LogFAQs > #876927045

Logos posted...

CruelBuffalo posted...

Considering they were unarmed robbers who weren't there to kill anyone and had no reason to get into a firefight as soon as one bullet was shot. Yes I think a rifle or a handgun would have also protected the kid.

lmfao what do you think an AR-15 is? it's a rifle you genius. lmfao. and why are you under the impression that you can dictate what he should've used? it's his life at risk, not yours. you're being a keyboard warrior, dude.

I didn't say he can't use it. I said he would have likely been fine with weaker firepower...which the original post implied he wouldn't have been safe had not had that specific weapon.