Lurker > majin_nemesis

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

no they are illegal to stop people from ,ruin their lifes, dying from them and hurting others

This sentence doesn't make much sense. What are you trying to convey?

Like what? Explain it.

i meant aren't instead of are, the sentence should have been

why tons of surgeries aren't allowed to be done and why there's mental health hospital to protect you from yourself

it's basically the same idea as the first sentence about drugs

No one here is advocating for anyone to destroy themselves. People are advocating for a dignified way to end their life when it's time. This is not a decision made on a whim. Just like pro-life people, you think that adults cannot make decisions for themselves regarding their own body.

You are not authority on anyone else's body.

ok but it should be only in very specific conditions and there's still things people shouldn't really be allowed at least without proving that they are mentally healthy,there's a lot of people changing their bodies due to desires that comes from them being mentally unwell

who even cares about reviews? also they might avoid reviews but it doesn't avoid public opinion also if you don't like MTX just don't buy any MTX, you are against MTX not agaisnt the game right? so why should the rest of the game suffer just because of one detail?

DarkDoc posted...
Basically if you're not happy with the way your game has been changed, you should be able to get a full refund. No question.

When they ask "do you accept these 37 pages of T&C's?", an acceptable answer is "NO."

so should the game be rereviwed and people have an option to get a full refund any time a game is patched?

--Zero- posted...

Everyone has an alt so you just lost that argument lol.

what makes you think that? and why do people need to have an alt?
btw i do have an alt but i only use it once to respond to someone after they blocked me and to make matters worse they were the TC and i couldn't even enter the topic and i regret making it and never used it again and i don't really remember how to login into it, i don't really get the point to use alts, gamefaqs isn't really that important to go trough the trouble of using alts, just post your opinion with the account you are using and deal with the consequences, you don't legally change your name and wear masks to state your opinion when talking in irl with other people so why do it here?

Youre the only one that followed up on defending that account's ignorance as if you were carrying on where they left off.

other people here have opinions similar to yours are they your alt?

Tucker Carlson: Leadership requires killing people

hey Tucker what people are you talking here and what situations requires leaders to kill people? in what context are you talking about here

Hornezz posted...

There's a rigorous process one has to go through to prove that the wish to die is voluntary and well thought out. If there's any pressure from family, doctors will not go through with it. It also needs to be a long lasting wish, not just a decision on a whim. People who are physically or mentally incapable of consenting are not allowed euthanasia either.

A friend of the Van Agt family was on a talk show a few days after their deaths and he said their children had peace with it and took comfort in knowing they died holding hands.

Because she was ill and was suffering with no chance of recovery.

You absolutely are.

funny how before you didn't had specifics on the wife and now you have, well ok i guess it's fine

TheOtherMike posted...

Yes you are.

no

--Zero- posted...

In the case of mental illness I get that they need saving from themselves to a certain extent. Youre completely wrong on everything else though.

not really

Also, I didnt know SpiritSephiroth was your alt.

?
not sure what makes you think that, i don't use alts

every country is trying to do that to every other country actually these days with the internet we can say that everyone is trying to do that to every country

DrizztLink posted...

And nobody cares about your ignorance, but look at you go.

except i'm not the one being ignorant, you people are and not only ignorant be irresponsible
Jeff_AKA_Snoopy posted...

As someone who had their wife of 11 years choose to end their life medically due to their deteriorating physical health, majin_nemesis is so terrified at the idea of someone close to him dying that he refuses to acknowledge a situation in which someone would choose to die over enduring for their sake.

I get it. My wife's decision was the most selfish decision one can make. I can caveat it, I can logic it, I can rationalize all I want. At the end of the day she made the most selfish decision one can make.

I took her to Vancouver to make that selfish decision. I supported her in getting to that point. I will take the anger, the rage, the sadness of that decision with me the rest of my life. It sucks and it's been 7 months and I'm still processing and going to therapy and counseling.

But if you can't be selfish with how your life ends... with deciding not to live in abject misery and despair and pain with no hope of recovery, when can you be? I'm sad that I couldn't provide enough happiness for my wife to live through the misery to the natural conclusion of her life. But ultimately that is on her and she has the right to make that decision.

the thing here is people aren't talking about terminal situations
people are defending people being allowed to not only kill themselves but hurt themselves without anyone being able to do anything because it would violate their freedom, i guess first responders can't save a person either because it would violate their body autonomy to do things to them that would save their life

DrizztLink posted...

