Poll of the Day > Why are 30 year olds getting triggered about teenagers not knowing who...

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
PK_Spam 09/10/19 7:45:07 AM #1:	Ozzy Osborne is? He very clearly hasnt been relevant in a while. Are teenagers supposed to know who every dude from the 80s is? Has he even consistently been on TV since that reality show he and his family had in the early 2000s? --- https://imgur.com/hCHZS1f <cite>PK_Spam posted [p:927231990] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>Ozzy Osborne is? He very clearly hasnt been relevant in a while. Are teenagers supposed to know who every dude from the 80s is? Has he even consistently been on TV since that reality show he and his family had in the early 2000s?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Philoktetes 09/10/19 7:49:39 AM #2:	kids these days only listen to techno not real music -_- --- I don't think so, Tim. ~~ Pizza Crew ~~ <cite>Philoktetes posted [p:927232068] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>kids these days only listen to techno not real music -_-</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 09/10/19 7:55:33 AM #3:	I hunk it might be similar to our parents mentioning someone famous from their time and acting like we were weirdos when we didnt know who they were... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:927232177] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>I hunk it might be similar to our parents mentioning someone famous from their time and acting like we were weirdos when we didnt know who they were...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Yellow 09/10/19 9:11:03 AM #4:	I didn't know who he was until 2008. --- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZNqaAh6iLU <cite>Yellow posted [p:927233780] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>I didn't know who he was until 2008.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Archgoat 09/10/19 9:28:27 AM #5:	You don't know who Ozzy Osbourne is? He has been relevant since 1970. <cite>Archgoat posted [p:927234242] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>You don't know who Ozzy Osbourne is? He has been relevant since 1970.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Final Fantasy2389 09/10/19 9:30:24 AM #6:	I think's it's more the fact people think Post Malone made him famous instead of doing some research. At least that's what I saw on twitter. But it's okay, because this 30 year old didn't know who tf post malone was until this Ozzy fiasco. --- Ha Ji-won <3 https://imgur.com/WsrLCO6 \| https://imgur.com/GNxSzQq \| https://imgur.com/PrYgCg6 <cite>Final Fantasy2389 posted [p:927234309] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>I think's it's more the fact people think Post Malone made him famous instead of doing some research. At least that's what I saw on twitter. But it's okay, because this 30 year old didn't know who tf post malone was until this Ozzy fiasco. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CTLM 09/10/19 9:44:29 AM #7:	I can't believe 30 year olds didn't know him. They would have been right in that age group to watch his show when it was on MTV, and their parents would have still listened to his music I heard my 1st post malone song a few months ago. I hope it's my last <cite>CTLM posted [p:927234675] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>I can't believe 30 year olds didn't know him. They would have been right in that age group to watch his show when it was on MTV, and their parents would have still listened to his music I heard my 1st post malone song a few months ago. I hope it's my last </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 09/10/19 9:47:00 AM #8:	You'd have to live under a rock to not know who he is. I take that back. You'd have to live in an underground bunker with no access to the outside world ever Anyway, I figured it was more of a joke/meme that people didnt know who he was moreso than people actually being that oblivious <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:927234749] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>You'd have to live under a rock to not know who he is. I take that back. You'd have to live in an underground bunker with no access to the outside world ever Anyway, I figured it was more of a joke/meme that people didnt know who he was moreso than people actually being that oblivious</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 09/10/19 9:53:49 AM #9:	Hes that Spider-Man villain --- More malicious than mischievous <cite>Mead posted [p:927234950] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>Hes that Spider-Man villain </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wolfy42 09/10/19 10:07:38 AM #10:	I went to one of his concerts in like 98 or so and he already should have retired by that point, so yeah, I don't blame anyone under 25 for not knowin who he is. --- We are 4 oreos from Heaven!!!! <cite>wolfy42 posted [p:927235307] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>I went to one of his concerts in like 98 or so and he already should have retired by that point, so yeah, I don't blame anyone under 25 for not knowin who he is.