Poll of the Day > Liberals: "Nobody is trying to take your guns away"

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
Blightzkrieg 03/27/18 3:31:10 PM #1:	Also liberals: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/27/opinion/john-paul-stevens-repeal-second-amendment.html?mtrref=www.google.com&assetType=opinion --- https://i.imgur.com/ysRN6GL.png <cite>Blightzkrieg posted [p:898592470] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote>Also liberals: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/27/opinion/john-paul-stevens-repeal-second-amendment.html?mtrref=www.google.com&assetType=opinion</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#2	Post #2 was unavailable or deleted.
Andromicus 03/27/18 4:13:57 PM #3:	Who is John Paul Stevens? <cite>Andromicus posted [p:898594991] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote>Who is John Paul Stevens?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 03/27/18 4:14:59 PM #4:	yet I have seen a sign on the news at protests that said "I miss my friends more than you will miss your guns" Disclaimer: I don't like guns and don't own one just saiyain <cite>Zikten posted [p:898595038] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote>yet I have seen a sign on the news at protests that said "I miss my friends more than you will miss your guns" Disclaimer: I don't like guns and don't own one just saiyain</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RCtheWSBC 03/27/18 4:26:26 PM #5:	Repealing the amendment wouldn't technically make gun ownership illegal. --- http://i.imgur.com/1yl1fH0.jpg the White-Sounding Black Chick <cite>RCtheWSBC posted [p:898595705] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote>Repealing the amendment wouldn't technically make gun ownership illegal.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 03/27/18 4:27:11 PM #6:	No one "WAS" trying to take the guns. Now there is a movement to get military grade weapons out of private hands. Good idea imo. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:898595755] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote>No one "WAS" trying to take the guns. Now there is a movement to get military grade weapons out of private hands. Good idea imo.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kigalas 03/27/18 4:54:20 PM #7:	Andromicus posted... Who is John Paul Stevens? A former Supreme Court Justice. --- Playing: Dragon Quest III - 1/6 Orbs, GTA:SA - 88.77%, FFVIII - Disc 2 Welcome to drinking place of village. Please, you must recline and unbend tranquilly. <cite>Kigalas posted [p:898597336] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>Andromicus posted...</cite> <quote>Who is John Paul Stevens?</quote> A former Supreme Court Justice.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
XlaxJynx007 03/27/18 5:04:26 PM #8:	BlackScythe0 posted... military grade weapons What is a military grade weapon --- XB1: MrMegaNutz Steam: Kennetic <cite>XlaxJynx007 posted [p:898597918] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>military grade weapons</quote> What is a military grade weapon</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PaddysPub 03/27/18 5:05:01 PM #9:	my ar-15 has killed less children than planned parenthood --- Paddys Pub, home of the original Kitten Mittens! <cite>PaddysPub posted [p:898597955] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote>my ar-15 has killed less children than planned parenthood</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 03/27/18 5:06:58 PM #10:	PaddysPub posted... my ar-15 has killed less children than planned parenthood Well, -1 is the next number less than 0... so your ar15 creates children? --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:898598083] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>PaddysPub posted...</cite> <quote>my ar-15 has killed less children than planned parenthood</quote> Well, -1 is the next number less than 0... so your ar15 creates children?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Noop_Noop 03/27/18 5:11:38 PM #11:	BlackScythe0 posted... No one "WAS" trying to take the guns. Now there is a movement to get military grade weapons out of private hands. Good idea imo. Military grade lol If ever there has been a more meaningless tag to put on a gun, that's it Using it just makes it clear that everything you know is misinformation you got from CNN <cite>Noop_Noop posted [p:898598370] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>No one "WAS" trying to take the guns. Now there is a movement to get military grade weapons out of private hands. Good idea imo.</quote> Military grade lol If ever there has been a more meaningless tag to put on a gun, that's it Using it just makes it clear that everything you know is misinformation you got from CNN</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 03/27/18 5:21:26 PM #12:	Noop_Noop posted... BlackScythe0 posted... No one "WAS" trying to take the guns. Now there is a movement to get military grade weapons out of private hands. Good idea imo. Military grade lol If ever there has been a more meaningless tag to put on a gun, that's it Using it just makes it clear that everything you know is misinformation you got from CNN Oh no! Semantics is so much more important than substance! <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:898598875] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>Noop_Noop posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>No one "WAS" trying to take the guns. Now there is a movement to get military grade weapons out of private hands. Good idea imo.</quote> Military grade lol If ever there has been a more meaningless tag to put on a gun, that's it Using it just makes it clear that everything you know is misinformation you got from CNN</quote> Oh no! Semantics is so much more important than substance!