Lurker > Wutobliteration

Lonestar2000 posted...

Wutobliteration posted...

about time someone finally made one...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NecroVisioN

I've played that game. Great fun but quickly turned from a WW1 shooter to game where you fight demons in hell.

Well, seeing as to how this topic will never, ever reach 500 anyway, I'll make things interesting.
The game right now offered is Witcher 3 Enhanced Edition, complete with all DLCs. Game offer however, might change after 3 hours if this topic still does not reach 500.

Have fun missing out, guys.

bump.

it's a PC game so you must have Steam.

also if I end up being the 500th person, no one gets anything. Ready? Set. Go.

about time someone finally made one...

OP too desperate to get a girl, I see...

it's literally happening right now and no topic about it? Seriously?

hotwheeler89 posted...

I've seen that before, its no scarier than other things posted in this topic. Just your average jump scare.

c'mon, you saw it but you never made a GIF to post here? I don't know but something about just a super creepy-looking pale ghost is more horrifying than all these overused blood and gore killers in horror movies today

Mind reading: You can read people's thoughts and even minipulate them mentally.

is there no limit to this? So basically, this must be the go-to power to rule the world, huh

Argh, could only find it here

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86IFj-3F34Q&t=6m37s


the rest of the ghost videos are pretty good as well though

hotwheeler89 posted...

Wutobliteration posted...

430 posts later and I still don't find any of this s**** scary

Then why don't you post something that you consider scary?

I remember there was this very CGI ghost video. The blonde girl talking to a laptop camera while some shadow moves behind her. Then the ghost appears.

The abrupt and daring upfront appearance of the ghost is what freaks everyone out. Too bad I can't find the video anymore

430 posts later and I still don't find any of this s**** scary

Is your GIF dump going to be endless, TC?

Virtually all modern scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed historically, although the quest for the historical Jesus has produced little agreement on the historical reliability of the Gospels and on how closely the biblical Jesus reflects the historical Jesus.

Athists or not, people so far can't actually disprove the existence of Jesus due to the overwhelming evidence and recordings.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus

twitterfriends posted...

Yeah I am sorry but you are seriously uneducated about world affairs.

If you take a good look around you, people that actually knows about world affairs aren't talking anything about a WW3. Because they know its stupid.

you know what's also stupid? the guy who actually knows nothing about world affairs, so much so, he can only give post single sentence comments disparaging others as ignorant while pretending he's some higher-up when he himself is ignorant. And why do I say this? Because you cant even provide an explanation.

People that still talk about WW3, I can only facepalm. The same talk generated since the 1960s till now by those clueless to the political environment. If anything, the world will most likely end from global warming and the sheer amount of pollution going on. Actually no, inevitably it will.

Again ironically, something so severe that will happen yet no one gives a s**** about doing anything about it cos it's far into the future and everyone just cares about making economies go round.

Howl posted...

Wutobliteration posted...

the reason why we will never have a WW3

It's gonna happen eventually regardless.

Yeah, if you're the kind of person that never studied on history. There's NEVER been a single war between countries since WW2, did you know that? All wars since WW2 has only been fought within a country (aka civil war), not between countries.
Sometimes this invites into a proxy war (eg. Vietnam and Korean war) but never a direct war between countries.

faizan_faizan posted...

This all would've made sense if North Korea didn't exist

It's no different. North Korea keeps their nukes for their own protection. That's how they view it and the US. They see the US as the threat, not the way round. They know they can't win in a war. That's why a war will never start.

its' nuclear bombs that's what's preventing a WW3. One of the big reason none of the almighty countries (USA, Russia and China) wants to go to war is because of this. Everyone fears a nuclear apocalypse. The moment these big countries get involved in a direct war with each other, use of nukes becomes inevitable. Everyone knows that.

It's also why the Cold War is the Cold War and not a WW3. Soviet Russia and USA wouldn't have gone to war with each other either. They know the repurcussions.

Nuclear bombs are ironically, the reason why we will never have a WW3

this topic poll was made actually to determine how much Trumpeteers are left on CE

inside

dicks

i can't wait to get to shoot the same old ww2 guns I've already got to play with in all the 100+ WWII action shooters ever that has been rehased and released so many times, it felt the game industry almost dropped dead from originality.

Can't wait to play at Normandy again. Can't wait to shoot the same old German soldiers again. Can't wait to play as America as save the world yet again.

so that's you, TC?

ThePrinceFish posted...

There should be voting tests to prove your ability to understand the issues before you are allowed to vote on them. I am aware of the comparison to rigged Jim Crow era tests and don't care.

that could work too. But of course, people gonna whine about ''equality'' and crap, meanwhile continuing to discriminate aliens and minorities

chill02 posted...

Wutobliteration posted...