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Peterass 09/10/19 10:07:47 AM #11:	Because it's like 30 year olds not knowing who the Beatles are. --- Everything is awesome <cite>Peterass posted [p:927235312] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>Because it's like 30 year olds not knowing who the Beatles are.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HornedLion 09/10/19 10:29:58 AM #12:	Philoktetes posted... kids these days only listen to techno not real music -_- Nobody listens to Techno!!! - Eminen(Lose Yourself) --- :) <cite>HornedLion posted [p:927235978] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>Philoktetes posted...</cite> <quote>kids these days only listen to techno not real music -_-</quote> Nobody listens to Techno!!! - Eminen(Lose Yourself)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wolfy42 09/10/19 10:32:48 AM #13:	You seriously didn't just compare Ozzy to the beatles did you? There is a massive difference there, I mean seriously. I mean, I'm even an ozzy fan (just not his concerts in the last 20+ years), I like a ton of his music, and still play it. But yeah, ANYONE not knowing who the beatles are is hard to believe, even like a 10 year old. I'm be down with someone who was 30 not knowing Ozzy, or 40 or any age. Not everyone is into that kinda music, and even if you like rock/hard rock, alot of people might not have liked Ozzy (he's more metal rock). But even if for some whacked out reason you don't like ANY of the beatles songs (I feel sorry for you), you should at least know who they are...even if your deaf........and blind....and play pinball alot.....you STILL would know them. --- We are 4 oreos from Heaven!!!! <cite>wolfy42 posted [p:927236051] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>You seriously didn't just compare Ozzy to the beatles did you? There is a massive difference there, I mean seriously. I mean, I'm even an ozzy fan (just not his concerts in the last 20+ years), I like a ton of his music, and still play it. But yeah, ANYONE not knowing who the beatles are is hard to believe, even like a 10 year old. I'm be down with someone who was 30 not knowing Ozzy, or 40 or any age. Not everyone is into that kinda music, and even if you like rock/hard rock, alot of people might not have liked Ozzy (he's more metal rock). But even if for some whacked out reason you don't like ANY of the beatles songs (I feel sorry for you), you should at least know who they are...even if your deaf........and blind....and play pinball alot.....you STILL would know them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 09/10/19 10:39:16 AM #14:	wolfy42 posted... There is a massive difference there, I mean seriously. Naw not really. While the Beatles are more famous (the single most famous band ever), it's still pretty hard to believe someone wouldnt know who ozzy is (even teenagers). He's one of the most famous musicians ever from any era <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:927236254] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>wolfy42 posted...</cite> <quote>There is a massive difference there, I mean seriously.</quote> Naw not really. While the Beatles are more famous (the single most famous band ever), it's still pretty hard to believe someone wouldnt know who ozzy is (even teenagers). He's one of the most famous musicians ever from any era</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DeathMagnetic80 09/10/19 10:40:39 AM #15:	wolfy42 posted... You seriously didn't just compare Ozzy to the beatles did you? There is a massive difference there, I mean seriously. I mean, I'm even an ozzy fan (just not his concerts in the last 20+ years), I like a ton of his music, and still play it. But yeah, ANYONE not knowing who the beatles are is hard to believe, even like a 10 year old. I'm be down with someone who was 30 not knowing Ozzy, or 40 or any age. Not everyone is into that kinda music, and even if you like rock/hard rock, alot of people might not have liked Ozzy (he's more metal rock). But even if for some whacked out reason you don't like ANY of the beatles songs (I feel sorry for you), you should at least know who they are...even if your deaf........and blind....and play pinball alot.....you STILL would know them. I mean... Black Sabbath are almost as influential of a band as The Beatles, so it's honestly a fair comparison <cite>DeathMagnetic80 posted [p:927236300] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>wolfy42 posted... </cite> <quote>You seriously didn't just compare Ozzy to the beatles did you? There is a massive difference there, I mean seriously. I mean, I'm even an ozzy fan (just not his concerts in the last 20+ years), I like a ton of his music, and still play it. But yeah, ANYONE not knowing who the beatles are is hard to believe, even like a 10 year old. I'm be down with someone who was 30 not knowing Ozzy, or 40 or any age. Not everyone is into that kinda music, and even if you like rock/hard rock, alot of people might not have liked Ozzy (he's more metal rock). But even if for some whacked out reason you don't like ANY of the beatles songs (I feel sorry for you), you should at least know who they are...even if your deaf........and blind....and play pinball alot.....you STILL would know them.