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Smarkil 03/27/18 5:25:52 PM #13:	RCtheWSBC posted... Repealing the amendment wouldn't technically make gun ownership illegal. Repealing the 1st amendment doesn't technically make free speech illegal either, that doesn't mean we should do it. --- "We're not even close" - Romans building Rome at the end of Day 1 <cite>Smarkil posted [p:898599083] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>RCtheWSBC posted...</cite> <quote>Repealing the amendment wouldn't technically make gun ownership illegal.</quote> Repealing the 1st amendment doesn't technically make free speech illegal either, that doesn't mean we should do it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 03/27/18 5:26:41 PM #14:	Smarkil posted... RCtheWSBC posted... Repealing the amendment wouldn't technically make gun ownership illegal. Repealing the 1st amendment doesn't technically make free speech illegal either, that doesn't mean we should do it. A misinterpretation of the first amendment doesn't kill people either. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:898599127] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>Smarkil posted...</cite> <quote><cite>RCtheWSBC posted...</cite> <quote>Repealing the amendment wouldn't technically make gun ownership illegal.</quote> Repealing the 1st amendment doesn't technically make free speech illegal either, that doesn't mean we should do it.</quote> A misinterpretation of the first amendment doesn't kill people either.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Smarkil 03/27/18 5:27:11 PM #15:	BlackScythe0 posted... Smarkil posted... RCtheWSBC posted... Repealing the amendment wouldn't technically make gun ownership illegal. Repealing the 1st amendment doesn't technically make free speech illegal either, that doesn't mean we should do it. A misinterpretation of the first amendment doesn't kill people either. Plenty of people have argued that it does The founding fathers couldn't possibly have imagined the internet or automated printing presses. Free speech should only be allowed in town squares and with the use hand presses. --- "We're not even close" - Romans building Rome at the end of Day 1 <cite>Smarkil posted [p:898599151] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Smarkil posted...</cite> <quote><cite>RCtheWSBC posted...</cite> <quote>Repealing the amendment wouldn't technically make gun ownership illegal.</quote> Repealing the 1st amendment doesn't technically make free speech illegal either, that doesn't mean we should do it.</quote> A misinterpretation of the first amendment doesn't kill people either.</quote> Plenty of people have argued that it does The founding fathers couldn't possibly have imagined the internet or automated printing presses. Free speech should only be allowed in town squares and with the use hand presses.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ListerineStrips 03/27/18 5:28:35 PM #16:	BlackScythe0 posted... Oh no! Semantics is so much more important than substance! It is when you're making laws. How do you define military grade? Which military? When? Are Mosin Nagant "military grade?" They were used for war purposes. Does it have to be current military? an M40A1 is used by current military and is available to the public. Are you just talking about semi-automatic rifles? You need to be clear when making laws. You can't just say "military grade" because it's a buzzword. <cite>ListerineStrips posted [p:898599232] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>Oh no! Semantics is so much more important than substance!</quote> It is when you're making laws. How do you define military grade? Which military? When? Are Mosin Nagant "military grade?" They were used for war purposes. Does it have to be current military? an M40A1 is used by current military and is available to the public. Are you just talking about semi-automatic rifles? You need to be clear when making laws. You can't just say "military grade" because it's a buzzword.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
argonautweakend 03/27/18 5:28:48 PM #17:	jps is a republican. damn between him and trumps due process later comments god dang <cite>argonautweakend posted [p:898599249] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote>jps is a republican. damn between him and trumps due process later comments god dang</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 03/27/18 5:32:49 PM #18:	ListerineStrips posted... BlackScythe0 posted... Oh no! Semantics is so much more important than substance! It is when you're making laws. How do you define military grade? Which military? When? Are Mosin Nagant "military grade?" They were used for war purposes. Does it have to be current military? an M40A1 is used by current military and is available to the public. Are you just talking about semi-automatic rifles? You need to be clear when making laws. You can't just say "military grade" because it's a buzzword. I'm not making a law! <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:898599488] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>ListerineStrips posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>Oh no! Semantics is so much more important than substance!</quote> It is when you're making laws. How do you define military grade? Which military? When? Are Mosin Nagant "military grade?" They were used for war purposes. Does it have to be current military? an M40A1 is used by current military and is available to the public. Are you just talking about semi-automatic rifles? You need to be clear when making laws. You can't just say "military grade" because it's a buzzword.</quote> I'm not making a law!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ListerineStrips 03/27/18 5:35:04 PM #19:	BlackScythe0 posted... I'm not making a law! Thank god. <cite>ListerineStrips posted [p:898599616] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>I'm not making a law!</quote> Thank god.