It's funny since if I were to ask this on a Russian or Chinese forum, I'd get very different results than here.

of course, because those are terrible countries to live in

sure, wait 10 years to come and see which country is still at the top. USA and western countries are all spiraling downwards now.

AmonAmarth posted...

so phds with women, liberal, gender studies get to vote,
but a guy who builds cars, homes, etc doesnt.

no thanks.

anyone gets to vote, so long as they can educate themselves first. Fair, isn't it?

or would you rather entrust your share of future to a bunch of dimwits who just randomly vote for candidates since they don't follow the news or current events?

chill02 posted...

Wutobliteration posted...

Other countries, it's the cabinet that elects the world leader. It's the Parliament that elects the world leader. Notice why they don't just let the whole country (most of whom know nothing about governance) to elect the world leader directly?

What is the Electoral College

electors vote directly for the president. They can't choose whoever from within party.

FighterStreet posted...

TC you should seriously stay away from government, your idea is so fucking terrible it's frankly astonishing

or maybe you should try learning more about politics and the different systems of governments there are. Unlike the USA where you let the young, the stupid, the old and everyone elect the most important person in the world. Other countries, it's the cabinet that elects the world leader. It's the Parliament that elects the world leader. Notice why they don't just let the whole country (most of whom know nothing about governance) to elect the world leader directly?

Next thing you know, your country is gonna have Kanye West as president. Just gotta say random stupid s*** that is nice to hear to get people to vote you.

People power! 51% of votes, oh wait, that's considered majority, despite in real fact, just further continuing the divide in a nation's populace and causing social unrest.

AssultTank posted...

Sativa_Rose posted...

This would be even more racist than voter IDs, you realize that?

Voter ID isn't inherently racist though to be fair...

But this idea of TC's is just so stupid I can't even begin to properly describe how stupid it is.

like how the idea of electing a dumbass as president is so stupid but hey, it happened, didnt it?

It's funny since if I were to ask this on a Russian or Chinese forum, I'd get very different results than here.

Bloodychess posted...

but those uneducated urban poor people are clear to vote

shit/10 topic

I said ALL uneducated people. Make it a criteria to hold at least a diploma or degree, or even just graduate from highschool.

chill02 posted...

this is how fascism starts

no, this is how democracy fails

bump.

not to say this is about discrimination, but more about more stringent rights given to those who deserve them.

An argument to this, is the question: Should people be given the right to vote on country matters or elections if they're so clueless and do not know fully about what and who they're voting for?
It's like giving a person the wheels to a car, when he can't even drive well.

Especially in cases like Brexit has shown, old people who know none better voting out of the EU only for the young people to suffer the consequences.

RoadsterUFO posted...

Didn't read the article yet, but going by the headline and what outlet is posting it. Whatever, what Trump does with his own money I could not give a flying fuck about. I'm more concerned with Trump's tax plan freeing up the burdens that business entrepreneurs face. People act like every damn business owner or CEO is a millionaire.

It's basically saying, Trump's tax plan is only really meant to benefit himself, and other big corporations. The rich becomes richer due to the cuts while the poor remain poor.
But instead, Trump claims the tax plan is to help the poor and middle-class, which proves to be untrue, since the reduction in tax would be insignificant to these group of people due to their lower income levels.

Also too much tax cuts would only mean a shortage in funds for the government, which could spiral the country into even more debt and a government deficit.

anime is cartoon for Japanese people.

ChromaticAngel posted...

Wutobliteration posted...

please read more about China. They're allied with NK for a good reason.

REMercsChamp posted...

China will not abandon North Korea. Anyone believing so must be either

- Uneducated
- Illiterate
- 12 years old

They were allied with NK for national defense reasons throughout the cold war and beyond. a few decades ago North Korea was hit with a famine that they were not able to recover from. Their ability to contribute what they were contributing to China before in terms of a security blanket is greatly diminished.

Additionally, the US desire to invade China has dropped to 0. China has grown increasingly uncomfortable with North Korea's actions and I wouldn't put it past them to cut ties entirely. There is already a huge Chinese speculative trade market of buying shit in South Korea and selling it in North Korea (illegally in most cases, because of the nature of the product, not because the trade itself is illegal).

You don't seem to get how China is using NK as leverage, do you? Or how geopolitics works. NK isn't important to China because of their resources, China has all of that already, it's the very region they're using them for.
China could have dropped ties with NK long ago but they clearly aren't doing so. NK is basically China's protection against the USA, it's in fact their most important strategic asset.
Ever heard of a buffer state? That's what NK is. The country is what's preventing US from spreading their influence around the Korean peninsula. If war were to really break out, the South would win. China does NOT want that. They'd rather keep the NK regime than a unified Korea as the buffer that it is. In other words, prevent a war from breaking out but also keep the region as destabilised as they can so no unification will ever happen.
Their cutoffs to NK in recent years is just another play by the book to pretend to remain in good favor with the international community. If they wanted to go all the way, they'd have cut off important trades such as crude oil or not protest against the increased US intervention in the Korean peninsula nor bother with their own military intervention at the Korean border.




also lol at this:

Additionally, the US desire to invade China has dropped to 0

legendarylemur posted...

