Board 8 > Politics Containment Topic 202: More Like Cesar Say-owned

(+) Yeah! (+)

People trying to blame their weak ass stomachs on Arby's

Tch get out with that noise
---

arbys containment topic
---

scarletspeed is definitely ralph club's biggest contributor
---

scarletspeed7 posted...

Reg posted...

scarletspeed7 posted...

Hey fuck Arby's though. I always have some sort of bathroom issue when I eat their roast beef.

I don't want to know what prompted this, but I eat Arbys regularly and I never have any issues like you're referencing.

Taco Bell too, for that matter <_<

I never have problems at Taco Bell! I can't think of a singe place I have any issue other than Arby's. Granted I don't eat too much fast food anymore (outside of Chipotle), but the only place that ever gives me an issue is Arby's.

Yeah I just mentioned that because I've heard similar complaints in the past.

The biggest complaints I've heard have been towards White Castle, but I'm not 100% sure that isn't a regional chain.
---

Suprak the Stud posted...

The biggest complaints I've heard have been towards White Castle, but I'm not 100% sure that isn't a regional chain.

Harold and Kumar go to White Castle. Wow Suprak. Talk shit on White Castle some more after that legendary movie.

Extreme!
---

Love me some white castle
---

Suprak the Stud posted...

Like I said, Farrakhan is mainstream adjacent.

First of all, fuck Louis Farrakhan. If for NO other reason than the fact that he had Malcolm X assassinated. Imagine if we still had Malcolm X as a part of our racial and political dialogue and how much better off we would be

Second, this is flagrantly untrue ever since getting dumped by Obama hes been like dipping into Scientology and away from mainstream politics and in 2016 actually fucking supported Trump.

Like I legitimately have no idea what you're talking about here.
---

Arby's has the best social media person.

And white castle is domestic terrorism.
---

HanOfTheNekos posted...

Arby's has the best social media person.

Spelled Wendy's wrong.
---

Yeah, some light googling shows that Farrakhan is very pro-Trump.
---

Peace___Frog posted...

Many Jews, myself included, were appalled by the decision to move the embassy to Jerusalem because we are democrats and a Republican did it (despite democrats vowing to do it also)

Ftfy
---

Says the guy who gets his panties in a bunch whenever liberals call a conservative a racist for making a dog whistle statement.
---

Corrik posted...

Peace___Frog posted...

Many Jews, myself included, were appalled by the decision to move the embassy to Jerusalem because we are democrats and a Republican did it (despite democrats vowing to do it also)

Ftfy

if democrats wanted to move the embassy to jerusalem then why didn't obama do it
---

scarletspeed7 posted...

HanOfTheNekos posted...

Arby's has the best social media person.

Spelled Wendy's wrong.

Nope
---

Not_an_Owl posted...

Corrik posted...

Peace___Frog posted...

Many Jews, myself included, were appalled by the decision to move the embassy to Jerusalem because we are democrats and a Republican did it (despite democrats vowing to do it also)

Ftfy

if democrats wanted to move the embassy to jerusalem then why didn't obama do it

The Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995[1] is a public law of the United States passed by the post-Republican Revolution 104th Congress on October 23, 1995. The proposed law was adopted by the Senate (935),[2] and the House (37437).[3] The Act became law without a presidential signature on November 8, 1995.

Bipartisan.

Both Clinton and Bush campaigned on moving it.

Now hush.
---

Wendy's is the GOAT because now I imagine the mascot as a snarky motherfucker


---

Wow, some unexpected good news. The outgoing (GOP) governor of Idaho just endorsed the states ballot proposition to expand Medicaid:

https://www.ktvb.com/article/news/politics/gov-otter-endorses-medicaid-expansion/277-609494610
---

I have been requested at crunch time not to post here for any reason. So I just wanted to say I wont be here for a week, I will return after the Red Wave Tuesday. Have a wonderful day bros. God bless
---

@DoomTheGyarados is this how it works
---

Corrik posted...

Not_an_Owl posted...

Corrik posted...

Peace___Frog posted...

