It reeked of awful in the seventh book, and apparently this suckage carried over quite naturally into the film adaptation. Basically bad fanfiction, ugh. So someone who's a bigger fan than I am, please explain this to me: why would Rowling do such a thing?
--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBpfwpOPXNc&NR=1&feature=fvwp I watch Planet Chasers Starlight Excellent all day, every day.
An author tends to do whatever the **** they want. Because, you know, they're the author.
--
If you wake up at a different time, in a different place, could you wake up as a different person? [HERO'S PLUNGE] http://img.imgcake.com/wesker.gif
Liberal Degenerate posted... cause she's not that talented?
She's damn talented with individual words and sentences and sometimes scenes. Not really good with universe coherency and large-scale plots and having a good sense of what to cut.
--
Cats land on their feet. Toast lands peanut butter side down. A cat with toast strapped to its back will hover above the ground in a state of quantum indecision
I think she wrote the epilogue way back when she was writing the first books.
From what I heard, yeah. She wrote the epilogue before the first book was published and refused to edit it from how it was original for sentimental reasons.
I think she changed one thing which was *spoilers*
Dudley was going to have a wizard kid, but she decided that anyone related to Vernon by blood would have no hope of having wizard genes. Which is actually a good change IMO.
My Immortal posted... From what I heard, yeah. She wrote the epilogue before the first book was published and refused to edit it from how it was original for sentimental reasons.
That would make sense, yeah. Having reread all the books several times, the first few books have noticeably worse writing quality than the later books. The quality of writing steadily goes up until about book 5 when she more or less has her writing down.
--
Cats land on their feet. Toast lands peanut butter side down. A cat with toast strapped to its back will hover above the ground in a state of quantum indecision
^Tell me more! I'd like to hear about its mediocrity.
An author tends to do whatever the **** they want. Because, you know, they're the author.
Well sure. Most authors, however, are trying to write *quality* novels, so leaving such a miserable conclusion in the final product is baffling to me, considering how great the conclusion is otherwise.
--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBpfwpOPXNc&NR=1&feature=fvwp I watch Planet Chasers Starlight Excellent all day, every day.
What I really never understood is why Rowling needed to make a point out of declaring that Dumbledore was gay, seeing as it had no relevancy to the series at all.
OInsaneOne32 posted... What I really never understood is why Rowling needed to make a point out of declaring that Dumbledore was gay, seeing as it had no relevancy to the series at all.
IIRC, the movie people wanted him to have a love interest and she just casually told them she always envisioned him as being gay. It wasn't so much that she made a point of it as the movie directors wanted to add extra crap when they already cut out so much relevant stuff.
so yeah you're probably like, "well Hagrid was there for Harry when they first brought him to Privet Dr, and there for him when he was a kid and had nothing, and there for him when he left Privet Dr, and he has a bit of a sad backstory... surely they address what happens to him in the epilogue" lol
--
Donny: Are they gonna hurt us, Walter? Walter: No, Donny. These men are cowards.
the epilogue wasn't too bad in the movie because you don't really hear all the kids names except Albus Severus.And as awful of a name as it is, it does go along with the "what if I go to slytherin" thing, WIZARD UNITY, so I didn't mind too much
--
omg did u red text from last night dats so me LMAO : ) im not a slut i jus liek 2 haev fun LOL : )
As somebody who hated the epilogue in the book, the movie one was entirely tolerable. The actors did not look their age at all, but they tried. Honestly, I think what made the book epilogue so bad was the way it was written. Rowling's writing style got much better as time went by, and the final book was by far the best written... Until it slams you in the face with something written almost ten years earlier and barely changed since. It's a little jarring!
--
Something something something ^Poorly disguised anti-caps sig
Yeah, as bad as "Albus Severus Potter" flows phonetically, I had no real complaints about the epilogue. I mean, it wasn't the crown jewel of the book/series, but it offered itself as a peek into their adult years.
They should have just had Ginny and Harry **** like rabbits and treat her uterus like a clown car in typical Weasley fashion and keep naming kids after all the adult wizards they knew. Just think of the possibilities. Remus Reubeus Potter, Minerva Nymphadora Potter, the awesome possibilities are endless I say!