LogFAQs > #908648673

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	2 Mississippi Cops who MURDERED an INNOCENT Man and his DOG are found INNOCENT!
Zeus 09/13/18 3:58:17 AM #15:	Blighboy posted... If you're going into someone's house obviously the dog wouldn't be wearing a leash Zeus The pet dogs statistic doesn't make exclusive mention of going into peoples' homes, Bligh BADoglick posted... Not having a leash on in it's own home warrants being killed? And for that matter, how many were on leashes? And how many weren't charging an officer? How can you reasonably believe that 10,000 dog killings by police a year is justifiable? You're proving my point. The lengths to which people will bend backwards for the sake of defending the most heinous of behavior, simply because the behavior is being committed by men in uniform, is astonishingly disgusting. Did you even read the article? One of the examples is a dog shot out on the boardwalk. What, was the person homeless so the whole boardwalk was his home? And you're talking about 10,000 annual incidents in a country with a 325m human population and a 89m dog population. Numbers don't exist in isolation. And whether or not something was justified is dependent on INDIVIDUAL INCIDENTS, not an overall quota. But, if we're just tossing around numbers, there are 4.7m dog bites in the US per year and 800k of those require medical care. https://www.caninejournal.com/dog-bite-statistics/ And while you're fine with thinking that somebody with a knife or gun is dangerous, you seem to somehow not understand that large dogs are dangerous as well. And the fact that you're so opposed to even look into those numbers -- and just claim outrage over volume -- says a lot about your "point" --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:908648673] in 2 Mississi... [t:76996304]...</cite> <quote><cite>Blighboy posted...</cite> <quote>If you're going into someone's house obviously the dog wouldn't be wearing a leash Zeus</quote> The pet dogs statistic doesn't make exclusive mention of going into peoples' homes, Bligh <cite>BADoglick posted...</cite> <quote>Not having a leash on in it's own home warrants being killed? And for that matter, how many were on leashes? And how many weren't charging an officer? How can you reasonably believe that 10,000 dog killings by police a year is justifiable? You're proving my point. The lengths to which people will bend backwards for the sake of defending the most heinous of behavior, simply because the behavior is being committed by men in uniform, is astonishingly disgusting.</quote> Did you even read the article? One of the examples is a dog shot out on the boardwalk. What, was the person homeless so the whole boardwalk was his home? And you're talking about 10,000 annual incidents in a country with a 325m human population and a 89m dog population. Numbers don't exist in isolation. And whether or not something was justified is dependent on INDIVIDUAL INCIDENTS, not an overall quota. But, if we're just tossing around numbers, there are 4.7m dog bites in the US per year and 800k of those require medical care. https://www.caninejournal.com/dog-bite-statistics/ And while you're fine with thinking that somebody with a knife or gun is dangerous, you seem to somehow not understand that large dogs are dangerous as well. And the fact that you're so opposed to even look into those numbers -- and just claim outrage over volume -- says a lot about your "point" --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1