Poll of the Day > 2 Mississippi Cops who MURDERED an INNOCENT Man and his DOG are found INNOCENT!

Topic List	Page List: 1
Full Throttle 09/12/18 11:35:54 PM #1:	Do you think these jerks should have been indicted? - Results (0 votes) Yes % (0 votes) 0 No % (0 votes) 0 2 Mississippi Cops who were fatally shot an INNOCENT man and his DOG during a BUNGLED ARREST last year will WALK FREE even though his death was rulde a HOMICIDE!! 41 y/o Ismael Lopez was shot in the back of the HEAD on July 23, 2017 when they appeared on his doorstep to execute an arrest warrant but it was intended for the man across the street!! Zachary Durden was listed as responsible for shooting Ismael and Samuel Maze shot and killed his dog, Coco A grand jury in July DECLINED to indict Durden on murder or manslaughter charges as DA John Champion said Lopez refused commands to put a rifle down from the inside of the house but the family disputes that claim. Zach said he saw a gun being pointed out of the house and started shouting "drop your weapon" and when that didn't happen, multiple shots were fired from outside the door and fatally wounded Lopez who died from gunshot wounds to the BACK of his head!! That's when the pitbull also charged at them and Samuel fired a shot at the pitbull and killed it. The officers were actually looking for Samuel Pearman who was wanted on domestic violence Champion said he sent a homicide charge to the grand jury but they declined to approve an indictment and said the case is now CLOSED as the men are essentially found innocent. The lopez family however are fighting on and said police shot through the closed door and hit Ismael at the back of the head that doesn't add up to their story Samuel was placed on desk duty and returned on the job in July when he learned he was found innocent as Zachary quit the force and moved into private sector work. Pictures of the cops were not released for safety of their identity from the public. Do you think these Cops should have been indicted?. Ismael - Deceased https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/07/27/10/42BAF00400000578-4735104-image-m-5_1501147416140.jpg https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/09/12/18/5016318100000578-6160353-image-a-7_1536772446099.jpg Samuel - The Real Man they were looking for https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/09/12/18/5016318F00000578-6160353-image-m-5_1536772012345.jpg The door they shot through to kill Ismael - https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/09/12/18/5016317700000578-6160353-image-a-6_1536772017151.jpg https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/07/27/10/42BABCEA00000578-4735104-image-a-18_1501147509351.jpg --- call me mrduckbear, sweater monkeys. A GFAQS User Steps On A Bug, I'll Stop Posting for 24 HOURS. THIS ACCOUNT ONLY!! I'm an Asian Liberal. RESIST The Alt-Right <cite>Full Throttle posted [p:908639948] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote> Do you think these jerks should have been indicted? - Results (0 votes) Yes % (0 votes) 0 No % (0 votes) 0 2 Mississippi Cops who were fatally shot an INNOCENT man and his DOG during a BUNGLED ARREST last year will WALK FREE even though his death was rulde a HOMICIDE!! 41 y/o Ismael Lopez was shot in the back of the HEAD on July 23, 2017 when they appeared on his doorstep to execute an arrest warrant but it was intended for the man across the street!! Zachary Durden was listed as responsible for shooting Ismael and Samuel Maze shot and killed his dog, Coco A grand jury in July DECLINED to indict Durden on murder or manslaughter charges as DA John Champion said Lopez refused commands to put a rifle down from the inside of the house but the family disputes that claim. Zach said he saw a gun being pointed out of the house and started shouting "drop your weapon" and when that didn't happen, multiple shots were fired from outside the door and fatally wounded Lopez who died from gunshot wounds to the BACK of his head!! That's when the pitbull also charged at them and Samuel fired a shot at the pitbull and killed it. The officers were actually looking for Samuel Pearman who was wanted on domestic violence Champion said he sent a homicide charge to the grand jury but they declined to approve an indictment and said the case is now CLOSED as the men are essentially found innocent. The lopez family however are fighting on and said police shot through the closed door and hit Ismael at the back of the head that doesn't add up to their story Samuel was placed on desk duty and returned on the job in July when he learned he was found innocent as Zachary quit the force and moved into private sector work. Pictures of the cops were not released for safety of their identity from the public. Do you think these Cops should have been indicted?. Ismael - Deceased https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/07/27/10/42BAF00400000578-4735104-image-m-5_1501147416140.jpg https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/09/12/18/5016318100000578-6160353-image-a-7_1536772446099.jpg Samuel - The Real Man they were looking for https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/09/12/18/5016318F00000578-6160353-image-m-5_1536772012345.jpg The door they shot through to kill Ismael - https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/09/12/18/5016317700000578-6160353-image-a-6_1536772017151.jpg https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/07/27/10/42BABCEA00000578-4735104-image-a-18_1501147509351.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 09/12/18 11:44:11 PM #2:	Full Throttle posted... 41 y/o Ismael Lopez was shot in the back of the HEAD on July 23, 2017 when they appeared on his doorstep to execute an arrest warrant but it was intended for the man across the street!! As Ducky might say, "whoopsie-doo" >_> Cops really need to start getting these fucking addresses right. Full Throttle posted... A grand jury in July DECLINED to indict Durden on murder or manslaughter charges as DA John Champion said Lopez refused commands to put a rifle down from the inside of the house but the family disputes that claim. Zach said he saw a gun being pointed out of the house and started shouting "drop your weapon" and when that didn't happen, multiple shots were fired from outside the door and fatally wounded Lopez who died from gunshot wounds to the BACK of his head!! That's when the pitbull also charged at them and Samuel fired a shot at the pitbull and killed it. Did they at least find the alleged rifle? --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:908640388] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Full Throttle posted...</cite> <quote> 41 y/o Ismael Lopez was shot in the back of the HEAD on July 23, 2017 when they appeared on his doorstep to execute an arrest warrant but it was intended for the man across the street!!</quote> As Ducky might say, "whoopsie-doo" >_> Cops really need to start getting these fucking addresses right. <cite>Full Throttle posted...</cite> <quote>A grand jury in July DECLINED to indict Durden on murder or manslaughter charges as DA John Champion said Lopez refused commands to put a rifle down from the inside of the house but the family disputes that claim. Zach said he saw a gun being pointed out of the house and started shouting "drop your weapon" and when that didn't happen, multiple shots were fired from outside the door and fatally wounded Lopez who died from gunshot wounds to the BACK of his head!! That's when the pitbull also charged at them and Samuel fired a shot at the pitbull and killed it.</quote> Did they at least find the alleged rifle?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Keebs05 09/13/18 12:19:54 AM #3:	Not being indicted is not the same as being found not guilty. --- "Old soldiers never die, they just fade away" R.I.P PFC Dusty Seidel <cite>Keebs05 posted [p:908642232] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote>Not being indicted is not the same as being found not guilty.