Poll of the Day > Jeremy Renner is BROKE cause of COVID-19 and his EX WIFE!! Is She Hot???

(+) Yeah! (+)

Dailymail has revealed 49 y/o Avengers Star, Jeremy Renner sas COVID-19 has cost him MILLIONS in salary and he's BROKE and cannot afford the alimony money to his ex wife as movies have dried up and he cannot work when he used to make 344,000 a MONTH!!

He's losing 20,000 a month according to the Oscar Winner and his plummeting income in the latest legal documents to be filled in the bitter long running custody battle he's at with his ex wife, Canadian Model, Sonni Pachecho over their 7 y/o daughter, Ava

He's asked Judge Anne Richardson to reduce his monthly child support payments to his 29 y/o ex from 30,000 to 11,000 and said "It's likely that most productions will not resume again prior to the end of the year. As such, the projects that i had previously lined up to film this year are cancelled or postponed"

To back it up, he detailed how his income has been reduced to ZERO and his monthly net income during the 3 years from 2017 to 2019 as 344,649

But by May of this year in the midst of the pandemic when Hollywood shut down, his net income dropped to -18,368 and his monthly expenses total almost 98,000 who describes himself as an actor,singer and songwriter

Those expenses include 18,279 for the mortage on his luxury 9 bedroom mansion in LA and 5651 a month for groceries and household supplies and 3393 for laundry plus 11,438 for his vacation homein Reno, Nevada

Although he's not claiming to be "broke" he has 19 MILLION in ASSETTS

The custody battle has been raging as he refused to take drug tests when she accusedhim of being drunk and high with their daughter as he has a long history of drug and alcohol abuse that has persisted since before his marriage

The judge refused the canadian born actress for that order but she did demand he submit a COVID-19 testing after he threw a maskless party with Ava around with several women around him and is concerned he is not practicing safe measures such as social distancing

Renner denies it and tells dailymail that Ava was not there in Reno when he threw that party

They broke in December 2014 after a marriage that lasted only 10 MONTHS and agreed for shared custody where he would pay 30,000 a month for child support plus 200,000 a year in Ava's trust fund

But it just went ugly from there and now Pacheco wants sole custody after she accused him of abuse and still taking drugs and says he is a danger to their child but Renner accused her of milking him for money while she lives a LAVISH lifestyle

Is Sonni Hot?

https://i.imgur.com/NMdpuv5.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/XMNw9Y9.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/Ga9kZF4.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/8PbqSs1.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/agDUoQ1.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/Smea2I0.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/TtvjqwJ.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/Xe67zBs.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/TI7k4zP.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/w89lyhz.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/j0BcZP5.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/mOoVy3B.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/XPwJFh3.jpg
---

My guess is she's hot for her age, but all of those shots look like they've been retouched.

---

Too skinny

---

Tell her to get a job.
---

mrduckbear posted...

he cannot work when he used to make 344,000 a MONTH!!

Which is kinda insane, considering he's usually not a headline act.

mrduckbear posted...

He's asked Judge Anne Richardson to reduce his monthly child support payments to his 29 y/o ex from 30,000 to 11,000 and said "It's likely that most productions will not resume again prior to the end of the year. As such, the projects that i had previously lined up to film this year are cancelled or postponed"

So from obscene to merely outrageous?

mrduckbear posted...

Those expenses include 18,279 for the mortage on his luxury 9 bedroom mansion in LA and 5651 a month for groceries and household supplies and 3393 for laundry plus 11,438 for his vacation homein Reno, Nevada

Which is yowzers, but I guess if you're usually making $3m+/year...

mrduckbear posted...

Although he's not claiming to be "broke" he has 19 MILLION in ASSETTS

Well, you kinda can be broke and have a ton in assets, at which point you're kinda fucked since you often have to fire sale some of those assets to pay bills (thereby getting a smaller return)

mrduckbear posted...

