> Yeah, never really liked the park restriction especially considering that children aren't allowed to be there unsupervised anyway and there are generally enough people that they can't get into mischief in the first place. <cite>inTaCtfuL posted...</cite> <quote>If it's true that you're seen as a sex offender for peeing in public (like behind a tree or something) and that you get all the punishments as someone who actually violated kids then that's a problem </quote> Yes, there are countless problems with the sex offender registry besides this. Granted, for certain offenders, there are a lot of great provisions since child sex offenders (ie, the ones going after the really young kids) are more dangerous than normal offenders for the simple reason that kids are less able to fend off abuse so publicly identifying them and restricting them from certain areas is a good idea.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude 04/22/18 1:54:53 AM #97:	fair, next. however, they should change what it means to be a sex offender. i.e. someone pissing in public shouldnt be classed as a sex offender --- http://www.imgur.com/oQHLBrx.jpg http://www.imgur.com/ah5IE8D.jpg http://www.imgur.com/USV84z9.jpg http://www.imgur.com/PSjlohO.jpg <cite>Rika_Furude posted [p:900085827] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote>fair, next. however, they should change what it means to be a sex offender. i.e. someone pissing in public shouldnt be classed as a sex offender</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
02fran 04/24/18 2:34:07 AM #98:	I couldn't really care less for the rights of child molesters but the law should be consistent <cite>02fran posted [p:900201949] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote>I couldn't really care less for the rights of child molesters but the law should be consistent</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#99	Post #99 was unavailable or deleted.
Endofall 04/28/18 4:06:13 AM #100:	that ain't right <cite>Endofall posted [p:900446072] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote>that ain't right</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#101	Post #101 was unavailable or deleted.
02fran 05/02/18 5:59:52 AM #102:	I couldn't really care less for the rights of child molesters but the law should be consistent <cite>02fran posted [p:900666930] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote>I couldn't really care less for the rights of child molesters but the law should be consistent</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3

Current Events > Supreme Court upholds a law banning sex offenders from being in public parks. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Supreme Court upholds a law banning sex offenders from being in public parks.