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BADoglick 09/13/18 1:13:52 AM #4:	Cops shoot an obscene number of pet dogs every year. An estimated ten thousand annually, actually. It's really quite reflective of the whole 'we don't care if we kill one of your family members for little or no reason just so long as we ensure our safety' attitude that's prevalent among our nation's police forces. A lack of accountability exacerbates the problem. All too often we see people excuse the officers and blame the victims, and that really needs to change. Source: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/533319/ --- BADoglick to the Max! <cite>BADoglick posted [p:908644367] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote>Cops shoot an obscene number of pet dogs every year. An estimated ten thousand annually, actually. It's really quite reflective of the whole 'we don't care if we kill one of your family members for little or no reason just so long as we ensure our safety' attitude that's prevalent among our nation's police forces. A lack of accountability exacerbates the problem. All too often we see people excuse the officers and blame the victims, and that really needs to change. Source: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/533319/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 09/13/18 1:29:21 AM #5:	BADoglick posted... Cops shoot an obscene number of pet dogs every year. An estimated ten thousand annually, actually. It's really quite reflective of the whole 'we don't care if we kill one of your family members for little or no reason just so long as we ensure our safety' attitude that's prevalent among our nation's police forces. A lack of accountability exacerbates the problem. All too often we see people excuse the officers and blame the victims, and that really needs to change. Source: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/533319/ How many of those dogs were without leash? And how many were charging the officer? Otherwise the Atlantic article seems to heavily source a libertarian magazine >_> --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:908644899] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>BADoglick posted...</cite> <quote>Cops shoot an obscene number of pet dogs every year. An estimated ten thousand annually, actually. It's really quite reflective of the whole 'we don't care if we kill one of your family members for little or no reason just so long as we ensure our safety' attitude that's prevalent among our nation's police forces. A lack of accountability exacerbates the problem. All too often we see people excuse the officers and blame the victims, and that really needs to change. Source: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/533319/</quote> How many of those dogs were without leash? And how many were charging the officer? Otherwise the Atlantic article seems to heavily source a libertarian magazine >_></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 09/13/18 2:01:42 AM #6:	If the US police was a state, they would have at least the 3rd largest amount of homocides in the country lol --- Scloud posted... Its like he wants two things at the same time. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:908645926] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote>If the US police was a state, they would have at least the 3rd largest amount of homocides in the country lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Cacciato 09/13/18 2:02:58 AM #7:	Kyuubi4269 posted... homocides They're murdering gay people? --- "I properly understand when a woman wants my dick and I can do whatever I want to them, and then do it." OmegaTomHank <cite>Cacciato posted [p:908645960] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>homocides</quote> They're murdering gay people?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 09/13/18 2:07:22 AM #8:	Cacciato posted... Kyuubi4269 posted... homocides They're murdering gay people? You know that even with the misspelling, it still would mean humans killing their own, right? --- Scloud posted... Its like he wants two things at the same time. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:908646096] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Cacciato posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>homocides</quote> They're murdering gay people?</quote> You know that even with the misspelling, it still would mean humans killing their own, right?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Blighboy 09/13/18 2:08:04 AM #9:	If you're going into someone's house obviously the dog wouldn't be wearing a leash Zeus --- https://i.imgtc.com/s5SZnYd.jpg <cite>Blighboy posted [p:908646117] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote>If you're going into someone's house obviously the dog wouldn't be wearing a leash Zeus</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Cacciato 09/13/18 2:09:21 AM #10:	Kyuubi4269 posted... Cacciato posted... Kyuubi4269 posted... homocides They're murdering gay people? You know that even with the misspelling, it still would mean humans killing their own, right? Unlike you, I know that gay people are still people. --- "I properly understand when a woman wants my dick and I can do whatever I want to them, and then do it." OmegaTomHank <cite>Cacciato posted [p:908646155] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Cacciato posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>homocides</quote> They're murdering gay people?</quote> You know that even with the misspelling, it still would mean humans killing their own, right?</quote> Unlike you, I know that gay people are still people.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 09/13/18 2:11:39 AM #11:	Cacciato posted... Kyuubi4269 posted... Cacciato posted... Kyuubi4269 posted... homocides They're murdering gay people? You know that even with the misspelling, it still would mean humans killing their own, right? Unlike you, I know that gay people are still people. lol fail Git gud bro --- Scloud posted... Its like he wants two things at the same time. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:908646235] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Cacciato posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Cacciato posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>homocides</quote> They're murdering gay people?</quote> You know that even with the misspelling, it still would mean humans killing their own, right?</quote> Unlike you, I know that gay people are still people.</quote> lol fail Git gud bro</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 09/13/18 2:44:22 AM #12:	BADoglick posted... Cops shoot an obscene number of pet dogs every year. An estimated ten thousand annually, actually. It's really quite reflective of the whole 'we don't care if we kill one of your family members for little or no reason just so long as we ensure our safety' attitude that's prevalent among our nation's police forces. A lack of accountability exacerbates the problem. All too often we see people excuse the officers and blame the victims, and that really needs to change. Source: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/533319/ I read once a pet dog is killed by cops somewhere in America every day <cite>Zikten posted [p:908647134] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>BADoglick posted...