Current Events > My newborn boy got snipped and they had to use thar largest plastibell they make

(+) Yeah! (+)

inb4 "TC violated his child's human rights"

---

weird ass topic but par for the course for the fucking weirdos of CE

---

No girls like uncut.

---

Conflict posted...

It's always funny when people say this. Just reeks of buyer's remorse

But its true. Nobody likes anteater dick

Conflict posted...

It's always funny when people say this. Just reeks of buyer's remorse

I think there's a poll in North America that was close to a 55% of women preferring cut dicks, but almost every other part of the world that doesn't circumcise like most of Asia (Except maybe the Filipines) and Europe, women don't give a crap. A dick's a dick. I just think it's a barbaric practice to do it on a child that can't give consent like this. If you wanna do it when you're an adult (the only legit reason I can think of is maybe for cosmetic reasons) then more power to ya.

---

Used a plastibell instead of a Gomco or Mogen? What kind of ancient place did yall send him to?

---

gunplagirl posted...

It does more harm than good, all it's useful for is early in their life making it so the kid can wash it easier. But later in life it means reduced sensitivity, removal of healthy organs, and harms the natural pH of it. So. "Totally helpful"

People use that one a lot. And while it does reduce sensitivity, its not as bad as people make it out to be. Im cut, and get plenty sensitive. Many men do. They will never know any other sensitivity. I also know men who got cut later in life, and they say it noticeable, but not by as much as people make it seem. And still have a healthy and happy sex life. But it does make washing easier. And can make certain infections very hard, if not impossible, to get...
---

Prestoff posted...

I think there's a poll in North America that was close to a 55% of women preferring cut dicks, but almost every other part of the world that doesn't circumcise like most of Asia (Except maybe the Filipines) and Europe, women don't give a crap. A dick's a dick. I just think it's a barbaric practice to do it on a child that can't give consent like this. If you wanna do it when you're an adult (the only legit reason I can think of is maybe for cosmetic reasons) then more power to ya.

They could also wait until theyre a little older. Though, thats more what uncut people want. People wouldnt want to change their dick later in life. Like, I love being cut, but wouldnt want to go through that pain when older. So, Im glad I got cut as a baby when I was too young to remember. I dont really think it violates any basic rights, though. As your parents make all kinds of decisions for you when youre too young to make them yourself... Which is probably why people are still allowed to do it...
---

Yeah. Huge problem with me during sex. Lack of sensitivity. I end up taking forever and no girl likes that!

"Why cant you get off quickly like all the non-mutilated-penises ive been with and prefer!?"

---

Prestoff posted...

I think there's a poll in North America that was close to a 55% of women preferring cut dicks, but almost every other part of the world that doesn't circumcise like most of Asia (Except maybe the Filipines) and Europe, women don't give a crap. A dick's a dick. I just think it's a barbaric practice to do it on a child that can't give consent like this. If you wanna do it when you're an adult (the only legit reason I can think of is maybe for cosmetic reasons) then more power to ya.

Yeah, like guys just dont care about looks. A girls a girl. No one cares.

---

LordMarshal posted...

Yeah, like guys just dont care about looks. A girls a girl. No one cares.

its more like no one knows what the fuck to do with a circumcised dick outside of America


---

GiggetySplicer posted...

Maybe not that overt about it but you wouldnt be proud of your childrens looks? If anything it also means theyll have it easier in life.

Hes talking about wanting his kids dick, which is private and hidden, to be big. Looks are external and seen by all.
---

LinkPizza posted...

They could also wait until theyre a little older

Yeah +18 years at least.

LinkPizza posted...

People wouldnt want to change their dick later in life.

Nope, people still get circumcision later in their life for cosmetic reasons. Might not be as often, but at least they can consent to it.

LinkPizza posted...

I dont really think it violates any basic rights, though. As your parents make all kinds of decisions for you when youre too young to make them yourself... Which is probably why people are still allowed to do it...

By current law, no it doesn't but in my opinion baby circumcision is a barbaric act to do to ones child. Would I be in favor in making it law not to allow baby circumcision? You bet I would. This isn't something minor, this is a permenant removal of a skin part that can't grow back.

---

Conflict posted...

It's ok if you're just really resentful towards your parents for cutting your dick and repeatedly telling yourself no one likes uncut dicks is your coping mechanism.

Damn man you are really reading into this for no reason whatsoever...

---

MrPeppers posted...

Damn man you are really reading into this for no reason whatsoever...

Super defensive about his dick sleeve.

---

What when did you have a kid. Let alone have a steady girlfriend

---

Trigg3rH4ppy posted...

No that's weird. Every dad wants their boy to be a lady killer though.

Yah, what that dude said was really weird. Like really weird.

Im with you TC, stuff like that makes a dad proud.