Many Jews, myself included, were appalled by the decision to move the embassy to Jerusalem because we are democrats and a Republican did it (despite democrats vowing to do it also)

Ftfy

if democrats wanted to move the embassy to jerusalem then why didn't obama do it

The Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995[1] is a public law of the United States passed by the post-Republican Revolution 104th Congress on October 23, 1995. The proposed law was adopted by the Senate (935),[2] and the House (37437).[3] The Act became law without a presidential signature on November 8, 1995.

Bipartisan.

Both Clinton and Bush campaigned on moving it.

Now hush.

grats on answering a question i didn't ask

now try again

if democrats wanted to move the embassy to jerusalem then why didn't obama do it
---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lA5UqUyFmT0" data-time="

this topic in a nutshell

peewee is timeless
---

WrestIeMania posted...

I have been requested at crunch time not to post here for any reason. So I just wanted to say I wont be here for a week, I will return after the Red Wave Tuesday. Have a wonderful day bros. God bless

Feel free to stay gone.
---

Moving the embassy was a bad idea. Bush, Clinton, and Obama all three decided not to move it for good reason. Trump moved it for one simple reason: Because it would be easy to do, and would play well to his base. He didn't consider any of the political ramifications for anything, because he never does. It's the same reason he wouldn't outright criticize the Charlottesville White Supremacists. The Republican platform essentially labels roughly half of American Citizens as their enemy. And much of the base eats it up.
---

Ill aleays remember that Bitch we got the meats. Tweet
---

Not_an_Owl posted...

Corrik posted...

Not_an_Owl posted...

Corrik posted...

Peace___Frog posted...

Many Jews, myself included, were appalled by the decision to move the embassy to Jerusalem because we are democrats and a Republican did it (despite democrats vowing to do it also)

Ftfy

if democrats wanted to move the embassy to jerusalem then why didn't obama do it

The Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995[1] is a public law of the United States passed by the post-Republican Revolution 104th Congress on October 23, 1995. The proposed law was adopted by the Senate (935),[2] and the House (37437).[3] The Act became law without a presidential signature on November 8, 1995.

Bipartisan.

Both Clinton and Bush campaigned on moving it.

Now hush.

grats on answering a question i didn't ask

now try again

if democrats wanted to move the embassy to jerusalem then why didn't obama do it

If Republicans want to end abortion, why didn't George Bush do it?

If Democrats want to ban assault rifles, why didn't Obama do it?

If Democrats want legalized marijuana, why didn't Clinton do it?

This is such an astronomically silly response to what I said that it is silly.

Is Obama literally the only democrat that ever existed?

Because he decided not to. Like, duh.

What the hell does that have to do with what I said?

Like,

"grats on answering a question i didn't ask

now try again"

While

"grats on asking a question that had nothing to do with what I said

now try again"

Democrats voted bipartisanly with Republicans to move the Embassy to Jerusalem. Bill Clinton campaigned on it at points.

So, let's just make this simple. I am entirely right. You tried to ask something disingenuous unrelated which you thought is cute. You will never admit I was right and you are wrong, so we will move along on it.
---

LordoftheMorons posted...

Wow, some unexpected good news. The outgoing (GOP) governor of Idaho just endorsed the states ballot proposition to expand Medicaid:

https://www.ktvb.com/article/news/politics/gov-otter-endorses-medicaid-expansion/277-609494610

Is it with work requirements? Most Republican governors are pushing for expanding Medicaid. Just with work requirements.
---

I'm glad DiGiorno's has been taking advantage of GioGio
---

Corrik posted...

If Republicans want to end abortion, why didn't George Bush do it?

If Democrats want to ban assault rifles, why didn't Obama do it?

If Democrats want legalized marijuana, why didn't Clinton do it?

Because all of these things require legislation, i.e. Congress, to do. The President could not do any of them unilaterally. The President can move an embassy unilaterally; he does not need Congressional approval to do so.

So let's try yet again. If moving the embassy to Jerusalem enjoyed such wide bipartisan support, why was it not done already?
---

a friendly note that corrik completely changed the line of questioning in that post
---

Oh I'm well aware he's being disingenuous. I'm curious to see how far he's willing to go to avoid admitting Trump made a really obviously bad decision.
---

GuessMyUserName posted...

a friendly note that corrik completely changed the line of questioning in that post

Yeah. This argument literally began with King I didnt say that, youre putting words in my mouth, typical liberal tactic, #ThisIsWhyYouLost #MAGA altering Peafs post to put words in his mouth.
---

Jakyl25 posted...

https://twitter.com/globalnews/status/1057241611460075520?s=21

Were the only country in the world where a person comes in and has a baby, and the baby is essentially a citizen of the United States, Trump said.