They broke in December 2014 after a marriage that lasted only 10 MONTHS and agreed for shared custody where he would pay 30,000 a month for child support plus 200,000 a year in Ava's trust fund

Oh ffs... That's downright criminal. $360k/year in child support is absolutely insane, especially for shared custody. And that's in addition to the alimony, I imagine?

mrduckbear posted...

Is Sonni Hot?

Sure, she's hot, but not hot enough for that much money.

---

mrduckbear posted...

5651 a month for groceries

He could live on a tenth of that a month. And I shop at Whole Foods and Sprouts. Unless cocaine is a food all of a sudden.

---

It's fucking stupid that he has to pay that much to his ex wife

It's also fucking stupid that he has that much money to begin with and still manages to spend it all

Jfc fuck rich people


---

Blightzkrieg posted...

It's f***ing stupid that he has to pay that much to his ex wife

As a percentage of his income, it seems quasi-reasonable, but that's still an absurd amount. It does not cost that much to raise a child. Plenty of single parents do it on that much per year. Rich people alimony is dumb. The point of alimony is to keep somebody who was dependent on their ex-spouse from being destitute, not to allow them to maintain the same lavish lifestyle they married into.

Blightzkrieg posted...

It's also f***ing stupid that he has that much money to begin with and still manages to spend it all

Eeyup. Even with that mortgage and those child support payments (the latter of which really should be reduced to reflect his lost income), a single 344k month should have been able to support him for ~6 months once it became apparent he wasn't going to be getting work and he should live a bit more frugally, let alone multiple months at that pay grade.

---

I was wondering where he went.

he suddenly got popular with the avengers, then he tried to become a singer (!?), did a Jeep ad where he sings, and the he disappeared

mrduckbear posted...

5651 a month for groceries and household supplies and 3393 for laundry

what the actual fuck

5651 is more than my goddamn house payments and this dude spends that on just food?

and how many fucking clothes is this dude wearing in a day to have it cost that much

---

likehelly posted...

what the actual fuck

5651 is more than my goddamn house payments and this dude spends that on just food?

and how many fucking clothes is this dude wearing in a day to have it cost that much

Most likely he has (or had) a personal chef. They are expensive. I'm gonna guess that probably accounts for at least 2-3k a month.

---

What happened to the money he's made from those movies? Did he not save or invest some of that. I mean it's not like he's being paid by the hour. He makes roughly between 3 to 10M per movie so how the heck is he broke.

---

BUMPED2002 posted...

What happened to the money he's made from those movies? Did he not save or invest some of that. I mean it's not like he's being paid by the hour. He makes roughly between 3 to 10M per movie so how the heck is he broke.

Duckbear says he owns 19 million dollars in assets, so probably houses, cars, and maybe stocks or something

---

Noop_Noop posted...

Most likely he has (or had) a personal chef. They are expensive. I'm gonna guess that probably accounts for at least 2-3k a month.

That's still a solid ~3k worth of food per month, for a single guy. Is he snacking on truffles or something?

likehelly posted...

and how many f***ing clothes is this dude wearing in a day to have it cost that much

I'm guessing that's a consequence of having everything dry cleaned. Now, why one would have a full dry clean-only wardrobe, I don't know, because that just seems silly.

---

adjl posted...

That's still a solid ~3k worth of food per month, for a single guy. Is he snacking on truffles or something?

lets actually break this down

if he is hiring a good personal chef for even 1 meal a day you can count on him dropping 2.5k per month on it (more likely he gets lunch and breakfast too. that number is likely closer to 3.5k or 4k, but im being conservative)

entertaining ladies? throwing dinner parties? shit is expensive, and im willing to guess that mr renner probably does so at least once a month, and i would guess that he spends at least 1000 on the affair

leaving him with about 2k per month, or about $500 per week for food and "other household supplies"

personally i would speculate that a good chunk of that $500 is probably going toward recreational substances. booze, marijuana, coke, who knows what mr renner gets into.

One high priced bottle of scotch per week could easily knock $100 off of that total, bringing us to 400 per week.