</quote> I mean... Black Sabbath are almost as influential of a band as The Beatles, so it's honestly a fair comparison </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 09/10/19 10:58:09 AM #16:	DeathMagnetic80 posted... I mean... Black Sabbath are almost as influential of a band as The Beatles, so it's honestly a fair comparison No. --- More malicious than mischievous <cite>Mead posted [p:927236874] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>DeathMagnetic80 posted... </cite> <quote>I mean... Black Sabbath are almost as influential of a band as The Beatles, so it's honestly a fair comparison</quote> No. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gloBal enemy 09/10/19 11:17:46 AM #17:	I'm 30 something and I only know him as the guy from one of those horrible reality TV shows. --- If you can understand this, I'm 2/cosC for you. <cite>gloBal enemy posted [p:927237599] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>I'm 30 something and I only know him as the guy from one of those horrible reality TV shows. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DeathMagnetic80 09/10/19 11:30:34 AM #18:	Mead posted... No. I mean, you're welcome to be wrong but pretty much every metal band and quite a few bands from other styles have Sabbath influence in there. <cite>DeathMagnetic80 posted [p:927238117] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted... </cite> <quote>No.</quote> I mean, you're welcome to be wrong but pretty much every metal band and quite a few bands from other styles have Sabbath influence in there. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Popo 09/10/19 11:36:37 AM #19:	I remember when those React videos were popular, and the comments section on a video about showing a VCR to kids ages 5-11 were about how they were a bunch of fucking idiots. Because everyone from the 80s/90s would have no problem with using technology from the 50s/60s (as children) without any instruction... People in general are just a buncha idiots, looking to criticize anyone that they dont associate with. --- Live action Hungry Hungry Hippos though, now that was a sport. ~Aeon Azuran <cite>The Popo posted [p:927238348] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>I remember when those React videos were popular, and the comments section on a video about showing a VCR to kids ages 5-11 were about how they were a bunch of fucking idiots. Because everyone from the 80s/90s would have no problem with using technology from the 50s/60s (as children) without any instruction... People in general are just a buncha idiots, looking to criticize anyone that they dont associate with.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 09/10/19 11:40:50 AM #20:	DeathMagnetic80 posted... Mead posted... No. I mean, you're welcome to be wrong but pretty much every metal band and quite a few bands from other styles have Sabbath influence in there. As a metal musician myself, I dont think I've ever met another metal musician that didnt respect sabbath. As a matter of fact, you'd probably get laughed out of a room if you trashed them <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:927238504] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>DeathMagnetic80 posted...</cite> <quote>Mead posted... </cite> <quote>No.</quote> I mean, you're welcome to be wrong but pretty much every metal band and quite a few bands from other styles have Sabbath influence in there. </quote> As a metal musician myself, I dont think I've ever met another metal musician that didnt respect sabbath. As a matter of fact, you'd probably get laughed out of a room if you trashed them</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DeathMagnetic80 09/10/19 11:53:22 AM #21:	OhhhJa posted... As a metal musician myself, I dont think I've ever met another metal musician that didnt respect sabbath. As a matter of fact, you'd probably get laughed out of a room if you trashed them Exactly. Now you can argue that that's mostly because of Iommi and Geezer, and Ozzy was along for the ride, but the dude was the voice of an incredibly influential band. <cite>DeathMagnetic80 posted [p:927238959] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>OhhhJa posted... </cite> <quote>As a metal musician myself, I dont think I've ever met another metal musician that didnt respect sabbath. As a matter of fact, you'd probably get laughed out of a room if you trashed them</quote> Exactly. Now you can argue that that's mostly because of Iommi and Geezer, and Ozzy was along for the ride, but the dude was the voice of an incredibly influential band. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wolfy42 09/10/19 1:12:32 PM #22:	Guess it depends on your musical taste and what you consider influential. I do like quite a few beatles songs, and can even sing them, but they were before my time, and mainly have the distinction of being the least rock/hard rock/metal type group that I actually add to spotify (other then Enya etc on my new age list). Ozzy is sure on my list, pretty much all of his songs, but I wouldn't even come close to rating him up there with Metallica (went to a few concerts of theirs as well, WAY better than ozzy's...even that time their equipment blew up and they had to use Korns instead). I'm slightly prejudiced because I went to only one of his concerts and it was really bad....probably the worst concert I went to (think it was his second retirement tour). I still do like his music though, but yeah, I rate Tom Petty waaay over Ozzy, and even though I love Tom's music, I still rate the beatles over him. Still have not seen Yesterday (Waiting for it to hit DvD) but am looking forward to it. I know all the words to that song, hey jude and a bunch of other beatles songs. I might know the chorus on a few of Ozzy's but thats about it, even after playing video games with a bunch of them as part of a puzzle (the actual music video for no more tears etc) that you had to put together while listening to it (so I heard them ALOT lol). Think that might have even been on the jaguar system. --- We are 4 oreos from Heaven!!!! <cite>wolfy42 posted [p:927242365] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>Guess it depends on your musical taste and what you consider influential. I do like quite a few beatles songs, and can even sing them, but they were before my time, and mainly have the distinction of being the least rock/hard rock/metal type group that I actually add to spotify (other then Enya etc on my new age list). Ozzy is sure on my list, pretty much all of his songs, but I wouldn't even come close to rating him up there with Metallica (went to a few concerts of theirs as well, WAY better than ozzy's...even that time their equipment blew up and they had to use Korns instead). I'm slightly prejudiced because I went to only one of his concerts and it was really bad....probably the worst concert I went to (think it was his second retirement tour). I still do like his music though, but yeah, I rate Tom Petty waaay over Ozzy, and even though I love Tom's music, I still rate the beatles over him. Still have not seen Yesterday (Waiting for it to hit DvD) but am looking forward to it. I know all the words to that song, hey jude and a bunch of other beatles songs. I might know the chorus on a few of Ozzy's but thats about it, even after playing video games with a bunch of them as part of a puzzle (the actual music video for no more tears etc) that you had to put together while listening to it (so I heard them ALOT lol). Think that might have even been on the jaguar system.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DeathMagnetic80 09/10/19 2:01:42 PM #23:	wolfy42 posted... Guess it depends on your musical taste and what you consider influential. I do like quite a few beatles songs, and can even sing them, but they were before my time, and mainly have the distinction of being the least rock/hard rock/metal type group that I actually add to spotify (other then Enya etc on my new age list). Ozzy is sure on my list, pretty much all of his songs, but I wouldn't even come close to rating him up there with Metallica (went to a few concerts of theirs as well, WAY better than ozzy's...even that time their equipment blew up and they had to use Korns instead). I'm slightly prejudiced because I went to only one of his concerts and it was really bad....probably the worst concert I went to (think it was his second retirement tour). I still do like his music though, but yeah, I rate Tom Petty waaay over Ozzy, and even though I love Tom's music, I still rate the beatles over him. Still have not seen Yesterday (Waiting for it to hit DvD) but am looking forward to it. I know all the words to that song, hey jude and a bunch of other beatles songs. I might know the chorus on a few of Ozzy's but thats about it, even after playing video games with a bunch of them as part of a puzzle (the actual music video for no more tears etc) that you had to put together while listening to it (so I heard them ALOT lol). Think that might have even been on the jaguar system. Honestly the most influential part of Ozzy as a solo act is Randy Rhoads guitar playing on "Blizzard of Oz" and "Diary of a Madman", Randy was a monster. <cite>DeathMagnetic80 posted [p:927244421] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>wolfy42 posted... </cite> <quote>Guess it depends on your musical taste and what you consider influential. I do like quite a few beatles songs, and can even sing them, but they were before my time, and mainly have the distinction of being the least rock/hard rock/metal type group that I actually add to spotify (other then Enya etc on my new age list). Ozzy is sure on my list, pretty much all of his songs, but I wouldn't even come close to rating him up there with Metallica (went to a few concerts of theirs as well, WAY better than ozzy's...even that time their equipment blew up and they had to use Korns instead). I'm slightly prejudiced because I went to only one of his concerts and it was really bad....probably the worst concert I went to (think it was his second retirement tour). I still do like his music though, but yeah, I rate Tom Petty waaay over Ozzy, and even though I love Tom's music, I still rate the beatles over him. Still have not seen Yesterday (Waiting for it to hit DvD) but am looking forward to it. I know all the words to that song, hey jude and a bunch of other beatles songs. I might know the chorus on a few of Ozzy's but thats about it, even after playing video games with a bunch of them as part of a puzzle (the actual music video for no more tears etc) that you had to put together while listening to it (so I heard them ALOT lol). Think that might have even been on the jaguar system.