Another brush I'd recommend you avoid.

nobody cares about your brushes

Kradek posted...

Maggots on a Plane

I've had it with these mf maggots on this mf plane

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Nope, there's a reason why drugs are illegal and why tons of surgeries are allowed to be done and why there's mental health hospital to protect you from yourself

bodily autonomy doesn't give you the right to do a lot of things and you people arguing like it should is why there should be more information and education on mental health, you people really want to make it okay for people to destroy themselves and their families over the childish idea of absolute freedom which is something that doesn't exist and never will
maybe that law about forcing people off social media wasn't wrong after all you people need to go outside and actually socialize with people in real life you will get how stupid you are all sounding by acting like people should do everything to their bodies

Murphiroth posted... I don't know, maybe because they were both old as fuck and wanted to go out peacefully together? The fuck is wrong with you that you'd immediately jump to "Oh she was manipulated!"

Like, the sheer egomania you have to have to think you know this is what happened is horrifying.

there's people even older that are perfectly fine with being alive the whole being old isn't an excuse

--Zero- posted...

False.

nope it's true

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

think about it why would she kill herself with him?

Murphiroth posted...

Holy meaningless speculation with literally no evidence Batman!

Gross.

so why did she went with it?

--Zero- posted...

This is unhinged CEman behavior if I ever saw it.

No one should be allowed to dictate how someone lives their life. Assisted suicide should be legal all
over. Its their body their choice.

nope it shouldn't and the whole their body their choice isn't true at all, lots of times people need to be rescued from themselves, there's a lot of things people can't be allowed to do for their own safety and their own health, the whole people should be allowed to do everything is a childish mentality from people that never seen how bad people can get and have no knowledge of how mental illnesses work

SgtBash posted... Yeah, that's a big yikes.

So that user would rather see people suffer

allowing people to kill themselves is making them and others suffer

GranTurismo posted...
What about his wife?

probably manipulated to follow him

Dark_Arbron posted... Anyone should have the right to end their life for any reason, no questions asked. This is non-negotiable.

And no, "age" and "mental competence" should not be factors. If a person wants to die, you have no right to stop them. They are the only authority on their life.

nope, that's not how it works at all ,you have the right to stop them and they will thank you for it

if things work like you want people like Dokibird would probably be dead by now and not having fun and laughing again also you forget about the suffering that suicide causes to family and friends

McSame_as_Bush posted...

Can't have that in America though because Jesus.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/former-dutch-prime-minister-and-wife-die-together-at-93_n_65cbc456e4b01f4a8b02b906

Not it's because it's freaking dumb and leads to people with depression and other mental issues to kill themselves for no reason
Not everything is about religion most people don't care about religion and morality can and exists without religion

That outfit is looks like crap

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

and again the navigation wasn't bad at all and you didn't had to press weird directions, everyone navigated every area of the games just fine, there was nothing annoying or obnoxious stop making things up

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

except there's no flaw nobody ever had a problem controlling the characters and making them go where they wanted and the areas aren't obscure and what's the problem with areas not being linear? wasn't being linear the reason why FF13 was trashed so much? does FF has to be completely linear because people don't want to explore and have multiple areas they can go? Freedom is part of why FF7-9 were so great also the indicators were optional, they didn't treated the players like they were dumb and didn't ruined immersion and were unnecessary since anyone could tell where you had to go

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

nope, there's nothing bad about the navigation

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

it's not, the navigation is good

WingsOfGood posted...

Putin: "please guys! Please don't vote Trump! I am so scared of him! ahhh uhhh"

he probably legitimately is and we all should be scared, trump is nuts

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

didn't Russia invaded and took Crimea in like 2014? which way before Trump or Biden

Alucard188 posted...

Yep. One person's experience does not invalidate another person's experience. That user may not have found it difficult, but I found it very annoying to traverse and find out where the fuck I was supposed to go, especially in the train graveyard.

it wasn't that whole sequence is just easy trial and error and finding out is part of the fun,it's not like you were playing Tomb Raider or something

VeggetaX posted...

No it's hard Why? Because I said so.

it's not i beat the game without ever using it, i don't like how it gets in the way and i end up just forgetting it's there

VeggetaX posted...

No it's hard

it's not, it's easy to see where all the ladders and doors are in the original FF7

Funkydog posted...

