Poll of the Day > Blonde faces being FIRED for GRINDING on NFL Coach and she bought a 400K HOUSE!

(+) Yeah! (+)

24 y/o Cayman Nebraska, the blonde who was filmed backing her butt up Jacksonville Jaguars head coach is seen for the first time after her mom released a statement that her daughter's life is being DESTROYED and being labeled a HOMEWRECKER by the public as her employer is now reviewing her employment when the scandal broke out and this after she bought a 400,000 HOUSE just months prior!!

She is seen opening the door of her 400,000 house which is just a mile from the Meyer's bar

She's a digital marketing executive who REFUSED to take a comment from dailymail, a month after she was filmed grinding on top of Urban Meyer while his wife was home babysitting their grandkids.

Since then the viral video took a hit on both of them but moreso on her while Urban's wife DEFENDED her husband and said they are in love now more than ever and nothing will break their bond that they made to God when they exchanged vows years ago.

But Cayman is apparently afraid to leave her home and is facing abuse. Her mother said "I'm worried for her emotional status right now. She can't even go anywhere. It's ruining her life"

Her mother is praying for her daughter that she does not get fired because she needs the job for her newly purchased house.

She prays the owner of New Horizons doesn't fire her daughter after she had just bought a 3 bedroom, 2 bathroom house.

But the company has begun an internal investigation into Nebraska after many Karens called into them demanding her firing for being a HOMEWRECKER and attempting to destroy a man's afmily.

When asked why the investigation is necessary, New Horizon told USA they were merely looking into whether the scandal would have any lasting effects on operations of the company and what kind of impact she will have on them but has said she has no prior issues with her before this and remained an asset

The coach raised eyebrows when he was captured letting a girl grind on him and he made an apology to the city and the team for his actions and that his wife, Shelley and daughter Gigi stand by him and wanted to move on from this..

Gigi said God brought her parents together and will always be with them to together forever and will not let one encounter ruin 37 years of marriage because of it

Do you think Cayman should be fired because she's a homewrecker who tried to get into 2 loving Christians?

https://i.imgur.com/eC57aha.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/wjXo3ib.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/us8A5mF.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/vRnY4RJ.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/cnB47v3.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/XHPBvxH.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/0R7OrOL.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/9DktfO0.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/Li7h4Mv.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/10StQf2.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/pQZvFPV.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/nFuNdxi.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/epzY9GS.jpg
---

She did absolutely nothing wrong.
---

Revelation34 posted...

She did absolutely nothing wrong.

This, the coach is the creep.

---

Rough 24.

Revelation34 posted...

She did absolutely nothing wrong.

DocDelicious posted...

This, the coach is the creep.

If she knew the guy was married, they both arguably did something wrong.

---

Zeus posted...

Rough 24.

If she knew the guy was married, they both arguably did something wrong.

Helping somebody cheat is not the same as the person cheating.
---

Zeus posted...

If she knew the guy was married, they both arguably did something wrong.

I'm not sure it's even arguable. How is it in any way her responsibility to maintain that boundary at all? To my way of thinking she can come on to him, he can say no, that's that.


---

Why isn't the coach being investigated? Sexism.

---

Who are the Christians you're referring to? Urban Meyer isn't a saint because had he reeled in Aaron Hernandez when he coached Florida when he knew Hernandez was hanging with gang members and brandishing guns and starting fights, maybe Hernandez doesn't murder someone.

---

Revelation34 posted...

She did absolutely nothing wrong.

---

That house better be in a nice area.


---

I dont think she should get fired
---

Zeus posted...

Rough 24.

If she knew the guy was married, they both arguably did something wrong.

was SHE part of the marriage?

no. She was a third party with zero involvement in whatever agreement or relationship the husband and wife had.

absent evidence of her using roofies or similar blame is 100% his.

---

I feel each of the people complained calling her a home wrecker should be fired then Publically tarred and feathered to make their punishment Fit their screwed up twisted view of the world.

---

While I think the guy is the most to blame, I wont say shes blameless Not yet, at least. One reason is its possible she knew who he was and that he was married. Even if she didnt know, he may have been wearing his wedding ring, which is also a sign or his relationship. If she didnt know who he was, and he wasnt wearing his ring, then she can be blameless. If not, well, its still a shitty thing to do in most cases. Though, its not like they had sex, right? Unless I missed that part of the article. Either way, she gets some blame, even though most goes to the guy because it should

That said, I still dont think she should be fired because of it
---

LinkPizza posted...

