Current Events > Pitbull breeding should be illegal.

(+) Yeah! (+)

Do we really. Need more of these shitty dogs around they have to be bred?

Boo fucking hoo

look at this quan-chi looking motherfucker ready to nanny some baby ducks or something:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84apuq2wZpw

D

Pitbulls are great dogs. If anything make people get a license if they want more than 1 dog regardless of breed.

Yes. When we we produce things with serious flaws, we have a moral duty to fix our mistakes for the future.

A_Good_Boy posted...

D

Pitbulls are great dogs. If anything make people get a license if they want more than 1 dog regardless of breed.

Ah. Just what we need: bureaucracy

hockeybub89 posted...

Ah. Just what we need: bureaucracy

He says unironically while advocating that it should be illegal to breed types of dogs he doesn't like.

hockeybub89 posted...

Yes. When we we produce things with serious flaws, we have a moral duty to fix our mistakes for the future.

Ah. Just what we need: bureaucracy

Pitbulls aren't predisposed by genetics to be violent. This has already been proven time and time again in these shit topics.

Agreed

How about Pitbull feeding?

stop being dog-racist

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Pitbulls and bull terrier mixes make up over 20% of the US dog population. If German Shepherds cost the same and were as abundant as pits they'd be the deadliest dog in America.

Shit bulls.

What could go wrong with saving a poor, sweet pit bull from the shelter that was put there for biting the dad?

The_shibe posted...

look at this quan-chi looking motherfucker ready to nanny some baby ducks or something:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84apuq2wZpw

Awww what a cute velvet hippo

The_shibe posted...

look at this quan-chi looking motherfucker ready to nanny some baby ducks or something:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84apuq2wZpw

No thanks Im good

Here, to make this topic a little worthwhile:
https://people.com/pets/hero-dog-protects-toddler-during-detroit-house-fire/#:~:text=The%20three%2Dyear%2Dold%20pit,them%20both%20from%20the%20fire

Is there a word for being racist against a specific race from another species?

These topics are so stupid and attention seeking

Smashingpmkns posted...

Pitbulls aren't predisposed by genetics to be violent. This has already been proven time and time again in these shit topics.

Well neither are hippos, but I wouldn't want anyone owning one as a pet, even if the majority of them never kill anyone. I don't think pit bulls are evil or anything. They're just animals, but unlike wild animals whose homes we wander into, we created domestic dogs and bring them into our homes and neighborhoods. Maybe we shouldn't have any pets that can easily dismember a man wandering about, regardless of how responsible we are at coexisting with them.

I don't just care about violence. I also think we should stop breeding those poor bulldogs and all the health issues we make them suffer. It was wildly irresponsible to fuck up a dog breed that much.

hockeybub89 posted...

Well neither are hippos, but I wouldn't want anyone owning one as a pet, even if the majority of them never kill anyone.

Dude, what are you talking about? Hippos are naturally aggressive and one of the most dangerous and deadliest land animal in the planet killing 500 people per year.

hockeybub89 posted...

Well neither are hippos, but I wouldn't want anyone owning one as a pet, even if the majority of them never kill anyone. I don't think pit bulls are evil or anything. They're just animals, but unlike wild animals whose homes we wander into, we created domestic dogs and bring them into our homes and neighborhoods. Maybe we shouldn't have any pets that can easily dismember a man wandering about, regardless of how responsible we are at coexisting with them.

I don't just care about violence. I also think we should stop breeding those poor bulldogs and all the health issues we make them suffer. It was wildly irresponsible to fuck up a dog breed that much.

Same could be said about literally any large dog breed.

The biggest issue with pit bulls are the amount of absolutely stupid people that breed them and sell them to every other stupid asshole they know. You don't see very many GSDs, rottweilers or dobermans selling for $150 out of the backyard of some ghetto fuck.

Smashingpmkns posted...

Same could be said about literally any large dog breed.

Ok

Cats can cause Cat Scratch Fever, and tend to claw any anyone (including owners). They're vicious and can kill a baby.

Ban cats.

Pitbulls and bull terrier mixes make up over 20% of the US dog population. If German Shepherds cost the same and were as abundant as pits they'd be the deadliest dog in America.

wow, it's like you believe that no-name 'aspca' organization instead of the handful of weird CE posters who obsess over this.

ban spiders as pets because spiders are poisonous

kill all sharks in the ocean, cause great whites sometimes kill people swimming at beaches

Kloe_Rinz posted...

ban spiders as pets because spiders are poisonous

kill all sharks in the ocean, cause great whites sometimes kill people swimming at beaches

Lolwut

Pit bulls kill and injure more pets/people every year than both spiders and sharks combined

When was the last time a poisonous spider or shark killed a baby?