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 03/27/18 5:36:00 PM #20:	The greatest rifle of all time was basement made and used hexagonal bullets --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:898599672] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote>The greatest rifle of all time was basement made and used hexagonal bullets</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 03/27/18 6:01:14 PM #21:	Lokarin posted... PaddysPub posted... my ar-15 has killed less children than planned parenthood Well, -1 is the next number less than 0... so your ar15 creates children? That's not how values work, however a negative number of child deaths would mean a deficit of child lives taken, and I think we can agree that the use of an AR-15 has saved many children's lives in the past. --- Scloud posted... Its like he wants two things at the same time. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:898601160] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>PaddysPub posted...</cite> <quote>my ar-15 has killed less children than planned parenthood</quote> Well, -1 is the next number less than 0... so your ar15 creates children?</quote> That's not how values work, however a negative number of child deaths would mean a deficit of child lives taken, and I think we can agree that the use of an AR-15 has saved many children's lives in the past.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 03/27/18 6:02:00 PM #22:	Lokarin posted... The greatest rifle of all time was basement made and used hexagonal bullets SCAR-H uses 7.62. --- Scloud posted... Its like he wants two things at the same time. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:898601205] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote>The greatest rifle of all time was basement made and used hexagonal bullets</quote> SCAR-H uses 7.62.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 03/27/18 6:14:34 PM #23:	Kyuubi4269 posted... Lokarin posted... The greatest rifle of all time was basement made and used hexagonal bullets SCAR-H uses 7.62. Well, I'm referring to the Whitworth Rifle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitworth_rifle --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:898601901] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote>The greatest rifle of all time was basement made and used hexagonal bullets</quote> SCAR-H uses 7.62.</quote> Well, I'm referring to the Whitworth Rifle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitworth_rifle</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 03/27/18 6:16:13 PM #24:	Lokarin posted... Kyuubi4269 posted... Lokarin posted... The greatest rifle of all time was basement made and used hexagonal bullets SCAR-H uses 7.62. Well, I'm referring to the Whitworth Rifle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitworth_rifle > Best rifle of all time. > Sniper rifle with sub-1000 accuracy. --- Scloud posted... Its like he wants two things at the same time. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:898601979] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote>The greatest rifle of all time was basement made and used hexagonal bullets</quote> SCAR-H uses 7.62.</quote> Well, I'm referring to the Whitworth Rifle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitworth_rifle</quote> > Best rifle of all time. > Sniper rifle with sub-1000 accuracy.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 03/27/18 6:18:01 PM #25:	Historical context --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:898602064] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote>Historical context</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 03/27/18 6:18:05 PM #26:	BlackScythe0 posted... No one "WAS" trying to take the guns. Now there is a movement to get military grade weapons out of private hands. Good idea imo. Considering that "military grade" is a meaningless and purposefully vague term, it's a terrible idea since it's just a carte blanche gun grab. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:898602066] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>No one "WAS" trying to take the guns. Now there is a movement to get military grade weapons out of private hands. Good idea imo.</quote> Considering that "military grade" is a meaningless and purposefully vague term, it's a terrible idea since it's just a carte blanche gun grab.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 03/27/18 6:22:54 PM #27:	Zeus posted... BlackScythe0 posted... No one "WAS" trying to take the guns. Now there is a movement to get military grade weapons out of private hands. Good idea imo. Considering that "military grade" is a meaningless and purposefully vague term, it's a terrible idea since it's just a carte blanche gun grab. Obviously it means no M4A4, the current military variant of the AR-15, so SIGM400 is fair game to use. --- Scloud posted... Its like he wants two things at the same time. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:898602303] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>No one "WAS" trying to take the guns. Now there is a movement to get military grade weapons out of private hands. Good idea imo.</quote> Considering that "military grade" is a meaningless and purposefully vague term, it's a terrible idea since it's just a carte blanche gun grab.</quote> Obviously it means no M4A4, the current military variant of the AR-15, so SIGM400 is fair game to use.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BADoglick 03/27/18 6:33:32 PM #28:	Which branch uses the AR 15? Anyone? Military grade to liberals=anything that looks scary. Also, how can one party frequently complain about police brutality and then also claim that only the police or military should have 'assault' rifles? --- BADoglick to the Max! <cite>BADoglick posted [p:898602943] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote>Which branch uses the AR 15? Anyone? Military grade to liberals=anything that looks scary. Also, how can one party frequently complain about police brutality and then also claim that only the police or military should have 'assault' rifles?