While I think the guy is the most to blame, I wont say shes blameless Not yet, at least. One reason is its possible she knew who he was and that he was married. Even if she didnt know, he may have been wearing his wedding ring, which is also a sign or his relationship. If she didnt know who he was, and he wasnt wearing his ring, then she can be blameless. If not, well, its still a shitty thing to do in most cases. Though, its not like they had sex, right? Unless I missed that part of the article. Either way, she gets some blame, even though most goes to the guy because it should

That said, I still dont think she should be fired because of it

Revelation34 posted...

Helping somebody cheat is not the same as the person cheating.

---

Oh. I agree its not the same. But its still a shitty thing to do. Just because its not as bad doesnt mean theyre blameless Just less blame
---

LinkPizza posted...

Oh. I agree its not the same. But its still a shitty thing to do. Just because its not as bad doesnt mean theyre blameless Just less blame

Not sure why you have to explain this. It takes two to tango. As the married one he has to take the big responsibility. But he basically got off scot free while she's getting all the heat. But its not like she didn't know he was married. Some cheating married people are real tricky and can fool you. Then she would be blameless. But she was dumb. This has gone to the other extreme where she's getting too much blame. It be like that though. The funny part is that I can bet you all these people totally absolving her would be doing the same thing if their man/woman got hooked by a "homewrecker". They wouldn't say the other person is blameless at all!

---

The most absurd this is that they never even had sex or did anything sexual other than a form of dancing.

was there any form of sexual activity? Any form of oral sex or even making out?

if not then this is totally absurd.

i bet most of the crazies blaming her even .0001% would have no issue if the dude went to a strip club and there the chicks are topless (maybe bottomless depending on the kind of club) on top of that this kind of dancing is more covid 19 prevention friendly as they arent breathing on each other.

---

Bumping and grinding on a married man known to you is dumb no matter how you try and slice it. You trying to compare her to a stripper in a nightclub says it all. A stripper wouldn't even know who the hell he is just some other rando paying them. Strippers would actually be blameless. Not hard to understand. That said, the part I don't get is why she should be losing her job. Its him that should lose his if anything, he's the one who's the figurehead of an institution.

---

Conner4REAL posted...

The most absurd this is that they never even had sex or did anything sexual other than a form of dancing.

was there any form of sexual activity? Any form of oral sex or even making out?

if not then this is totally absurd.

I did mention that. I think its weird that this has gone to the lengths it has as there was no sex. Which to me means it shouldnt even be this big of a deal. Or a scandal. Should just be a sleep on the couch thing for him. And she shouldnt be getting my the heat that she is More like a shame on you, dont do it again, slap on the wrist thing

Conner4REAL posted...

i bet most of the crazies blaming her even .0001% would have no issue if the dude went to a strip club and there the chicks are topless (maybe bottomless depending on the kind of club) on top of that this kind of dancing is more covid 19 prevention friendly as they arent breathing on each other.

It depends on if his wife knew. Though, at that point, the girls there are doing there job. Which is a little different than a random girl not working at the strip club

I also dont think it crazy to blame her a little, as she deserves some of it. Not enough to lose her job, and not even close the amount he should have. But still some
---

Why is this news

But theyre both not great.

You can say only the guy had an obligation to turn him down but its also shitty to tempt someone. I dont want to live in a world where its considered "okay" to tempt people in dedicated relationships.

---

she did what most women do when a rich man is giving them attention.

Full Throttle posted...

Do you think Cayman should be fired because she's a homewrecker who tried to get into 2 loving Christians?

There are dating sites for that, couples seeking a third person to spice things up.

---

what a sloozy

Full Throttle posted...

REFUSED to take a comment from dailymail

What did dailymail want to say to her?

Full Throttle posted...

a homewrecker who tried to get into 2 loving Christians?

Is that like a 3-way? That's not the same as being a homewrecker.

---

deoxxys posted...

I dont want to live in a world where its considered "okay" to tempt people in dedicated relationships.

Why not? That seems like a pretty easy problem to solve with judicious use of the word "no." Nothing about this was in any way non-consensual.

---

deoxxys posted...

I dont want to live in a world where its considered "okay" to tempt people in dedicated relationships.

Same
---

adjl posted...

Why not? That seems like a pretty easy problem to solve with judicious use of the word "no." Nothing about this was in any way non-consensual.

I mean yeah no can be said but its still best not to offer a diabetic a donut or and alcoholic a drink.
I myself have had many different addictions I have gotten over and I know the power of temptation.
Im not perfect myself and I know that no one else is either, but I would rather not encourage or normalize that sort of thing, thats why.

---

I reserve my opinion until she grinds on me so I can have an educated opinion.

---

deoxxys posted...

Why is this news

But theyre both not great.

You can say only the guy had an obligation to turn him down but its also shitty to tempt someone. I dont want to live in a world where its considered "okay" to tempt people in dedicated relationships.