</quote> Honestly the most influential part of Ozzy as a solo act is Randy Rhoads guitar playing on "Blizzard of Oz" and "Diary of a Madman", Randy was a monster. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wwinterj25 09/10/19 2:04:38 PM #24:	PK_Spam posted... Ozzy Osborne is? They should be better educated on icons of music. Age is irrelevant. I mean when I was 10 years old I know who old timers are as a song doesn't stop being good just because it's old. --- One who knows nothing can understand nothing. http://psnprofiles.com/wwinterj - https://imgur.com/kDysIcd <cite>wwinterj25 posted [p:927244547] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>PK_Spam posted...</cite> <quote>Ozzy Osborne is? </quote> They should be better educated on icons of music. Age is irrelevant. I mean when I was 10 years old I know who old timers are as a song doesn't stop being good just because it's old.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OrangeDawn 09/10/19 6:59:40 PM #25:	Yeah it's totally okay that the younger generation doesn't know who Ozzy is. --- 3DS Friend Code: 3308-5843-0863 Town: Virginia <cite>OrangeDawn posted [p:927256851] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>Yeah it's totally okay that the younger generation doesn't know who Ozzy is.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Royal_Umbreon 09/10/19 7:02:18 PM #26:	I'm a teen and I know who he is (I'm in to old-ish music!) --- Pokemon Queen!!!!!!! <cite>Royal_Umbreon posted [p:927256954] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>I'm a teen and I know who he is (I'm in to old-ish music!)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TomNook 09/10/19 7:08:51 PM #27:	I'd sure these kids would at least recognize the credits music that Ozzy made for the Iron Man movie. --- Bells, bells, bells! <cite>TomNook posted [p:927257203] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>I'd sure these kids would at least recognize the credits music that Ozzy made for the Iron Man movie.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Aculo 09/10/19 7:14:46 PM #28:	It's always around 30 that adults start realizing they're not young and aren't in on the "cool" shit anymore. That's about how old I was when the younger generation starting pissing me off. Then those people get older, realize it's dumb to get angry over that stuff, and then the teenagers hit 30 and the cycle repeats forever, ok? --- ok? <cite>Aculo posted [p:927257433] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>It's always around 30 that adults start realizing they're not young and aren't in on the "cool" shit anymore. That's about how old I was when the younger generation starting pissing me off. Then those people get older, realize it's dumb to get angry over that stuff, and then the teenagers hit 30 and the cycle repeats forever, ok?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
zebatov 09/10/19 7:17:09 PM #29:	Ill bet theyve heard of Abbott and Costello. Ozzy is not less famous than them. Also, this proves music sucks today. --- I'm right, as expected. <cite>zebatov posted [p:927257547] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>Ill bet theyve heard of Abbott and Costello. Ozzy is not less famous than them. Also, this proves music sucks today.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 09/10/19 7:20:00 PM #30:	Why are you getting triggered by a belief that 30 y/os are getting triggered by teens? Why would you care? --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:927257652] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>Why are you getting triggered by a belief that 30 y/os are getting triggered by teens? Why would you care?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sarcasthma 09/10/19 7:23:20 PM #31:	zebatov posted... Ill bet theyve heard of Abbott and Costello. You want to bet that the average teenager knows who Abbot and Costello were? zebatov posted... Also, this proves music sucks today. Not really. --- What's the difference between a pickpocket and a peeping tom? A pickpocket snatches your watch. <cite>Sarcasthma posted [p:927257799] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>zebatov posted...</cite> <quote>Ill bet theyve heard of Abbott and Costello.</quote> You want to bet that the average teenager knows who Abbot and Costello were? zebatov posted...</cite> <quote>Also, this proves music sucks today.</quote> Not really.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Metalsonic66 09/10/19 7:24:47 PM #32:	Mead posted... Hes that Spider-Man villain fingerguns --- PSN/Steam ID: Metalsonic_69 Big bombs go kabang. <cite>Metalsonic66 posted [p:927257848] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>Hes that Spider-Man villain </quote> fingerguns</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
