Current Events > Breaking: Shooting at San Bernadino Elementary School

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
#104	Post #104 was unavailable or deleted.
CruelBuffalo 04/10/17 3:38:42 PM #105:	ChopinList posted... Has the identity/background of the shooter been revealed yet? Was the shooter Muslim? Or was it another white person? Seems to be a domestic issue. So not relevant <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:876925133] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>ChopinList posted...</cite> <quote>Has the identity/background of the shooter been revealed yet? Was the shooter Muslim? Or was it another white person?</quote> Seems to be a domestic issue. So not relevant</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Logos 04/10/17 3:38:54 PM #106:	Anarchy_Juiblex posted... I'll say what some gun proponents are afraid to admit. Regardless of how effective some laws might be at mitigating it, there is an acceptable cost to having any right and freedom. Whether it's cars, guns, sky diving, ladders, scissors . . . it is in my opinion that we have not gone beyond what are acceptable losses for gun rights. Exactly. If we want to minimize all unnecessary loss of life, we should ban swimming pools, cars, etc. And the government should force everyone to live in climate-controlled bullet-proof cubes. --- My biggest flaw is how logical and reasonable I am. - hockeybub89 <cite>Logos posted [p:876925146] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote>I'll say what some gun proponents are afraid to admit. Regardless of how effective some laws might be at mitigating it, there is an acceptable cost to having any right and freedom. Whether it's cars, guns, sky diving, ladders, scissors . . . it is in my opinion that we have not gone beyond what are acceptable losses for gun rights.</quote> Exactly. If we want to minimize all unnecessary loss of life, we should ban swimming pools, cars, etc. And the government should force everyone to live in climate-controlled bullet-proof cubes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DifferentialEquation 04/10/17 3:39:37 PM #107:	CruelBuffalo posted... DifferentialEquation posted... CruelBuffalo posted... I wouldnt be opposed to bans or incredibly tight restrictions on large capacity magazines and that's something they should be determined by what's needed for hunters Hunters don't need high capacity magazines. They try to take to the animal down in a single shot and will sometimes wait hours or the entire day for a good shot. I know that was my point So you want magazines to be restricted to ~5 rounds? --- "If the day does not require an AK, it is good." The Great Warrior Poet, Ice Cube <cite>DifferentialEquation posted [p:876925197] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>I wouldnt be opposed to bans or incredibly tight restrictions on large capacity magazines and that's something they should be determined by what's needed for hunters</quote> Hunters don't need high capacity magazines. They try to take to the animal down in a single shot and will sometimes wait hours or the entire day for a good shot.</quote> I know that was my point</quote> So you want magazines to be restricted to ~5 rounds?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 04/10/17 3:40:26 PM #108:	DifferentialEquation posted... CruelBuffalo posted... DifferentialEquation posted... CruelBuffalo posted... I wouldnt be opposed to bans or incredibly tight restrictions on large capacity magazines and that's something they should be determined by what's needed for hunters Hunters don't need high capacity magazines. They try to take to the animal down in a single shot and will sometimes wait hours or the entire day for a good shot. I know that was my point So you want magazines to be restricted to ~5 rounds? I'm not an expert so I don't feel comfortable giving the count. <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:876925247] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>I wouldnt be opposed to bans or incredibly tight restrictions on large capacity magazines and that's something they should be determined by what's needed for hunters</quote> Hunters don't need high capacity magazines. They try to take to the animal down in a single shot and will sometimes wait hours or the entire day for a good shot.</quote> I know that was my point</quote> So you want magazines to be restricted to ~5 rounds?</quote> I'm not an expert so I don't feel comfortable giving the count.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 04/10/17 3:41:15 PM #109:	Since when do gang shootings end in suicide? Is the internet being racist again? <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:876925301] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote>Since when do gang shootings end in suicide? Is the internet being racist again?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DifferentialEquation 04/10/17 3:43:08 PM #110:	CruelBuffalo posted... DifferentialEquation posted... CruelBuffalo posted... DifferentialEquation posted... CruelBuffalo posted... I wouldnt be opposed to bans or incredibly tight restrictions on large capacity magazines and that's something they should be determined by what's needed for hunters Hunters don't need high capacity magazines. They try to take to the animal down in a single shot and will sometimes wait hours or the entire day for a good shot. I know that was my point So you want magazines to be restricted to ~5 rounds? I'm not an expert so I don't feel comfortable giving the count. And hunters are not going to be experts on home/self defense or those types of situations, so why do you want them to decide? --- "If the day does not require an AK, it is good." The Great Warrior Poet, Ice Cube <cite>DifferentialEquation posted [p:876925438] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>I wouldnt be opposed to bans or incredibly tight restrictions on large capacity magazines and that's something they should be determined by what's needed for hunters</quote> Hunters don't need high capacity magazines. They try to take to the animal down in a single shot and will sometimes wait hours or the entire day for a good shot.</quote> I know that was my point</quote> So you want magazines to be restricted to ~5 rounds?</quote> I'm not an expert so I don't feel comfortable giving the count.</quote> And hunters are not going to be experts on home/self defense or those types of situations, so why do you want them to decide?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 04/10/17 3:43:23 PM #111:	DifferentialEquation posted... CruelBuffalo posted... DifferentialEquation posted... CruelBuffalo posted... I wouldnt be opposed to bans or incredibly tight restrictions on large capacity magazines and that's something they should be determined by what's needed for hunters Hunters don't need high capacity magazines. They try to take to the animal down in a single shot and will sometimes wait hours or the entire day for a good shot. I know that was my point So you want magazines to be restricted to ~5 rounds? Five rounds but you can only ever have one in it at any given point (an actual law) --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:876925449] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>I wouldnt be opposed to bans or incredibly tight restrictions on large capacity magazines and that's something they should be determined by what's needed for hunters</quote> Hunters don't need high capacity magazines. They try to take to the animal down in a single shot and will sometimes wait hours or the entire day for a good shot.