Current Events > Trump Spokesman: Anyone comparing Trump to Hitler will be exterminated

(+) Yeah! (+)

itachi15243 posted...

Cheung claimed, those who try to make that ridiculous assertion are clearly snowflakes grasping for anything because they are suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Yes, obviously we're the snowflakes not the person looking to literally kill people over it.

This whole Trump not being in jail yet thing makes me feel not safe as an American or as a person in general.

Trump spokesman? Check
"Snowflake"? Check
"Trump Derangement Syndrome"? Check

Yep, definitely someone not worth the time or effort

ItsNotA2Mer posted...

To that point, I'm trying to figure out if it's just more a general sense of fear/not feeling safe? Much like you would use a raincoat/umbrella to stay dry, do people believe they would have occasion to actually use a firearm during our next election cycle, or is it more of a preparedness/just in case type of deal.

Don't think you'll be safe even if you're a conservative, straight white male basement or cornfield dweller

Fine, I'll stop comparing Fhrer Trump to Hitler.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


I understand full well everything the GOP is doing. I think I'm having trouble trying to ask my question here.
To your specific point then, in a practical sense, how does a firearm stop the GOP from trying to erase trans individuals? Or are we saying that trans individuals should specifically arm themselves in case they are physically accosted?
I own firearms, (and have my specific reasons), so I'm not anti. I just think sometimes people believe that firearms can solve problems that they can't, and don't always think about it in a practical sense.
When someone says "I want to obtain some guns for the next election cycle", I'm just trying to figure out if it's more for a general sense of security/safety, or do they believe they could actually find themselves in a situation where they may need to engage?
My hope is that people engage their critical thinking skills when it comes to what a firearm will/ will not solve, before rushing out to buy them.

"There are people trying to find and kill you"

"Now, I need you to write an essay and really understand the ramifications of owning a gun for self-defense. Have you done the requisite amount of critical thinking for trying to save your own life?"

/wank

ItsNotA2Mer posted...

.

Regular User
User Since: Aug 2023
Karma: 99
Active Posts: 223
Total Badges: 9

Trump is like Hitler, if Hitler got a plastic bag stuck on his head as an infant, turned purple, and was somehow revived.

Why are we still treating the MAGAts with kids' gloves? They're clearly a domestic terrorist group at this point.

ItsNotA2Mer posted...

I understand full well everything the GOP is doing. I think I'm having trouble trying to ask my question here.
To your specific point then, in a practical sense, how does a firearm stop the GOP from trying to erase trans individuals? Or are we saying that trans individuals should specifically arm themselves in case they are physically accosted?
I own firearms, (and have my specific reasons), so I'm not anti. I just think sometimes people believe that firearms can solve problems that they can't, and don't always think about it in a practical sense.
When someone says "I want to obtain some guns for the next election cycle", I'm just trying to figure out if it's more for a general sense of security/safety, or do they believe they could actually find themselves in a situation where they may need to engage?
My hope is that people engage their critical thinking skills when it comes to what a firearm will/ will not solve, before rushing out to buy them.

Sir, this is a Wendys.

This is just the final form of "Oh yeah? You're gonna accuse me of being a Nazi? Well then I guess I have no choice but to identify as a Nazi and be even more openly vile!"

Nah bro, you're just a Nazi regardless.

Kradek posted...

This is just the final form of "Oh yeah? You're gonna accuse me of being a Nazi? Well then I guess I have no choice but to identify as a Nazi and be even more openly vile!"

Nah bro, you're just a Nazi regardless.

Very similar to the chuds that go "I voted for Trump because the left was mean to me when I did racist things!"

Letron_James posted...

Yeah imma go ahead and buy a few guns in preparation of this next election cycle tbh. I can totally see his dullards causing issues again

At your home? Or will you bring these guns to places and look for trouble?

Sandalorn posted...

"There are people trying to find and kill you"

"Now, I need you to write an essay and really understand the ramifications of owning a gun for self-defense. Have you done the requisite amount of critical thinking for trying to save your own life?"

/wank

In your attempt to be sarcastic, you made my point for me. Thank you.
People absolutely need to understand the ramifications of owning a gun for self defense, and many don't. They generalize the need for it, when they need to specifically personalize it, and internalize it.
It's easy to say something like "I'll get a gun because the GOP is on a mission to erase trans individuals". It's generalized, and owning a firearm won't stop the GOP from being the GOP. It's more specific and accurate to say, "As a trans individual, I feel so unsafe that I am going to carry a firearm, and am fully prepared to take a life if I'm forced to". That's how it needs to be viewed.
Same thing with people who say "I'll get a gun to feel safe". That's so generalized. It's harder to say, "I'm going to carry a firearm, and get the appropriate training/practice to make sure I can actually protect myself/others if the situation dictates. I'm fully prepared to take a life if I have no choice".
If someone said to me, "I'm going to purchase some firearms for the next election cycle, because I'm worried the clowns from last time around are acting squirrely again", I would wonder how much thought they had given to it beyond just in a more general sense. Would owning a firearm stop those people from doing something like that again in 2024? Or do you believe that you could actually find yourself in a specific situation where you will have to take lives to save lives?
Do you see the distinction? Generalizing the reasons to obtain firearms isn't a good idea. Internalization is important, it makes you really have to stop and think about what you truly are/are not prepared to do to be a safe, responsible, and effective firearm owner.