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Monopoman 03/27/18 6:34:52 PM #29:	Zangulus posted... Blightzkrieg posted... Also liberals: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/27/opinion/john-paul-stevens-repeal-second-amendment.html?mtrref=www.google.com&assetType=opinion So what kind of percentage does that single instance encompass that you can make a claim that all liberals also say the same in complete contradiction to the first claim? It's like if how a conservative guy straps a bomb to his chest and blows up a building we can claim that all conservatives are homicidal suicide bombers. --- BF ID: Birck #1559845599 Leads: Senbonzakura Miku, Priestess Snow Miku, Bjorn+Linlin <cite>Monopoman posted [p:898603018] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zangulus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Blightzkrieg posted...</cite> <quote>Also liberals: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/27/opinion/john-paul-stevens-repeal-second-amendment.html?mtrref=www.google.com&assetType=opinion</quote> So what kind of percentage does that single instance encompass that you can make a claim that all liberals also say the same in complete contradiction to the first claim?</quote> It's like if how a conservative guy straps a bomb to his chest and blows up a building we can claim that all conservatives are homicidal suicide bombers.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
chaosbowser 03/27/18 6:39:23 PM #30:	You could argue the NRA's strong opposition to ANY kind of gun control is the reason why you're getting more and more of a push for total banning of guns. We have no way of knowing how beneficial or harmful guns are to our society since we spent the past two decades banning research of guns. We watch as lone wolf shootings happen in seemingly increasing numbers yet no action is being taken. As a result, many people are forced to believe any and all guns are the problem even though they likely aren't the real problem with all these killing sprees. --- I love people. I hate people. <cite>chaosbowser posted [p:898603301] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote>You could argue the NRA's strong opposition to ANY kind of gun control is the reason why you're getting more and more of a push for total banning of guns. We have no way of knowing how beneficial or harmful guns are to our society since we spent the past two decades banning research of guns. We watch as lone wolf shootings happen in seemingly increasing numbers yet no action is being taken. As a result, many people are forced to believe any and all guns are the problem even though they likely aren't the real problem with all these killing sprees.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 03/27/18 6:40:02 PM #31:	Monopoman posted... Zangulus posted... Blightzkrieg posted... Also liberals: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/27/opinion/john-paul-stevens-repeal-second-amendment.html?mtrref=www.google.com&assetType=opinion So what kind of percentage does that single instance encompass that you can make a claim that all liberals also say the same in complete contradiction to the first claim? It's like if how a conservative guy straps a bomb to his chest and blows up a building we can claim that all conservatives are homicidal suicide bombers. Let's just ignore that when you say nobody, it means no body, as in not one person. --- Scloud posted... Its like he wants two things at the same time. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:898603330] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>Monopoman posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zangulus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Blightzkrieg posted...</cite> <quote>Also liberals: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/27/opinion/john-paul-stevens-repeal-second-amendment.html?mtrref=www.google.com&assetType=opinion</quote> So what kind of percentage does that single instance encompass that you can make a claim that all liberals also say the same in complete contradiction to the first claim?</quote> It's like if how a conservative guy straps a bomb to his chest and blows up a building we can claim that all conservatives are homicidal suicide bombers.</quote> Let's just ignore that when you say nobody, it means no body, as in not one person.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 03/27/18 6:45:03 PM #32:	chaosbowser posted... As a result, many people are forced to believe any and all guns are the problem even though they likely aren't the real problem with all these killing sprees. I don't see how it's not obvious that they aren't the real source of the problem. I've watched way too many leftists dance around the argument that mass shootings are really only a serious problem beginning in the last decade despite the fact that gun ownership has always been through the roof here. Every leftist I've debated in the issue will never address that point directly. It's always deflection <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:898603621] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>chaosbowser posted...</cite> <quote>As a result, many people are forced to believe any and all guns are the problem even though they likely aren't the real problem with all these killing sprees.</quote> I don't see how it's not obvious that they aren't the real source of the problem. I've watched way too many leftists dance around the argument that mass shootings are really only a serious problem beginning in the last decade despite the fact that gun ownership has always been through the roof here. Every leftist I've debated in the issue will never address that point directly. It's always deflection</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 03/27/18 6:45:37 PM #33:	Zeus posted... BlackScythe0 posted... No one "WAS" trying to take the guns. Now there is a movement to get military grade weapons out of private hands. Good idea imo. Considering that "military grade" is a meaningless and purposefully vague term, it's a terrible idea since it's just a carte blanche gun grab. Already another one trying to start a semantics debate and not a substance debate. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:898603640] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>No one "WAS" trying to take the guns. Now there is a movement to get military grade weapons out of private hands. Good idea imo.