Moral to have Kids...

Topic List	Page List: 1
pionear 03/09/22 10:32:23 AM #1:	Which One? Yup Nah Depends on Your Spouse/Mate Which One? - Results (100 votes) Yup 36% (36 votes) 36 Nah 29% (29 votes) 29 Depends on Your Spouse/Mate 35% (35 votes) 35 If you think you're going to die within 10 years? <cite>pionear posted [p:963296600] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote> Which One? Yup Nah Depends on Your Spouse/Mate Vote View Results Which One? - Results (100 votes) Yup 36% (36 votes) 36 Nah 29% (29 votes) 29 Depends on Your Spouse/Mate 35% (35 votes) 35 Show Voting Form If you think you're going to die within 10 years? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kind9 03/09/22 10:34:33 AM #2:	I'm an antinatalist debate me and loose --- http://i.imgur.com/NkZUeFd.gif <cite>kind9 posted [p:963296661] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>I'm an antinatalist debate me and loose </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Veedrock- 03/09/22 10:34:54 AM #3:	Yes, their training must begin immediately so they can avenge my death. --- My friends call me Vee. I'm not your friend, buddy. <cite>Veedrock- posted [p:963296676] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>Yes, their training must begin immediately so they can avenge my death. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 03/09/22 10:35:08 AM #4:	Sure it's ok, but it's not a morality issue. Having kids is just a fundamental bodily function... is it moral to poop? --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:963296681] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>Sure it's ok, but it's not a morality issue. Having kids is just a fundamental bodily function... is it moral to poop? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 03/09/22 10:42:31 AM #5:	Lokarin posted... Sure it's ok, but it's not a morality issue. Having kids is just a fundamental bodily function... is it moral to poop? It's immoral to shit on a table in a Wendy's, so you can apply situational morality like this. --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:963296846] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote>Sure it's ok, but it's not a morality issue. Having kids is just a fundamental bodily function... is it moral to poop? </quote> It's immoral to shit on a table in a Wendy's, so you can apply situational morality like this.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jen0125 03/09/22 10:43:00 AM #6:	Lokarin posted... Sure it's ok, but it's not a morality issue. Having kids is just a fundamental bodily function... is it moral to poop? Having kids is not a fundamental bodily function lmao. It's entirely optional and has a real affect on the planet and society. It's not anything like popping. Lok, I like you but you seriously have the most brain dead takes of anyone on this board sometimes. <cite>Jen0125 posted [p:963296855] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>Lokarin posted... </cite> <quote>Sure it's ok, but it's not a morality issue. Having kids is just a fundamental bodily function... is it moral to poop?</quote> Having kids is not a fundamental bodily function lmao. It's entirely optional and has a real affect on the planet and society. It's not anything like popping. Lok, I like you but you seriously have the most brain dead takes of anyone on this board sometimes. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 03/09/22 10:48:37 AM #7:	Kyuubi4269 posted... It's immoral to shit on a table in a Wendy's, so you can apply situational morality like this. Ya, I agree -it's immoral to have a baby on a Wendy's table, too Jen0125 posted... I like you :D --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:963297003] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>Kyuubi4269 posted... </cite> <quote>It's immoral to shit on a table in a Wendy's, so you can apply situational morality like this.</quote> Ya, I agree -it's immoral to have a baby on a Wendy's table, too Jen0125 posted... </cite> <quote>I like you</quote> :D </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gaawa_chan 03/09/22 10:51:13 AM #8:	I... guess it would depend on a few more pieces of information. Are we talking about ourselves specifically, or some other hypothetical person? I don't want children. I also hold the belief that children deserve to be wanted. Because I do not want children, if I had a child and kept it, I would, by my own standards, be behaving unethically. For similar reasons, I assume the person in this scenario is expected to keep the child instead of giving them up for adoption, because otherwise the timer on the parent's head is irrelevant. Then there are other issues. Would the child have a large support system? Is the parent economically stable? Is whatever is going to kill the parent in this scenario inheritable? Etc, etc... So... assuming the person in the scenario is me, no, I would not consider it to be ethical. Assuming it was someone else? It would still depend on a variety of factors, but I admit that I perhaps take the concept of bringing a human being into the world more seriously than the average person. --- Hi <cite>Gaawa_chan posted [p:963297060] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>I... guess it would depend on a few more pieces of information. Are we talking about ourselves specifically, or some other hypothetical person? I don't want children. I also hold the belief that children deserve to be wanted. Because I do not want children, if I had a child and kept it, I would, by my own standards, be behaving unethically. For similar reasons, I assume the person in this scenario is expected to keep the child instead of giving them up for adoption, because otherwise the timer on the parent's head is irrelevant. Then there are other issues. Would the child have a large support system? Is the parent economically stable? Is whatever is going to kill the parent in this scenario inheritable? Etc, etc... So... assuming the person in the scenario is me, no, I would not consider it to be ethical. Assuming it was someone else? It would still depend on a variety of factors, but I admit that I perhaps take the concept of bringing a human being into the world more seriously than the average person. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Judgmenl 03/09/22 10:53:12 AM #9:	Child rearing is an act of greed. --- You're a regular Jack Kerouac Not removing this until I've left March 2020. <cite>Judgmenl posted [p:963297092] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>Child rearing is an act of greed. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gaawa_chan 03/09/22 10:58:07 AM #10:	Judgmenl posted... Child rearing is an act of greed. Hmm, not always, though. I've met people who did not want children (oh boy they did not want children and it really showed) but they thought they were morally obligated to have children. Oof. I don't think that can be classified as greed, as satisfying their personal desire for something... but I'm not sure what to classify it as, mostly because I haven't slept for quite a long time and my brain is shutting down, I think? Anyway, one of you can figure that out, I'm sure. --- Hi <cite>Gaawa_chan posted [p:963297200] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>Judgmenl posted... </cite> <quote>Child rearing is an act of greed.</quote>Hmm, not always, though. I've met people who did not want children (oh boy they did not want children and it really showed) but they thought they were morally obligated to have children. Oof. I don't think that can be classified as greed, as satisfying their personal desire for something... but I'm not sure what to classify it as, mostly because I haven't slept for quite a long time and my brain is shutting down, I think? Anyway, one of you can figure that out, I'm sure. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl 03/09/22 11:07:48 AM #11:	The morality is debatable, but there's a pretty strong case for calling it irresponsible. <10-year-olds still need quite a bit of parenting, so if you know you're not going to be there for it, you're taking on that responsibility fully expecting that you won't be fulfilling it and somebody else will have to pick up your slack. If you organize that yourself ahead of time by finding somebody willing to take over, I'd say that makes it okay, but otherwise you're just dumping a kid on somebody else. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:963297430] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>The morality is debatable, but there's a pretty strong case for calling it irresponsible. <10-year-olds still need quite a bit of parenting, so if you know you're not going to be there for it, you're taking on that responsibility fully expecting that you won't be fulfilling it and somebody else will have to pick up your slack. If you organize that yourself ahead of time by finding somebody willing to take over, I'd say that makes it okay, but otherwise you're just dumping a kid on somebody else. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nichtcrawler X 03/09/22 11:54:31 AM #12:	Jen0125 posted... Having kids is not a fundamental bodily function lmao. It's entirely optional and has a real affect on the planet and society. It's not anything like pooping. Lok, I like you but you seriously have the most brain dead takes of anyone on this board sometimes. Depends on how you look at it. Biologically, our main function is to produce new units with slightly mixed genomes. Yes, evolution has potentially resulted in additional functions, but the main one remains to survive long enough and produce off-spring. --- Official Teetotaller of PotD Dovie'andi se tovya sagain! <cite>Nichtcrawler X posted [p:963298556] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>Jen0125 posted... </cite> <quote>Having kids is not a fundamental bodily function lmao. It's entirely optional and has a real affect on the planet and society. It's not anything like pooping. Lok, I like you but you seriously have the most brain dead takes of anyone on this board sometimes.</quote> Depends on how you look at it. Biologically, our main function is to produce new units with slightly mixed genomes. Yes, evolution has potentially resulted in additional functions, but the main one remains to survive long enough and produce off-spring. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 03/09/22 11:55:29 AM #13:	also just because it's optional doesn't mean it's not fundamental --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:963298582] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>also just because it's optional doesn't mean it's not fundamental </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jen0125 03/09/22 12:00:55 PM #14:	Lokarin posted... also just because it's optional doesn't mean it's not fundamental Fundamental would mean it's a necessary core process of your body. It's not. It's an evolutionary drive. If it was a fundamental process for your body infertile people wouldn't survive. <cite>Jen0125 posted [p:963298730] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>Lokarin posted... </cite> <quote>also just because it's optional doesn't mean it's not fundamental</quote> Fundamental would mean it's a necessary core process of your body. It's not. It's an evolutionary drive. If it was a fundamental process for your body infertile people wouldn't survive. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 03/09/22 12:02:16 PM #15:	Jen0125 posted... Fundamental would mean it's a necessary core process of your body. It's not. It's an evolutionary drive. If it was a fundamental process for your body infertile people wouldn't survive. ok, we just have different definitions of fundamental is all --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:963298781] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>Jen0125 posted... </cite> <quote>Fundamental would mean it's a necessary core process of your body. It's not. It's an evolutionary drive. If it was a fundamental process for your body infertile people wouldn't survive.</quote> ok, we just have different definitions of fundamental is all </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Blightzkrieg 03/09/22 12:03:55 PM #16:	That's the best time to have kids, gives you a chance at creating Batman --- http://i.imgur.com/1XbPahR.png <cite>Blightzkrieg posted [p:963298834] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>That's the best time to have kids, gives you a chance at creating Batman </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wolfy42 03/09/22 12:11:45 PM #17:	I believe it is not, hence me not having kids once I hit 40 (even though I have always wanted to be a dad, just not a dead dad). I'm ok with possibly meeting someone who has kids already, especially if they are a bit older (9 or more), since i would just be adding to their lives. I believe (strongly) that if you have children it is your responsibility to make their life as happy/good as possible and to be there for them until they are adults (not just 18) and ready/able to take care of themselves. Having kids and not taking responsibility for them is cruel and depending on their life can basically be torturing someone, forcing them to live in a world with nobody that cares for them and possibly suffering most of their lives (ending up in jail etc). You have the ability to have sex without having kids, if you do have a child and then abandon them, that is pretty horrible. --- Tacobot 3000 "Saving the world from not having tacos." Friends don't make their friends die Hanz. Psychopathic friends do. <cite>wolfy42 posted [p:963299070] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>I believe it is not, hence me not having kids once I hit 40 (even though I have always wanted to be a dad, just not a dead dad). I'm ok with possibly meeting someone who has kids already, especially if they are a bit older (9 or more), since i would just be adding to their lives. I believe (strongly) that if you have children it is your responsibility to make their life as happy/good as possible and to be there for them until they are adults (not just 18) and ready/able to take care of themselves. Having kids and not taking responsibility for them is cruel and depending on their life can basically be torturing someone, forcing them to live in a world with nobody that cares for them and possibly suffering most of their lives (ending up in jail etc). You have the ability to have sex without having kids, if you do have a child and then abandon them, that is pretty horrible. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sodium-chloride 03/09/22 12:22:45 PM #18:	I don't think there is a good reason to have children in this period of humanity. In the past you'd have kids to help you live your life, and even that is kind of a greedy concept. Choosing to reproduce today is inherently selfish and while not immoral, there isn't anything morally redeeming about it. <cite>sodium-chloride posted [p:963299389] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>I don't think there is a good reason to have children in this period of humanity. In the past you'd have kids to help you live your life, and even that is kind of a greedy concept. Choosing to reproduce today is inherently selfish and while not immoral, there isn't anything morally redeeming about it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wolfy42 03/09/22 12:28:51 PM #19:	sodium-chloride posted... I don't think there is a good