RchHomieQuanChi posted...

Very similar to the chuds that go "I voted for Trump because the left was mean to me when I did racist things!"

The exact same people I was referencing because their Venn Diagram is just a circle lol.

bluezero posted...

Or will you bring these guns to places and look for trouble?

You mean like the MAGAts did last time?

rodu_jr posted...

Exterminated? Where did Trump find a Dalek?

EX-TER-MINNNN-AAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYTE!!!

I've always said the left, women, racial minorities, LGBTQ+ people, and more need to arm up and learn how to use them. The right in this country are openly being Nazis. It's either that or let them kill you. I know which I'd rather do. Don't expect any help from Democrats, the military, or anyone else.

ItsNotA2Mer posted...

In your attempt to be sarcastic, you made my point for me. Thank you.
People absolutely need to understand the ramifications of owning a gun for self defense, and many don't. They generalize the need for it, when they need to specifically personalize it, and internalize it.
It's easy to say something like "I'll get a gun because the GOP is on a mission to erase trans individuals". It's generalized, and owning a firearm won't stop the GOP from being the GOP. It's more specific and accurate to say, "As a trans individual, I feel so unsafe that I am going to carry a firearm, and am fully prepared to take a life if I'm forced to". That's how it needs to be viewed.
Same thing with people who say "I'll get a gun to feel safe". That's so generalized. It's harder to say, "I'm going to carry a firearm, and get the appropriate training/practice to make sure I can actually protect myself/others if the situation dictates. I'm fully prepared to take a life if I have no choice".
If someone said to me, "I'm going to purchase some firearms for the next election cycle, because I'm worried the clowns from last time around are acting squirrely again", I would wonder how much thought they had given to it beyond just in a more general sense. Would owning a firearm stop those people from doing something like that again in 2024? Or do you believe that you could actually find yourself in a specific situation where you will have to take lives to save lives?
Do you see the distinction? Generalizing the reasons to obtain firearms isn't a good idea. Internalization is important, it makes you really have to stop and think about what you truly are/are not prepared to do to be a safe, responsible, and effective firearm owner.

Sir, this is a Wendys

@Kradek

This is just the final form of "Oh yeah? You're gonna accuse me of being a Nazi? Well then I guess I have no choice but to identify as a Nazi and be even more openly vile!"

Nah bro, you're just a Nazi regardless.

Yeah, they often complain about virtue signaling while ultimately showing that any decency they display is on the condition of being praised for it.

Basically "Nice Guys". And even that is a stretch of a term.

Sandalorn posted...

Sir, this is a Wendys

That's a very easy response. If you disagree with me, I don't fault you for that. But let's not pretend that it's somehow lunacy to want people to fully understand the ramifications of owning firearms, (and that just owning them doesn't in and of itself somehow solve problems).

In a perfect world, everyone who already voted for Trump would be DQ'd from voting...ever again.

Simply can't have a functional democracy with people supporting literal Nazis.

ItsNotA2Mer posted...

That's a very easy response. If you disagree with me, I don't fault you for that. But let's not pretend that it's somehow lunacy to want people to fully understand the ramifications of owning firearms, (and that just owning them doesn't in and of itself somehow solve problems).

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/c/c2cd5e05.jpg

DrizztLink posted...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/c/c2cd5e05.jpg

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/6/6b9ce30c.jpg

Alucard188 posted...

lol

God, how is this muppet so popular? Trump and all of his satellites need to be expunged.

A combo of poor education and propaganda.

ItsNotA2Mer posted...

That's a very easy response. If you disagree with me, I don't fault you for that. But let's not pretend that it's somehow lunacy to want people to fully understand the ramifications of owning firearms, (and that just owning them doesn't in and of itself somehow solve problems).

You're sealoining so hard in this topic people are going to start assuming you're Muffinz0r or something.

Haha, that's gotta be an Onion headline.

Wow, that wasn't an Onion headline.

Philip027 posted...

Haha, that's gotta be an Onion headline.

Wow, that wasn't an Onion headline.

2017-20XX headlines

those who try to make that ridiculous assertion are clearly snowflakes grasping for anything because they are suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome and their entire existence will be crushed when President Trump returns to the White House.

The full (actual) quote from Trump spokes person. It's not a good quote, but there isn't any talk of extermination. Pretty shit "journalism".

justaguy3492 posted...

those who try to make that ridiculous assertion are clearly snowflakes grasping for anything because they are suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome and their entire existence will be crushed when President Trump returns to the White House.

The full (actual) quote from Trump spokes person. It's not a good quote, but there isn't any talk of extermination. Pretty shit "journalism".

How does one "crush your entire existence" exactly?

Umbreon posted...

How does one "crush your entire existence" exactly?

He's claiming that people comparing Trump to Hitler/Mussolini are freaking out over nothing (being snowflakes) and that if Trump becomes President again they will freak out harder (their existence crushed).

