Lurker > Wutobliteration

because that's the whole freakin' point of a dashcam?

ZCheveyo posted...

Wutobliteration posted...

Seems like he just went in to sit down and rest.

Still more than I would have done, which would be...."lay there on the sidewalk and cry".

well, depends on the severity of the situation. Depends where you got hit from the vehicle and the fortunate bounce-back impact you can get.

Men who get hit by a vehicle would usually try to brush it aside and run off since it's kinda an embarrassment to themselves. Also makes them seem more macho and s***.

of course that is, if they are not seriously injured to the point where they can hardly move.

ZCheveyo posted...

This guy gets hit by a bus and then hobbles for half a second before walking into the store next to him like nothing happened.

Seems like he just went in to sit down and rest. You can see all the passer-bys going to the doorway entrance and talking to the person

in the video, the driver never went out of his vehicle... don't know why. Probably in shock or hiding under his seat in embarassment

oh realised its in 2016

full vid

lucky the driver had a dashcam on. Otherwise he'd probably be in jail now

is it the most out of any US president ever?

It's being efficient. Unless you telling me you have trouble reading stuff you need to watch a full length video with colorful visuals and audio to understand things?

heh sounds like anime dub watchers

they can just post the script in the video description below. I know some Youtubers with enough common sense to do that. You don't lose on views since people have to click your video link anyway.

Also half the things people say in videos are nonsensical, irrelevant crap just spewing out their mouths. It just adds unnecessary filler. For instance, AngryJoe maybe? People like saying his reviews are good and detailed.
Yeah well, I'm not gonna sit down and listen to his blahblahblah and waste 15 minutes of my life when i could just read finish a text review by other sites and get to the damn point in just a few minutes. Or just do what some review sites do. List a summary of pros and cons. The end. 'nuff said.

i never understood the rationale behind this. What's so productive about watching a video of a person talking at his webcam for 20 long minutes about some topic or watching a ''how-to'' guide for something when you could have just read a wall of text explaining the same topic but getting to the damn point in just 1 minute or so?

I'm gonna waste 20 minutes of my time just for that s****. Seriously, why do most people resort to YT videos for? Are they illiterate or something? Can't write it down in words?

recently he spelled the word 'heal' as 'heel'. Again. For the third time.

And of course Trumptards bash the news for reporting it like it's some minor thing no one should even dare talk about. Oh sure, it's totally normal for world leaders to make 7-year old spelling mistakes now because it's totally NORMAL and DONT DARE journalists do their jobs of letting the world know. If any other world leader always made such childish mistakes, let alone ridiculous rants on twitter, these same people would be taking to bashing them. Let alone if it was Hillary.


But when it comes to Trump, suddenly all these s**** becomes totally OK in their book. Their logic suddenly becomes ''oh well, everyone makes mistakes!'' instead of ''this is shameful for someone of such important authority and the president of USA nonetheless!''

Trumptards have a clearly incomprehensible level of bias

It's to show respect and formality since you're going into a holy place.

Brains: You're now a complete genius in a few select fields of study of your choice. Suddenly you know everything and your IQ has gone up leaps and bounds.

Brawns: You now have a very muscular, permanent peak condition body of your maximum strength potential with low bodyfat and all that. This is a body that you don't to worry about maintaining, even if you don't bother going to the gym. Kinda like Superman

If you could choose between these two, which would you pick?

those youtubers with as little as less than a hundred views on their videos...with such a mere amount of subscribers it would make a baby cry.
What keeps them continuing to upload and make videos? I see some with even over a 100+ videos. Why would you spend so much time and effort making YT videos barely anyone watches? Is it worth it?

just curious

they'll probably casualise it to the point where you can't even customise character appearances anymore

http://www.wftv.com/news/local/central-florida-businessman-accused-of-illegally-adopting-filipino-girl-for-sex/580827038

quite an interesting case. Is it really ''forced sex'' if the girls is a willing participant though? Maybe you could argue she may have been indoctrinated at such a young age but now this is how she feels anyway.

How is this really a crime then, when the victim is not really a victim who is suffering?

hop up and down like a bunny for 10 seconds every day. Remember to do this consistently for effective results

MegaButterfree posted...

So they make the name longer & get rid of the unique black label? Seems stupid.

it's not. There's alot of ignorant people out there that just think Coke Zero is some Coke taste variant. They don't know it's a diet coke since its never clearly stated anywhere on the drink except in small nutrition labels that who bothers reading?

Cj_WlLL_VVlN posted...