</quote> I know that was my point</quote> So you want magazines to be restricted to ~5 rounds?</quote> Five rounds but you can only ever have one in it at any given point (an actual law)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Logos 04/10/17 3:44:12 PM #112:	CruelBuffalo posted... I'm not an expert so I don't feel comfortable giving the count. Yet you feel comfortable enough to run your mouth about why there should be a magazine ban. --- My biggest flaw is how logical and reasonable I am. - hockeybub89 <cite>Logos posted [p:876925507] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>I'm not an expert so I don't feel comfortable giving the count. </quote> Yet you feel comfortable enough to run your mouth about why there should be a magazine ban.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AlephZero 04/10/17 3:44:20 PM #113:	ban all guns --- "There is value in segregation." - qwertyman2002 01001100 01010101 01000101 00100000 00110100 00110000 00110010 <cite>AlephZero posted [p:876925516] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote>ban all guns</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 04/10/17 3:44:27 PM #114:	DifferentialEquation posted... CruelBuffalo posted... DifferentialEquation posted... CruelBuffalo posted... DifferentialEquation posted... CruelBuffalo posted... I wouldnt be opposed to bans or incredibly tight restrictions on large capacity magazines and that's something they should be determined by what's needed for hunters Hunters don't need high capacity magazines. They try to take to the animal down in a single shot and will sometimes wait hours or the entire day for a good shot. I know that was my point So you want magazines to be restricted to ~5 rounds? I'm not an expert so I don't feel comfortable giving the count. And hunters are not going to be experts on home/self defense or those types of situations, so why do you want them to decide? Because they actively use firearms. You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:876925520] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>I wouldnt be opposed to bans or incredibly tight restrictions on large capacity magazines and that's something they should be determined by what's needed for hunters</quote> Hunters don't need high capacity magazines. They try to take to the animal down in a single shot and will sometimes wait hours or the entire day for a good shot.</quote> I know that was my point</quote> So you want magazines to be restricted to ~5 rounds?</quote> I'm not an expert so I don't feel comfortable giving the count.</quote> And hunters are not going to be experts on home/self defense or those types of situations, so why do you want them to decide?</quote> Because they actively use firearms. You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Logos 04/10/17 3:44:37 PM #115:	Tropicalwood posted... Five rounds but you can only ever have one in it at any given point (an actual law) And what are you going to do if multiple armed invaders make their way towards your room at night? --- My biggest flaw is how logical and reasonable I am. - hockeybub89 <cite>Logos posted [p:876925528] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote>Five rounds but you can only ever have one in it at any given point (an actual law) </quote> And what are you going to do if multiple armed invaders make their way towards your room at night?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Great Muta 22 04/10/17 3:44:52 PM #116:	Logos posted... the gun death metrics tend to include gang shootings in their data. if you look at just the public mass shooting sprees, they're incredibly uncommon. far less common than shootings, and about as common as islamic terrorism in europe. yet liberals constantly make the argument that islamic terrorism in europe is so uncommon and improbable that it's not statistically a problem. it's the same with mass shooting sprees in america. both are statistically irrelevant. meaning you're basically guaranteed to never be a victim of either. Well at least you admit that neither is statistically probable and the majority of the people aren't going to suffer either in their lifetime. And while both issues are serious and need to be given the proper attention it's better if we realize that neither are such a dramatic issue that we should automatically assume the very worse and be paranoid at all moments, right? <cite>The Great Muta 22 posted [p:876925541] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>Logos posted...</cite> <quote>the gun death metrics tend to include gang shootings in their data. if you look at just the public mass shooting sprees, they're incredibly uncommon. far less common than shootings, and about as common as islamic terrorism in europe. yet liberals constantly make the argument that islamic terrorism in europe is so uncommon and improbable that it's not statistically a problem. it's the same with mass shooting sprees in america. both are statistically irrelevant. meaning you're basically guaranteed to never be a victim of either. </quote> Well at least you admit that neither is statistically probable and the majority of the people aren't going to suffer either in their lifetime. And while both issues are serious and need to be given the proper attention it's better if we realize that neither are such a dramatic issue that we should automatically assume the very worse and be paranoid at all moments, right?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anarchy_Juiblex 04/10/17 3:44:58 PM #117:	Tropicalwood posted... Five rounds but you can only ever have one in it at any given point (an actual law) Difference states have difference rules. KY shotguns were limited to 3, rifles 4 iirc. No limit on handgun hunting. --- "Tolerance of intolerance is cowardice." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali <cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted [p:876925548] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote>Five rounds but you can only ever have one in it at any given point (an actual law)</quote> Difference states have difference rules. KY shotguns were limited to 3, rifles 4 iirc. No limit on handgun hunting.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
andel 04/10/17 3:45:13 PM #118:	gun ban will never happen in the us. i am fine with background checks but magazine capacity limits are moronic and always proposed by ignorant people --- I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis <cite>andel posted [p:876925564] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote>gun ban will never happen in the us. i am fine with background checks but magazine capacity limits are moronic and always proposed by ignorant people</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 04/10/17 3:45:19 PM #119:	CruelBuffalo posted... DifferentialEquation posted... CruelBuffalo posted... DifferentialEquation posted... CruelBuffalo posted... DifferentialEquation posted... CruelBuffalo posted... I wouldnt be opposed to bans or incredibly tight restrictions on large capacity magazines and that's something they should be determined by what's needed for hunters Hunters don't need high capacity magazines. They try to take to the animal down in a single shot and will sometimes wait hours or the entire day for a good shot. I know that was my point So you want magazines to be restricted to ~5 rounds? I'm not an expert so I don't feel comfortable giving the count. And hunters are not going to be experts on home/self defense or those types of situations, so why do you want them to decide? Because they actively use firearms. You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself That's not going to keep king George off your lawn. --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:876925570] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>I wouldnt be opposed to bans or incredibly tight restrictions on large capacity magazines and that's something they should be determined by what's needed for hunters</quote> Hunters don't need high capacity magazines. They try to take to the animal down in a single shot and will sometimes wait hours or the entire day for a good shot.