Again not a good quote, dude is obviously a turd, but this isn't a call for extermination.

justaguy3492 posted...

those who try to make that ridiculous assertion are clearly snowflakes grasping for anything because they are suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome and their entire existence will be crushed when President Trump returns to the White House.

The full (actual) quote from Trump spokes person. It's not a good quote, but there isn't any talk of extermination. Pretty shit "journalism".

Are you fucking serious here?

"crush your entire existence" = extermination.

Just a piece of advice : Playing semantics is not a sign of a high intelligence.

Neither Trump nor the people who work for him get the benefit of the doubt.

Your interpretations are far too generous for those who already are openly calling for violence.

ItsNotA2Mer posted...

That's a very easy response. If you disagree with me, I don't fault you for that. But let's not pretend that it's somehow lunacy to want people to fully understand the ramifications of owning firearms, (and that just owning them doesn't in and of itself somehow solve problems).

White
Right-Wing
Rural

"It's your God-given right to own a firearm in America. You need no reasons. In fact, it is Patriotic! I believe in the 2ND!"

Black
Trans
Liberal
Urban

"Are you sure you need a weapon? Maybe seek counseling or a therapist before buying a gun? Maybe you're not of sound mind!"

Odd that eh?

Antiyonder posted...

@Kradek

Yeah, they often complain about virtue signaling while ultimately showing that any decency they display is on the condition of being praised for it.

Basically "Nice Guys". And even that is a stretch of a term.

I don't think it's so much a need to be praised, but a need to be viewed as a good person. In this country there is this societal assumption that being Christian = good person, even though some of the biggest degenerate dregs of society identify as Christian, which explains why they constantly shove their Christianity in the faces of others; because they have this neurotic need for being seen as a good person, when they're actually one of the worst examples of humanity and a justification for an alien race subjugating us.

Sounds like buying a weapon is probably a good choice.

Sandalorn posted...

Black
Trans
Liberal
Urban

"Are you sure you need a weapon? Maybe seek counseling or a therapist before buying a gun? Maybe you're not of sound mind!"

Odd that eh?

It's certainly odd that you took what I said to mean all of these things that you just made up in your mind. I'm a gay liberal, so you're very far off base here.

To the mods participating in this topic, I'm seriously asking:

TheOtherMike posted...

At what point are we allowed to call political groups that engage in terroristic threats "terrorists" on this website?

TheOtherMike posted...

To the mods participating in this topic, I'm seriously asking:

I'm not a mod, however as far as January 6th goes, I can't think of anybody modded over addressing domestic terrorism as domestic terrorism. In fact, there was a long-time troll named Jaghave who actually got banned for claiming he was there on Jan 6th and personally saw BLM/AntiFa instigating the violence.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]



Yes...Yes he is.

ItsNotA2Mer posted...

It's certainly odd that you took what I said to mean all of these things that you just made up in your mind. I'm a gay liberal, so you're very far off base here.

Not a single soul believes you. Also you took what someone else said and made up in your mind what they meant.

Why do you people try this garbage? Is it just to satisfy yourselves?

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/1/1a83e6cc.jpg

It comes across like this 100% of the time. Sockpuppets don't work. Stop it.

Kradek posted...

I'm not a mod, however as far as January 6th goes, I can't think of anybody modded over addressing domestic terrorism as domestic terrorism.

I was repeatedly modded/purged for calling a certain political party that engages in terroristic threats terrorists.

TheOtherMike posted...

I was repeatedly modded/purged for calling a certain political party that engages in terroristic threats terrorists.

Hopefully you appealed and linked them to news reports of the GOP saying "we are all domestic terrorists" at CPAC. Or you could have linked them to the DHS report that named right wing extremists as the gravest terrorist threat to the country.

justaguy3492 posted...

He's claiming that people comparing Trump to Hitler/Mussolini are freaking out over nothing (being snowflakes) and that if Trump becomes President again they will freak out harder (their existence crushed).

Again not a good quote, dude is obviously a turd, but this isn't a call for extermination.

Also posted here over the past few days. Try and keep up.

Trump Mulling Deploying Military to Streets on Day 1 if Elected: Report
https://news.yahoo.com/trump-mulling-deploying-military-streets-000421422.html?guccounter=1

Behind the Curtain: Trump allies pre-screen loyalists for unprecedented power grab
https://www.axios.com/2023/11/13/trump-loyalists-2024-presidential-election

That "We are all domestic terrorists" pic was getting molded on 261 for a while. Maybe the mods thought it was edited, but no that's what they literally called themselves.

Well, hopefully whoever the democratic nominee is, be it Biden or someone else saves that little gem of a quote in their back pocket for a debate.

darkace77450 posted...

Hopefully you appealed and linked them to news reports of the GOP saying "we are all domestic terrorists" at CPAC. Or you could have linked them to the DHS report that named right wing extremists as the gravest terrorist threat to the country.

I did. They did not care.

Hey w. trash Republicans, why dont you try not talking like a bunch of nazis if you dont want to be called nazis?