Prove she knew he is married.
---

deoxxys posted...

I mean yeah no can be said but its still best not to offer a diabetic a donut or and alcoholic a drink.

In either case, though, the person offering isn't going to know that that's something the recipient would rather avoid until they're told. Once they've been asked to stop offering, absolutely, continuing to do so is a dick move, but I haven't suggested that that's any less true in this situation (and, in fact, responding to "no" with further pressure to engage in sexual activity could be characterized as attempted rape, depending on the circumstances). The individual's wishes should be respected, but the one providing the temptation has no responsibility to figure out those wishes before making the offer, nor do they have any responsibility to assume that any requests the individual makes shouldn't be taken at face value.

In the case of actual addictions, there are potentially concerns about the person's ability to properly consent, such that a bit more onus can be placed on the person offering to recognize when they shouldn't do so, but even then, it's not reasonable to expect them to show that restraint unless they've been given reason to. That also isn't particularly applicable here: Dude isn't addicted to anything, he was just horny.

---

I hear you adjl, I tried reading it over multiple times because I wasnt processing it.

At the end of the day all I'm saying is it feels terrible to be cheated on, like in sometimes it can make you feel bad enough to want to commit suicide and I dont think we should accept that its okay to tempt people who are in a dedicated relationship. But Im also saying sexual urges are powerful carnal desires which can sometimes overwrite our better judgement. My duality is leaking through.

Revelation34 posted...

Prove she knew he is married.

I thought we were going with the assumption that she knew.

---

deoxxys posted...

At the end of the day all I'm saying is it feels terrible to be cheated on, like in sometimes it can make you feel bad enough to want to commit suicide and I dont think we should accept that its okay to tempt people who are in a dedicated relationship. But Im also saying sexual urges are powerful carnal desires which can sometimes overwrite our better judgement. My duality is leaking through.

And what I'm saying is that the responsibility for cheating lies solely on the person who made the decision to cheat, because the other party has no obligation and has made no commitment to respect their relationship. It's inconsiderate in the sense that the other party is saying "I don't care about *cheated partner*'s feelings, but *cheated partner* is a complete stranger (in this case), so there's no reason to expect them to care about that (note that sleeping with a friend's partner is definitely a dick move because one should care about one's friends' feelings). The person doing the cheating is the one that's deciding to betray their partner. That's what should be focused on.

---

$400k isn't a lot of money...

---

Judgmenl posted...

$400k isn't a lot of money...

Okay Remy Buxaplenty

---

adjl posted...

And what I'm saying is that the responsibility for cheating lies solely on the person who made the decision to cheat, because the other party has no obligation and has made no commitment to respect their relationship. It's inconsiderate in the sense that the other party is saying "I don't care about *cheated partner*'s feelings, but *cheated partner* is a complete stranger (in this case), so there's no reason to expect them to care about that (note that sleeping with a friend's partner is definitely a dick move because one should care about one's friends' feelings). The person doing the cheating is the one that's deciding to betray their partner. That's what should be focused on.

Sure. Whatever. I still rather not have people pulling dick moves like messing around with people in relationships around Nor does it make any sense for people to condone their behavior saying its ok. They arent betraying you, but theyre still a shitty person
---

Metalsonic66 posted...

Okay Remy Buxaplenty

That's like the average price of a home in my area?

---

LinkPizza posted...

Sure. Whatever. I still rather not have people pulling dick moves like messing around with people in relationships around Nor does it make any sense for people to condone their behavior saying its ok. They arent betraying you, but theyre still a shitty person

The only way you couldn't assign any blame beyond your partner is if they cheated so much you don't even know how many people they fucked. At which point you have bigger concerns. If it's just the one outside person, especially a longterm affair then obviously the parties will share blame. I would suggest the person being cheated on also must take some blame. In most cases unless they a hoe, people don't cheat for no reason. It's because the main parties are failing at their relationship. There's plenty of blame to go around so completely absolving someone as though they weren't even there is such a weird take. Even many cheaters themselves own up to it. It's like saying an accessory to crime should get off free because they weren't the main culprit. But I already told you these people wouldn't be talking so high and mighty if it happened to them. They're full of shite.

---

deoxxys posted...

I thought we were going with the assumption that she knew

Maybe you are but nobody else is.

Judgmenl posted...

That's like the average price of a home in my area?

That's because they're overpriced.

MeteoricBurst posted...

There's plenty of blame to go around so completely absolving someone as though they weren't even there is such a weird take.

Lol.
---

Revelation34 posted...

Lol.

Maybe weird isn't the word. More like shameless. I can say I haven't ever seen that logic used outside of shameless serial cheaters that try to play the guilt free card. They just don't care. Even "regular" cheaters accept blame for their part in the affair.