likehelly 09/10/19 7:26:58 PM #33:	the Beatles were far more influential than Sabbath, how is this even a debate there likely wouldn't have even been Sabbath if the Beatles didn't take off like a fuckin rocket --- // / <cite>likehelly posted [p:927257918] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>the Beatles were far more influential than Sabbath, how is this even a debate there likely wouldn't have even been Sabbath if the Beatles didn't take off like a fuckin rocket</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
myghostisdead 09/10/19 7:28:12 PM #34:	...and I have no idea who Post Malone is....it sounds like a rural mailbox. --- "Mom, was I in a wreck?" <cite>myghostisdead posted [p:927257969] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>...and I have no idea who Post Malone is....it sounds like a rural mailbox. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
zebatov 09/10/19 8:27:33 PM #35:	Sarcasthma posted... zebatov posted... Ill bet theyve heard of Abbott and Costello. You want to bet that the average teenager knows who Abbot and Costello were? zebatov posted... Also, this proves music sucks today. Not really. Yes. $50 USD. Please note for this very real bet that I stated theyve heard of. Although in hearing of them they should know that theyre involved in entertainment somehow. It has to suck if kids dont know who Ozzy is. I mean what kind of guitar are they playing? Rough. Bark at the Moon is a classic and that opening riff is almost never played correctly! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2akLS8kmRjU" data-time=" --- I'm right, as expected. <cite>zebatov posted [p:927260431] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>Sarcasthma posted...</cite> <quote>zebatov posted...</cite> <quote>Ill bet theyve heard of Abbott and Costello.</quote> You want to bet that the average teenager knows who Abbot and Costello were? zebatov posted...</cite> <quote>Also, this proves music sucks today.</quote> Not really.</quote> Yes. $50 USD. Please note for this very real bet that I stated theyve heard of. Although in hearing of them they should know that theyre involved in entertainment somehow. It has to suck if kids dont know who Ozzy is. I mean what kind of guitar are they playing? Rough. Bark at the Moon is a classic and that opening riff is almost never played correctly! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2akLS8kmRjU" data-time="</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BeerOnTap 09/10/19 9:31:51 PM #36:	Philoktetes posted... kids these days only listen to techno not real music -_- Ozzys music is terrible. His voice and singing style just plain sounds bad. <cite>BeerOnTap posted [p:927263409] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>Philoktetes posted...</cite> <quote>kids these days only listen to techno not real music -_-</quote> Ozzys music is terrible. His voice and singing style just plain sounds bad.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MICHALECOLE 09/10/19 9:40:27 PM #37:	DeathMagnetic80 posted... wolfy42 posted... You seriously didn't just compare Ozzy to the beatles did you? There is a massive difference there, I mean seriously. I mean, I'm even an ozzy fan (just not his concerts in the last 20+ years), I like a ton of his music, and still play it. But yeah, ANYONE not knowing who the beatles are is hard to believe, even like a 10 year old. I'm be down with someone who was 30 not knowing Ozzy, or 40 or any age. Not everyone is into that kinda music, and even if you like rock/hard rock, alot of people might not have liked Ozzy (he's more metal rock). But even if for some whacked out reason you don't like ANY of the beatles songs (I feel sorry for you), you should at least know who they are...even if your deaf........and blind....and play pinball alot.....you STILL would know them. I mean... Black Sabbath are almost as influential of a band as The Beatles, so it's honestly a fair comparison Hahahaha what <cite>MICHALECOLE posted [p:927263808] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>DeathMagnetic80 posted...</cite> <quote>wolfy42 posted... </cite> <quote>You seriously didn't just compare Ozzy to the beatles did you? There is a massive difference there, I mean seriously. I mean, I'm even an ozzy fan (just not his concerts in the last 20+ years), I like a ton of his music, and still play it. But yeah, ANYONE not knowing who the beatles are is hard to believe, even like a 10 year old. I'm be down with someone who was 30 not knowing Ozzy, or 40 or any age. Not everyone is into that kinda music, and even if you like rock/hard rock, alot of people might not have liked Ozzy (he's more metal rock). But even if for some whacked out reason you don't like ANY of the beatles songs (I feel sorry for you), you should at least know who they are...even if your deaf........and blind....and play pinball alot.....you STILL would know them.