</quote> I know that was my point</quote> So you want magazines to be restricted to ~5 rounds?</quote> I'm not an expert so I don't feel comfortable giving the count.</quote> And hunters are not going to be experts on home/self defense or those types of situations, so why do you want them to decide?</quote> Because they actively use firearms. You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself</quote> That's not going to keep king George off your lawn.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ManSpread 04/10/17 3:45:32 PM #120:	CruelBuffalo posted... DifferentialEquation posted... CruelBuffalo posted... DifferentialEquation posted... CruelBuffalo posted... DifferentialEquation posted... CruelBuffalo posted... I wouldnt be opposed to bans or incredibly tight restrictions on large capacity magazines and that's something they should be determined by what's needed for hunters Hunters don't need high capacity magazines. They try to take to the animal down in a single shot and will sometimes wait hours or the entire day for a good shot. I know that was my point So you want magazines to be restricted to ~5 rounds? I'm not an expert so I don't feel comfortable giving the count. And hunters are not going to be experts on home/self defense or those types of situations, so why do you want them to decide? Because they actively use firearms. You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself you do realize most AKs are semi automatic? and aside from obvious differences is no different than owning an AR-15 for home defense --- https://i.imgur.com/mYLURVv.png http://i.imgur.com/Dj68WVS.gifv <cite>ManSpread posted [p:876925584] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>I wouldnt be opposed to bans or incredibly tight restrictions on large capacity magazines and that's something they should be determined by what's needed for hunters</quote> Hunters don't need high capacity magazines. They try to take to the animal down in a single shot and will sometimes wait hours or the entire day for a good shot.</quote> I know that was my point</quote> So you want magazines to be restricted to ~5 rounds?</quote> I'm not an expert so I don't feel comfortable giving the count.</quote> And hunters are not going to be experts on home/self defense or those types of situations, so why do you want them to decide?</quote> Because they actively use firearms. You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself</quote> you do realize most AKs are semi automatic? and aside from obvious differences is no different than owning an AR-15 for home defense</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Logos 04/10/17 3:45:51 PM #121:	The Great Muta 22 posted... Logos posted... the gun death metrics tend to include gang shootings in their data. if you look at just the public mass shooting sprees, they're incredibly uncommon. far less common than shootings, and about as common as islamic terrorism in europe. yet liberals constantly make the argument that islamic terrorism in europe is so uncommon and improbable that it's not statistically a problem. it's the same with mass shooting sprees in america. both are statistically irrelevant. meaning you're basically guaranteed to never be a victim of either. Well at least you admit that neither is statistically probable and the majority of the people aren't going to suffer either in their lifetime. And while both issues are serious and need to be given the proper attention it's better if we realize that neither are such a dramatic issue that we should automatically assume the very worse and be paranoid at all moments, right? no, because then we'd have to ban cars, swimming pools, immigration from third world countries, etc. --- My biggest flaw is how logical and reasonable I am. - hockeybub89 <cite>Logos posted [p:876925600] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Great Muta 22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Logos posted...</cite> <quote>the gun death metrics tend to include gang shootings in their data. if you look at just the public mass shooting sprees, they're incredibly uncommon. far less common than shootings, and about as common as islamic terrorism in europe. yet liberals constantly make the argument that islamic terrorism in europe is so uncommon and improbable that it's not statistically a problem. it's the same with mass shooting sprees in america. both are statistically irrelevant. meaning you're basically guaranteed to never be a victim of either. </quote> Well at least you admit that neither is statistically probable and the majority of the people aren't going to suffer either in their lifetime. And while both issues are serious and need to be given the proper attention it's better if we realize that neither are such a dramatic issue that we should automatically assume the very worse and be paranoid at all moments, right?</quote> no, because then we'd have to ban cars, swimming pools, immigration from third world countries, etc.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#122	Post #122 was unavailable or deleted.
Anarchy_Juiblex 04/10/17 3:46:46 PM #123:	CruelBuffalo posted... You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself Last week some kid defended his home with a AR15 against 3 assailants. Yes, you might need 30 rounds. --- "Tolerance of intolerance is cowardice." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali <cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted [p:876925662] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself</quote> Last week some kid defended his home with a AR15 against 3 assailants. Yes, you might need 30 rounds.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DifferentialEquation 04/10/17 3:47:01 PM #124:	CruelBuffalo posted... DifferentialEquation posted... CruelBuffalo posted... DifferentialEquation posted... CruelBuffalo posted... DifferentialEquation posted... CruelBuffalo posted... I wouldnt be opposed to bans or incredibly tight restrictions on large capacity magazines and that's something they should be determined by what's needed for hunters Hunters don't need high capacity magazines. They try to take to the animal down in a single shot and will sometimes wait hours or the entire day for a good shot. I know that was my point So you want magazines to be restricted to ~5 rounds? I'm not an expert so I don't feel comfortable giving the count. And hunters are not going to be experts on home/self defense or those types of situations, so why do you want them to decide? Because they actively use firearms. You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself Self/home defense is an entirely different situation from hunting. If you're going to go by what hunters need, then why not go further and only allow bolt/lever actions? --- "If the day does not require an AK, it is good." The Great Warrior Poet, Ice Cube <cite>DifferentialEquation posted [p:876925683] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>I wouldnt be opposed to bans or incredibly tight restrictions on large capacity magazines and that's something they should be determined by what's needed for hunters</quote> Hunters don't need high capacity magazines. They try to take to the animal down in a single shot and will sometimes wait hours or the entire day for a good shot.