Hey, thats technically true

am i missing a reference here?

Because that's completely false. Pretty much the entire western hemisphere has birthright citizenship.

Edit: oh wait duh. you mean that in the sense of "the united states is the only country where having a baby here makes them a citizen of the united states"
---

xp1337 posted...

Jakyl25 posted...

https://twitter.com/globalnews/status/1057241611460075520?s=21

Were the only country in the world where a person comes in and has a baby, and the baby is essentially a citizen of the United States, Trump said.

Hey, thats technically true

am i missing a reference here?

Because that's completely false. Pretty much the entire western hemisphere has birthright citizenship.

Take the words completely literally and imagine Were is replaced by The United States is
---

xp1337 posted...

Jakyl25 posted...

https://twitter.com/globalnews/status/1057241611460075520?s=21

Were the only country in the world where a person comes in and has a baby, and the baby is essentially a citizen of the United States, Trump said.

Hey, thats technically true

am i missing a reference here?

Because that's completely false. Pretty much the entire western hemisphere has birthright citizenship.

but they aren't citizens of the United States!
---

yes i realized that right after >_>
---

Also to be fair to Trump, we are the only country worth being a citizen of that offers birthright citizenship (other than Canada I guess). People aren't flying to Paraguay to give birth.
---

Not_an_Owl posted...

Corrik posted...

If Republicans want to end abortion, why didn't George Bush do it?

If Democrats want to ban assault rifles, why didn't Obama do it?

If Democrats want legalized marijuana, why didn't Clinton do it?

Because all of these things require legislation, i.e. Congress, to do. The President could not do any of them unilaterally. The President can move an embassy unilaterally; he does not need Congressional approval to do so.

So let's try yet again. If moving the embassy to Jerusalem enjoyed such wide bipartisan support, why was it not done already?

The Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995[1] is a public law of the United States passed by the post-Republican Revolution 104th Congress on October 23, 1995. The proposed law was adopted by the Senate (935),[2] and the House (37437).[3] The Act became law without a presidential signature on November 8, 1995.

Bipartisan.

Both Clinton and Bush campaigned on moving it.

Now hush.

I feel like I am seriously just talking to people who have no interest in actually reading or making valid points. And, instead, just dig into the echo chamber looking for support instead of being able to just admit when they are wrong.
---

man I did not catch on to that earlier

sending jakyl a Like
---

Oh wow, youre right. He IS completely ignoring the question. If it has bipartisan support, why didnt they move it? It totally had bipartisan support! Way to not read, libs!
---

Amazing. I never thought I would meet someone who was totally incapable of realizing their premise had been granted.
---

"Democratic delegates restored to their party platform Wednesday the position that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel, reversing a controversial omission that had angered some Jewish organizations and drew criticism from Republicans that President Obama was distancing the United States from its closest ally in the Middle East.

The amendment to the platform, which essentially reinstates the language on Jerusalem from the 2008 version, was introduced by former Ohio governor Ted Strickland. It was put to a voice vote by Los Angeles Mayor Antonio R. Villaraigosa, the convention chairman, who asked three times for aye votes before determining that the amendment had a two-thirds majority."

"President Obama, seeking to quell a storm of criticism from Republicans and pro-Israel groups, directed the Democratic Party on Wednesday to amend its platform to restore language declaring Jerusalem the Israeli capital."

"The problem for pro-Israel Democrats is that their party, increasingly dependent on minority voters, has become vulnerable to intersectional arguments in which the Palestinian war on Israel is a Third World parallel to the Black Lives Matter movement. That factor helps account for the fact that sympathy for Israel as measured by the polls is so low among Democrats when compared to Republicans. According to Pew, Republicans back Israel against the Palestinians by a staggering 79 percent to 6 percent margin, while Democrats are split 2725 percent on the issue. Gallup shows that 87 percent of Republicans sympathize more with Israel than with the Palestinians, while the same is true of only 49 percent of Democrats. While both polls show that large majorities of Americans overall back Israel, the partisan differences, which have been in place for two decades, are growing."