I could easily spend that amount on groceries in a given week if i thought the money was never going to stop rolling
in.

dont get me wrong, if you make that kind of money you should be setting yourself to be able to retire at the drop of a hat. if he were actually broke, then he is a fucking idiot, but then so is most of hollywood.

---

adjl posted...

As a percentage of his income, it seems quasi-reasonable, but that's still an absurd amount. It does not cost that much to raise a child. Plenty of single parents do it on that much per year. Rich people alimony is dumb. The point of alimony is to keep somebody who was dependent on their ex-spouse from being destitute, not to allow them to maintain the same lavish lifestyle they married into.

Alimony is never reasonable. It should not exist. Child support is different than alimony.

likehelly posted...

what the actual fuck

5651 is more than my goddamn house payments and this dude spends that on just food?

and how many fucking clothes is this dude wearing in a day to have it cost that much

The laundry probably includes dry cleaning.
---

adjl posted...

The point of alimony is to keep somebody who was dependent on their ex-spouse from being destitute, not to allow them to maintain the same lavish lifestyle they married into.

Not to mention they were only married TEN MONTHS so it's not like she had that much time to get used to the lifestyle anyway.

adjl posted...

Eeyup. Even with that mortgage and those child support payments (the latter of which really should be reduced to reflect his lost income), a single 344k month should have been able to support him for ~6 months once it became apparent he wasn't going to be getting work and he should live a bit more frugally, let alone multiple months at that pay grade.

idk, it's a mansion in LA, that mortgage could be per month instead of per year =p

TheBabaYaga posted...

I was wondering where he went.

he suddenly got popular with the avengers, then he tried to become a singer (!?), did a Jeep ad where he sings, and the he disappeared

He didn't really "go" anywhere, it's COVID season. There isn't going to be much happening. Otherwise I think he has a D+ series.

BUMPED2002 posted...

What happened to the money he's made from those movies? Did he not save or invest some of that. I mean it's not like he's being paid by the hour. He makes roughly between 3 to 10M per movie so how the heck is he broke.

Citation? Because he's a much smaller figure in the franchise and that $10m claim doesn't jive with anything he reported to the courts.

Otherwise he has a mansion he likely put a downpayment on, he has a second home, etc. And even he isn't saying he's broke since, even if he's cash poor, he still has $19m in assets at least some of which is probably cash.

adjl posted...

I'm guessing that's a consequence of having everything dry cleaned. Now, why one would have a full dry clean-only wardrobe, I don't know, because that just seems silly.

When you can afford things, you tend to fall into a lot of things most people consider luxuries and it's worth noting that some things we consider luxuries are actually important for helping an entertainer's career. In this case, an actor's public image and public profile can help them secure jobs.

---

should have been more aware

---

Revelation34 posted...

Alimony is never reasonable. It should not exist. Child support is different than alimony.

how come no one ever talks or does anything about this eventhough it's probably the only issue both leftists and right wingers agree about?

---

Wanded posted...

how come no one ever talks or does anything about this eventhough it's probably the only issue both leftists and right wingers agree about?

Because much of the left does not agree about that. Men are evil and will hurt you because this is lifetime.

---

Wanded posted...

how come no one ever talks or does anything about this eventhough it's probably the only issue both leftists and right wingers agree about?

Both the left and right generally agree on alimony to some extent, although there's often disagreement over how it should be handled (and, in some cases, who it should impact -- ie, there's often a strong opposition to paying a man alimony even if both partners decided he should skip working to care for the child).

Personally, I view alimony like unemployment: It shouldn't be an open-ended obligation. I know that at least some states do set limits, although I'm not sure how many cap the payment amount. That's kinda why you always want to get a prenup.

---

Wanded posted...

how come no one ever talks or does anything about this eventhough it's probably the only issue both leftists and right wingers agree about?

Because they're all getting alimony? :D

Imagine thinking you can't live without $30,000 a month. Jesus Christ, where did I go wrong in life?