</quote> I know that was my point</quote> So you want magazines to be restricted to ~5 rounds?</quote> I'm not an expert so I don't feel comfortable giving the count.</quote> And hunters are not going to be experts on home/self defense or those types of situations, so why do you want them to decide?</quote> Because they actively use firearms. You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself</quote> Self/home defense is an entirely different situation from hunting. If you're going to go by what hunters need, then why not go further and only allow bolt/lever actions?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Logos 04/10/17 3:47:31 PM #125:	i'm convinced that CruelBuffalo has shut his mind to facts and reason and is entirely committed to his narrative. pointless to even argue with him. --- My biggest flaw is how logical and reasonable I am. - hockeybub89 <cite>Logos posted [p:876925717] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote>i'm convinced that CruelBuffalo has shut his mind to facts and reason and is entirely committed to his narrative. pointless to even argue with him.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DundiesAward 04/10/17 3:47:49 PM #126:	CruelBuffalo posted... Since when do gang shootings end in suicide? Is the internet being racist again? I'm more shocked this took place in a school. I thought gangs were the type to say let's take this outside. The school is a learning zone and outside is where you fight/kill each other. --- Black Pope <cite>DundiesAward posted [p:876925746] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>Since when do gang shootings end in suicide? Is the internet being racist again?</quote> I'm more shocked this took place in a school. I thought gangs were the type to say let's take this outside. The school is a learning zone and outside is where you fight/kill each other.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
yem69420 04/10/17 3:49:02 PM #127:	ManSpread posted... large magazine bans are stupid drills with a 10 round 1911 mag takes me an average of 2-2.5 seconds per reload more than drills with a 21 round magpul glock mag i'm not as good a shooter anymore (older and not as fit), but I can still pull off B-class (60-75%) rank in most courses. I'm also talking about holsters with multiple kydex mag pouches. The first time I picked up an AR-15 I hit a 10-ring multiple times from 150yds out with iron sights. Wasn't my first rifle I've ever shot but it is an easy gun to pick up and shoot for even kids. I don't want AR's banned or High Cap mags but at this point I have so many high cap mags for the guns that matter that I don't really give a fuck. During the clinton gun ban you could still find high-cap mags straight out of the cabelas catalog. Assault weapons bans really aren't very effective. --- psn, steam id: yem69420 origin id: yemman 360/xbone gt/uplay: cjpitt1985 <cite>yem69420 posted [p:876925827] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>ManSpread posted...</cite> <quote>large magazine bans are stupid</quote> drills with a 10 round 1911 mag takes me an average of 2-2.5 seconds per reload more than drills with a 21 round magpul glock mag i'm not as good a shooter anymore (older and not as fit), but I can still pull off B-class (60-75%) rank in most courses. I'm also talking about holsters with multiple kydex mag pouches. The first time I picked up an AR-15 I hit a 10-ring multiple times from 150yds out with iron sights. Wasn't my first rifle I've ever shot but it is an easy gun to pick up and shoot for even kids. I don't want AR's banned or High Cap mags but at this point I have so many high cap mags for the guns that matter that I don't really give a fuck. During the clinton gun ban you could still find high-cap mags straight out of the cabelas catalog. Assault weapons bans really aren't very effective.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 04/10/17 3:51:50 PM #128:	Anarchy_Juiblex posted... CruelBuffalo posted... You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself Last week some kid defended his home with a AR15 against 3 assailants. Yes, you might need 30 rounds. He could have used a bazooka as well doesn't mean I'd wish that. And since it's legal Im not in favor of any charges to the kid. <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:876925991] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself</quote> Last week some kid defended his home with a AR15 against 3 assailants. Yes, you might need 30 rounds.</quote> He could have used a bazooka as well doesn't mean I'd wish that. And since it's legal Im not in favor of any charges to the kid.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 04/10/17 3:53:16 PM #129:	Logos posted... i'm convinced that CruelBuffalo has shut his mind to facts and reason and is entirely committed to his narrative. pointless to even argue with him. I said I wasn't an expert nor have I attacked anyone besides you derping around. I'm giving my opinion and discussing it with others. You're the one going guns blazing attacking calling me dumb liberal and such <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:876926086] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>Logos posted...</cite> <quote>i'm convinced that CruelBuffalo has shut his mind to facts and reason and is entirely committed to his narrative. pointless to even argue with him.</quote> I said I wasn't an expert nor have I attacked anyone besides you derping around. I'm giving my opinion and discussing it with others. You're the one going guns blazing attacking calling me dumb liberal and such</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Logos 04/10/17 3:53:46 PM #130:	CruelBuffalo posted... Anarchy_Juiblex posted... CruelBuffalo posted... You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself Last week some kid defended his home with a AR15 against 3 assailants. Yes, you might need 30 rounds. He could have used a bazooka as well doesn't mean I'd wish that. And since it's legal Im not in favor of any charges to the kid. are you seriously going to pretend that you really think that's a legitimate argument --- My biggest flaw is how logical and reasonable I am. - hockeybub89 <cite>Logos posted [p:876926112] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself</quote> Last week some kid defended his home with a AR15 against 3 assailants. Yes, you might need 30 rounds.</quote> He could have used a bazooka as well doesn't mean I'd wish that. And since it's legal Im not in favor of any charges to the kid.</quote> are you seriously going to pretend that you really think that's a legitimate argument</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 04/10/17 3:54:11 PM #131:	Anarchy_Juiblex posted... CruelBuffalo posted... You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself Last week some kid defended his home with a AR15 against 3 assailants. Yes, you might need 30 rounds. Statistically, you don't need a gun at all. It is a much better argument to just mention that guns are a right and that inanimate objects are typically only as deadly as the person wielding them. I think people should be able to have guns because they want them, not because there is a slim chance they may be in a situation where they will fire them at another human being. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:876926137] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself</quote> Last week some kid defended his home with a AR15 against 3 assailants. Yes, you might need 30 rounds.</quote> Statistically, you don't need a gun at all. It is a much better argument to just mention that guns are a right and that inanimate objects are typically only as deadly as the person wielding them. I think people should be able to have guns because they want them, not because there is a slim chance they may be in a situation where they will fire them at another human being.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fart_Tzar 04/10/17 3:54:45 PM #132:	Jesus christ, look how fast people on the left and right in this topic are trying to get in a few political jabs. --- 5820k (H100i) \| 32gb DDR4 \| Asus X99-A \| EVGA 980 SC \| 512gb 840 pro + 2gb WD Black \| Nvidia Surround \| Ducky Shine 5 <cite>Fart_Tzar posted [p:876926179] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote>Jesus christ, look how fast people on the left and right in this topic are trying to get in a few political jabs.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 04/10/17 3:54:46 PM #133:	GOATTHlEF posted... CruelBuffalo posted... Since when do gang shootings end in suicide? Is the internet being racist again? Just posting what the police scanner was saying earlier Ah so using unverified info from an active investigation to make definitive statements. Got it. <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:876926181] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>GOATTHlEF posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>Since when do gang shootings end in suicide? Is the internet being racist again?</quote> Just posting what the police scanner was saying earlier</quote> Ah so using unverified info from an active investigation to make definitive statements. Got it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sktgamer_13dude 04/10/17 3:55:32 PM #134:	"Hey guys we should limit who gets guns and make sure that people with mental health issues don't have the opportunity to have guns." "THEY'RE TAKING OUR GUNS!!!!!" - the right --- http://i.imgur.com/jWVrg9U.gif http://i.imgur.com/g2efUtT.jpg http://i.imgur.com/5dOwhaP.jpg http://i.imgur.com/LVdqu8J.gif Go Cougs and M's #DI4B <cite>sktgamer_13dude posted [p:876926228] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote>"Hey guys we should limit who gets guns and make sure that people with mental health issues don't have the opportunity to have guns." "THEY'RE TAKING OUR GUNS!!!!!" - the right</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 04/10/17 3:57:12 PM #135:	CruelBuffalo posted... Logos posted... i'm convinced that CruelBuffalo has shut his mind to facts and reason and is entirely committed to his narrative. pointless to even argue with him. I said I wasn't an expert nor have I attacked anyone besides you derping around. I'm giving my opinion and discussing it with others. You're the one going guns blazing attacking calling me dumb liberal and such Maybe because you are being dumb. 30 rounds is a standard capacity magazine. If you want to talk about high capacity, you can get ammo belts as long as you have ammo and links. --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:876926345] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Logos posted...</cite> <quote>i'm convinced that CruelBuffalo has shut his mind to facts and reason and is entirely committed to his narrative. pointless to even argue with him.</quote> I said I wasn't an expert nor have I attacked anyone besides you derping around. I'm giving my opinion and discussing it with others. You're the one going guns blazing attacking calling me dumb liberal and such</quote> Maybe because you are being dumb. 30 rounds is a standard capacity magazine. If you want to talk about high capacity, you can get ammo belts as long as you have ammo and links.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
scorpion41 04/10/17 3:57:49 PM #136:	sktgamer_13dude posted... "Hey guys we should limit who gets guns and make sure that people with mental health issues don't have the opportunity to have guns." "THEY'RE TAKING OUR GUNS!!!!!" - the right Please explain what that does to address the problem with criminals getting their hands on illegal weapons. I'll save you the trouble: not a damned thing. --- PSN: scorpion_4160 Currently Playing: NCAA 14, Devil May Cry HD collection <cite>scorpion41 posted [p:876926380] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>sktgamer_13dude posted...</cite> <quote>"Hey guys we should limit who gets guns and make sure that people with mental health issues don't have the opportunity to have guns." "THEY'RE TAKING OUR GUNS!!!!!" - the right</quote> Please explain what that does to address the problem with criminals getting their hands on illegal weapons. I'll save you the trouble: not a damned thing.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ShinyMasamuneZ 04/10/17 3:57:55 PM #137:	But if they ban guns, I'll never get to live out my fantasy when six guys break into my house from all directions and I get to dual-wield AR15s to protect my family! Think about my unrealistic fantasies, guys! --- Currently Playing: Final Fantasy XV, Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance 2 Recently Finished: Assassin's Creed Unity <cite>ShinyMasamuneZ posted [p:876926385] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote>But if they ban guns, I'll never get to live out my fantasy when six guys break into my house from all directions and I get to dual-wield AR15s to protect my family! Think about my unrealistic fantasies, guys!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
3rd_Best_Master 04/10/17 3:58:35 PM #138:	CruelBuffalo posted... GOATTHlEF posted... CruelBuffalo posted... Since when do gang shootings end in suicide? Is the internet being racist again? Just posting what the police scanner was saying earlier Ah so using unverified info from an active investigation to make definitive statements. Got it. Could always just do the typical CE thing where we just dribble diarrhea on the keyboards and by the time the investigation is complete and all the details are known we've already moved on to the newest racist Addy post. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.2 <cite>3rd_Best_Master posted [p:876926417] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GOATTHlEF posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote> Since when do gang shootings end in suicide? Is the internet being racist again? </quote> Just posting what the police scanner was saying earlier</quote> Ah so using unverified info from an active investigation to make definitive statements. Got it.</quote> Could always just do the typical CE thing where we just dribble diarrhea on the keyboards and by the time the investigation is complete and all the details are known we've already moved on to the newest racist Addy post.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 04/10/17 4:01:40 PM #139:	Logos posted... CruelBuffalo posted... Anarchy_Juiblex posted... CruelBuffalo posted... You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself Last week some kid defended his home with a AR15 against 3 assailants. Yes, you might need 30 rounds. He could have used a bazooka as well doesn't mean I'd wish that. And since it's legal Im not in favor of any charges to the kid. are you seriously going to pretend that you really think that's a legitimate argument Considering they were unarmed robbers who weren't there to kill anyone and had no reason to get into a firefight as soon as one bullet was shot. Yes I think a rifle or a handgun would have also protected the kid. <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:876926612] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>Logos posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself</quote> Last week some kid defended his home with a AR15 against 3 assailants. Yes, you might need 30 rounds.</quote> He could have used a bazooka as well doesn't mean I'd wish that. And since it's legal Im not in favor of any charges to the kid.</quote> are you seriously going to pretend that you really think that's a legitimate argument</quote> Considering they were unarmed robbers who weren't there to kill anyone and had no reason to get into a firefight as soon as one bullet was shot. Yes I think a rifle or a handgun would have also protected the kid.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