</quote> Considering that "military grade" is a meaningless and purposefully vague term, it's a terrible idea since it's just a carte blanche gun grab.</quote> Already another one trying to start a semantics debate and not a substance debate.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Troll_Police_ 03/27/18 6:46:39 PM #34:	BlackScythe0 posted... ListerineStrips posted... BlackScythe0 posted... Oh no! Semantics is so much more important than substance! It is when you're making laws. How do you define military grade? Which military? When? Are Mosin Nagant "military grade?" They were used for war purposes. Does it have to be current military? an M40A1 is used by current military and is available to the public. Are you just talking about semi-automatic rifles? You need to be clear when making laws. You can't just say "military grade" because it's a buzzword. I'm not making a law! yeah, but the idiots who are trying to are about as well educated on the topic as you are, which is to say that they are NOT AT ALL educated on the topic and are just using it to push an agenda --- Is this going to be one of those times when you pretend not to have a plan until the last moment? And then turn out to really not have one? <cite>Troll_Police_ posted [p:898603705] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ListerineStrips posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>Oh no! Semantics is so much more important than substance!</quote> It is when you're making laws. How do you define military grade? Which military? When? Are Mosin Nagant "military grade?" They were used for war purposes. Does it have to be current military? an M40A1 is used by current military and is available to the public. Are you just talking about semi-automatic rifles? You need to be clear when making laws. You can't just say "military grade" because it's a buzzword.</quote> I'm not making a law!</quote> yeah, but the idiots who are trying to are about as well educated on the topic as you are, which is to say that they are NOT AT ALL educated on the topic and are just using it to push an agenda</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 03/27/18 6:47:22 PM #35:	Troll_Police_ posted... BlackScythe0 posted... ListerineStrips posted... BlackScythe0 posted... Oh no! Semantics is so much more important than substance! It is when you're making laws. How do you define military grade? Which military? When? Are Mosin Nagant "military grade?" They were used for war purposes. Does it have to be current military? an M40A1 is used by current military and is available to the public. Are you just talking about semi-automatic rifles? You need to be clear when making laws. You can't just say "military grade" because it's a buzzword. I'm not making a law! yeah, but the idiots who are trying to are about as well educated on the topic as you are, which is to say that they are NOT AT ALL educated on the topic and are just using it to push an agenda And? <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:898603754] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>Troll_Police_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ListerineStrips posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>Oh no! Semantics is so much more important than substance!</quote> It is when you're making laws. How do you define military grade? Which military? When? Are Mosin Nagant "military grade?" They were used for war purposes. Does it have to be current military? an M40A1 is used by current military and is available to the public. Are you just talking about semi-automatic rifles? You need to be clear when making laws. You can't just say "military grade" because it's a buzzword.</quote> I'm not making a law!</quote> yeah, but the idiots who are trying to are about as well educated on the topic as you are, which is to say that they are NOT AT ALL educated on the topic and are just using it to push an agenda</quote> And?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 03/27/18 6:48:44 PM #36:	BlackScythe0 posted... Already another one trying to start a semantics debate and not a substance debate. Lawyers skirt the law with semantics so you really need to get that on point. --- Scloud posted... Its like he wants two things at the same time. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:898603847] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>Already another one trying to start a semantics debate and not a substance debate.</quote> Lawyers skirt the law with semantics so you really need to get that on point.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Troll_Police_ 03/27/18 6:55:09 PM #37:	BlackScythe0 posted... Troll_Police_ posted... BlackScythe0 posted... ListerineStrips posted... BlackScythe0 posted... Oh no! Semantics is so much more important than substance! It is when you're making laws. How do you define military grade? Which military? When? Are Mosin Nagant "military grade?" They were used for war purposes. Does it have to be current military? an M40A1 is used by current military and is available to the public. Are you just talking about semi-automatic rifles? You need to be clear when making laws. You can't just say "military grade" because it's a buzzword. I'm not making a law! yeah, but the idiots who are trying to are about as well educated on the topic as you are, which is to say that they are NOT AT ALL educated on the topic and are just using it to push an agenda And? i mean, the fact that you are OK with that is just indicative of how ignorant you are and how nobody should (or does) take your opinion seriously --- Is this going to be one of those times when you pretend not to have a plan until the last moment? And then turn out to really not have one? <cite>Troll_Police_ posted [p:898604243] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Troll_Police_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ListerineStrips posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>Oh no! Semantics is so much more important than substance!