---

That house does not look likes it worth $400k. A house like that would go for like $125K in the South. Also, Urban Meyer a Christian LOL. That man ain't no saint.

deoxxys posted...

Im not perfect myself and I know that no one else is either, but I would rather not encourage or normalize that sort of thing, thats why.

So a more puritanical society? Just because something is considered immoral by a subset of people, should not mean it has to be illegal.

---

Revelation34 posted...

Helping somebody cheat is not the same as the person cheating.

Kungfu Kenobi posted...

I'm not sure it's even arguable. How is it in any way her responsibility to maintain that boundary at all? To my way of thinking she can come on to him, he can say no, that's that.

Those are some pretty shitty semantic arguments.

SunWuKung420 posted...

Why isn't the coach being investigated? Sexism.

Investigated for what? And his punishment is coaching the Jaguars. (Although he should probably be fired as-is, given the Jaguars' record. Everybody on that team should probably be shitcanned.)

LinkPizza posted...

I dont think she should get fired

That's the only part of this that kinda sucks, but that's social media for you.

LinkPizza posted...

While I think the guy is the most to blame, I wont say shes blameless Not yet, at least. One reason is its possible she knew who he was and that he was married. Even if she didnt know, he may have been wearing his wedding ring, which is also a sign or his relationship. If she didnt know who he was, and he wasnt wearing his ring, then she can be blameless. If not, well, its still a shitty thing to do in most cases. Though, its not like they had sex, right? Unless I missed that part of the article. Either way, she gets some blame, even though most goes to the guy because it should

Yeah, if she knew he was married, she absolutely deserves some blame. While it's not unreasonable to argue that more onus on is on the guy, if you're fucking around with a married person, you're generally doing something wrong.

And if she didn't know, that's just some shit luck.

MeteoricBurst posted...

But he basically got off scot free while she's getting all the heat.

And that's the bigger issue here, although he's probably under contract so they can't fire him.

---

Nichtcrawler X posted...

So a more puritanical society? Just because something is considered immoral by a subset of people, should not mean it has to be illegal.

lmao no one said cheating should be illegal. Lets just not condone it and act like it doesnt "take two to tango".

adjl posted...

And what I'm saying is that the responsibility for cheating lies solely on the person who made the decision to cheat, because the other party has no obligation and has made no commitment to respect their relationship. It's inconsiderate in the sense that the other party is saying "I don't care about *cheated partner*'s feelings, but *cheated partner* is a complete stranger (in this case), so there's no reason to expect them to care about that (note that sleeping with a friend's partner is definitely a dick move because one should care about one's friends' feelings). The person doing the cheating is the one that's deciding to betray their partner. That's what should be focused on.

Well yeah obviously the cheater in the relationship is the main focus.

No one is saying they arent the main problem and while you may not feel this way, I will still also blame the skeevy person that came on to them.

I guess its one thing to flirt with someone and make comments that lead to going back and forth with a developing thing over time versus someone straight up grinding on you.

But anyway I rest my case.

---

Yeah it didn't really look like he wanted a lap dance from some random stranger. He looked clearly awkward and hunched down and blocking his privates like a creepy aunt or president was rubbing his shoulders or something.

She is an executive at 24?

deoxxys posted...

Lets just not condone it and act like it doesnt "take two to tango".

But cases can be looked at at an individual basis. Is knowingly homewrecking the same thing as dating someone who is unbeknownst to you in another relationship?
Who's responsibility is it that neither one in a relationship is cheating? If everyone involved is fine with the situation, is it still wrong?

The disdain for other people having relationships outside of their main/official one is mostly puritanical.

---

Nichtcrawler X posted...

But cases can be looked at at an individual basis. Is knowingly homewrecking the same thing as dating someone who is unbeknownst to you in another relationship?

Thats how it is, already

Nichtcrawler X posted...

Is knowingly homewrecking the same thing as dating someone who is unbeknownst to you in another relationship?

That means the person is cheating on both of them

Nichtcrawler X posted...

Who's responsibility is it that neither one in a relationship is cheating? If everyone involved is fine with the situation, is it still wrong?

Thats either and open relationship or polyamorous relationship

Nichtcrawler X posted...

The disdain for other people having relationships outside of their main/official one is mostly puritanical.

No. Its can also be a trust issue Or just because people dont like people who act shitty
---

If she gets fired and nothing happens to the coach, our world is fucked.

The coach is f-ed. Not flying back with his team after the loss, so he can go partying at his bar was a major PR fiasco for him . That and the fact the Jags can not win a game to save thier lives means that he is not long for the NFL head coaching world after this season, maybe even before.

---