LogFAQs > #876927073

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicBreaking: Shooting at San Bernadino Elementary School
CruelBuffalo
04/10/17 4:08:56 PM
#153:


Logos posted...
CruelBuffalo posted...
Considering they were unarmed robbers who weren't there to kill anyone and had no reason to get into a firefight as soon as one bullet was shot. Yes I think a rifle or a handgun would have also protected the kid.


lmfao what do you think an AR-15 is? it's a rifle you genius. lmfao. and why are you under the impression that you can dictate what he should've used? it's his life at risk, not yours. you're being a keyboard warrior, dude.


I didn't say he can't use it. I said he would have likely been fine with weaker firepower...which the original post implied he wouldn't have been safe had not had that specific weapon. Logos posted...
CruelBuffalo posted...
Logos posted...
CruelBuffalo posted...
There's nothing you can do to prevent someone from carrying extra ammo but someone reloading gives a higher percentage for intervention


lmao why don't you go fire a gun at a shooting range before you just make yourself look even dumber

Shot my first firearm at 6 years old


then how is it that you're so fucking ignorant on guns?


Because im not obsessed with them and do not actively use them.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1