</quote> It is when you're making laws. How do you define military grade? Which military? When? Are Mosin Nagant "military grade?" They were used for war purposes. Does it have to be current military? an M40A1 is used by current military and is available to the public. Are you just talking about semi-automatic rifles? You need to be clear when making laws. You can't just say "military grade" because it's a buzzword.</quote> I'm not making a law!</quote> yeah, but the idiots who are trying to are about as well educated on the topic as you are, which is to say that they are NOT AT ALL educated on the topic and are just using it to push an agenda</quote> And?</quote> i mean, the fact that you are OK with that is just indicative of how ignorant you are and how nobody should (or does) take your opinion seriously</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Troll_Police_ 03/27/18 6:56:33 PM #38:	BlackScythe0 posted... Zeus posted... BlackScythe0 posted... No one "WAS" trying to take the guns. Now there is a movement to get military grade weapons out of private hands. Good idea imo. Considering that "military grade" is a meaningless and purposefully vague term, it's a terrible idea since it's just a carte blanche gun grab. Already another one trying to start a semantics debate and not a substance debate. when discussing the law, semantics are fucking important is it that hard for you to actually say what you mean? is it possible that you have no idea what you mean in the first place and are just regurgitating what you heard on CNN? --- Is this going to be one of those times when you pretend not to have a plan until the last moment? And then turn out to really not have one? <cite>Troll_Police_ posted [p:898604328] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>No one "WAS" trying to take the guns. Now there is a movement to get military grade weapons out of private hands. Good idea imo.</quote> Considering that "military grade" is a meaningless and purposefully vague term, it's a terrible idea since it's just a carte blanche gun grab.</quote> Already another one trying to start a semantics debate and not a substance debate.</quote> when discussing the law, semantics are fucking important is it that hard for you to actually say what you mean? is it possible that you have no idea what you mean in the first place and are just regurgitating what you heard on CNN?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 03/27/18 7:00:08 PM #39:	Troll_Police_ posted... BlackScythe0 posted... Zeus posted... BlackScythe0 posted... No one "WAS" trying to take the guns. Now there is a movement to get military grade weapons out of private hands. Good idea imo. Considering that "military grade" is a meaningless and purposefully vague term, it's a terrible idea since it's just a carte blanche gun grab. Already another one trying to start a semantics debate and not a substance debate. when discussing the law, semantics are fucking important is it that hard for you to actually say what you mean? is it possible that you have no idea what you mean in the first place and are just regurgitating what you heard on CNN? I have a problem with weapons that exist for the sole purpose of mass murder. We don't allow fully automatic weapons, bombs, missiles or whatever else the fuck to be in private hands. We don't live in the post apocalyptic delusions that some people think we are in. They are never going to have to defend themselves from a gang of bandits or cult of cannibals besieging their house. I don't really care about the terms, because I'm not writing the laws. I don't need to know the terms to know there is a problem. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:898604512] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>Troll_Police_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>No one "WAS" trying to take the guns. Now there is a movement to get military grade weapons out of private hands. Good idea imo.</quote> Considering that "military grade" is a meaningless and purposefully vague term, it's a terrible idea since it's just a carte blanche gun grab.</quote> Already another one trying to start a semantics debate and not a substance debate.</quote> when discussing the law, semantics are fucking important is it that hard for you to actually say what you mean? is it possible that you have no idea what you mean in the first place and are just regurgitating what you heard on CNN?</quote> I have a problem with weapons that exist for the sole purpose of mass murder. We don't allow fully automatic weapons, bombs, missiles or whatever else the fuck to be in private hands. We don't live in the post apocalyptic delusions that some people think we are in. They are never going to have to defend themselves from a gang of bandits or cult of cannibals besieging their house. I don't really care about the terms, because I'm not writing the laws. I don't need to know the terms to know there is a problem.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Troll_Police_ 03/27/18 7:12:29 PM #40:	BlackScythe0 posted... I have a problem with weapons that exist for the sole purpose of mass murder. AR-15s are pretty commonly used for hunting, and very often recreationally at the shooting range, so again, they are not used for the sole purpose of mass murder BlackScythe0 posted... We don't live in the post apocalyptic delusions that some people think we are in. They are never going to have to defend themselves from a gang of bandits or cult of cannibals besieging their house. literally nobody is making that argument, so... ok? BlackScythe0 posted... I don't really care about the terms, because I'm not writing the laws. I don't need to know the terms to know there is a problem. youve been told there is a problem and done no reasearch on it so you have no idea how to fix it, but at the same time you are positive that banning (certain) firearms will fix it despite your admitted ignorance? seriously, read and think about the shit you are saying. see through the buzzwords and you may just get a glimpse of the actual fucking problem --- Is this going to be one of those times when you pretend not to have a plan until the last moment? And then turn out to really not have one? <cite>Troll_Police_ posted [p:898605160] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>I have a problem with weapons that exist for the sole purpose of mass murder.