scorpion41 04/10/17 4:02:47 PM #140:	CruelBuffalo posted... Logos posted... CruelBuffalo posted... Anarchy_Juiblex posted... CruelBuffalo posted... You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself Last week some kid defended his home with a AR15 against 3 assailants. Yes, you might need 30 rounds. He could have used a bazooka as well doesn't mean I'd wish that. And since it's legal Im not in favor of any charges to the kid. are you seriously going to pretend that you really think that's a legitimate argument Considering they were unarmed robbers who weren't there to kill anyone and had no reason to get into a firefight as soon as one bullet was shot. Yes I think a rifle or a handgun would have also protected the kid. An AR-15 is a rifle... --- PSN: scorpion_4160 Currently Playing: NCAA 14, Devil May Cry HD collection <cite>scorpion41 posted [p:876926681] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Logos posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself</quote> Last week some kid defended his home with a AR15 against 3 assailants. Yes, you might need 30 rounds.</quote> He could have used a bazooka as well doesn't mean I'd wish that. And since it's legal Im not in favor of any charges to the kid.</quote> are you seriously going to pretend that you really think that's a legitimate argument</quote> Considering they were unarmed robbers who weren't there to kill anyone and had no reason to get into a firefight as soon as one bullet was shot. Yes I think a rifle or a handgun would have also protected the kid.</quote> An AR-15 is a rifle...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Logos 04/10/17 4:03:20 PM #141:	hockeybub89 posted... Anarchy_Juiblex posted... CruelBuffalo posted... You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself Last week some kid defended his home with a AR15 against 3 assailants. Yes, you might need 30 rounds. Statistically, you don't need a gun at all. It is a much better argument to just mention that guns are a right and that inanimate objects are typically only as deadly as the person wielding them. I think people should be able to have guns because they want them, not because there is a slim chance they may be in a situation where they will fire them at another human being. move to chicago and try owning property without getting breakins. --- My biggest flaw is how logical and reasonable I am. - hockeybub89 <cite>Logos posted [p:876926715] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself</quote> Last week some kid defended his home with a AR15 against 3 assailants. Yes, you might need 30 rounds.</quote> Statistically, you don't need a gun at all. It is a much better argument to just mention that guns are a right and that inanimate objects are typically only as deadly as the person wielding them. I think people should be able to have guns because they want them, not because there is a slim chance they may be in a situation where they will fire them at another human being.</quote> move to chicago and try owning property without getting breakins.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fart_Tzar 04/10/17 4:03:48 PM #142:	CruelBuffalo posted... Logos posted... CruelBuffalo posted... Anarchy_Juiblex posted... CruelBuffalo posted... You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself Last week some kid defended his home with a AR15 against 3 assailants. Yes, you might need 30 rounds. He could have used a bazooka as well doesn't mean I'd wish that. And since it's legal Im not in favor of any charges to the kid. are you seriously going to pretend that you really think that's a legitimate argument Considering they were unarmed robbers who weren't there to kill anyone and had no reason to get into a firefight as soon as one bullet was shot. Yes I think a rifle or a handgun would have also protected the kid. they were armed --- 5820k (H100i) \| 32gb DDR4 \| Asus X99-A \| EVGA 980 SC \| 512gb 840 pro + 2gb WD Black \| Nvidia Surround \| Ducky Shine 5 <cite>Fart_Tzar posted [p:876926739] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Logos posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself</quote> Last week some kid defended his home with a AR15 against 3 assailants. Yes, you might need 30 rounds.</quote> He could have used a bazooka as well doesn't mean I'd wish that. And since it's legal Im not in favor of any charges to the kid.</quote> are you seriously going to pretend that you really think that's a legitimate argument</quote> Considering they were unarmed robbers who weren't there to kill anyone and had no reason to get into a firefight as soon as one bullet was shot. Yes I think a rifle or a handgun would have also protected the kid.</quote> they were armed</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 04/10/17 4:04:02 PM #143:	Tropicalwood posted... CruelBuffalo posted... Logos posted... i'm convinced that CruelBuffalo has shut his mind to facts and reason and is entirely committed to his narrative. pointless to even argue with him. I said I wasn't an expert nor have I attacked anyone besides you derping around. I'm giving my opinion and discussing it with others. You're the one going guns blazing attacking calling me dumb liberal and such Maybe because you are being dumb. 30 rounds is a standard capacity magazine. If you want to talk about high capacity, you can get ammo belts as long as you have ammo and links. There's nothing you can do to prevent someone from carrying extra ammo but someone reloading gives a higher percentage for intervention <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:876926758] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Logos posted...</cite> <quote>i'm convinced that CruelBuffalo has shut his mind to facts and reason and is entirely committed to his narrative. pointless to even argue with him.</quote> I said I wasn't an expert nor have I attacked anyone besides you derping around. I'm giving my opinion and discussing it with others. You're the one going guns blazing attacking calling me dumb liberal and such</quote> Maybe because you are being dumb. 30 rounds is a standard capacity magazine. If you want to talk about high capacity, you can get ammo belts as long as you have ammo and links.