People also dont keep sharks or certain spiders as pets, due to obvious reasons

Mew posted...

Lolwut

Pit bulls kill and injure more pets/people every year than both spiders and sharks combined

When was the last time a poisonous spider or shark killed a baby?

People also dont keep sharks or certain spiders as pets, due to obvious reasons

There are millions of Pit Bulls and Bull breed mixes in America, the chance encounter of a venomous spider or shark are exceedingly rare. Come on, this you're smarter than this.

I can't remember the last time I saw a brown recluse. I live near the ocean and never went out to the water yet I come across bull breeds on the regular.

Kloe_Rinz posted...

ban spiders as pets because spiders are poisonous

kill all sharks in the ocean, cause great whites sometimes kill people swimming at beaches

a) Do people keep poisonous spiders as pets? Maybe they shouldn't

b) Sharks aren't pets and we don't live among sharks. We didn't breed sharks. They are wild animals.

If not letting people own certain dogs is wrong, then I guess it is also wrong that we don't let people own literally any animal on the planet as a pet.

hockeybub89 posted...

a) Do people keep poisonous spiders as pets? Maybe they shouldn't

b) Sharks aren't pets and we don't live among sharks. We didn't breed sharks. They are wild animals.

If not letting people own certain dogs is wrong, then I guess it is also wrong that we don't let people own literally any animal on the planet as a pet.

maybe they shouldnt

or maybe they can if they are responsible. Not everyone tries to train animals to be aggressive on purpose

sharks arent pets

but they do come into contact with humans in public areas and are a threat.

You havent given any valid justifications for your shitty, evil gunplagirl/proudclad tier beliefs.

Dog breeders in general shouldnt be a thing. But marking group(s) to be eliminated from the gene pool is some genocidal bullshit. Its wrong when its a type of human just like when its a type of dog.

The_shibe posted...

look at this quan-chi looking motherfucker ready to nanny some baby ducks or something:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84apuq2wZpw

That is an animal that needs to be put down.

A_Good_Boy posted...

D

Pitbulls are great dogs. If anything make people get a license if they want more than 1 dog regardless of breed.

Lol

Taharqa_ posted...

There are millions of Pit Bulls and Bull breed mixes in America, the chance encounter of a venomous spider or shark are exceedingly rare. Come on, this you're smarter than this.

I can't remember the last time I saw a brown recluse. I live near the ocean and never went out to the water yet I come across bull breeds on the regular.

I've never hurt anyone with my guns nor do i know anyone who has been hurt by a gun.

Conclusion: guns are not dangerous and should have no regulation whatsoever

Thud posted...

I've never hurt anyone with my guns nor do i know anyone who has been hurt by a gun.

Conclusion: guns are not dangerous and should have no regulation whatsoever

A gun is an inanimate weapon that cause 45,000 related deaths per year. There are millions of Pit Bulls and Pit mixes in the US, estimated around 20 percent of the total dog population. Dogs of any kind don't even come close to what guns do to our society.

Taharqa_ posted...

A gun is an inanimate weapon that cause 45,000 related deaths per year. There are millions of Pit Bulls and Pit mixes in the US, estimated around 20 percent of the total dog population. Dogs of any kind don't even come close to what guns do to our society.

No, people caused those gun deaths by being irresponsible or rotten. Also, the vast majority of guns and gun owners have never killed anyone.

And yet I still think we should have gun control and "punish" all gun owners for the dangers caused by some.

You still ignore that these are completely preventable deaths as no one needs a pit bull or similar at all. If grizzly bears were a domestic animal that we essentially created, I'd call for us to stop breeding them even if only 1% of owners let them maul someone to death. An animal that can cause so much destruction should not be in our neighborhoods. People can own a poodle, or a hamster.

divot1338 posted...

Dog breeders in general shouldnt be a thing. But marking group(s) to be eliminated from the gene pool is some genocidal bullshit. Its wrong when its a type of human just like when its a type of dog.

We literally encourage all people to neuter their dogs. That would be evil and completely unforgivable if we did it to groups of humans. Ban spaying and neutering? Stop making bad comparisons.

Kloe_Rinz posted...

maybe they shouldnt

or maybe they can if they are responsible. Not everyone tries to train animals to be aggressive on purpose

sharks arent pets

but they do come into contact with humans in public areas and are a threat.