</cite> <quote>Cops shoot an obscene number of pet dogs every year. An estimated ten thousand annually, actually. It's really quite reflective of the whole 'we don't care if we kill one of your family members for little or no reason just so long as we ensure our safety' attitude that's prevalent among our nation's police forces. A lack of accountability exacerbates the problem. All too often we see people excuse the officers and blame the victims, and that really needs to change. Source: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/533319/</quote> I read once a pet dog is killed by cops somewhere in America every day</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BADoglick 09/13/18 3:09:00 AM #13:	Zeus posted... BADoglick posted... Cops shoot an obscene number of pet dogs every year. An estimated ten thousand annually, actually. It's really quite reflective of the whole 'we don't care if we kill one of your family members for little or no reason just so long as we ensure our safety' attitude that's prevalent among our nation's police forces. A lack of accountability exacerbates the problem. All too often we see people excuse the officers and blame the victims, and that really needs to change. Source: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/533319/ How many of those dogs were without leash? And how many were charging the officer? Otherwise the Atlantic article seems to heavily source a libertarian magazine >_> Not having a leash on in it's own home warrants being killed? And for that matter, how many were on leashes? And how many weren't charging an officer? How can you reasonably believe that 10,000 dog killings by police a year is justifiable? You're proving my point. The lengths to which people will bend backwards for the sake of defending the most heinous of behavior, simply because the behavior is being committed by men in uniform, is astonishingly disgusting. --- BADoglick to the Max! <cite>BADoglick posted [p:908647712] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BADoglick posted...</cite> <quote>Cops shoot an obscene number of pet dogs every year. An estimated ten thousand annually, actually. It's really quite reflective of the whole 'we don't care if we kill one of your family members for little or no reason just so long as we ensure our safety' attitude that's prevalent among our nation's police forces. A lack of accountability exacerbates the problem. All too often we see people excuse the officers and blame the victims, and that really needs to change. Source: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/533319/</quote> How many of those dogs were without leash? And how many were charging the officer? Otherwise the Atlantic article seems to heavily source a libertarian magazine >_></quote> Not having a leash on in it's own home warrants being killed? And for that matter, how many were on leashes? And how many weren't charging an officer? How can you reasonably believe that 10,000 dog killings by police a year is justifiable? You're proving my point. The lengths to which people will bend backwards for the sake of defending the most heinous of behavior, simply because the behavior is being committed by men in uniform, is astonishingly disgusting.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 09/13/18 3:29:28 AM #14:	Zikten posted... BADoglick posted... Cops shoot an obscene number of pet dogs every year. An estimated ten thousand annually, actually. It's really quite reflective of the whole 'we don't care if we kill one of your family members for little or no reason just so long as we ensure our safety' attitude that's prevalent among our nation's police forces. A lack of accountability exacerbates the problem. All too often we see people excuse the officers and blame the victims, and that really needs to change. Source: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/533319/ I read once a pet dog is killed by cops somewhere in America every day 3 times more people get killed by cops. --- Scloud posted... Its like he wants two things at the same time. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:908648158] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BADoglick posted...</cite> <quote>Cops shoot an obscene number of pet dogs every year. An estimated ten thousand annually, actually. It's really quite reflective of the whole 'we don't care if we kill one of your family members for little or no reason just so long as we ensure our safety' attitude that's prevalent among our nation's police forces. A lack of accountability exacerbates the problem. All too often we see people excuse the officers and blame the victims, and that really needs to change. Source: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/533319/</quote> I read once a pet dog is killed by cops somewhere in America every day</quote> 3 times more people get killed by cops.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 09/13/18 3:58:17 AM #15:	Blighboy posted... If you're going into someone's house obviously the dog wouldn't be wearing a leash Zeus The pet dogs statistic doesn't make exclusive mention of going into peoples' homes, Bligh BADoglick posted... Not having a leash on in it's own home warrants being killed? And for that matter, how many were on leashes? And how many weren't charging an officer? How can you reasonably believe that 10,000 dog killings by police a year is justifiable? You're proving my point. The lengths to which people will bend backwards for the sake of defending the most heinous of behavior, simply because the behavior is being committed by men in uniform, is astonishingly disgusting. Did you even read the article? One of the examples is a dog shot out on the boardwalk. What, was the person homeless so the whole boardwalk was his home? And you're talking about 10,000 annual incidents in a country with a 325m human population and a 89m dog population. Numbers don't exist in isolation. And whether or not something was justified is dependent on INDIVIDUAL INCIDENTS, not an overall quota. But, if we're just tossing around numbers, there are 4.7m dog bites in the US per year and 800k of those require medical care. https://www.caninejournal.com/dog-bite-statistics/ And while you're fine with thinking that somebody with a knife or gun is dangerous, you seem to somehow not understand that large dogs are dangerous as well. And the fact that you're so opposed to even look into those numbers -- and just claim outrage over volume -- says a lot about your "point" --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:908648673] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Blighboy posted...</cite> <quote>If you're going into someone's house obviously the dog wouldn't be wearing a leash Zeus</quote> The pet dogs statistic doesn't make exclusive mention of going into peoples' homes, Bligh <cite>BADoglick posted...</cite> <quote>Not having a leash on in it's own home warrants being killed? And for that matter, how many were on leashes? And how many weren't charging an officer? How can you reasonably believe that 10,000 dog killings by police a year is justifiable? You're proving my point. The lengths to which people will bend backwards for the sake of defending the most heinous of behavior, simply because the behavior is being committed by men in uniform, is astonishingly disgusting.</quote> Did you even read the article? One of the examples is a dog shot out on the boardwalk. What, was the person homeless so the whole boardwalk was his home? And you're talking about 10,000 annual incidents in a country with a 325m human population and a 89m dog population. Numbers don't exist in isolation. And whether or not something was justified is dependent on INDIVIDUAL INCIDENTS, not an overall quota. But, if we're just tossing around numbers, there are 4.7m dog bites in the US per year and 800k of those require medical care. https://www.caninejournal.com/dog-bite-statistics/ And while you're fine with thinking that somebody with a knife or gun is dangerous, you seem to somehow not understand that large dogs are dangerous as well. And the fact that you're so opposed to even look into those numbers -- and just claim outrage over volume -- says a lot about your "point"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Cacciato 09/13/18 4:00:13 AM #16:	Zeus posted... Numbers don't exist in isolation. If that were true then there wouldn't be a whole song about how one is the loneliest number. --- "I properly understand when a woman wants my dick and I can do whatever I want to them, and then do it." OmegaTomHank <cite>Cacciato posted [p:908648718] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Numbers don't exist in isolation. </quote> If that were true then there wouldn't be a whole song about how one is the loneliest number.