</quote> I mean... Black Sabbath are almost as influential of a band as The Beatles, so it's honestly a fair comparison </quote> Hahahaha what</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 09/10/19 10:07:48 PM #38:	It shows complete ignorance when people dont realize just how influential sabbath is. The sheer number of bands that have spawned directly as a result of sabbath. There are probably more bands named after sabbath songs and that owe their identity to sabbath than any other band To top that off, not every rock band will cite the beatles as an influence but just about every single metal band on the planet would cite sabbath <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:927265013] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>It shows complete ignorance when people dont realize just how influential sabbath is. The sheer number of bands that have spawned directly as a result of sabbath. There are probably more bands named after sabbath songs and that owe their identity to sabbath than any other band To top that off, not every rock band will cite the beatles as an influence but just about every single metal band on the planet would cite sabbath</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 09/10/19 10:12:07 PM #39:	It's important to note that popularity doesnt necessarily equate to influence. For instance, nickelback is extremely popular but I dont think they're gonna go down as the most influential band of all time <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:927265190] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>It's important to note that popularity doesnt necessarily equate to influence. For instance, nickelback is extremely popular but I dont think they're gonna go down as the most influential band of all time</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sarcasthma 09/10/19 10:12:47 PM #40:	zebatov posted... Sarcasthma posted... zebatov posted... Ill bet theyve heard of Abbott and Costello. You want to bet that the average teenager knows who Abbot and Costello were? zebatov posted... Also, this proves music sucks today. Not really. Yes. $50 USD. Please note for this very real bet that I stated theyve heard of. Although in hearing of them they should know that theyre involved in entertainment somehow. Let me know when your survey is ready. --- What's the difference between a pickpocket and a peeping tom? A pickpocket snatches your watch. <cite>Sarcasthma posted [p:927265217] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>zebatov posted...</cite> <quote>Sarcasthma posted...</cite> <quote>zebatov posted...</cite> <quote>Ill bet theyve heard of Abbott and Costello.</quote> You want to bet that the average teenager knows who Abbot and Costello were? zebatov posted...</cite> <quote>Also, this proves music sucks today.</quote> Not really.</quote> Yes. $50 USD. Please note for this very real bet that I stated theyve heard of. Although in hearing of them they should know that theyre involved in entertainment somehow.</quote> Let me know when your survey is ready.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 09/10/19 10:14:17 PM #41:	I also demand $50 --- More malicious than mischievous <cite>Mead posted [p:927265274] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>I also demand $50 </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sarcasthma 09/10/19 10:16:27 PM #42:	OhhhJa posted... It shows complete ignorance when people dont realize just how influential sabbath is. I dont think anyone here is saying Sabbath wasnt influential; its just that the Beatles are so far ahead of everyone else in terms of the impact theyve had on music and society in general. --- What's the difference between a pickpocket and a peeping tom? A pickpocket snatches your watch. <cite>Sarcasthma posted [p:927265359] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>It shows complete ignorance when people dont realize just how influential sabbath is.</quote> I dont think anyone here is saying Sabbath wasnt influential; its just that the Beatles are so far ahead of everyone else in terms of the impact theyve had on music and society in general.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 09/10/19 10:20:31 PM #43:	Sarcasthma posted... OhhhJa posted... It shows complete ignorance when people dont realize just how influential sabbath is. I dont think anyone here is saying Sabbath wasnt influential; its just that the Beatles are so far ahead of everyone else in terms of the impact theyve had on music and society in general. Well, then we're probably making separate arguments. It seems you're referencing society and culture whereas I'm referencing bands/musicians. In terms of sheer number of musicians and bands, I'd say the level of influence is probably a lot closer than some here might think. I've talked to more rock musicians that cite zeppelin personally than I have the Beatles. But in terms of impact on music and society at the time, that's a different story <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:927265518] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>Sarcasthma posted...</cite> <quote>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>It shows complete ignorance when people dont realize just how influential sabbath is.</quote> I dont think anyone here is saying Sabbath wasnt influential; its just that the Beatles are so far ahead of everyone else in terms of the impact theyve had on music and society in general.</quote> Well, then we're probably making separate arguments. It seems you're referencing society and culture whereas I'm referencing bands/musicians. In terms of sheer number of musicians and bands, I'd say the level of influence is probably a lot closer than some here might think. I've talked to more rock musicians that cite zeppelin personally than I have the Beatles. But in terms of impact on music and society at the time, that's a different story</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