reason to have children in this period of humanity. In the past you'd have kids to help you live your life, and even that is kind of a greedy concept. Choosing to reproduce today is inherently selfish and while not immoral, there isn't anything morally redeeming about it. I mean I would have always been down to adopt instead of having my own children, but having kids, if you feel like your life is secure enough and you can protect them and give them a good life, can be a joyous thing for both you, and your children. Long as you can give them a good life, full of more joy than pain, happiness than sadness and prepare them for the world, then having kids can be a great thing, even in todays (in my opinion overpopulated) world. More good people in the world the better. There are certainly plenty of greedy/bad/evil etc people out there, so if you can raise some children who care about others, are responsible, and work to make the world better, you are doing something great. The problem is Idiocracy was right, and not just about IQ levels, but also about how likely it is for selfish people to have children over people who care about others. Same general rules apply. Selfish people will be more likely to have multiple kids, while those who truly care about the children and want what is best for them probably only have a few (obviously there are exceptions and religion can also play a role in that). --- Tacobot 3000 "Saving the world from not having tacos." Friends don't make their friends die Hanz. Psychopathic friends do. <cite>wolfy42 posted [p:963299568] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>sodium-chloride posted... </cite> <quote>I don't think there is a good reason to have children in this period of humanity. In the past you'd have kids to help you live your life, and even that is kind of a greedy concept. Choosing to reproduce today is inherently selfish and while not immoral, there isn't anything morally redeeming about it.</quote> I mean I would have always been down to adopt instead of having my own children, but having kids, if you feel like your life is secure enough and you can protect them and give them a good life, can be a joyous thing for both you, and your children. Long as you can give them a good life, full of more joy than pain, happiness than sadness and prepare them for the world, then having kids can be a great thing, even in todays (in my opinion overpopulated) world. More good people in the world the better. There are certainly plenty of greedy/bad/evil etc people out there, so if you can raise some children who care about others, are responsible, and work to make the world better, you are doing something great. The problem is Idiocracy was right, and not just about IQ levels, but also about how likely it is for selfish people to have children over people who care about others. Same general rules apply. Selfish people will be more likely to have multiple kids, while those who truly care about the children and want what is best for them probably only have a few (obviously there are exceptions and religion can also play a role in that). </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Muscles 03/09/22 12:38:47 PM #20:	People die unexpectedly every day, even if you think you'll die in 10 years it really could be tomorrow by something unrelated So yeah, you take the risk of making orphans regardless --- Muscles Chicago Bears \| Chicago Blackhawks \| Chicago Bulls \| Chicago Cubs \| NIU Huskies <cite>Muscles posted [p:963299860] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>People die unexpectedly every day, even if you think you'll die in 10 years it really could be tomorrow by something unrelated So yeah, you take the risk of making orphans regardless </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wwinterj25 03/09/22 1:53:57 PM #21:	I believe it's fine. --- One who knows nothing can understand nothing. http://psnprofiles.com/wwinterj <cite>wwinterj25 posted [p:963301825] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>I believe it's fine. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sodium-chloride 03/09/22 2:43:31 PM #22:	wolfy42 posted... More good people in the world the better. There are certainly plenty of greedy/bad/evil etc people out there, so if you can raise some children who care about others, are responsible, and work to make the world better, you are doing something great. Honestly what would make the world better is having no humans at all. We have done nothing to benefit this planet and the future looks grim based on how the last century (and the last few years) have gone. <cite>sodium-chloride posted [p:963303381] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>wolfy42 posted... </cite> <quote>More good people in the world the better. There are certainly plenty of greedy/bad/evil etc people out there, so if you can raise some children who care about others, are responsible, and work to make the world better, you are doing something great.</quote> Honestly what would make the world better is having no humans at all. We have done nothing to benefit this planet and the future looks grim based on how the last century (and the last few years) have gone. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sage_assassin20 03/09/22 2:55:54 PM #23:	The entire point off offspring is to carry your genes into the future. <cite>Sage_assassin20 posted [p:963303730] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>The entire point off offspring is to carry your genes into the future. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nichtcrawler X 03/09/22 3:02:29 PM #24:	sodium-chloride posted... Honestly what would make the world better is having no humans at all. We have done nothing to benefit this planet and the future looks grim based on how the last century (and the last few years) have gone. The 90's was filled with Anim villains who had that mindset. --- Official Teetotaller of PotD Dovie'andi se tovya sagain! <cite>Nichtcrawler X posted [p:963303914] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>sodium-chloride posted... </cite> <quote>Honestly what would make the world better is having no humans at all. We have done nothing to benefit this planet and the future looks grim based on how the last century (and the last few years) have gone.</quote> The 90's was filled with Anim villains who had that mindset. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DangerCaged 03/09/22 3:19:25 PM #25:	Is this a real poll? --- I'm just here to escape the real world. <cite>DangerCaged posted [p:963304381] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>Is this a real poll? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zareth 03/09/22 3:38:07 PM #26:	I really don't understand how anyone can look at the state of the world right now, and the future, and think, "yes, this is a good time to bring a child into the world." --- In my opinion, all slavery is wrong, even the really fancy kind - Mead <cite>Zareth posted [p:963304911] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>I really don't understand how anyone can look at the state of the world right now, and the future, and think, "yes, this is a good time to bring a child into the world." </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Metalsonic66 03/09/22 6:56:26 PM #27:	It's immoral to have kids --- PSN/Steam ID: Metalsonic_69 Big bombs go kabang. <cite>Metalsonic66 posted [p:963311440] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>It's immoral to have kids </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wolfy42 03/09/22 7:32:41 PM #28:	sodium-chloride posted... Honestly what would make the world better is having no humans at all. We have done nothing to benefit this planet and the future looks grim based on how the last century (and the last few years) have gone. Sadly that is because of greedy/evil people who don't care about each other, the world, etc. They already exist, and they will have kids etc. The only way to fight against it (other than wiping out all of humanity which is pretty cruel as well), is to help create more good/caring people who do care about each other, the environment etc. The decision to destroy all humans is a pretty horrid one, as there are many good people on this planet and there is no reason why humanity can not live in peace and help the world become a heavan not just for humans but for all animals etc. Honestly if we only had 1 billion people on this planet and we were careful with resources, and used humane methods of killing animals for food (if we didn't just spend our time figuring out how to grow meat etc so no animals needed to die etc) humans could live great lives while not harming anything (including each other). And that is still a FREAKTON of humans on the planet. Everyone could still have 2 children (total though) just keeping the population even (and then a lottery could be held for an additional child if you wanted one (you would enter into it each year, and it's based on the number of unexpected deaths by people who had not already had 2 children yet). That would allow for the human race to maintain a steady/consistent population on this planet. you could easily use clean sources of energy as well, and focus on boosting technology etc without any wars, no drugs (non-recreational), no crime or very little etc (since everything has what they need to enjoy life). There is literally no reason with our technology and resources available to us, that we don't have that kind of life, except plain greed and a lack of caring/concern for each other. We as a race are pretty much monsters. There are good people and bad people, but in general the people who end up in control or with power are greedy (hence seizing the power) and that leads to the way the world currently works. It's actually insanely sad. --- Tacobot 3000 "Saving the world from not having tacos." Friends don't make their friends die Hanz. Psychopathic friends do. <cite>wolfy42 posted [p:963312541] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>sodium-chloride posted... </cite> <quote>Honestly what would make the world better is having no humans at all. We have done nothing to benefit this planet and the future looks grim based on how the last century (and the last few years) have gone.