That's not true unfortunately.

They can't. Vast amounts of people have trouble with the basic concept of moving the camera or shooting and so need to be told point blank what to do.

yes they can the vast majority can beat games without hand holding just fine

Alucard188 posted...

Oh no, I absolutely hate when accessibility features break my immersion because I am the only person that matters. Imagine playing the original Final Fantasy VII without pointers and OSD guides to show you where all of the ladders and doors were.

it's not even hard

Funkydog posted...

Sadly most gamers miss the 'natural' attempts and even the blatant guiding so this is what is required sadly

Except none of this is required people can find and climb a ladder without an indicator being there and they don't need to be guided

Just because a person doesn't fit the mold of how women or men should look and act doesn't mean they are trans or even LGBT

Nope he's cool

well The Undertaker from WWE has wore eyeliner pretty much his whole career and nobody had a problem with it then again nobody wants to go tell him they have a problem with that

Gobstoppers12 posted...

I understand that you're arguing from a position of emotional investment, but please don't make any claims about following the science if you refuse to acknowledge the simple facts that circumcision has a strong effect in UTI and HIV transmission prevention.

Areas with high HIV prevalence and low circumcision rates saw a significant decrease in HIV rates when circumcision rates increased. If it were as easy as you say, why were HIV rates so high before?

you know what prevents HIV? a condom use it and stop cutting off a baby penis against his will, you don't own his body or his life to make that decision, it's not your decision to make

Kaldrenthebold posted...

You are mistaken.

no i'm not

Cocytus posted...

You have to have those so players don't get lost.

let them get lost,it's better then handholding them to this degree

Gobstoppers12 posted...

And it's also a situation of "if you're circumcised, your risk goes down."

Also, most of those UTIs occur in infants, and those infants can have many complications from those UTIs.

by your logic we should remove females breasts to reduce the risk of breast cancer, that would be funny a whole mutilated society due to fear of something that might never happen

dude foreskins have health benefits and all the issues can be prevented by washing and by using a condom also the whole cancer argument and UTI is bs especially UTIs,most men don't will never have those and women have those more often and they aren't dying or having that many complications that are worth cutting things off, UTI can easily be cured
just admit you lost the argument and shut up

Gobstoppers12 posted... Also, you keep using this term but it doesn't really apply here. There are several health benefits to consider in addition to the increased visual appeal.

not only it doesn't have health benefits they aren't visual appealing at all, it's just looks like a mutilated incomplete organ

Scardude posted...

America is known to sue everyone as a joke. But has anyone really sued for this?

they should and the hospital too btw

VeggetaX posted...

You must be to new to gamers

they are not this dumb or dumb at all

yeah this is treating gamers like they are dumb

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

hopefully he grows up and sues you

willythemailboy posted...

How far in advance must this alleged cancer be prevented justifies surgical removal of the tissue that may one day cause cancer? You're not preventing cancer in children because the mean age of onset of penile cancer is 67 years of age and even then it's about 1 in 100,000 men who will ever contract it at all. Roughly 1.8 million baby boys are born each year, which translates to an expected 18 cases of penile cancer 60+ years from now.

Also keep in mind that the surgery is not risk-free. A study in Toronto found over a 14 year period 1 in 10,000 neonatal circumcisions resulted in complications requiring hospitalization and one in 83,000 resulted in DEATH. Let that sink in: More babies died from circumcision in the Toronto area than would be expected to ever even get penile cancer, let alone die from it.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34973956/

Talk about the cure being worse than the disease.

More proof that circumsion is a barbaric pratice

Gobstoppers12 posted...

Evidently not very well.

Source?

here
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSBRE91D1CP/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23374102/

but you don't really need a source the head of the penis just grinding into clothes and stuff all the time is going to lose sensation compared to one that doesn't do that also you are forgetting that the foreskin itself is quite sensitive, so you are going to lose that sensitivity if you don't have one

Gobstoppers12 posted...

