Rules: - Vote once or abstain in each match - Matches last 24 hours - Votes by suspected alts and/or people from other boards will be removed at my discretion - The company with more votes at the end of the match advances - In the case of a tie, a 24-hour rematch will take place - Discussion related to the contest is encouraged in both the voting and the discussion topics
--
Will not remove this line of my signature until the Seahawks, Jazz or Rockies win a title (Started 5-16-09) http://www.sporcle.com/games/Kazbar/gfaqscontest
From: StealThisSheen | #026 Only because I, unlike most of the board, didn't get over "Capcom is a terrible company" the minute their next new shiny game was revealed.
These are my two favorite gaming companies, but honestly, one can make arguments about both being terrible this generation. No one has nickle-and-dimed their fans more this gen than Capcom, and Nintendo has fallen so far behind technologically and in terms of online community. It's pretty telling how only one Wii exclusive is a really big game on this site.
-- Yoblazer: http://i32.tinypic.com/zlf1w7.gif Watch and you'll see... someday I'll be... part of your world!
PartOfYourWorld posted... These are my two favorite gaming companies, but honestly, one can make arguments about both being terrible this generation. No one has nickle-and-dimed their fans more this gen than Capcom, and Nintendo has fallen so far behind technologically and in terms of online community. It's pretty telling how only one Wii exclusive is a really big game on this site.
To be fair, I'd say Wii has two, which isn't far below par, if at all, for this gen. Multiplatform games rule this gen.
-- SEP Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996 Step FOUR! Get Paid! http://img.imgcake.com/stevenashgifpu.gif
Only because I, unlike most of the board, didn't get over "Capcom is a terrible company" the minute their next new shiny game was revealed.
and yet you got over nintendo being a terrible company when they really aren't releasing **** for like 2 years lmao
oh they did have that one game that has been getting good reviews all over the place, but they decided that americans wouldn't be interested in that kind of thing. we need more casual shovelware, we wouldn't buy games that aren't 100% BS motion gimmicks
Besides, I'd rather a company release less games than to purposely hold back content from every game they release to get more money out of me with a second edition or DLC. Or force me to be online to play stuff I already purchased. Or kill off a game I was looking forward to and then try to blame me for it.
Nintendo's 3DS line-up alone looks much more appealing to me than "Here are some updates to games you already own. And here are some games that will no doubt get an update within 8 months. I hope you like spending $140 on one game!"
-- SEP Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996 Step FOUR! Get Paid! http://img.imgcake.com/stevenashgifpu.gif
nintendo's new games are essentially updates, idk, people will freak out about MW3 being a $60 map pack but they'll plunk down $50 for galaxy 2 and call it one of the best games in it's series? nintendo's fanbase is a joke.
quick look at the bracket, nintendo did have a pretty free ride. konami is the only good company they've had to face so far, so maybe square can pull it off since square is also huge on this board