Yeah South Korea, a well-fed first world country that is always near the head of technological breakthroughs that make almost all of our phones, home appliances, computer components that has a mandatory military service meaning almost every male knows how to deal with a war-like situation

Will... let a starving third world country with constant proof of failed missile launches, malnourished soldiers, super outclassed technology march into freaking Seoul? I mean... What?

never underestimate the dumbness that is CE

Suchomimus posted...

They will if it comes to war. We are far more valuable to them in trade.

Except there never will be a war.


I will restructure and repeat what REMercsChamp put across excellently:
Anyone believing there's gonna be a WWIII must be either

- Uneducated
- Illiterate
- 12 years old


Please that get stupidity out of your heads.
This isn't like the olden times where countries just hop around colonizing one another and starting wars over mere disputes. Countries all depend on one another now because of something called globalisation, countries all use their military might as a form of defense, not offense, the same goes for NK as well, and unlike before due to fervent nationalism, no one wants wars today. Wars costs billions of dollars, leaves only destruction behind and balloons belligerents involved out of economic growth and opportunity, whilst being kicked out of precious international organisations like UN and WTO.


If anything, the end of the world is most likely to come about from the inevitable dying of our planet due to global warming and sheer pollution. Ironically, something no one seems concerned about, instead all being too obsessed with the delusional idea of a WW3. Of course, since no one cares about this future that only our great-grandchildren will have to suffer in.

Suchomimus posted...

Imagine if the US, China, South Korea, and Japan all cooperated to take down this monster? Would be a triumph for human rights worldwide.

please read more about China. They're allied with NK for a good reason.

lol you seriously believe this s***? These are words coming from the Trump administration no less. How about reading some actual news on actual happenings? Like how China is going against South Korea just because of the new missile system they're putting up.

They give excuses like how it invades their airspace when in truth, they're doing it since it undermines as a threat to NK. Same for calling for ''diplomacy'' instead of war. They don't want either.
China would want to keep NK with them as long as possible.

MakoReizei posted...

Wutobliteration posted...

The Rape of Nanking, the Chinese massacre

how do you even make a game centered around these. That's like asking why there's no Holocaust game.

Do YOU even WWII, bro?

Never played as a prisoner-of-war before? As some ordinary citizen trying to escape or fight his way through the chaos? CoD has done that in their WWII campaigns before. It's not uncommon for other war games either, that innovate over the player always being a standard soldier.
The Japanese occupation also gave rise to rebellions and espionage. There's always a gameplay to be made out of the war.

MakoReizei posted...

and TC is only thinking about the big budget console shooters. On PC there are plenty of WWII games which don't focus only on the western front

tell me of a game that covers places like the Japanese-Sino war then. The Conquest of Burma, occupation of IndoChina, invasion of Malaya (now known as Malaysia), Singapore. Their triumph, their hellish invasion and occupation. The Rape of Nanking, the Chinese massacre etc.

Do you even WWII, bro?

MakoReizei posted...

TC doesn't remember COD 1, UO or CoD2 which all featured the Soviets.

I do. In fact, I've played all the classic games on PC, including the very underrated United Offensive. That's what did differentitate CoD franchise in the beginning. At that time, 2003, all other WWII games (Medal of Honor, BF, Hidden and Dangerous) only focused on the American's point-of-view in the war, like the whole war revolved around them SMH...

CoD1 was the first to break that barrier, to venture to the Soviets, to the British, to the Italians. Still, they've never touched the rest of the world, especially in Asia.

Now here I was hoping CoD WWII would be different. Nope, same s****. In fact, this time the devs said they'd focus very specifically on just a certain part of the war to tell a 'story'. Not even wider, more narrower instead.

Sativa_Rose posted...

Have they confirmed that it will only be in the west?

Also if this is a success, you can pretty much fucking guarantee that they are going to want to keep milking it, which naturally means expanding into content like fighting the Japanese

yeah sure, fighting the Japanese in the Pacific war only, like all movies, games and TV shows ever do. Why can't they take some cues from BF1? BF1's campaign actually did span round the world, not just focusing on the Western Front (where the popular misconception that trench warfare is ''everything WW1'' was derived from)

hotwheeler89 posted...

World at War and MoH: Rising Sun covered fighting in the pacific.

They covered the Pacific Ocean battles, which obviously...had to involve the US or it wouldnt have been covered. No coverage at all on the South Pacific, South West and South East regions, which btw, had lots of s**** going on as well, involving Australia and UK empire.