You havent given any valid justifications for your shitty, evil gunplagirl/proudclad tier beliefs.

Yes I have. When humans produce a defective product that hurts a small percentage of users, we are supposed to recall and fix the problem.

hockeybub89 posted...

No, people caused those gun deaths by being irresponsible or rotten. Also, the vast majority of guns and gun owners have never killed anyone.

And the overwhelming majority of the millions of Pit Bulls, Pit mixes and dogs in general live their lives and die without harming a single human. The same argument that you try to make about irresponsible gun owners is the same one I can say about dog owners. Responsible owners don't have those kind of problems with their dogs.

And yet I still think we should have gun control and "punish" all gun owners for the dangers caused by some.
You still ignore that these are completely preventable deaths as no one needs a pit bull or similar at all. If grizzly bears were a domestic animal that we essentially created, I'd call for us to stop breeding them even if only 1% of owners let them maul someone to death. An animal that can cause so much destruction should not be in our neighborhoods. People can own a poodle, or a hamster.

Breed Specific Legislation has been proven time and time again to be a waste of resources, money and does not work to prevent serious dog bites. Every professional organization that seriously works with canines does not agree to it. That time would be better spent educating owners on dog training and safety, enforcing leash laws, giving incentives to folks for spaying/neutering their animals and requiring breeders to be licensed. If you think a 40 lbs Pit Bull is scary wait until you find out what a Central Asian Ovcharka is and people start to overbreed them. Instead if moving the goalposts to whatever breed looks scary that time would be better spent educating the public on proper dog management, the former never approaches the root of the problem which is irresponsible ownership.

hockeybub89 posted...

We literally encourage all people to neuter their dogs. That would be evil and completely unforgivable if we did it to groups of humans. Ban spaying and neutering? Stop making bad comparisons.

Recommending that owners get their pets spayed or neutered is perfectly fine. And also not even close to outlawing a particular breed.

divot1338 posted...

Recommending that owners get their pets spayed or neutered is perfectly fine. And also not even close to outlawing a particular breed.

Why is it fine? Imagine if we told people they should spay and neuter the humans they own. Are we only applying human morals to animals sometimes?

Taharqa_ posted...

And the overwhelming majority of the millions of Pit Bulls, Pit mixes and dogs in general live their lives and die without harming a single human. The same argument that you try to make about irresponsible gun owners is the same one I can say about dog owners. Responsible owners don't have those kind of problems with their dogs.

Breed Specific Legislation has been proven time and time again to be a waste of resources, money and does not work to prevent serious dog bites. Every professional organization that seriously works with canines does not agree to it. That time would be better spent educating owners on dog training and safety, enforcing leash laws, giving incentives to folks for spaying/neutering their animals and requiring breeders to be licensed. If you think a 40 lbs Pit Bull is scary wait until you find out what a Central Asian Ovcharka is and people start to overbreed them. Instead if moving the goalposts to whatever breed looks scary that time would be better spent educating the public on proper dog management, the former never approaches the root of the problem which is irresponsible ownership.

Nope. We need to eliminate a number of breeds for a number of reasons and we have the power and responsibility to do so since we brought them into this world. Both guns and pets need to be restricted because of irresponsible people. Is not breeding certain domestic animals truly more ridiculous than trying to make the entire human race less stupid? Should we or should we not allow people to breed bears that easily kill anyone if they have one bad day or a bad owners? Sounds like letting everyone own nuclear missile launchers because the majority are probably responsible enough to respect their power.

hockeybub89 posted...

Nope. We need to eliminate a number of breeds for a number of reasons and we have the power and responsibility to do so since we brought them into this world. Both guns and pets need to be restricted because of irresponsible people. Is not breeding certain domestic animals truly more ridiculous than trying to make the entire human race less stupid? Should we or should we not allow people to breed bears that easily kill anyone if they have one bad day or a bad owners? Sounds like letting everyone own nuclear missile launchers because the majority are probably responsible enough to respect their power.

BSL does not work, full stop. At that point you might as well just restrict dog ownership to dogs no bigger than Yorkshire Terriers. Trying to equate bears to domestic dogs is a faulty argument for obvious reasons. Common sense laws work, I've already mentioned a few in my previous post.

Pitbulls need to be classified as a weapon and not an animal.

GhostFaceLeaks posted...

Pitbulls need to be classified as a weapon and not an animal.

If I posted a picture of various purebred dogs would you be able to spot one?

https://www.bnd.com/news/nation-world/national/article273339195.html

This woman was mauled to death by great danes