LogFAQs > #899959446

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Supreme Court upholds a law banning sex offenders from being in public parks.
ImTheMacheteGuy 04/19/18 7:48:24 PM #85:	thelovefist posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... Laserion posted... thelovefist posted... Aristoph posted... thelovefist posted... Zanzenburger posted... The issue with this is that the bar for getting put on the sex offenders registry list is pretty low. People can get on that list for peeing outside, having consensual sex in a car, etc. They really need to tighten the leash on who gets on that list if they are making the restrictions more severe. Oh look this bullshit argument again. Oh look this complete lack of a counter-argument again. Imagine arguing for pedophiles. This part was not arguing for pedophiles. It was arguing for other people put on the list of sex offenders, like two adults that were caught having sex in a car, or someone who had to pee outside. Those shouldn't be put in the same punished category as pedophiles. But do you have a citation that proves those people aren't pedophiles? Imagine having such a poor grasp of basic reasoning and such a desperate need for attention that you ask someone to prove a negative by mentioning them... Huh? I didn't mention you. I wasn't even talking to you. I was actually mocking you to another user. Of course you would completely ignore the post where I was talking to you. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:899959446] in Supreme Co... [t:76532153]...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Laserion posted...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Aristoph posted...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zanzenburger posted...</cite> <quote>The issue with this is that the bar for getting put on the sex offenders registry list is pretty low. People can get on that list for peeing outside, having consensual sex in a car, etc. They really need to tighten the leash on who gets on that list if they are making the restrictions more severe.</quote> Oh look this bullshit argument again.</quote> Oh look this complete lack of a counter-argument again.</quote> Imagine arguing for pedophiles.</quote> This part was not arguing for pedophiles. It was arguing for other people put on the list of sex offenders, like two adults that were caught having sex in a car, or someone who had to pee outside. Those shouldn't be put in the same punished category as pedophiles.</quote> But do you have a citation that proves those people aren't pedophiles?</quote> Imagine having such a poor grasp of basic reasoning and such a desperate need for attention that you ask someone to prove a negative by mentioning them...</quote> Huh? I didn't mention you. I wasn't even talking to you. I was actually mocking you to another user. Of course you would completely ignore the post where I was talking to you. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1