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EvilMegas 09/13/18 8:09:48 AM #17:	Zeus posted... BADoglick posted... Cops shoot an obscene number of pet dogs every year. An estimated ten thousand annually, actually. It's really quite reflective of the whole 'we don't care if we kill one of your family members for little or no reason just so long as we ensure our safety' attitude that's prevalent among our nation's police forces. A lack of accountability exacerbates the problem. All too often we see people excuse the officers and blame the victims, and that really needs to change. Source: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/533319/ How many of those dogs were without leash? And how many were charging the officer? Otherwise the Atlantic article seems to heavily source a libertarian magazine >_> All ten thousand are bad dogs. --- Official King of Black People https://imgur.com/Zk3VS3o http://imgur.com/a/UeQiE <cite>EvilMegas posted [p:908654241] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BADoglick posted...</cite> <quote>Cops shoot an obscene number of pet dogs every year. An estimated ten thousand annually, actually. It's really quite reflective of the whole 'we don't care if we kill one of your family members for little or no reason just so long as we ensure our safety' attitude that's prevalent among our nation's police forces. A lack of accountability exacerbates the problem. All too often we see people excuse the officers and blame the victims, and that really needs to change. Source: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/533319/</quote> How many of those dogs were without leash? And how many were charging the officer? Otherwise the Atlantic article seems to heavily source a libertarian magazine >_></quote> All ten thousand are bad dogs.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 09/13/18 8:50:19 AM #18:	EvilMegas posted... Zeus posted... BADoglick posted... Cops shoot an obscene number of pet dogs every year. An estimated ten thousand annually, actually. It's really quite reflective of the whole 'we don't care if we kill one of your family members for little or no reason just so long as we ensure our safety' attitude that's prevalent among our nation's police forces. A lack of accountability exacerbates the problem. All too often we see people excuse the officers and blame the victims, and that really needs to change. Source: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/533319/ How many of those dogs were without leash? And how many were charging the officer? Otherwise the Atlantic article seems to heavily source a libertarian magazine >_> All ten thousand are bad dogs. Well no cats were shot. --- Scloud posted... Its like he wants two things at the same time. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:908655637] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>EvilMegas posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BADoglick posted...</cite> <quote>Cops shoot an obscene number of pet dogs every year. An estimated ten thousand annually, actually. It's really quite reflective of the whole 'we don't care if we kill one of your family members for little or no reason just so long as we ensure our safety' attitude that's prevalent among our nation's police forces. A lack of accountability exacerbates the problem. All too often we see people excuse the officers and blame the victims, and that really needs to change. Source: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/533319/</quote> How many of those dogs were without leash? And how many were charging the officer? Otherwise the Atlantic article seems to heavily source a libertarian magazine >_></quote> All ten thousand are bad dogs.</quote> Well no cats were shot.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EvilMegas 09/13/18 9:41:05 AM #19:	Kyuubi4269 posted... EvilMegas posted... Zeus posted... BADoglick posted... Cops shoot an obscene number of pet dogs every year. An estimated ten thousand annually, actually. It's really quite reflective of the whole 'we don't care if we kill one of your family members for little or no reason just so long as we ensure our safety' attitude that's prevalent among our nation's police forces. A lack of accountability exacerbates the problem. All too often we see people excuse the officers and blame the victims, and that really needs to change. Source: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/533319/ How many of those dogs were without leash? And how many were charging the officer? Otherwise the Atlantic article seems to heavily source a libertarian magazine >_> All ten thousand are bad dogs. Well no cats were shot. It was a cat organized conspiracy. --- Official King of Black People https://imgur.com/Zk3VS3o http://imgur.com/a/UeQiE <cite>EvilMegas posted [p:908657605] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>EvilMegas posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BADoglick posted...</cite> <quote>Cops shoot an obscene number of pet dogs every year. An estimated ten thousand annually, actually. It's really quite reflective of the whole 'we don't care if we kill one of your family members for little or no reason just so long as we ensure our safety' attitude that's prevalent among our nation's police forces. A lack of accountability exacerbates the problem. All too often we see people excuse the officers and blame the victims, and that really needs to change. Source: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/533319/</quote> How many of those dogs were without leash? And how many were charging the officer? Otherwise the Atlantic article seems to heavily source a libertarian magazine >_></quote> All ten thousand are bad dogs.</quote> Well no cats were shot.</quote> It was a cat organized conspiracy.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
VixYW 09/13/18 10:57:47 AM #20:	EvilMegas posted... Kyuubi4269 posted... EvilMegas posted... Zeus posted... BADoglick posted... Cops shoot an obscene number of pet dogs every year. An estimated ten thousand annually, actually. It's really quite reflective of the whole 'we don't care if we kill one of your family members for little or no reason just so long as we ensure our safety' attitude that's prevalent among our nation's police forces. A lack of accountability exacerbates the problem. All too often we see people excuse the officers and blame the victims, and that really needs to change. Source: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/533319/ How many of those dogs were without leash? And how many were charging the officer? Otherwise the Atlantic article seems to heavily source a libertarian magazine >_> All ten thousand are bad dogs. Well no cats were shot. It was a cat organized conspiracy. I support this cause! Arrest them for killing the man, but then let them go for killing the beast! Canines must be eliminated! <cite>VixYW posted [p:908661015] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>EvilMegas posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>EvilMegas posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BADoglick posted...</cite> <quote>Cops shoot an obscene number of pet dogs every year. An estimated ten thousand annually, actually. It's really quite reflective of the whole 'we don't care if we kill one of your family members for little or no reason just so long as we ensure our safety' attitude that's prevalent among our nation's police forces. A lack of accountability exacerbates the problem. All too often we see people excuse the officers and blame the victims, and that really needs to change. Source: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/533319/</quote> How many of those dogs were without leash? And how many were charging the officer? Otherwise the Atlantic article seems to heavily source a libertarian magazine >_></quote> All ten thousand are bad dogs.</quote> Well no cats were shot.</quote> It was a cat organized conspiracy.</quote> I support this cause! Arrest them for killing the man, but then let them go for killing the beast! Canines must be eliminated!