Poll of the Day > Chili

(+) Yeah! (+)

With or without beans and pasta. I eat it both ways but I prefer no beans.

---

No pasta, yes beans.

---

chili with pasta? What is this heresy?

---

Depends on the chili. If you think of Cincinnati
chili as more Greek bolognese, the served with spaghetti and cheese makes more sense.

Otherwise, just the chili, or maybe rice. Also yes beans.

---

Pasta? No.
Beans? Always.

Also, your choices are awful.

Why no "yes beans, no pasta" choice?

---

I think what needs to be said has been said already.

*Goes back to eating a leftover cornbread muffin from last night*

---

with beans, no pasta.

if it doesn't have beans, it's not chili
---

I like it better with rice. Beans are part of said chilli regardless.

---

Chili spaghetti is ok however I dont like pasta. Chili with rice is good and very common in dry mixes for pantry storage

---

Meal chili? With beans

As a condiment? No beans.

Chili on pasta is fine, but I refer you to my first statement.

---

A Cincinnati five-way sounds like something really dirty.

---

I prefer my chili to have beans in it

I have never heard of chili with pasta

---

I prefer Cincinnati style.

I used to work at Lonestar Steakhouse and people used to complain that our chili had beans in it, because authentic Texas chili has no beans. I guess I just prefer more substance than liquified ground beef

---

BADoglick posted...

I prefer Cincinnati style.

I used to work at Lonestar Steakhouse and people used to complain that our chili had beans in it, because authentic Texas chili has no beans. I guess I just prefer more substance than liquified ground beef

Yah food going in looking the same as going out is a little eck
Bonus add corn

---

I've literally never heard of eating pasta in chili at any point in my life.

I've only ever heard discussion whether or not there should be beans in it.
---

Chili with no beans is a Texas thing. Us civilized folk know that chili has beans. Both are good, but I do prefer beans usually.

Chili with pasta... That sounds like something a midwesterner would do, thinking they're a culinary genius. Midwesterners have a lot of weird takes on food.

ParanoidObsessive posted...

I've literally never heard of eating pasta in chili at any point in my life.

I've only ever heard discussion whether or not there should be beans in it.

---

Never pasta, sometimes beans. Sometimes instead of beans, I use ground pork or pork sausage.

The only place I've ever had pasta and chili together was at Steak n' Shake

---

Chili needs to be less artsy and more fartsy.

---

When I was really young growing up we had no beans, no pasta. When I got a little older my dad started making pasta noodles with it most of the time (jumbo macaroni works best). Making my own as an adult Its beans and pasta.
---

Don't care for Cincinnati style , which is how my schools served it when I was a kid.

We called it goolash when using macaroni , not chili.

My wife makes ours with hamburger , dark red kidney beans , onions , spicy diced tomatoes, brooks ketchup , and enough chili powder it's hotter on the third day of leftovers than it was freshly cooked.

adjl posted...

No pasta, yes beans.

this
Judgmenl posted...

chili with pasta? What is this heresy?

also this

---