</quote> Sadly that is because of greedy/evil people who don't care about each other, the world, etc. They already exist, and they will have kids etc. The only way to fight against it (other than wiping out all of humanity which is pretty cruel as well), is to help create more good/caring people who do care about each other, the environment etc. The decision to destroy all humans is a pretty horrid one, as there are many good people on this planet and there is no reason why humanity can not live in peace and help the world become a heavan not just for humans but for all animals etc. Honestly if we only had 1 billion people on this planet and we were careful with resources, and used humane methods of killing animals for food (if we didn't just spend our time figuring out how to grow meat etc so no animals needed to die etc) humans could live great lives while not harming anything (including each other). And that is still a FREAKTON of humans on the planet. Everyone could still have 2 children (total though) just keeping the population even (and then a lottery could be held for an additional child if you wanted one (you would enter into it each year, and it's based on the number of unexpected deaths by people who had not already had 2 children yet). That would allow for the human race to maintain a steady/consistent population on this planet. you could easily use clean sources of energy as well, and focus on boosting technology etc without any wars, no drugs (non-recreational), no crime or very little etc (since everything has what they need to enjoy life). There is literally no reason with our technology and resources available to us, that we don't have that kind of life, except plain greed and a lack of caring/concern for each other. We as a race are pretty much monsters. There are good people and bad people, but in general the people who end up in control or with power are greedy (hence seizing the power) and that leads to the way the world currently works. It's actually insanely sad. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SunWuKung420 03/09/22 7:42:34 PM #29:	Raising smart, kind children is the only way to change the world. --- "I don't question our existence, I just question our modern needs" Pearl Jam - Garden My theme song - https://youtu.be/-PXIbVNfj3s <cite>SunWuKung420 posted [p:963312846] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>Raising smart, kind children is the only way to change the world. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HornedLion 03/09/22 8:19:30 PM #30:	kind9 posted... I'm an antinatalist debate me and loose kind9 posted... loose --- Century: Age Of Ashes is the greatest dragon riding game to ever exist and it's FREE. <cite>HornedLion posted [p:963313996] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>kind9 posted... </cite> <quote>I'm an antinatalist debate me and loose</quote> kind9 posted... </cite> <quote> loose</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Wanded 03/09/22 10:55:35 PM #31:	this thread is potd incarnate --- I stand with Israel. #FightAntisemitism <cite>Wanded posted [p:963318713] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>this thread is potd incarnate </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The_tall_midget 03/09/22 11:01:15 PM #32:	The overpopulated countries or even countries with normal # of children per family tend to not actually think that having children is inherently bad. But then again, their countries tend to not tolerate groups of mentally ill individuals who constantly scream against /actively weaken their own nation, thus allowing them to have a normal age pyramid which will prevent them from dealing a lot of social/financial issues in the future. --- Let's go Brandon! <cite>The_tall_midget posted [p:963318894] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>The overpopulated countries or even countries with normal # of children per family tend to not actually think that having children is inherently bad. But then again, their countries tend to not tolerate groups of mentally ill individuals who constantly scream against /actively weaken their own nation, thus allowing them to have a normal age pyramid which will prevent them from dealing a lot of social/financial issues in the future. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pionear 03/10/22 8:00:11 AM #33:	kind9 posted... antinatalist Actually had to go Google That... <cite>pionear posted [p:963326398] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>kind9 posted... </cite> <quote>antinatalist</quote> Actually had to go Google That... </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BEERandWEED 03/10/22 8:09:07 AM #34:	Kids are a gift from God. Hopefully one day I will be blessed with a dozen. --- Always have a hamms in hand. <cite>BEERandWEED posted [p:963326522] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>Kids are a gift from God. Hopefully one day I will be blessed with a dozen. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kind9 03/10/22 8:14:23 AM #35:	pionear posted... Actually had to go Google That... I was parodying some dude who made a topic about that once on here. He was very sure of himself and his bigbrain philosophy. --- http://i.imgur.com/NkZUeFd.gif <cite>kind9 posted [p:963326602] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>pionear posted... </cite> <quote>Actually had to go Google That...