Lurker > LinkPizza

the whiny gimmick guy doesnt like a guy with a whiny gimmick?

Seems silly to have Nintendo direct when theres Pokmon day 2 weeks later might as well just bundle it all in one

Probably Kurzgesagt

I love all the different noises he makes
https://youtu.be/iUXY-KMSrdU

Youtube is just a place to randomly search something - not to watch channels or episodes.

You think every social media post is true? You think that looks like someone who was violently assaulted? Are you aware that social media is the number one source of fake news and false flags? Are you gullible?

If theyre hard to take care of, as you say, then Im a natural.

"Age gap, hight difference, etc..." falls under superficial compatibility. Like if someone cares about those things, they are red flags that they probably aren't looking for any serious type of relationship, or they aren't mature enough to be in a serious relationship. I mean sure, if you ask me "what is your fantasy?" for someone I am going to have a specific list of qualities. But I also know that if I want someone that isn't just eye candy that I am going to have to sacrifice several of those quantities in favor of meaningful stuff that would make me want to actually spend time with them.

Or maybe were twins. Which might be even sexier.

Is he also at a point where he doesn't want to get married or have any more kids?

Then I would say that is "comparable". It is less about history and more about what you are looking to get out of being in a relationship together. Yes, history plays a part in that too since it can impact the current relationship (like maybe helping take care of his kids?), but less so.

That is a different situation than I was describing though. My example was someone who needs to live with their parents because they are working on their education and can't get a job to afford their own place without sacrificing their studies. Your example is someone who chooses to because they are helping their parents out while saving money for something else (like possibly a house they can raise a family in with their significant other).

Not really, it is more important that whoever your dating is at a comparable point in your life. It would be weird if you were dating someone who was still in school and lived with their parents while you have a decent job and own a house, even if you were of the same age. Conversely, if both of you are divorced with similar aged kids, it doesn't really matter if you are 10-20 years apart age wise.

I don't want to enter a house that smells like feet.

No? Shoes serve a purpose, regardless of whether I am inside or outside.

I personally never thought that was weird.

The hangup that people have over it is weird though. Same thing with guys who need their girl to be shorter than them.

GS-9

Thats not a kitten, but its still cute

The one guy whos pictured they showed looked barely 18,

While true thatd be operating out of hindsight which i am assuming we would not have. Id trust a chunk of them to the extent of doing potentially stupid things that could get me killed but i would never trust the idea that there were no killers at all until the game was over.

Yeah the motives work and im confident that someone wouldve died regardless but it would make the job of the killer harder if you set it up so that the only reliable 1 on 1 confrontation they could have is with the person they were in charge of looking out for and thus would bear immediate suspicion for should they die. I mean even with it having been set up that someone couldve come and taken Ibuki in a way Mikan wouldnt have noticed she was still the instant suspect for me. I just dont think leaving all 3 vulnerable people in the hands of a single person is a good call regardless. And if i viewed any of the three as a friend i dont think i wouldve allowed it. *Assuming our insertion into the game has us replacing Hajime.

That said, the Wii wasn't a particularly great console either.

Clearly we see things differently so I guess we will have to agree to disagree on this subject otherwise we will just keep around in circles repeating what's already been said.

People do and say strange things on social media. She has 5 years to change her mind, so even if it is unusual it seems weird for anyone else to care at this point.

How long can a woman even produce breastmilk for after pregnancy? Like is it even plausible for tittay to keep making milk for 6 years straight?

Jeans for sure.

It means everything as clearly she's intentionally putting a kid in line for ridicule and bulling. Even more so when she's plastering it all over social media. It's a selfish thing todo.

People shouldn't care about the welfare of a child? Huh....

Others do though and here we are. Again she put it all over social media so it's open for discussion.

My sister never breastfed for a extra couple of years and she certainly wouldn't be giving my five year old nephew a cup with breast milk in it because it isn't a normal thing todo with a kid who is five. People bother with what others do with their kids because some "parents" abuse their kids and whatever. You can't simply do whatever you want to a kid because it's your kid. She also made this pubic knowledge by putting it on social media so obviously will get comments.

So again breastfeeding a six year old is not normal. I'd even question breastfeeding a kid past the age of two although I know sometimes kids can be late adaptors.

Would they know? Yeah as they will see a six year old drinking milk from a bottle and probably would ask what kind or milk it is or whatever. Hell this woman would probably proudly tell the parents of the kids she STILL breastfeeds her six year old. Would the kids care? They probably would yeah or at least some of them just to bully someone. It's weird you're been a advocate for this as it's certainly not a normal thing todo. Most people stop breastfeeding their kid at around six months not six years.

Thanks!
Just got to wait for Purolator to bring it now

Dell told me i get charged when it is shipped, but still nothing on my Credit Cards. Well if it becomes free cause their system doesnt charge me, i won't complain

As long as everyone loses, I win.

Sabotaging everyone for no reason.

Best girl from 2 died. Ibuki

The Ultimate Pizza Chef title might make some killers like you enough to pick a different target at least :P

Everything about this post is objectively correct. Though if we actually became friends i probably wouldve insisted on either the 3 infected to be split up among the 3 exposed to look after as Nagito was the only one with actual need to be in the hospital or as the rule stated that only one could stay there couldve just established taking shifts with the other two. Even if Mikan didnt get infected she couldnt be in every room at once and was probably in Nagitos for 95%+ due to his condition. Ibuki and Akane couldve been killed off fairly easily from how it looked.

Have you ever played a game of Mafia/Werewolf/Town of Salem?

It's like that, only every character is a caricature of someone you hated from high school.

It would be more because I'm assuming I would get attached to somebody if it was real. So they die then somebody else dies due to the nature of the human brain.

I would probably snap.

Because I don't have much to live for in a normal world. If I literally was in a Danganronpa game, in a situation that completely hopeless, <u>(WARNING!!!!! DANGANRONPA V3 SPOILERS RIGHT AFTER THIS!!!!!)</u> I probably would do what Ryoma Hoshi did and cooperate with the killer. Plus I'm weak as shit. I wouldn't last long anyway.

Considering I'm not familiar with the franchise, I don't like my odds

My new computer

I'd probably be the first one to die.

Ah nah leave the despair bear to rule over killings. I was meaning more of his potential of becoming a rapist. Giving benefit of the doubt that he wasnt already prior to remnant status.

A game with actual people is probably even worse for me. The characters in game are a bit unbelievably nonchalant for the situation theyre in a chunk of the time. D2 cast gets abducted and put on an isolated island against their will and most of their first instincts are to go party on the beach? I dont know about that one. I think real people would end up with more deteriorated mental states and thus be more dangerous overall.

If it was the first game I'd be one of the few happy to stay in my room for eternity.

I would be the guy that refuses to take part in the manufactured scenario, so I would probly be a victim of someone that does take part.

Danganronpa

wat a name

someone would definitely kill me

but i would do my damnedest to take them out too

Very likely a victim. If Teru Teru survived longer due to my presence in the game i could maybe see him crossing a big enough line to warrant killing but eh.

And victim over survivor pretty much due to the same reasons as most the victims in game. Lack of real concern for the situation and too willing to trust unless i outright dislike em. Given who id gravitate towards in the second game my odds would be alright but first game i die for sure. Yet to play 3 or the spinoff.