Gold... Says ability to not that it always is like that? Make money I need and then stop.

you can't stop. You have to always pee like a regular person does. You'll pee gold for the rest of your life. And endure that pain for the rest of your life too.

DocileOrangeCup posted...

Who would actually pick the gold one?

PEOPLE WHO ARE MAN ENOUGH TO TOLERATE THE PAIN, MAYBE?!

you can rich really fast with all the unlimited gold you can spew out of your birdie, but everytime you pee, it HURTS REALLY. REALLY. BAD.
Like a woman giving birth kind of bad.

which do you choose?

lol I've seen enough. Was hoping to see at least some rational argument gun supporters can have on their cause. Turns out, really, barely at all.

ToonLinkWithGun posted...

So TC came in trying to use someone's personal tragedy to push his anti gun agenda, that blew up in his face, and now he's just being nonsensical and saying things that aren't true like dems don't want to affect civilian gun laws.

http://www.npr.org/2017/02/02/513126985/house-votes-to-overturn-obama-rule-restricting-gun-sales-to-mentally-ill

try reading the news sometimes. It's good for you.

MattSFfrd posted...

Wutobliteration posted...

I'm still waiting for anyone to answer this

MattSFfrd posted...

because I fucking can, and there's nothing you can do about it.

good to see more childish remarks. Shows alot about the argument gun supporters have on them and overall, their very basis of logic.

FrenchCrunch posted...

Wutobliteration posted...

FrenchCrunch posted...

i dont see any real reason people own guns. sucks but it's never gonna change, it's too ingrained in our country

I'm still waiting for anyone to answer this

It's amusing how gun-rights supporters are protesting against a law that does NOT even affect them.

theyre right though. just because there's no good reason doesnt mean they shouldnt be able to. it's their right as an american - they dont have to need a gun to want/own one

the whole point of my topic was about gun laws in the country, not whether everyone suddenly shouldn't have guns. And the law proposed I was referring to was the one Obama handed down the last time which only aimed to curb gun accessibility to some very specific groups of people.

None of whom 99% of gun-supporters would even be affected AT ALL.

FrenchCrunch posted...

i dont see any real reason people own guns. sucks but it's never gonna change, it's too ingrained in our country

I'm still waiting for anyone to answer this

It's amusing how gun-rights supporters are protesting against a law that does NOT even affect them.

chill02 posted...

Wutobliteration posted...

Being real ignorant and also real selfish

Irony™

when people don't know how to read

weapon_d00d816 posted...

Wutobliteration posted...

weapon_d00d816 posted...

No you're not getting to the root of your opinion. What makes it a no-brainer to you that guns should not be available to people?

let's make this simple. Just answer me. WHAT do you even need a gun for as a civilian?

For hunting? You don't use guns like pistols for hunting.
For self-defense? You gonna carry your pistol everywhere with you?

really, do say.

For one thing, it's not always about need. Gun enthusiasm is a great hobby, and more legal restrictions would hurt these people far more than it would violent criminals for no reason. Guns are everywhere in the US. Nothing is going to make them go away, and it's a fact of life that the more understanding and grounded lawmakers acknowledge when writing policy.

Also yes, there are people who do carry their pistol everywhere.

except the gun restrictions proposed by Dems before has nothing to do with affecting people like you. It has nothing to do with banning guns. It just tightens regulations and would only affect criminals and those others likely to commit a crime with it, especially the mentally ill.

It's amusing how gun-rights supporters are protesting against a law that does NOT even affect them.

Being real ignorant and also real selfish, isn't it? And look who are the only ones that suffer. Point of my topic. Learn some empathy, eh?

chill02 posted...

Wutobliteration posted...

For self-defense? You gonna carry your pistol everywhere with you?

yes

see, that's funny considering the instances of people actually managing to defend themselves with a gun is completely outweighed by the sheer number of instances of people killing themselves and others with guns.

weapon_d00d816 posted...

No you're not getting to the root of your opinion. What makes it a no-brainer to you that guns should not be available to people?

let's make this simple. Just answer me. WHAT do you even need a gun for as a civilian?

For hunting? You don't use guns like pistols for hunting.
For self-defense? You gonna carry your pistol everywhere with you?

really, do say.

Asherlee10 posted...

Wutobliteration posted...

Oh, I don't know. Maybe because USA is one of, if not, the only developed country in the world where you can literally just buy a gun off the streets? If that sounds sensible to an American, it is indeed sensible, only to the country that elected Trump into office.