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BADoglick 09/13/18 11:06:57 AM #21:	Zeus posted... Blighboy posted... If you're going into someone's house obviously the dog wouldn't be wearing a leash Zeus The pet dogs statistic doesn't make exclusive mention of going into peoples' homes, Bligh BADoglick posted... Not having a leash on in it's own home warrants being killed? And for that matter, how many were on leashes? And how many weren't charging an officer? How can you reasonably believe that 10,000 dog killings by police a year is justifiable? You're proving my point. The lengths to which people will bend backwards for the sake of defending the most heinous of behavior, simply because the behavior is being committed by men in uniform, is astonishingly disgusting. Did you even read the article? One of the examples is a dog shot out on the boardwalk. What, was the person homeless so the whole boardwalk was his home? And you're talking about 10,000 annual incidents in a country with a 325m human population and a 89m dog population. Numbers don't exist in isolation. And whether or not something was justified is dependent on INDIVIDUAL INCIDENTS, not an overall quota. But, if we're just tossing around numbers, there are 4.7m dog bites in the US per year and 800k of those require medical care. https://www.caninejournal.com/dog-bite-statistics/ And while you're fine with thinking that somebody with a knife or gun is dangerous, you seem to somehow not understand that large dogs are dangerous as well. And the fact that you're so opposed to even look into those numbers -- and just claim outrage over volume -- says a lot about your "point" So being owned by a homeless person is reason enough to be murdered by a police officer? Is that the straw you're gonna reach for, boot shoved halfway down your throat? The fact that dogs have the capability of biting someone means that a cop should shoot the dog every time they do a no knock raid? Because God forbid a dog gets upset when a stranger breaks into their home unannounced and bites an officer? There would be considerably less police officers being bitten by dogs (or shot for that matter) if they didn't use violence to address non violent 'crime'. But since it's more lucrative for them to bribe congress via police unions/private prison lobbyists to maintain their racket, and plunder the income of private citizens in order to afford their protection against said private citizens, they're not interested in making any changes. --- BADoglick to the Max! <cite>BADoglick posted [p:908661461] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Blighboy posted...</cite> <quote>If you're going into someone's house obviously the dog wouldn't be wearing a leash Zeus</quote> The pet dogs statistic doesn't make exclusive mention of going into peoples' homes, Bligh <cite>BADoglick posted...</cite> <quote>Not having a leash on in it's own home warrants being killed? And for that matter, how many were on leashes? And how many weren't charging an officer? How can you reasonably believe that 10,000 dog killings by police a year is justifiable? You're proving my point. The lengths to which people will bend backwards for the sake of defending the most heinous of behavior, simply because the behavior is being committed by men in uniform, is astonishingly disgusting.</quote> Did you even read the article? One of the examples is a dog shot out on the boardwalk. What, was the person homeless so the whole boardwalk was his home? And you're talking about 10,000 annual incidents in a country with a 325m human population and a 89m dog population. Numbers don't exist in isolation. And whether or not something was justified is dependent on INDIVIDUAL INCIDENTS, not an overall quota. But, if we're just tossing around numbers, there are 4.7m dog bites in the US per year and 800k of those require medical care. https://www.caninejournal.com/dog-bite-statistics/ And while you're fine with thinking that somebody with a knife or gun is dangerous, you seem to somehow not understand that large dogs are dangerous as well. And the fact that you're so opposed to even look into those numbers -- and just claim outrage over volume -- says a lot about your "point"</quote> So being owned by a homeless person is reason enough to be murdered by a police officer? Is that the straw you're gonna reach for, boot shoved halfway down your throat? The fact that dogs have the capability of biting someone means that a cop should shoot the dog every time they do a no knock raid? Because God forbid a dog gets upset when a stranger breaks into their home unannounced and bites an officer? There would be considerably less police officers being bitten by dogs (or shot for that matter) if they didn't use violence to address non violent 'crime'. But since it's more lucrative for them to bribe congress via police unions/private prison lobbyists to maintain their racket, and plunder the income of private citizens in order to afford their protection against said private citizens, they're not interested in making any changes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KrissVector 09/13/18 1:04:44 PM #22:	Cops belong to the biggest criminal organization in the world, the US government. Of course they protect their own. You have a dude on video being executed in a hotel hallway by a cop. Cop goes free. --- Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito. Do not give in to evil but proceed ever more boldly against it. <cite>KrissVector posted [p:908668066] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote>Cops belong to the biggest criminal organization in the world, the US government. Of course they protect their own. You have a dude on video being executed in a hotel hallway by a cop. Cop goes free.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gguirao 09/13/18 1:13:18 PM #23:	How the fuck are such stupid people allowed to carry guns? Put them to death! --- Donald J. Trump--proof against government intelligence. <cite>gguirao posted [p:908668539] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote>How the fuck are such stupid people allowed to carry guns? Put them to death!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 09/18/18 3:52:08 PM #24:	Keebs05 posted... Not being indicted is not the same as being found not guilty. Yes it is. KrissVector posted... Cops belong to the biggest criminal organization in the world, the US government. Of course they protect their own. You have a dude on video being executed in a hotel hallway by a cop. Cop goes free. People pretending to be cops also get away with it like George Zimmerman. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:909000593] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Keebs05 posted...</cite> <quote>Not being indicted is not the same as being found not guilty.</quote> Yes it is. <cite>KrissVector posted...</cite> <quote>Cops belong to the biggest criminal organization in the world, the US government. Of course they protect their own. You have a dude on video being executed in a hotel hallway by a cop. Cop goes free.</quote> People pretending to be cops also get away with it like George Zimmerman.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Troll_Police_ 09/18/18 4:04:28 PM #25:	Kyuubi4269 posted... If the US police was a state, they would have at least the 3rd largest amount of homocides in the country lol If the UK police was a state, they'd pretty much be canada --- Give him what he wants then take what you want. Nobody is more vulnerable than in their moment of victory when you know whatever you do he will never let you go <cite>Troll_Police_ posted [p:909001303] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>If the US police was a state, they would have at least the 3rd largest amount of homocides in the country lol</quote> If the UK police was a state, they'd pretty much be canada</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KrissVector 09/18/18 11:03:12 PM #26:	Revelation34 posted... Keebs05 posted... Not being indicted is not the same as being found not guilty. Yes it is. KrissVector posted... Cops belong to the biggest criminal organization in the world, the US government. Of course they protect their own. You have a dude on video being executed in a hotel hallway by a cop. Cop goes free. People pretending to be cops also get away with it like George Zimmerman. Zimmerman was defending himself. Quite obvious, especially when Trayvon's friend moronically admitted that Trayvon went back to jump Zimmerman. --- Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito. Do not give in to evil but proceed ever more boldly against it. <cite>KrissVector posted [p:909025986] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Keebs05 posted...