Poll of the Day > Gal Gadot will NOT do Wonder Woman 2 unless Brett Ratner is OUT!!!

(+) Yeah! (+)

Wonder Woman Star, Gal Gadot has REFUSED to star in the sequel unless sexual harasser Brett Ratner is REMOVED from the franchise!!

Ratner has been accused by 6 women in recent days of sexual harassment as he helped financed the summer blockbuster and took home a a huge stake in the 412 million domestic box office gross.

His company, Rat-Pac Dune co-financed the hit movie in agreement with Warner Brother sand now Gadot wants th studio to buy out his stake!

An Insider said "She's tough and stands by her principles. She also knows the best way to hit people like Brett Ratner is in the wallet. She also knows that WB has to side with her on this issue as it develops. They can't have a movie rooted in women's empowerment being part-financed by a man accused of sexual misconduct against women. Brett made a lot of money from the success of wonder woman thanks to his company having helped finance the first movie. Now Gadot is saying she won't sign fo the sequel unless WB buys Bret tout and gets rid of him"

Brett has vehemently denied the allegations but it made little difference to Gadot.

Ratner is responsible for the Rush Hour Series and X-Men The Last Stand and is the latest in a slew of hollywood heavy hitters feeling the wrath of allegations.

Ellen Page is one of those who accused Ratner for calling her out as a lesbian and saying degrading things about women. She took to facebook in a lenghty post against him after Ratner outed her when she was 18 at the time.

Do you think Warner Brothers should give into Gal's demands?.

Gal -

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/11/11/23/463FB76300000578-0-image-m-15_1510442663995.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/11/11/23/463FB73C00000578-0-image-a-17_1510442705680.jpg

Brett Ratner - Perv

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/11/11/23/463FB74C00000578-0-image-a-16_1510442670482.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/11/10/18/4636399500000578-5071135-image-m-27_1510340298872.jpg

Ellen Page -

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/11/10/18/4636399000000578-5071135-image-a-28_1510340305395.jpg
---

I normally don't side with virtue signalling, but Gadot has a very valid point on this issue.
---

Full Throttle posted...

Do you think WB should give into Gal's demands?

Nope. She's not that valuable.
---

It's too early into her career to pull a Crispin Glover
---

While I understand her concerns, I do think that it's too early for her to be jumping into these kinds of things. In the end, the company would probably make a decision on the basis of what's profitable for them; and that might mean even if she's not to be in their future films.

I like her as WW but she really doesn't have enough leverage to pull this off.
---

He should be fired for his track record of terrible films alone, him being a filthy creep is just the icing on th---actually let me think of a different metaphor
---

Alexandra_Trent posted...

While I understand her concerns, I do think that it's too early for her to be jumping into these kinds of things. In the end, the company would probably make a decision on the basis of what's profitable for them; and that might mean even if she's not to be in their future films.

I like her as WW but she really doesn't have enough leverage to pull this off.

They can't fire her because the media will crucify them, so they'll probably placate her, but you're right this is going to hurt her career by making other studios reluctant to hire her in the future. She'll probably make enough money from playing WW in half a dozen movies to live comfortably the rest of her life, though.

wwinterj25 posted...

Full Throttle posted...

Do you think WB should give into Gal's demands?

Nope. She's not that valuable.

Mr. Clueless over here.
---

Duck-I-Says posted...

Alexandra_Trent posted...

While I understand her concerns, I do think that it's too early for her to be jumping into these kinds of things. In the end, the company would probably make a decision on the basis of what's profitable for them; and that might mean even if she's not to be in their future films.

I like her as WW but she really doesn't have enough leverage to pull this off.

They can't fire her because the media will crucify them, so they'll probably placate her, but you're right this is going to hurt her career by making other studios reluctant to hire her in the future. She'll probably make enough money from playing WW in half a dozen movies to live comfortably the rest of her life, though.

Then again, WB is known to go the easy route.

*Points to Batman Arkham Knight for PC*
---

Metal_Mario99 posted...

wwinterj25 posted...

Full Throttle posted...

Do you think WB should give into Gal's demands?

Nope. She's not that valuable.

Mr. Clueless over here.

He's a really shitty troll and not very bright.
---

Metal_Mario99 posted...

Mr. Clueless over here.

That's me told.

jedirood posted...

He's a really shitty troll and not very bright.

Perhaps but I'm still better than someone who blocks someone only to respond to something about them anyway.
---

Full Throttle posted...

Ellen Page is one of those who accused Ratner for calling her out as a lesbian and saying degrading things about women. She took to facebook in a lenghty post against him after Ratner outed her when she was 18 at the time.

...literally not sexual misconduct.

WhiskeyDisk posted...

I normally don't side with virtue signalling, but Gadot has a very valid point on this issue.

Given that the allegations are thus far unproven and, if they're anything like what Ducky claimed of Ellen Page, they may be meritless. Kneejerk reactions are irrational.
---

Gal sucked, hopefully ratman embeds himself so we can get a recast.

Mead posted...

He should be fired for his track record of terrible films alone, him being a filthy creep is just the icing on th---actually let me think of a different metaphor

The Rush Hour movies are hilarious. I'm worried about Rush Hour 4 now, but maybe Jackie Chan can direct the movie, lol.
---

Mead posted...

He should be fired for his track record of terrible films alone, him being a filthy creep is just the icing on th---actually let me think of a different metaphor

Came in to say this lol, he is so bad at his job
---

I clicked on this topic just to vote my agreement, without knowing anything about what her issue was.
He's fucking terrible and any movie is better without him at the helm.

Hell, Wonder Woman 1 itself was basically a rebuke of his "talent" -- the DC movie with the least involvement from him was the only one that wasn't horrible.

wwinterj25 posted...

jedirood posted...

He's a really shitty troll and not very bright.

Perhaps but I'm still better than someone who blocks someone only to respond to something about them anyway.

You're really not.
---

Metal_Mario99 posted...

You're really not.

Thanks for the useful input yet again. Why would I be without it?
---

wwinterj25 posted...

Metal_Mario99 posted...

You're really not.

Thanks for the useful input yet again. Why would I be without it?

I don't know. Why would you be without it?
---

Zeus posted...

Full Throttle posted...

Ellen Page is one of those who accused Ratner for calling her out as a lesbian and saying degrading things about women. She took to facebook in a lenghty post against him after Ratner outed her when she was 18 at the time.

...literally not sexual misconduct.

it is when you tell a 16 year old girl she should have sex with a 27 year old woman, which ratner did

Lokarin posted...

It's too early into her career to pull a Crispin Glover

Doesn't that make it the perfect time to pull a Crispin Glover?
Or would a Terence Howard from Iron Man would be more fitting perhaps?
---

Don't bother making another Wonder Woman, just choose another of the billion other female comic heroes. Lead actors pulling this sort of shit shouldn't get work, regardless of the morality.
---