</quote> AR-15s are pretty commonly used for hunting, and very often recreationally at the shooting range, so again, they are not used for the sole purpose of mass murder <cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>We don't live in the post apocalyptic delusions that some people think we are in. They are never going to have to defend themselves from a gang of bandits or cult of cannibals besieging their house. </quote> literally nobody is making that argument, so... ok? <cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>I don't really care about the terms, because I'm not writing the laws. I don't need to know the terms to know there is a problem.</quote> youve been told there is a problem and done no reasearch on it so you have no idea how to fix it, but at the same time you are positive that banning (certain) firearms will fix it despite your admitted ignorance? seriously, read and think about the shit you are saying. see through the buzzwords and you may just get a glimpse of the actual fucking problem</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
__Blight__ 03/27/18 7:34:42 PM #41:	Really just have to link this - https://www.reddit.com/r/NOWTTYG/ --- "The Emperor protects." <cite>__Blight__ posted [p:898606477] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote>Really just have to link this - https://www.reddit.com/r/NOWTTYG/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GanonsSpirit 03/27/18 7:45:13 PM #42:	Bligh you madman. Look at what you've wrought! --- http://i.imgur.com/tsQUpxC.jpg Thanks, Nade Duck! [[[[[[[[[[[[[[[\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] <cite>GanonsSpirit posted [p:898607051] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote>Bligh you madman. Look at what you've wrought!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 03/27/18 7:56:07 PM #43:	BlackScythe0 posted... I have a problem with weapons that exist for the sole purpose of mass murder. Not a single weapon has been made for mass murder outside comics. Even nukes are designed for their huge strategic advantage, deaths are merely a consequence of that purpose. --- Scloud posted... Its like he wants two things at the same time. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:898607592] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>I have a problem with weapons that exist for the sole purpose of mass murder. </quote> Not a single weapon has been made for mass murder outside comics. Even nukes are designed for their huge strategic advantage, deaths are merely a consequence of that purpose.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Blightzkrieg 03/27/18 8:19:22 PM #44:	GanonsSpirit posted... Bligh you madman. Look at what you've wrought! Just performing my civic duty. --- https://i.imgur.com/ysRN6GL.png <cite>Blightzkrieg posted [p:898608921] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>GanonsSpirit posted...</cite> <quote>Bligh you madman. Look at what you've wrought!</quote> Just performing my civic duty.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mauser 03/27/18 8:21:40 PM #45:	PaddysPub posted... my ar-15 has killed less children than planned parenthood <cite>Mauser posted [p:898609057] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>PaddysPub posted...</cite> <quote>my ar-15 has killed less children than planned parenthood</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mauser 03/27/18 8:22:39 PM #46:	BlackScythe0 posted... Troll_Police_ posted... BlackScythe0 posted... Zeus posted... BlackScythe0 posted... No one "WAS" trying to take the guns. Now there is a movement to get military grade weapons out of private hands. Good idea imo. Considering that "military grade" is a meaningless and purposefully vague term, it's a terrible idea since it's just a carte blanche gun grab. Already another one trying to start a semantics debate and not a substance debate. when discussing the law, semantics are fucking important is it that hard for you to actually say what you mean? is it possible that you have no idea what you mean in the first place and are just regurgitating what you heard on CNN? I have a problem with weapons that exist for the sole purpose of mass murder. We don't allow fully automatic weapons, bombs, missiles or whatever else the fuck to be in private hands. We don't live in the post apocalyptic delusions that some people think we are in. They are never going to have to defend themselves from a gang of bandits or cult of cannibals besieging their house. I don't really care about the terms, because I'm not writing the laws. I don't need to know the terms to know there is a problem. #liberals <cite>Mauser posted [p:898609103] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Troll_Police_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>No one "WAS" trying to take the guns. Now there is a movement to get military grade weapons out of private hands. Good idea imo.</quote> Considering that "military grade" is a meaningless and purposefully vague term, it's a terrible idea since it's just a carte blanche gun grab.</quote> Already another one trying to start a semantics debate and not a substance debate.</quote> when discussing the law, semantics are fucking important is it that hard for you to actually say what you mean? is it possible that you have no idea what you mean in the first place and are just regurgitating what you heard on CNN?</quote> I have a problem with weapons that exist for the sole purpose of mass murder. We don't allow fully automatic weapons, bombs, missiles or whatever else the fuck to be in private hands. We don't live in the post apocalyptic delusions that some people think we are in. They are never going to have to defend themselves from a gang of bandits or cult of cannibals besieging their house. I don't really care about the terms, because I'm not writing the laws. I don't need to know the terms to know there is a problem.