</quote>I was parodying some dude who made a topic about that once on here. He was very sure of himself and his bigbrain philosophy. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lil_Bit83 03/10/22 12:22:43 PM #36:	Veedrock- posted... Yes, their training must begin immediately so they can avenge my death. --- 2DS FC tempest 1478 9807 1205 <cite>Lil_Bit83 posted [p:963332076] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>Veedrock- posted... </cite> <quote>Yes, their training must begin immediately so they can avenge my death.</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DangerCaged 03/10/22 9:14:25 PM #37:	pionear posted... Actually had to go Google That... If you often frequent online communities to discuss politics and the like, then alot of uncommon words start becoming normal lexicon for you. They just become normalized. However, when was the last time you heard anyone call anyone a "fascist" in real life? Probably never right? Its not a word thats used, not even on the news. Its almost exclusively reserved for online discussion. If I were to go to the mall right now and ask 20 random people what a fascist is, I bet only 5 or less would be able to provide me with a legible answer. Some of this internet lingo we use man, it clouds our judgement, because we forget its not common linguistics when out and about in the real world. --- I'm just here to escape the real world. <cite>DangerCaged posted [p:963346736] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>pionear posted... </cite> <quote>Actually had to go Google That...</quote> If you often frequent online communities to discuss politics and the like, then alot of uncommon words start becoming normal lexicon for you. They just become normalized. However, when was the last time you heard anyone call anyone a "fascist" in real life? Probably never right? Its not a word thats used, not even on the news. Its almost exclusively reserved for online discussion. If I were to go to the mall right now and ask 20 random people what a fascist is, I bet only 5 or less would be able to provide me with a legible answer. Some of this internet lingo we use man, it clouds our judgement, because we forget its not common linguistics when out and about in the real world. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The_Viscount 03/10/22 10:02:01 PM #38:	pionear posted... If you think you're going to die within 10 years? ...jfc, pio, why do you ALWAYS put some weird fucking caveat past the poll that completely changes the context of the poll? Short answer: It depends. If a support structure exists for the child afterward, there's zero issue. And if you know you only have ten years of life, you can probably do more to make sure the child will be okay than somebody who thought they had longer to live. Veedrock- posted... Yes, their training must begin immediately so they can avenge my death. I can see it. Judgmenl posted... Child rearing is an act of greed. Your posts are always so fucking crazy and backward. Child rearing is effectively the opposite, since you're giving your time and generally a ton of cash. sodium-chloride posted... Honestly what would make the world better is having no humans at all. We have done nothing to benefit this planet and the future looks grim based on how the last century (and the last few years) have gone. By that logic, what would make the world better is having no life at all. And life does nothing to benefit the planet, because the planet is just a ball of dirt in space. However, if you care about the existence of life in the universe, humanity is your only option right now because if something was going to happen to the Earth that completely wiped it out (more than a ELE), we're the only species capable of evacuating it for another planet. And, honestly, given the existence of ELEs, what humans "do" to the planet is irrelevant. --- Woken LLC <cite>The_Viscount posted [p:963347717] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>pionear posted... </cite> <quote>If you think you're going to die within 10 years?</quote> ...jfc, pio, why do you ALWAYS put some weird fucking caveat past the poll that completely changes the context of the poll? Short answer: It depends. If a support structure exists for the child afterward, there's zero issue. And if you know you only have ten years of life, you can probably do more to make sure the child will be okay than somebody who thought they had longer to live. Veedrock- posted... </cite> <quote>Yes, their training must begin immediately so they can avenge my death.</quote> I can see it. Judgmenl posted... </cite> <quote>Child rearing is an act of greed.</quote> Your posts are always so fucking crazy and backward. Child rearing is effectively the opposite, since you're giving your time and generally a ton of cash. sodium-chloride posted... </cite> <quote>Honestly what would make the world better is having no humans at all. We have done nothing to benefit this planet and the future looks grim based on how the last century (and the last few years) have gone.