</cite> <quote>Not being indicted is not the same as being found not guilty.</quote> Yes it is. <cite>KrissVector posted...</cite> <quote>Cops belong to the biggest criminal organization in the world, the US government. Of course they protect their own. You have a dude on video being executed in a hotel hallway by a cop. Cop goes free.</quote> People pretending to be cops also get away with it like George Zimmerman.</quote> Zimmerman was defending himself. Quite obvious, especially when Trayvon's friend moronically admitted that Trayvon went back to jump Zimmerman.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Keebs05 09/19/18 12:42:34 AM #27:	Revelation34 posted... Keebs05 posted... Not being indicted is not the same as being found not guilty. Yes it is. No it's not. --- "Old soldiers never die, they just fade away" R.I.P PFC Dusty Seidel <cite>Keebs05 posted [p:909030715] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Keebs05 posted...</cite> <quote>Not being indicted is not the same as being found not guilty.</quote> Yes it is. </quote> No it's not.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dioxxys 09/19/18 2:10:27 AM #28:	Good thing the dog was found innocent <cite>dioxxys posted [p:909033937] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote>Good thing the dog was found innocent</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RoboXgp89 09/19/18 2:38:36 AM #29:	yikes never moving there you cannot shoot a person in the back I don't care how dangerous you think they are that's murder the lawyer messed up on that one <cite>RoboXgp89 posted [p:909034853] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote>yikes never moving there you cannot shoot a person in the back I don't care how dangerous you think they are that's murder the lawyer messed up on that one</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 09/19/18 2:51:58 AM #30:	Cacciato posted... Zeus posted... Numbers don't exist in isolation. If that were true then there wouldn't be a whole song about how one is the loneliest number. Kyuubi4269 posted... Well no cats were shot. Because that would be a catastrophe! BADoglick posted... So being owned by a homeless person is reason enough to be murdered by a police officer? Is that the straw you're gonna reach for, boot shoved halfway down your throat? ...he says trying to desperately spin things rather than concede being dead wrong in his post. BADoglick posted... The fact that dogs have the capability of biting someone means that a cop should shoot the dog every time they do a no knock raid? Because God forbid a dog gets upset when a stranger breaks into their home unannounced and bites an officer? There would be considerably less police officers being bitten by dogs (or shot for that matter) if they didn't use violence to address non violent 'crime'. But since it's more lucrative for them to bribe congress via police unions/private prison lobbyists to maintain their racket, and plunder the income of private citizens in order to afford their protection against said private citizens, they're not interested in making any changes. First off, you know that I'm deeply opposed to no-knock raids. Second, I like that you're more concerned about the dog during a no-knock raid than the human who, rightly thinking his home has been invaded, may get hurt trying to defend himself. And I'm not touching your hilarious end rant. KrissVector posted... You have a dude on video being executed in a hotel hallway by a cop. Cop goes free. lolwut? State the specific incident. If you're wrongly thinking of the incident where a cop shot a person in an APARTMENT, she was arrested for it and the investigation is currently pending last I checked. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:909035256] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Cacciato posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Numbers don't exist in isolation. </quote> If that were true then there wouldn't be a whole song about how one is the loneliest number.</quote> <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>Well no cats were shot.</quote> Because that would be a catastrophe! <cite>BADoglick posted...</cite> <quote>So being owned by a homeless person is reason enough to be murdered by a police officer? Is that the straw you're gonna reach for, boot shoved halfway down your throat?</quote> ...he says trying to desperately spin things rather than concede being dead wrong in his post. <cite>BADoglick posted...</cite> <quote>The fact that dogs have the capability of biting someone means that a cop should shoot the dog every time they do a no knock raid? Because God forbid a dog gets upset when a stranger breaks into their home unannounced and bites an officer? There would be considerably less police officers being bitten by dogs (or shot for that matter) if they didn't use violence to address non violent 'crime'. But since it's more lucrative for them to bribe congress via police unions/private prison lobbyists to maintain their racket, and plunder the income of private citizens in order to afford their protection against said private citizens, they're not interested in making any changes.</quote> First off, you know that I'm deeply opposed to no-knock raids. Second, I like that you're more concerned about the dog during a no-knock raid than the human who, rightly thinking his home has been invaded, may get hurt trying to defend himself. And I'm not touching your hilarious end rant. <cite>KrissVector posted...</cite> <quote>You have a dude on video being executed in a hotel hallway by a cop. Cop goes free.</quote> lolwut? State the specific incident. If you're wrongly thinking of the incident where a cop shot a person in an APARTMENT, she was arrested for it and the investigation is currently pending last I checked.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Keebs05 09/19/18 2:56:48 AM #31:	Zeus posted... KrissVector posted... You have a dude on video being executed in a hotel hallway by a cop. Cop goes free. lolwut? State the specific incident. If you're wrongly thinking of the incident where a cop shot a person in an APARTMENT, she was arrested for it and the investigation is currently pending last I checked. I believe he's referring to this. https://nypost.com/2017/12/08/ex-cop-acquitted-in-fatal-shooting-of-unarmed-man-at-hotel/ --- "Old soldiers never die, they just fade away" R.I.P PFC Dusty Seidel <cite>Keebs05 posted [p:909035399] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KrissVector posted...</cite> <quote>You have a dude on video being executed in a hotel hallway by a cop. Cop goes free.</quote> lolwut? State the specific incident. If you're wrongly thinking of the incident where a cop shot a person in an APARTMENT, she was arrested for it and the investigation is currently pending last I checked.</quote> I believe he's referring to this. https://nypost.com/2017/12/08/ex-cop-acquitted-in-fatal-shooting-of-unarmed-man-at-hotel/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 09/19/18 3:03:02 AM #32:	Keebs05 posted... Zeus posted... KrissVector posted... You have a dude on video being executed in a hotel hallway by a cop. Cop goes free. lolwut? State the specific incident. If you're wrongly thinking of the incident where a cop shot a person in an APARTMENT, she was arrested for it and the investigation is currently pending last I checked. I believe he's referring to this. https://nypost.com/2017/12/08/ex-cop-acquitted-in-fatal-shooting-of-unarmed-man-at-hotel/ Oh, so they were responding to a call about a guy having a gun and the suspect reached into his waistband? If that's the case he means, I can understand it ending in an acquittal. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:909035582] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Keebs05 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KrissVector posted...</cite> <quote>You have a dude on video being executed in a hotel hallway by a cop. Cop goes free.