</quote> There's nothing you can do to prevent someone from carrying extra ammo but someone reloading gives a higher percentage for intervention</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Logos 04/10/17 4:05:10 PM #144:	CruelBuffalo posted... There's nothing you can do to prevent someone from carrying extra ammo but someone reloading gives a higher percentage for intervention lmao why don't you go fire a gun at a shooting range before you just make yourself look even dumber --- My biggest flaw is how logical and reasonable I am. - hockeybub89 <cite>Logos posted [p:876926823] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>There's nothing you can do to prevent someone from carrying extra ammo but someone reloading gives a higher percentage for intervention </quote> lmao why don't you go fire a gun at a shooting range before you just make yourself look even dumber</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 04/10/17 4:05:22 PM #145:	Fart_Tzar posted... CruelBuffalo posted... Logos posted... CruelBuffalo posted... Anarchy_Juiblex posted... CruelBuffalo posted... You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself Last week some kid defended his home with a AR15 against 3 assailants. Yes, you might need 30 rounds. He could have used a bazooka as well doesn't mean I'd wish that. And since it's legal Im not in favor of any charges to the kid. are you seriously going to pretend that you really think that's a legitimate argument Considering they were unarmed robbers who weren't there to kill anyone and had no reason to get into a firefight as soon as one bullet was shot. Yes I think a rifle or a handgun would have also protected the kid. they were armed With a firearm? I hadn't heard about them being armed <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:876926841] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>Fart_Tzar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Logos posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>You don't need an ak47 and 30 rounds per magazine to defend yourself</quote> Last week some kid defended his home with a AR15 against 3 assailants. Yes, you might need 30 rounds.</quote> He could have used a bazooka as well doesn't mean I'd wish that. And since it's legal Im not in favor of any charges to the kid.</quote> are you seriously going to pretend that you really think that's a legitimate argument</quote> Considering they were unarmed robbers who weren't there to kill anyone and had no reason to get into a firefight as soon as one bullet was shot. Yes I think a rifle or a handgun would have also protected the kid.</quote> they were armed</quote> With a firearm? I hadn't heard about them being armed</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Steve Nick 04/10/17 4:05:33 PM #146:	CruelBuffalo posted... Tropicalwood posted... CruelBuffalo posted... Logos posted... i'm convinced that CruelBuffalo has shut his mind to facts and reason and is entirely committed to his narrative. pointless to even argue with him. I said I wasn't an expert nor have I attacked anyone besides you derping around. I'm giving my opinion and discussing it with others. You're the one going guns blazing attacking calling me dumb liberal and such Maybe because you are being dumb. 30 rounds is a standard capacity magazine. If you want to talk about high capacity, you can get ammo belts as long as you have ammo and links. There's nothing you can do to prevent someone from carrying extra ammo but someone reloading gives a higher percentage for intervention You realize a reload takes 3 seconds or less for someone prepared for combat. 3 seconds is a high estimate, considering most experts take about 1 second. --- This is my signature. <cite>Steve Nick posted [p:876926857] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Logos posted...</cite> <quote>i'm convinced that CruelBuffalo has shut his mind to facts and reason and is entirely committed to his narrative. pointless to even argue with him.</quote> I said I wasn't an expert nor have I attacked anyone besides you derping around. I'm giving my opinion and discussing it with others. You're the one going guns blazing attacking calling me dumb liberal and such</quote> Maybe because you are being dumb. 30 rounds is a standard capacity magazine. If you want to talk about high capacity, you can get ammo belts as long as you have ammo and links.</quote> There's nothing you can do to prevent someone from carrying extra ammo but someone reloading gives a higher percentage for intervention</quote> You realize a reload takes 3 seconds or less for someone prepared for combat. 3 seconds is a high estimate, considering most experts take about 1 second.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 04/10/17 4:05:39 PM #147:	Logos posted... CruelBuffalo posted... There's nothing you can do to prevent someone from carrying extra ammo but someone reloading gives a higher percentage for intervention lmao why don't you go fire a gun at a shooting range before you just make yourself look even dumber Shot my first firearm at 6 years old <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:876926860] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>Logos posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>There's nothing you can do to prevent someone from carrying extra ammo but someone reloading gives a higher percentage for intervention </quote> lmao why don't you go fire a gun at a shooting range before you just make yourself look even dumber</quote> Shot my first firearm at 6 years old</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
andel 04/10/17 4:05:53 PM #148:	CruelBuffalo posted... GOATTHlEF posted... CruelBuffalo posted... Since when do gang shootings end in suicide? Is the internet being racist again? Just posting what the police scanner was saying earlier Ah so using unverified info from an active investigation to make definitive statements. Got it. he said 'looks like', so not definitive. do you not know what words mean? --- I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis <cite>andel posted [p:876926877] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GOATTHlEF posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>Since when do gang shootings end in suicide? Is the internet being racist again?</quote> Just posting what the police scanner was saying earlier</quote> Ah so using unverified info from an active investigation to make definitive statements. Got it.</quote> he said 'looks like', so not definitive. do you not know what words mean?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Logos 04/10/17 4:06:05 PM #149:	CruelBuffalo posted... Considering they were unarmed robbers who weren't there to kill anyone and had no reason to get into a firefight as soon as one bullet was shot. Yes I think a rifle or a handgun would have also protected the kid. lmfao what do you think an AR-15 is? it's a rifle you genius. lmfao. and why are you under the impression that you can dictate what he should've used? it's his life at risk, not yours. you're being a keyboard warrior, dude. --- My biggest flaw is how logical and reasonable I am. - hockeybub89 <cite>Logos posted [p:876926896] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>Considering they were unarmed robbers who weren't there to kill anyone and had no reason to get into a firefight as soon as one bullet was shot. Yes I think a rifle or a handgun would have also protected the kid. </quote> lmfao what do you think an AR-15 is? it's a rifle you genius. lmfao. and why are you under the impression that you can dictate what he should've used? it's his life at risk, not yours. you're being a keyboard warrior, dude.