"The DNC also said Jerusalem should be an "undivided city", while contradicting itself by adding that the issue is subject to negotiation with the Palestinians, who claim occupied East Jerusalem as their own capital.

That's exactly what the Democratic party platform said when Barack Obama was elected in 2008."

"On June 5, 2017, the senate passed a resolution commemorating Israels 50th year claiming Jerusalem as their capital, and it passed unanimously, 90-0. This means every Republican, Democrat or independent Senator that voted, voted in favor of recognizing Jerusalem as the capital city of Israel."

"Its not for me to tell you what that says, Graham said. It hurts me.

He noted that the absence of Democrats sent a dangerous message that Americans were not united in their support for Israel."

^ The heel turn. All the sudden democrats are against the move when Trump does it yet being so for it.

So, like said, "Against it because a republican did it and not a democrat" is the actual mindset of the democrats now supposedly so against it.
---

Will you people stop asking Corrik to think please.
---

Eddv posted...

Suprak the Stud posted...

Like I said, Farrakhan is mainstream adjacent.

First of all, fuck Louis Farrakhan. If for NO other reason than the fact that he had Malcolm X assassinated. Imagine if we still had Malcolm X as a part of our racial and political dialogue and how much better off we would be

Second, this is flagrantly untrue ever since getting dumped by Obama hes been like dipping into Scientology and away from mainstream politics and in 2016 actually fucking supported Trump.

Like I legitimately have no idea what you're talking about here.

Where in the country are you from? This is fairly big news around me since Farrakhan is bigger in Chicago than most of the rest of the country. There are two individuals in the house of representatives, Danny Davis and Andre Carson, that either met with Farrakhan recently or outright praised him. It was covered fairly heavily in the local news earlier this year in the Chicagoland area.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danny_K._Davis#Relationship_with_Louis_Farrakhan

Davis has said that Louis Farrakhan, the leader of the Nation of Islam who has attracted considerable controversy regarding his repeated anti-Semitic and homophobic remarks, is an "outstanding human being" and "I personally know [Farrakhan], Ive been to his home, done meetings, participated in events with him." In March 2018 he said, "The world is so much bigger than Farrakhan and the Jewish question and his position on that and so forth. For those heavy into it, thats their thing, but it aint my thing."

https://www.indystar.com/story/opinion/columnists/tim-swarens/2018/03/13/swarens-andre-carson-wont-rule-out-future-meetings-louis-farrakhan/415971002/

Ive spent my life fighting discrimination in every form, from anyone. As a Member of Congress, I have met with a diverse array of community leaders, including Minister Farrakhan, to discuss critical issues that are important to my constituents and all Americans. While many of these leaders have long track records of creating positive change in their communities, this does not mean that I see eye to eye with them on all beliefs or public statements. Racism, homophobia, islamophobia, anti-Semitism, xenophobia and other forms of intolerance have no place in our civil discourse. This is part of my responsibility as a Representative to the diverse constituency I represent. As public officials, we must all recommit ourselves to simultaneously advocating for our communities while fostering a more inclusive, tolerant society.

Again, I am not calling him mainstream at all. And his views aren't even mainstream adjacent. But he himself is, and by that I mean there are people that I view in the mainstream of democratic politics that will associate with him in some way or another. Like, Carson says the right thing there, but he legitimizes Farrakhan even by meeting him. These are just two local examples, and I'm sure with more digging I could find others.

I didn't know Obama "dumped" him because I was unaware the two of them ever had a relationship to begin with! I thought Obama (rightly) steered clear of Farrakhan his entire political career and would be disappointed to learn they ever associated in a meaningful way so I'd need some sort of source on that comment.

And the NOI is far more aligned with democratic politics than republicans. I think Farrakhan flirted with Trump because he assumed he was as anti-semitic as he was, but in recent speeches he has gone as far as to blame the weather on the US electing Trump (and warn the earthquakes are coming), so I would say its safe to say that he is no longer in Trump's camp (if he ever really was).
---

Trump keeping up as much scary brown people talk as he can muster before the elections.
---

ulti how many people have you personally stopped from crossing the Mexican border
---

That's a slippery slope to go down.

By that logic you also killed that kid in the ICE camp.
---