---

Lonestar2000 posted...

You're a terrible person for mutilating your son without his consent.

gatorsPENSbucs posted...

Yah, what that dude said was really weird. Like really weird.

Im with you TC, stuff like that makes a dad proud.

Yeah its just kinda like a "hey that's mah boy" kinda moment. It wasn't like a life changing thing or anything like that lol just thought it was kinda cool. But lol at this topic I just came back to it.

---

People really do have strong opinions on circumcision.

---

-one of the weirder semi-creepy things I've seen someone gloat about

-lol at the circumcision battle ITT

---

Prestoff posted...

Yeah +18 years at least.

I probably say 13+, but maybe younger depending...

Prestoff posted...

Nope, people still get circumcision later in their life for cosmetic reasons. Might not be as often, but at least they can consent to it.

Maybe. Though, probably not. Most people I know like their dick the way it is. Of course, things could be different. But I think most people would keep what they have because they like, and no one really likes pain. Not to mention, the recovery period. Like no sex for like a month and a half...

Though, many people would still get it for medical reasons...

Prestoff posted...

By current law, no it doesn't but in my opinion baby circumcision is a barbaric act to do to ones child. Would I be in favor in making it law not to allow baby circumcision? You bet I would. This isn't something minor, this is a permenant removal of a skin part that can't grow back.

Its minor to me, but its different for everybody. Like I said, since there is no law, it doesnt really violate anything. I personally wouldnt care for the law. But its just never been a big thing for me. So, eh...

Conflict posted...

Like idc if you're cut or not, a dick is a dick, but lying to yourself isn't gonna make you feel better.

I think the problem is that youre assuming that everybody who is cut wants to be uncut. Personally, I like cut dicks much more. I like the look a lot more than uncut. And it has helped being cut in situations where Ive had to take quick showers. Like in BMT. You never would have really gotten much time to clean as well as you wanted to. And, tbh, it was more of a normal look with other guys my age. Kids can sometimes be cruel and will sometimes make fun of someone whos different. In the end, Im glad I was cut. And glad it was done as baby so I wouldnt remember it. I personally havent really had any side effects. And nothing about it is really bad about having it for me, so... And it gets rid of possibly getting certain infections and such...

Though, I know people feel different. This is just how I feel. I personally like being cut.
---

inloveanddeath0 posted...

What when did you have a kid. Let alone have a steady girlfriend

---

With this unnecessary surgery, you just made your son's dick smaller. The cognitive dissonance is astounding.
---

1337toothbrush posted...

With this unnecessary surgery, you just made your son's dick smaller. The cognitive dissonance is astounding.

You don't count foreskin when measuring a penis. Also, you measure a penis when erect for proper measurements. During an erect state, the foreskin retracts, meaning it has no bearing on dick size. The foreskin can sometimes make it look larger in a flaccid state. But that's about it. And most people who see it flaccid would probably know that...
---

LinkPizza posted...

You don't count foreskin when measuring a penis. Also, you measure a penis when erect for proper measurements. During an erect state, the foreskin retracts, meaning it has no bearing on dick size. The foreskin can sometimes make it look larger in a flaccid state. But that's about it. And most people who see it flaccid would probably know that...

That's if you just measure length, which would be stupid. It adds to girth, which is actually more important.
---

Routine infant circumcision is wrong.

---

1337toothbrush posted...

That's if you just measure length, which would be stupid. It adds to girth, which is actually more important.

The difference is negligible. Skin doesn't expand when your penis is erect. It's a very thin layer. Depending on you base girth, it could go up some. But the difference wouldn't be noticeable.

Also, I forgot to mention something on my other post. When they do measure flaccid (For measuring growth between growers and showers), they don't measure foreskin.

So, in conclusion, foreskin doesn't matter for dick size...
---

LinkPizza posted...

The difference is negligible. Skin doesn't expand when your penis is erect. It's a very thin layer. Depending on you base girth, it could go up some. But the difference wouldn't be noticeable.

Also, I forgot to mention something on my other post. When they do measure flaccid (For measuring growth between growers and showers), they don't measure foreskin.

So, in conclusion, foreskin doesn't matter for dick size...

Just because it's not included in some dick measuring contest, doesn't mean it makes no difference during sex.
---

1337toothbrush posted...

Just because it's not included in some dick measuring contest, doesn't mean it makes no difference during sex.

Depends. I know females who say they didn't really feel a difference between the two. And most differences probably come from how the person is during sex rather than whether the penis is circumcised or not. Also, when talking about natural lubricant, that doesn't matter much if a condom is worn. And even in bareback sex, I know many uncut guys who still have to use extra lube when having anal sex. So, it's possible it might not have much to do with sex in a lot of cases... Unless there's something else you specifically mean...
---

why defend infant circumcision? People that regret being cut can't do anything about it. If you are cut and are okay with it, then good for you. Just don't make light of circumcision because it makes it difficult to normalize men being intact. There is absolutely nothing wrong with having a foreskin and no man should ever feel ashamed for having a foreskin or for thinking that infant circumcision is wrong.