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Logos 04/10/17 4:06:24 PM #150:	CruelBuffalo posted... Logos posted... CruelBuffalo posted... There's nothing you can do to prevent someone from carrying extra ammo but someone reloading gives a higher percentage for intervention lmao why don't you go fire a gun at a shooting range before you just make yourself look even dumber Shot my first firearm at 6 years old then how is it that you're so fucking ignorant on guns? --- My biggest flaw is how logical and reasonable I am. - hockeybub89 <cite>Logos posted [p:876926920] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Logos posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>There's nothing you can do to prevent someone from carrying extra ammo but someone reloading gives a higher percentage for intervention </quote> lmao why don't you go fire a gun at a shooting range before you just make yourself look even dumber</quote> Shot my first firearm at 6 years old</quote> then how is it that you're so fucking ignorant on guns?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 04/10/17 4:07:21 PM #151:	Steve Nick posted... CruelBuffalo posted... Tropicalwood posted... CruelBuffalo posted... Logos posted... i'm convinced that CruelBuffalo has shut his mind to facts and reason and is entirely committed to his narrative. pointless to even argue with him. I said I wasn't an expert nor have I attacked anyone besides you derping around. I'm giving my opinion and discussing it with others. You're the one going guns blazing attacking calling me dumb liberal and such Maybe because you are being dumb. 30 rounds is a standard capacity magazine. If you want to talk about high capacity, you can get ammo belts as long as you have ammo and links. There's nothing you can do to prevent someone from carrying extra ammo but someone reloading gives a higher percentage for intervention You realize a reload takes 3 seconds or less for someone prepared for combat. 3 seconds is a high estimate, considering most experts take about 1 second. Didn't say it's a guarantee but them fumbling around with equipment gives higher chance for intervention which is something that is now taught for mass shooter situations. Fight back during those times. <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:876926976] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>Steve Nick posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Logos posted...</cite> <quote>i'm convinced that CruelBuffalo has shut his mind to facts and reason and is entirely committed to his narrative. pointless to even argue with him.</quote> I said I wasn't an expert nor have I attacked anyone besides you derping around. I'm giving my opinion and discussing it with others. You're the one going guns blazing attacking calling me dumb liberal and such</quote> Maybe because you are being dumb. 30 rounds is a standard capacity magazine. If you want to talk about high capacity, you can get ammo belts as long as you have ammo and links.</quote> There's nothing you can do to prevent someone from carrying extra ammo but someone reloading gives a higher percentage for intervention</quote> You realize a reload takes 3 seconds or less for someone prepared for combat. 3 seconds is a high estimate, considering most experts take about 1 second.</quote> Didn't say it's a guarantee but them fumbling around with equipment gives higher chance for intervention which is something that is now taught for mass shooter situations. Fight back during those times.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 04/10/17 4:08:20 PM #152:	Logos posted... CruelBuffalo posted... Considering they were unarmed robbers who weren't there to kill anyone and had no reason to get into a firefight as soon as one bullet was shot. Yes I think a rifle or a handgun would have also protected the kid. lmfao what do you think an AR-15 is? it's a rifle you genius. lmfao. and why are you under the impression that you can dictate what he should've used? it's his life at risk, not yours. you're being a keyboard warrior, dude. I didn't say he can't use it. I said he would have likely been fine with weaker firepower...which the original post implied he wouldn't have been safe had not had that specific weapon. <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:876927045] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>Logos posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>Considering they were unarmed robbers who weren't there to kill anyone and had no reason to get into a firefight as soon as one bullet was shot. Yes I think a rifle or a handgun would have also protected the kid. </quote> lmfao what do you think an AR-15 is? it's a rifle you genius. lmfao. and why are you under the impression that you can dictate what he should've used? it's his life at risk, not yours. you're being a keyboard warrior, dude.</quote> I didn't say he can't use it. I said he would have likely been fine with weaker firepower...which the original post implied he wouldn't have been safe had not had that specific weapon.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 04/10/17 4:08:56 PM #153:	Logos posted... CruelBuffalo posted... Considering they were unarmed robbers who weren't there to kill anyone and had no reason to get into a firefight as soon as one bullet was shot. Yes I think a rifle or a handgun would have also protected the kid. lmfao what do you think an AR-15 is? it's a rifle you genius. lmfao. and why are you under the impression that you can dictate what he should've used? it's his life at risk, not yours. you're being a keyboard warrior, dude. I didn't say he can't use it. I said he would have likely been fine with weaker firepower...which the original post implied he wouldn't have been safe had not had that specific weapon. Logos posted... CruelBuffalo posted... Logos posted... CruelBuffalo posted... There's nothing you can do to prevent someone from carrying extra ammo but someone reloading gives a higher percentage for intervention lmao why don't you go fire a gun at a shooting range before you just make yourself look even dumber Shot my first firearm at 6 years old then how is it that you're so fucking ignorant on guns? Because im not obsessed with them and do not actively use them. <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:876927073] in Breaking: ... [t:75221403]...</cite> <quote><cite>Logos posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>Considering they were unarmed robbers who weren't there to kill anyone and had no reason to get into a firefight as soon as one bullet was shot. Yes I think a rifle or a handgun would have also protected the kid. </quote> lmfao what do you think an AR-15 is? it's a rifle you genius. lmfao. and why are you under the impression that you can dictate what he should've used? it's his life at risk, not yours. you're being a keyboard warrior, dude.</quote> I didn't say he can't use it. I said he would have likely been fine with weaker firepower...which the original post implied he wouldn't have been safe had not had that specific weapon. <cite>Logos posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Logos posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>There's nothing you can do to prevent someone from carrying extra ammo but someone reloading gives a higher percentage for intervention </quote> lmao why don't you go fire a gun at a shooting range before you just make yourself look even dumber</quote> Shot my first firearm at 6 years old</quote> then how is it that you're so fucking ignorant on guns?</quote> Because im not obsessed with them and do not actively use them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Current Events > Breaking: Shooting at San Bernadino Elementary School (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Breaking: Shooting at San Bernadino Elementary School