</quote> By that logic, what would make the world better is having no life at all. And life does nothing to benefit the planet, because the planet is just a ball of dirt in space. However, if you care about the existence of life in the universe, humanity is your only option right now because if something was going to happen to the Earth that completely wiped it out (more than a ELE), we're the only species capable of evacuating it for another planet. And, honestly, given the existence of ELEs, what humans "do" to the planet is irrelevant. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Joshs Name 03/10/22 10:08:23 PM #39:	Creating offspring is my only function. If I had 10 years left it would be even more imperative to make it happen. I hate that you made this a moral poll --- So I was standing still at a stationary store... <cite>Joshs Name posted [p:963347882] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>Creating offspring is my only function. If I had 10 years left it would be even more imperative to make it happen. I hate that you made this a moral poll </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DangerCaged 03/14/22 2:23:24 PM #41:	This topic has helped me lose faith in humanity. Of course it's moral to have kids. Its also obtainable for each and every one of you in this topic to become devoted husbands, and loving fathers. Thats a goal many should be shooting for, and I wish you all the best of luck in obtaining it. --- I'm just here to escape the real world. <cite>DangerCaged posted [p:963440061] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>This topic has helped me lose faith in humanity. Of course it's moral to have kids. Its also obtainable for each and every one of you in this topic to become devoted husbands, and loving fathers. Thats a goal many should be shooting for, and I wish you all the best of luck in obtaining it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sodium-chloride 03/14/22 11:47:44 PM #42:	DangerCaged posted... Of course it's moral to have kids. It's natural to have kids, but what makes having kids moral? What if you are living beyond your means or living in poverty, and give birth to children only to have them suffer with you? What if you are a neglectful parent, or in the case of this topic, a parent who is going to die in the foreseeable future? Do either of those situations make you think "of course it's still moral to have kids"? <cite>sodium-chloride posted [p:963455401] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>DangerCaged posted... </cite> <quote>Of course it's moral to have kids.</quote> It's natural to have kids, but what makes having kids moral? What if you are living beyond your means or living in poverty, and give birth to children only to have them suffer with you? What if you are a neglectful parent, or in the case of this topic, a parent who is going to die in the foreseeable future? Do either of those situations make you think "of course it's still moral to have kids"? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Metalsonic66 03/14/22 11:50:15 PM #43:	DangerCaged posted... Of course it's moral to have kids That's just what the corporations want you to think, maaaaan --- PSN/Steam ID: Metalsonic_69 Big bombs go kabang. <cite>Metalsonic66 posted [p:963455446] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>DangerCaged posted... </cite> <quote>Of course it's moral to have kids</quote>That's just what the corporations want you to think, maaaaan </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DangerCaged 03/15/22 5:35:34 PM #44:	sodium-chloride posted... It's natural to have kids, but what makes having kids moral? What if you are living beyond your means or living in poverty, and give birth to children only to have them suffer with you? What if you are a neglectful parent, or in the case of this topic, a parent who is going to die in the foreseeable future? Do either of those situations make you think "of course it's still moral to have kids"? If you raise them to be wonderful human beings then you are contributing to society, and making the earth a better place by adding a wonderful talented person into the mix. --- I'm just here to escape the real world. <cite>DangerCaged posted [p:963474516] in Think its ... [t:79934916]...</cite> <quote>sodium-chloride posted... </cite> <quote>It's natural to have kids, but what makes having kids moral? What if you are living beyond your means or living in poverty, and give birth to children only to have them suffer with you? What if you are a neglectful parent, or in the case of this topic, a parent who is going to die in the foreseeable future? Do either of those situations make you think "of course it's still moral to have kids"?</quote> If you raise them to be wonderful human beings then you are contributing to society, and making the earth a better place by adding a wonderful talented person into the mix. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Poll of the Day > Think its Ok/Moral to have Kids... (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Think its Ok/Moral to have Kids...