</quote> lolwut? State the specific incident. If you're wrongly thinking of the incident where a cop shot a person in an APARTMENT, she was arrested for it and the investigation is currently pending last I checked.</quote> I believe he's referring to this. https://nypost.com/2017/12/08/ex-cop-acquitted-in-fatal-shooting-of-unarmed-man-at-hotel/</quote> Oh, so they were responding to a call about a guy having a gun and the suspect reached into his waistband? If that's the case he means, I can understand it ending in an acquittal.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dioxxys 09/19/18 4:37:52 AM #33:	Keebs05 posted... https://nypost.com/2017/12/08/ex-cop-acquitted-in-fatal-shooting-of-unarmed-man-at-hotel/ god that was awful Why would anyone order someone to crawl to him if hes worried about being shot?" Why not just do the "lay face down with hands behind your head?" <cite>dioxxys posted [p:909037980] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Keebs05 posted...</cite> <quote> https://nypost.com/2017/12/08/ex-cop-acquitted-in-fatal-shooting-of-unarmed-man-at-hotel/ </quote> god that was awful Why would anyone order someone to crawl to him if hes worried about being shot?" Why not just do the "lay face down with hands behind your head?"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NightMareBunny 09/19/18 5:16:32 AM #34:	KrissVector posted... Revelation34 posted... Keebs05 posted... Not being indicted is not the same as being found not guilty. Yes it is. KrissVector posted... Cops belong to the biggest criminal organization in the world, the US government. Of course they protect their own. You have a dude on video being executed in a hotel hallway by a cop. Cop goes free. People pretending to be cops also get away with it like George Zimmerman. Zimmerman was defending himself. Quite obvious, especially when Trayvon's friend moronically admitted that Trayvon went back to jump Zimmerman. facepalm Zimmerman admitted to acting like a wannabe cop --- Gamefaqs Nintendo Discord Server: https://discord.gg/v9ut5hv <cite>NightMareBunny posted [p:909038609] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>KrissVector posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Keebs05 posted...</cite> <quote>Not being indicted is not the same as being found not guilty.</quote> Yes it is. <cite>KrissVector posted...</cite> <quote>Cops belong to the biggest criminal organization in the world, the US government. Of course they protect their own. You have a dude on video being executed in a hotel hallway by a cop. Cop goes free.</quote> People pretending to be cops also get away with it like George Zimmerman.</quote> Zimmerman was defending himself. Quite obvious, especially when Trayvon's friend moronically admitted that Trayvon went back to jump Zimmerman.</quote> facepalm Zimmerman admitted to acting like a wannabe cop</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 09/19/18 5:22:38 AM #35:	KrissVector posted... Zimmerman was defending himself. Quite obvious, especially when Trayvon's friend moronically admitted that Trayvon went back to jump Zimmerman. He was stalking somebody who tried to defend themselves. Keebs05 posted... No it's not. They won't get charged for anything therefore they will never be found guilty. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:909038738] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>KrissVector posted...</cite> <quote>Zimmerman was defending himself. Quite obvious, especially when Trayvon's friend moronically admitted that Trayvon went back to jump Zimmerman.</quote> He was stalking somebody who tried to defend themselves. <cite>Keebs05 posted...</cite> <quote>No it's not.</quote> They won't get charged for anything therefore they will never be found guilty.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Keebs05 09/19/18 6:23:59 AM #36:	Revelation34 posted... Keebs05 posted... No it's not. They won't get charged for anything therefore they will never be found guilty. You're playing semantics. Prosecutors can go before a grand jury as many times as they want to get an indictment. In most cases, a not guilty verdict has double jeopardy attached and they can't be prosecuted for the same crime again. No bill =/= not guilty --- "Old soldiers never die, they just fade away" R.I.P PFC Dusty Seidel <cite>Keebs05 posted [p:909039932] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Keebs05 posted...</cite> <quote>No it's not.</quote> They won't get charged for anything therefore they will never be found guilty.</quote> You're playing semantics. Prosecutors can go before a grand jury as many times as they want to get an indictment. In most cases, a not guilty verdict has double jeopardy attached and they can't be prosecuted for the same crime again. No bill =/= not guilty</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 09/19/18 11:46:58 AM #37:	Keebs05 posted... You're playing semantics. Prosecutors can go before a grand jury as many times as they want to get an indictment. In most cases, a not guilty verdict has double jeopardy attached and they can't be prosecuted for the same crime again. No bill =/= not guilty Prosecutors are on the side of the cop always. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:909052562] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Keebs05 posted...</cite> <quote>You're playing semantics. Prosecutors can go before a grand jury as many times as they want to get an indictment. In most cases, a not guilty verdict has double jeopardy attached and they can't be prosecuted for the same crime again. No bill =/= not guilty</quote> Prosecutors are on the side of the cop always.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
streamofthesky 09/19/18 12:19:24 PM #38:	Revelation34 posted... Keebs05 posted... You're playing semantics. Prosecutors can go before a grand jury as many times as they want to get an indictment. In most cases, a not guilty verdict has double jeopardy attached and they can't be prosecuted for the same crime again. No bill =/= not guilty Prosecutors are on the side of the cop always. Yup. The fucking DA himself was peddling the accused cops' lies as fact: Full Throttle posted... 41 y/o Ismael Lopez was shot in the back of the HEAD on July 23, 2017 when they appeared on his doorstep to execute an arrest warrant but it was intended for the man across the street!! A grand jury in July DECLINED to indict Durden on murder or manslaughter charges as DA John Champion said Lopez refused commands to put a rifle down from the inside of the house but the family disputes that claim. Zach said he saw a gun being pointed out of the house and started shouting "drop your weapon" and when that didn't happen, multiple shots were fired from outside the door and fatally wounded Lopez who died from gunshot wounds to the BACK of his head!! Champion said he sent a homicide charge to the grand jury but they declined to approve an indictment and said the case is now CLOSED as the men are essentially found innocent. He basically made the defenses arguments for them and quickly shut down the case as soon as the rigged grand jury he set up where instead of trying to prove the defendants guilty he argued on their behalf. They could have done literally any crime and this bastard would've gotten them off the hook. <cite>streamofthesky posted [p:909054369] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Keebs05 posted...</cite> <quote>You're playing semantics. Prosecutors can go before a grand jury as many times as they want to get an indictment. In most cases, a not guilty verdict has double jeopardy attached and they can't be prosecuted for the same crime again. No bill =/= not guilty</quote> Prosecutors are on the side of the cop always.</quote> Yup. The fucking DA himself was peddling the accused cops' lies as fact: <cite>Full Throttle posted...