It's fun when people are vigorously pro-science until it comes to things they disagree with. Then scientists are wrong and preventative medical procedures are evil.

circumcision isn't to prevent anything but to appease the religions and get foreskins to use for certain business, most countries don't really do circumcisions and there's no increase in illness because of that, all the things that circumcisions are supposed to prevent can be prevented by using condoms and washing your penis with soap, but of course religions and the US culture don't want men to touch their penis to wash it or being able to masturbate, people with foreskins don't need lube to masturbate

Gobstoppers12 posted... It's extremely sensitive for me, too, but there's other skin and such that gets 'in the way' when flaccid so it doesn't cause any discomfort or difficulty. Which is why I think you're mistaken about what actually happens to people when they're circumcised.

it would be way more sensitive if your weren't circumcised

thronedfire2 posted...

baptism is stupid too

children shouldn't be indoctrinated into cults

that's another can of worms, most people believe in a certain religions not because they actually chose to believe that religion but because they born and grew in that religion

Enclave posted...

ArsGoetia posted...

why would having a medical issue that necessitated getting part of your dick cut off be better than doing it because you want to
pretty sure aint nobody wants dick cancer

Show me literally anybody who chose to get circumcised in order to reduce their odds of getting dick cancer. Remember there's no great dick cancer epidemic going on in the world.

this whole cancer argument is dumb, no men is out there removing their balls to reduce the risk of testicle cancer which is way more common then penis cancer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdOPBP9vuZA

no i'm going to use it right in the first date, if she doesn't like and goes away, that's a good thing why? because i'm much better without a psychopath that makes a big deal about a fucking phone brand

you know what else can reduce the risk? wearing a condom which you should do all the time you are having sex

Toonstrack posted...

After the best, least painful time to do it has passed?

So its ok with the young kid says they want to be circumcised? I actually don't find that disagreeable

dude you can take things for the pain especially if you are doing it at a hospital with an actual doctor like you should you are probably going to feel less pain the a baby does

also unless there's a medical reason people shouldn't be circumcised at all, it's a needless surgery in most cases

Darkinsanity1 posted...

I can agree with this also and admit that the only real reason I am for circumcision is because I prefer the way they look far more.

The part I find most frustrating is that circumcision is becoming a hot topic and is being done less now than before and it's largely because of PC bullshit. Don't overthink it because of woke nonsense, just do your kid a favor and have it done when they're a baby.

Ultimately I wish evolution would hurry up and foreskin would just disappear, now that would be the perfect dick, no scar tissue(though it mostly blends in unless you look for it or it was botched).

what in the blue hell is this bs?

do you really want to mutilate a baby's penis just because you like how that looks? there's people out there that like scars should we cut a baby's face just because they like scars?

and since when is being against circumcision woke? and no you are doing the kids a favor by not mutilating their penis with a circumcision

also here's the thing evolution wants foreskins they are there to protect the penis and has health benefits

ai123 posted... On an unrelated note, how lucrative a business is circumcision?

What do US hospitals charge for the procedure?

no only the hospitals get money from the procedure companies pay them to get the foreskins for a lot of products

yes circumcision is mutilation, i don't get why people get up in arms about the female genital mutilation thing but then act like circumcision in men is something that should be done, it's not it's sick
btw circumcision is only really big in the US and some big religious countries in most of the world it's not really something that is done
and circumcision in the US might be big due to business earning money out of foreskins, not out of concern for health, there's nothing unhealthy about having a foreskin, nothing a bath can't solve

IceCreamOnStero posted...

Because that's how relationships work. You get closer over time, not right away.

and you get close by opening up, a relationship doesn't go anywhere with this toxic masculinity incel crap of not opening up

You should have feelings. You shouldn't spill them onto relative randoms. The reason is the reason I pointed out right there in the reply you quoted without reading.

I'd advise women to do the same. Don't open up to people you aren't extremely close to. Completely gender neutral statement.

again if you are in a relationship then the person you are with isn't a stranger and you are close to them so why be afraid of open up?

also what if they use something against you? so what? you just move on they can't hurt, what can you say that they can hurt you with?

IceCreamOnStero posted...

For all the reasons already outlined in this thread. People you are not extremely close with will not care.

how are you not close to your significant other? and what reasons? all i see is weak men being afraid of having feelings not realizing that feelings makes them stronger, not too mention being deadly afraid of women saying words like lol, if a woman throws word to you then throw words to her too, two can play that game, she opens up to you too so why so why are you afraid of open up and not her?

pazzy posted...

Because you can open up to men? Even if you're straight. Like what the actual fuck?

do you know what the term significant other means? are you having romantic relationships with men if you aren't gay? i think not so you partner in a romantic relationship is going to have to be a woman are you not going to talk about her at all about your feelings?