You can't do that legally. All legal purchases of firearms require background checks.

I said obtain a gun in any way. oh this guy sure did it just fine.
http://www.tennessean.com/story/news/politics/2016/03/23/seeking-tighter-background-checks-lawmaker-brings-assault-weapon-legislature/82157746/

weapon_d00d816 posted...

Wutobliteration posted...

Lorenzo_2003 posted...

Wutobliteration posted...

Mal_Fet posted...

In other news, a muslim extremist got in a truck and killed more people with it than are killed in the average mass shooting.

a truck is needed for transportation of goods and people. Tell me what is a gun needed for than to kill people? Self-defense? Yep, just killing people.

In other words, you don't actually care that the instrument of mass death was a vehicle. Nope, gotta get dem guns.

and what do you suggest? Banning all vehiclces on the road? Does that sound sensible?

Now turn the question around for guns. Banning all guns from civilians? Does that sound sensible? Yes, yes, it does.

Why does that sound sensible to you?

Oh, I don't know. Maybe because USA is one of, if not, the only developed country in the world where you can literally just buy a gun off the streets? If that sounds sensible to an American, it is indeed sensible, only to the country that elected Trump into office.

Lorenzo_2003 posted...

Wutobliteration posted...

Mal_Fet posted...

In other news, a muslim extremist got in a truck and killed more people with it than are killed in the average mass shooting.

a truck is needed for transportation of goods and people. Tell me what is a gun needed for than to kill people? Self-defense? Yep, just killing people.

In other words, you don't actually care that the instrument of mass death was a vehicle. Nope, gotta get dem guns.

and what do you suggest? Banning all vehiclces on the road? Does that sound sensible?

Now turn the question around for guns. Banning all guns from civilians? Does that sound sensible? Yes, yes, it does.

cos he can't escape his fate from a s****ty cheesy 1930s comic book past

Irony posted...

Vomiting is a natural body phenomenon. How would you like it if I walked up to you and barfed on you?

farting is harmless. Vomitting isn't

Ultima Dragon posted...

I wouldn't say it's completely harmless when certain people fart and it smells like they literally shit their pants after dining on rotting garbage and the smell just lingers for an eternity.

how about those that fart loudly but without smell? The discrimination is real.

farting is a natural body phenomenon and is completely harmless. So why can't people start to learn to be more tolerant toward the act of farting?
This sort of stigma only encourages the unhealthy practice of the poor person having to hold in his fart.


What do you guys think?

Mal_Fet posted...

@Wutobliteration posted...

In other news....a guy tried to go on a killing spree at a school in China...with a knife...he only managed to injure a few people.

In other news, a muslim extremist got in a truck and killed more people with it than are killed in the average mass shooting.

a truck is needed for transportation of goods and people. Tell me what is a gun needed for than to kill people? Self-defense? Yep, just killing people.

Asherlee10 posted...

TheRealDill2000 posted...

QassTank posted...

Asherlee10 posted...

The issue is mental health, not the firearm.

Lol.
Guns make it too easy to kill people.

You could say that about many things. It's pretty easy to just run people over with your vehicle.

The ISSUE is mental health, not the tool.

In other news....a guy tried to go on a killing spree at a school in China...with a knife...he only managed to injure a few people.

Guns are banned in every other country for a reason. You have no other uses for a gun than to kill.

Asherlee10 posted...

The issue is mental health, not the firearm.

lol. That didn't take long.

I was expecting more of, ''the victims should have carried guns with them too''

if one or more of your loved ones was one day involved and killed in a shooting massacre? The shooting massacre was caused by a mentally disturbed killer who just bought a rifle at a nearby store. Would you still be in support of such lax gun laws? Especially when such an event could have easily been prevented if the killer did not have such easy access to guns?

wbloechel posted...

I'm a conservative and I criticize Trump all the time.

''then you're a liberal!''

seems like the only argument any Trump supporters ever know how to use. ''Libtards, liberal this, liberal that, Hillary blahblah''

So what if someone critcizes Trump and isn't a liberal? What do Trump supporters do?

Doe posted...

Wutobliteration posted...

I'm still amazed by how this guy makes money just by staying in his room making up few seconds Vine clips that require oh-so-little-effort.

I'd like to see you do better boi

nah I'm camera-shy

I'm still amazed by how this guy makes money just by staying in his room making up few seconds Vine clips that require oh-so-little-effort.

Punishment should be real rape for her.

Spidey5 posted...

There's countless porn pics of his wife/waifu out there.

maybe that's how they have sex?