</cite> <quote>41 y/o Ismael Lopez was shot in the back of the HEAD on July 23, 2017 when they appeared on his doorstep to execute an arrest warrant but it was intended for the man across the street!! A grand jury in July DECLINED to indict Durden on murder or manslaughter charges as DA John Champion said Lopez refused commands to put a rifle down from the inside of the house but the family disputes that claim. Zach said he saw a gun being pointed out of the house and started shouting "drop your weapon" and when that didn't happen, multiple shots were fired from outside the door and fatally wounded Lopez who died from gunshot wounds to the BACK of his head!! Champion said he sent a homicide charge to the grand jury but they declined to approve an indictment and said the case is now CLOSED as the men are essentially found innocent. </quote> He basically made the defenses arguments for them and quickly shut down the case as soon as the rigged grand jury he set up where instead of trying to prove the defendants guilty he argued on their behalf. They could have done literally any crime and this bastard would've gotten them off the hook.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GenericGuy 09/19/18 12:29:17 PM #39:	America. --- I am not afraid to express my opinions, no matter how unconventional they may be. I don't apologise for doing so. If you don't like what I say, tough. <cite>GenericGuy posted [p:909054917] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote>America.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KrissVector 09/19/18 4:22:39 PM #40:	Zeus posted... Keebs05 posted... Zeus posted... KrissVector posted... You have a dude on video being executed in a hotel hallway by a cop. Cop goes free. lolwut? State the specific incident. If you're wrongly thinking of the incident where a cop shot a person in an APARTMENT, she was arrested for it and the investigation is currently pending last I checked. I believe he's referring to this. https://nypost.com/2017/12/08/ex-cop-acquitted-in-fatal-shooting-of-unarmed-man-at-hotel/ Oh, so they were responding to a call about a guy having a gun and the suspect reached into his waistband? If that's the case he means, I can understand it ending in an acquittal. This is why it is understandable that the Nazis were able to murder millions without much local backlash. --- Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito. Do not give in to evil but proceed ever more boldly against it. <cite>KrissVector posted [p:909068164] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Keebs05 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KrissVector posted...</cite> <quote>You have a dude on video being executed in a hotel hallway by a cop. Cop goes free.</quote> lolwut? State the specific incident. If you're wrongly thinking of the incident where a cop shot a person in an APARTMENT, she was arrested for it and the investigation is currently pending last I checked.</quote> I believe he's referring to this. https://nypost.com/2017/12/08/ex-cop-acquitted-in-fatal-shooting-of-unarmed-man-at-hotel/</quote> Oh, so they were responding to a call about a guy having a gun and the suspect reached into his waistband? If that's the case he means, I can understand it ending in an acquittal.</quote> This is why it is understandable that the Nazis were able to murder millions without much local backlash.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KrissVector 09/19/18 4:23:17 PM #41:	dioxxys posted... Keebs05 posted... https://nypost.com/2017/12/08/ex-cop-acquitted-in-fatal-shooting-of-unarmed-man-at-hotel/ god that was awful Why would anyone order someone to crawl to him if hes worried about being shot?" Why not just do the "lay face down with hands behind your head?" Simon says where the loser gets blown away. --- Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito. Do not give in to evil but proceed ever more boldly against it. <cite>KrissVector posted [p:909068203] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>dioxxys posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Keebs05 posted...</cite> <quote> https://nypost.com/2017/12/08/ex-cop-acquitted-in-fatal-shooting-of-unarmed-man-at-hotel/ </quote> god that was awful Why would anyone order someone to crawl to him if hes worried about being shot?" Why not just do the "lay face down with hands behind your head?"</quote> Simon says where the loser gets blown away.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Keebs05 09/20/18 12:03:19 AM #42:	Revelation34 posted... Keebs05 posted... You're playing semantics. Prosecutors can go before a grand jury as many times as they want to get an indictment. In most cases, a not guilty verdict has double jeopardy attached and they can't be prosecuted for the same crime again. No bill =/= not guilty Prosecutors are on the side of the cop always. That has absolutely nothing to do with what we're talking about. --- "Old soldiers never die, they just fade away" R.I.P PFC Dusty Seidel <cite>Keebs05 posted [p:909093799] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Keebs05 posted...</cite> <quote>You're playing semantics. Prosecutors can go before a grand jury as many times as they want to get an indictment. In most cases, a not guilty verdict has double jeopardy attached and they can't be prosecuted for the same crime again. No bill =/= not guilty</quote> Prosecutors are on the side of the cop always.</quote> That has absolutely nothing to do with what we're talking about.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 09/20/18 2:33:05 AM #43:	Keebs05 posted... That has absolutely nothing to do with what we're talking about. It does. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:909099456] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Keebs05 posted...</cite> <quote>That has absolutely nothing to do with what we're talking about.</quote> It does.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Keebs05 09/20/18 2:41:20 AM #44:	Revelation34 posted... Keebs05 posted... That has absolutely nothing to do with what we're talking about. It does. How so? The difference between a no-bill and not guilty has nothing to do with what side the prosecution is on. --- "Old soldiers never die, they just fade away" R.I.P PFC Dusty Seidel <cite>Keebs05 posted [p:909099686] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Keebs05 posted...</cite> <quote>That has absolutely nothing to do with what we're talking about.</quote> It does.</quote> How so? The difference between a no-bill and not guilty has nothing to do with what side the prosecution is on.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 09/20/18 2:42:39 AM #45:	Keebs05 posted... How so? The difference between a no-bill and not guilty has nothing to do with what side the prosecution is on. Because they are not going to bother really trying since they're all on the same side. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:909099717] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Keebs05 posted...</cite> <quote>How so? The difference between a no-bill and not guilty has nothing to do with what side the prosecution is on.</quote> Because they are not going to bother really trying since they're all on the same side.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Keebs05 09/20/18 2:45:18 AM #46:	Revelation34 posted... Keebs05 posted... How so? The difference between a no-bill and not guilty has nothing to do with what side the prosecution is on. Because they are not going to bother really trying since they're all on the same side. It doesn't change the fact that they are not the same thing. In the court of law, they are two completely separate things. --- "Old soldiers never die, they just fade away" R.I.P PFC Dusty Seidel <cite>Keebs05 posted [p:909099782] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Keebs05 posted...</cite> <quote>How so? The difference between a no-bill and not guilty has nothing to do with what side the prosecution is on.</quote> Because they are not going to bother really trying since they're all on the same side.</quote> It doesn't change the fact that they are not the same thing. In the court of law, they are two completely separate things.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Poll of the Day > 2 Mississippi Cops who MURDERED an INNOCENT Man and his DOG are found INNOCENT! (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > 2 Mississippi Cops who MURDERED an INNOCENT Man and his DOG are found INNOCENT!