EDIT: As for the poll, I can't even see the picture at work and I voted No. Any leechy (c-word) like this I'll never be attracted to, regardless of what she looks like.

---

yeah, i'm not going to let jeremy renner's financial situation keep me up at night, duckbear, thanks so much for posting this, ok?

---

Noop_Noop posted...

lets actually break this down

if he is hiring a good personal chef for even 1 meal a day you can count on him dropping 2.5k per month on it (more likely he gets lunch and breakfast too. that number is likely closer to 3.5k or 4k, but im being conservative)

entertaining ladies? throwing dinner parties? shit is expensive, and im willing to guess that mr renner probably does so at least once a month, and i would guess that he spends at least 1000 on the affair

leaving him with about 2k per month, or about $500 per week for food and "other household supplies"

personally i would speculate that a good chunk of that $500 is probably going toward recreational substances. booze, marijuana, coke, who knows what mr renner gets into.

One high priced bottle of scotch per week could easily knock $100 off of that total, bringing us to 400 per week.

I could easily spend that amount on groceries in a given week if i thought the money was never going to stop rolling
in.

dont get me wrong, if you make that kind of money you should be setting yourself to be able to retire at the drop of a hat. if he were actually broke, then he is a fucking idiot, but then so is most of hollywood.

It's conceivable, but still seems positively absurd, especially where $1000 dinner parties aren't exactly commonplace in an era where having outsiders in your home is legally prohibited. The exact wording was also "for groceries," which I wouldn't think would include a chef's salary, but I know better than to put that much weight in Duckbear's word choices. It seems we agree on "what a moron," so let's leave it at that.

Zeus posted...

idk, it's a mansion in LA, that mortgage could be per month instead of per year =p

That math is based on it being monthly. Make it annual, and he should have been good for a couple years.

Zeus posted...

When you can afford things, you tend to fall into a lot of things most people consider luxuries and it's worth noting that some things we consider luxuries are actually important for helping an entertainer's career. In this case, an actor's public image and public profile can help them secure jobs.

Sure, I get that he'd have a whole lot more dry cleaning than most people, but an entire wardrobe, such that you always have to pay dry cleaning prices no matter what you're wearing? Actors can maintain their public image just fine with clothes that can go in a regular washing machine.

Revelation34 posted...

Alimony is never reasonable. It should not exist.

Eh, I can see some defense for it. In many ways, it's a relic of a time when most households were single-income: By the nature of that relationship, the non-working spouse becomes completely financially dependent on the other, and alimony ensures that divorce won't completely screw them over. With double-income households being more common these days, that's less of a concern, but there's still generally going to be enough of a difference in income that a divorce is going to introduce financial hardship for one party, and it's generally bad for people to be stuck in bad marriages because of that.

Now, does it need work? Absolutely. The extreme differences in income that you see in any trophy spouse situation should not result in similarly extreme alimony. There should be reasonable caps on it based on reasonable estimates of costs of living, rather than basing it on maintaining their current lifestyle. It should also probably have a time limit imposed on it (3-5 years is plenty of time to become independent), as well as adjusting it according to any changes in income level (whether due to employment or finding a new person to depend on). It also really needs to stop favouring women so much (again, that's a relic of the "man=breadwinner" dynamic of yore and has no place in today's world), though that's a broader cultural issue. Despite the numerous issues, though, I think the fundamental concept is sound.

That said, a lot of the issues alimony aims to solve can be solved with pre-nups instead, generally more amicably and efficiently than trying to sort out something "fair" in courts. Rather than trying to fix all the problems alimony has, it'd probably be more reasonable to promote a cultural shift to have pre-nups become normal (and possibly to revisit the agreements every few years to update them as needed to account for changes in the relationship dynamic), so that more couples are comfortable discussing them.

---

adjl posted...

By the nature of that relationship, the non-working spouse becomes completely financially dependent on the other, and alimony ensures that divorce won't completely screw them over.

Revelation34 posted...

Tell her to get a job.

---