</quote> #liberals</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 03/27/18 8:24:43 PM #47:	Mauser posted... BlackScythe0 posted... Troll_Police_ posted... BlackScythe0 posted... Zeus posted... BlackScythe0 posted... No one "WAS" trying to take the guns. Now there is a movement to get military grade weapons out of private hands. Good idea imo. Considering that "military grade" is a meaningless and purposefully vague term, it's a terrible idea since it's just a carte blanche gun grab. Already another one trying to start a semantics debate and not a substance debate. when discussing the law, semantics are fucking important is it that hard for you to actually say what you mean? is it possible that you have no idea what you mean in the first place and are just regurgitating what you heard on CNN? I have a problem with weapons that exist for the sole purpose of mass murder. We don't allow fully automatic weapons, bombs, missiles or whatever else the fuck to be in private hands. We don't live in the post apocalyptic delusions that some people think we are in. They are never going to have to defend themselves from a gang of bandits or cult of cannibals besieging their house. I don't really care about the terms, because I'm not writing the laws. I don't need to know the terms to know there is a problem. #liberals Yeah that bolded part pretty much screams, "I don't actually know what the problem is but I'm gonna cry aimlessly about guns some more because my political party demands that I do" <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:898609230] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mauser posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Troll_Police_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>No one "WAS" trying to take the guns. Now there is a movement to get military grade weapons out of private hands. Good idea imo.</quote> Considering that "military grade" is a meaningless and purposefully vague term, it's a terrible idea since it's just a carte blanche gun grab.</quote> Already another one trying to start a semantics debate and not a substance debate.</quote> when discussing the law, semantics are fucking important is it that hard for you to actually say what you mean? is it possible that you have no idea what you mean in the first place and are just regurgitating what you heard on CNN?</quote> I have a problem with weapons that exist for the sole purpose of mass murder. We don't allow fully automatic weapons, bombs, missiles or whatever else the fuck to be in private hands. We don't live in the post apocalyptic delusions that some people think we are in. They are never going to have to defend themselves from a gang of bandits or cult of cannibals besieging their house. I don't really care about the terms, because I'm not writing the laws. I don't need to know the terms to know there is a problem.</quote> #liberals</quote> Yeah that bolded part pretty much screams, "I don't actually know what the problem is but I'm gonna cry aimlessly about guns some more because my political party demands that I do"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MrMelodramatic 03/27/18 8:51:12 PM #48:	I'm a liberal and I'm trying to take your guns away --- Proud to be EPic Texas Aggie, Class of 2018 A-Whoop! <cite>MrMelodramatic posted [p:898610875] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote>I'm a liberal and I'm trying to take your guns away</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sveksii 03/27/18 9:54:43 PM #49:	I find it amusing how this thread is a circle jerk about liberals when the linked article is about republicans wanting to repeal the second amendment (because apparently an opinion of one person in a party is representative of the whole party) and that only one other person bothered to note that. <cite>sveksii posted [p:898614843] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote>I find it amusing how this thread is a circle jerk about liberals when the linked article is about republicans wanting to repeal the second amendment (because apparently an opinion of one person in a party is representative of the whole party) and that only one other person bothered to note that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 03/27/18 10:13:49 PM #50:	sveksii posted... I find it amusing how this thread is a circle jerk about liberals when the linked article is about republicans wanting to repeal the second amendment (because apparently an opinion of one person in a party is representative of the whole party) and that only one other person bothered to note that. I mean... if everyone in this topic is in the same boat as me... i realized that from the beginning because I know who the TC is and that most of his posts are jokes or sarcastic trollbait. I also realize that this republican is an exception whereas there are many many leftists who hold this view <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:898616009] in Liberals: ... [t:76458417]...</cite> <quote><cite>sveksii posted...</cite> <quote>I find it amusing how this thread is a circle jerk about liberals when the linked article is about republicans wanting to repeal the second amendment (because apparently an opinion of one person in a party is representative of the whole party) and that only one other person bothered to note that.</quote> I mean... if everyone in this topic is in the same boat as me... i realized that from the beginning because I know who the TC is and that most of his posts are jokes or sarcastic trollbait. I also realize that this republican is an exception whereas there are many many leftists who hold this view</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Poll of the Day > Liberals: "Nobody is trying to take your guns away" (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Liberals: "Nobody is trying to take your guns away"