Lurker > BigSLM1993

spudger posted...

RiderofHogs posted...

So what makes him any different than any other politician in office?

"drain the swamp!"

An outsider that is not corrupt!

iClockwork posted...

Private businesses have the right to refuse any customer.

This is a slippery slope. A bunch of people sharing beliefs could completely ostracize parts of a community. Maybe not in larger cities, but in smaller or more rural areas where options are limited?

I'd like for you to consider how this could affect people in reality; being discriminated against for their own beliefs.

ImmatureContent posted...

16 year old girls are often more mature than 25 year old men.

Very true, doesnt make it less predatory though

EliteC posted...

Do you guys remember his Facebook meltdown? Lol

Can you post it?

butthole666 posted...

MARKINGRAM22 posted...

OMG he made some bad jokes years ago! A guy who never pawned himself off as being a clean comedian used bad words, this is shocking and unheard of. Well I guess we should only listen to woke comics that just joke about Trump, white people and non ironically say latinx.

Its not that he used bad words, its that the things he is saying make it abdundantly clear he sees queer people as lesser

No he was clearly making jokes. The greatest comedian ever said "good jokes and bad jokes come from the same place, and you never know until you say them," and I stand by that. These are obviously presented as jokes, and has said just as if not more offensive things about all kinds of groups. So to say someone clearly is a bigot with no actual evidence than 3 edgy jokes that sucked a decade ago is disingenuous as hell.

like funbazooka, if you're white (i say if because there are some weird nonwhite CEmen who promote white nationalism for some reason), no one's stopping you from having a white wife. or husband. again, don't really know what you are.

but if other white people want to date or marry interracially, that's really none of your business and you can't force them not to either.

BigSLM1993 posted...

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

Anarchy_Juiblex posted...

Look at these Nazi sympathizers . . .

https://www.aclu.org/other/aclu-history-taking-stand-free-speech-skokie

Real talk, I can't tell if it's simply a new generation if kiddies that need to be taught the value of free speech (and frankly, rational consistent thought) or if it's nihilistic anti-American radical leftists that are simply gas-lighting everyone that isn't garbage on civil rights.

So what I'm gathering from your views expressed in this topic, you seem to want:

More legal protection under freedom of speech for nazis, racists, bigots etc. so that they are free to express hateful views...

And you're also against violence, so nazis, racists, bigots etc. are more protected against vigilante justice.

So nazis should have the freedom to openly be nazis and violence against nazis should be condemned. Nazis shouldn't have to fear the law when expressing their views and nazis shouldn't have to fear vigilante violence for expressing their views.

Reasonable, fair, unbiased, non-partisan. I applaud you sir...

So sarcasm aside, what legislation would you want proposed to combat nazis? Should we make it illegal to have those views openly?

Should we give people a legal defense if they harm one ? What if they accidentally kill one?

What precedent do you think this would set legally for the future?

They're nazis...

You're going for an "it's a slippery slope" gotcha, but it's actually basically just the beach...

Anarchy_Juiblex posted...

Look at these Nazi sympathizers . . .

https://www.aclu.org/other/aclu-history-taking-stand-free-speech-skokie

Real talk, I can't tell if it's simply a new generation if kiddies that need to be taught the value of free speech (and frankly, rational consistent thought) or if it's nihilistic anti-American radical leftists that are simply gas-lighting everyone that isn't garbage on civil rights.

So what I'm gathering from your views expressed in this topic, you seem to want:

More legal protection under freedom of speech for nazis, racists, bigots etc. so that they are free to express hateful views...

And you're also against violence, so nazis, racists, bigots etc. are more protected against vigilante justice.

So nazis should have the freedom to openly be nazis and violence against nazis should be condemned. Nazis shouldn't have to fear the law when expressing their views and nazis shouldn't have to fear vigilante violence for expressing their views.

Reasonable, fair, unbiased, non-partisan. I applaud you sir...

Alucard188 posted...

dotsdfe posted...

I'd kind of hope for a new game at this point. It's been like 4 years since Inquisition.

I like the series enough to at least consider a new game, even though I've still only played the original and Inquisition. I was actually just wondering what ever happened with it a day or two ago, so hopefully the news goes well and isn't just a port/spinoff.

ESPECIALLY since how Trespasser ended, which essentially sets up the next Dragon Age game.

Exactly. Trespasser was pretty damn good as an epilogue for Inquisition and as a great setup for the next one.

DoGCyN posted...

Yeah I'm equally confused why people side with Bethesda in this scenario.

It's not so much I side with Bethesda and more "people shouldn't be buying collectors editions at this point."

I'm actually glad that people are speaking up, but I feel if Fallout 76 hadn't been such a dog shit game people wouldn't have complained as much because people tend to let companies get away with this shit.

EliteC posted...

@OctilIery posted...

EliteC posted...

Youngster_Joey_ posted...

The first thing I was taught in my conceal carry class was that as soon as the threat is down or disarmed, you either holster your weapon or if police are on the scene, you immediately put it down because the cops can mistake you for the bad guy.

Just saying, but maybe this isn't so much a "the guy was black" thing and it was a "the guy was carrying a weapon in a threatening manner in a mass shooter situation."

Of course, the cop who was all gun ho and apparently shot him without issuing any commands whatsoever needs to be prosecuted still.

How come people like the aurora shooter and the Charleston shooter get talked down and maybe they even get a Burger King run instead of getting killed? Do you think they holstered their weapons before the cops arrived?

Different cops in different districts with different training responding to different situations.

So the surviving shooters survived because the cop was having a good day and it was a good district?

Funny how all the surviving shooters were NOT black, where even the good guys with a fun who got killed were black

Look at this, people get shot even when they have their hands up in the air and are lying on the ground :

LOL this is so fake

BigSLM1993 posted...

Why doesn't Trump just hire a special prosecutor for Hilary, like he said he would? He's been bringing her up since day 1 of his presidency.

Because that prosecutor would likely find nothing worthy of charging, and this way Trumpets can keep bleating on about "but Hillary."

23 or 24 full on penetration.

I think that's low for the average gay man tbh.

thronedfire2 posted...

WizardPowers posted...

Hairistotle posted...

at its core it's lying or manipulating in order to get a person or people to question/doubt their own sanity, or reality itself

How mentally unstable would you have to be to question reality

Wtf

Not that kind of reality

Basically its lying to someone enough, convincingly enough, that they start to believe you instead of believing what they knew to be true previously

What is an example that's happened in real life?

The thing is, he's not remotely alone. A LOT of conservative Christians believe this.

And at least Andromeda was patched to make some of the worst aspects better. We all know Bethesda track record with letting the community fix their games.

vocedelmorte posted...

CiIantro posted...

@BlueMage279 posted...

I don't get why guys like yaoi. Seems more like something girls/women would be into.

It is targeted towards women and has a lot of unrealistic/annoying stereotypes, but it is far better than any gay media in the west. There is hardly any gay representation in western media, and gay characters are usually used as jokes. While Yaoi is imperfect, I will take what I can get.

Agree. I don't like when its too stereotypical, so you can see that 'this guy suppose to represent a girl, so female audience would relate to him etc. But really yaoi writing is often better than any straight romance writing in Japanese media.
Oh and the most annoying yaoi trope is 'Im straight, but ..>:('
Also 2D-->3D

Im also not big on the whole falling in love with your rapist trope that is so prevalent in the genre.