---

There is nothing wrong with being upset with circumcision. If people don't speak up then circumcision will continue to be the norm.

---

Beveren_Rabbit posted...

why defend infant circumcision? People that regret being cut can't do anything about it. If you are cut and are okay with it, then good for you. Just don't make light of circumcision because it makes it difficult to normalize men being intact. There is absolutely nothing wrong with having a foreskin and no man should ever feel ashamed for having a foreskin or for thinking that infant circumcision is wrong.

If you're talking to me, I never said there was anything wrong with having a foreskin. Nor do I think not caring about circumcision makes it harder to normalize men being intact. Personally, I do prefer cut cocks. But there's nothing wrong with being uncircumcised.
---

Beveren_Rabbit posted...

There is nothing wrong with being upset with circumcision. If people don't speak up then circumcision will continue to be the norm.

Also, this is probably the reason most people defend being cut. You say there's nothing wrong with being uncut. And a lot of people agree. Even cut people. Then turn around and say how bad it is to be cut. Or that it's bad that's it the norm (which I think it mainly in the US). People don't like being told that the penis they have, or like, is bad. And so when you have people say that being uncut is the only way to be or better, that upset people who have opposing views. Instead of trying to change it and make the cut guys feel bad, which they shouldn't, just be polite about it.

Also, it's actually pretty close in the US. Well, during birth, I believe... I think it's like 60 cut and 40 uncut. Then, for medical reasons, the number of cut goes up...
---

Gamerguymass posted...

Girls with small tits and a flat ass still get laid. A guy with a small dick doesn't.

Huh? Pretty sure a girl cant see if you have a small dick until youve already started undressing for sex.

LinkPizza posted...

Depends. I know females who say they didn't really feel a difference between the two. And most differences probably come from how the person is during sex rather than whether the penis is circumcised or not. Also, when talking about natural lubricant, that doesn't matter much if a condom is worn. And even in bareback sex, I know many uncut guys who still have to use extra lube when having anal sex. So, it's possible it might not have much to do with sex in a lot of cases... Unless there's something else you specifically mean...

You're being incredibly selective in what you think matters. You start going into anal sex and wearing a condom. Clearly there are cases of superiority but you think that because some other cases are negligible then it cancels everything out.
---

1337toothbrush posted...

You're being incredibly selective in what you think matters. You start going into anal sex and wearing a condom. Clearly there are cases of superiority but you think that because some other cases are negligible then it cancels everything out.

I didn't say that. But I am saying that there are many cases where it doesn't matter. Condom and anal sex are two of those scenarios. And at least 1/3 of men are said to wear condoms during sex. Idk how many are cut or uncut, though. But that's still a lot of people. Anal sex probably has less people. But it still doesn't help them. Also, I've look it up, and according to most women (in the articles and in real life), they don't really feel much of a difference when having sex with cut and uncut men. Maybe some lube at the beginning if condom-less. Though, that shouldn't really bother anyone.

And I never said one was better than the other. I think they both have their ups and downs. People will usually prefer one over the other, but that's personal preference. A penis is a penis, whether cut or uncut. People should just like the one that have, with or without foreskin.

As for the negligible part for foreskin during measurements (if that's what you meant), a lot of the responses I saw about it being negligible were from uncut guys. But it really is. It's just skin. It's not use to measure length. And if gives barely any girth. But barely any, I mean a very negligible amount. Probably less the .05% of an inch. It's skin...
---

I have phimosis and nothing helped stretching the foreskin out :[ im gonna need to get snipped

---

Also, I haven't finished, but I've been reading this article about this company that makes fake foreskins. I think it's more for like normal wearing during the day and night, and probably not for sex. But it's interesting. And says it could help with people who still have some foreskin left by possibly stretching it. I don't know yet, as I'm still reading about it. But thought it was interesting.

Which got me to thinking, maybe they'll make an artificial foreskin for some people one day. Personally, I wouldn't go for it. But I know some people who would probably like it...
---

LArcEnCieIX posted...

I have phimosis and nothing helped stretching the foreskin out :[ im gonna need to get snipped

steroid creams, warm baths, and stretching didn't help?

---

I do not support circumcision. But Im also not sure I should have a say in whether or not the practice should be banned.

---

Lorenzo_2003 posted...

I do not support circumcision. But Im also not sure I should have a say in whether or not the practice should be banned.

infant circumcision should be banned at least. It's a premanent and often uncessary medical procedure done on someone that can't consent. If someone wants to get cut, they can do it as an adult.


---