zebatov 09/10/19 10:22:54 PM #44:	Sarcasthma posted... zebatov posted... Sarcasthma posted... zebatov posted... Ill bet theyve heard of Abbott and Costello. You want to bet that the average teenager knows who Abbot and Costello were? zebatov posted... Also, this proves music sucks today. Not really. Yes. $50 USD. Please note for this very real bet that I stated theyve heard of. Although in hearing of them they should know that theyre involved in entertainment somehow. Let me know when your survey is ready. It would be fair if it was collaborative, but I think from your current location you cant really expect as many people to have heard of him. And if it wasnt the Beatles, it would have been someone else. Sabbath specifically (Iommi) used to crank his amp so that he couldnt hear people talking while he was playing at shows when they first started. That with a clean tone would be enough to get that overdrive sound had it not already been invented. --- I'm right, as expected. <cite>zebatov posted [p:927265602] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>Sarcasthma posted...</cite> <quote>zebatov posted...</cite> <quote>Sarcasthma posted...</cite> <quote>zebatov posted...</cite> <quote>Ill bet theyve heard of Abbott and Costello.</quote> You want to bet that the average teenager knows who Abbot and Costello were? zebatov posted...</cite> <quote>Also, this proves music sucks today.</quote> Not really.</quote> Yes. $50 USD. Please note for this very real bet that I stated theyve heard of. Although in hearing of them they should know that theyre involved in entertainment somehow.</quote> Let me know when your survey is ready.</quote> It would be fair if it was collaborative, but I think from your current location you cant really expect as many people to have heard of him. And if it wasnt the Beatles, it would have been someone else. Sabbath specifically (Iommi) used to crank his amp so that he couldnt hear people talking while he was playing at shows when they first started. That with a clean tone would be enough to get that overdrive sound had it not already been invented.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WhiskeyDisk 09/10/19 10:28:42 PM #45:	wolfy42 posted... I went to one of his concerts in like 98 or so and he already should have retired by that point, so yeah, I don't blame anyone under 25 for not knowin who he is. Saw him on the OzFest year when they did the Black Sabbath reunion. There's been rumors for years that he has a shadow singer that's been hiding in the wings for years at live gigs. I believe it 100%. The guy is as good at apeing Ozzy as Rome is at apeing Bradley from Sublime. There were points in the show where I'd bet my ass, hat, and gloves that you could see Ozzy sucking wind on stage while his shadow singer carried on from back stage. You can't put a 70 year old man in leather pants that are 2 sizes too small and expect him to truly be the Prince of Darkness. It's not like the thing is unheard of...for the majority of Bon Jovi's "Glory days" , Alec John Such was the credited bassist, because he looked the big hair pretty boy part, but the real guy in the studio and actually playing on tour from the shadows backstage was Hugh McDonald. A session musician born in '51 that obviously didn't fit the bill in the 80's. --- The SBA has closed for business, we thank you for your patronage Assassins. ~there's always free cheese in a mousetrap. <cite>WhiskeyDisk posted [p:927265821] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>wolfy42 posted...</cite> <quote>I went to one of his concerts in like 98 or so and he already should have retired by that point, so yeah, I don't blame anyone under 25 for not knowin who he is.</quote> Saw him on the OzFest year when they did the Black Sabbath reunion. There's been rumors for years that he has a shadow singer that's been hiding in the wings for years at live gigs. I believe it 100%. The guy is as good at apeing Ozzy as Rome is at apeing Bradley from Sublime. There were points in the show where I'd bet my ass, hat, and gloves that you could see Ozzy sucking wind on stage while his shadow singer carried on from back stage. You can't put a 70 year old man in leather pants that are 2 sizes too small and expect him to truly be the Prince of Darkness. It's not like the thing is unheard of...for the majority of Bon Jovi's "Glory days" , Alec John Such was the credited bassist, because he looked the big hair pretty boy part, but the real guy in the studio and actually playing on tour from the shadows backstage was Hugh McDonald. A session musician born in '51 that obviously didn't fit the bill in the 80's.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WhiskeyDisk 09/10/19 10:34:56 PM #46:	likehelly posted... the Beatles were far more influential than Sabbath, how is this even a debate there likely wouldn't have even been Sabbath if the Beatles didn't take off like a fuckin rocket If we're being honest, both the Beatles and the Beach Boys were basically the first Boy Bands. Then there were The Monkees... I would seriously posit that Deep Purple, Jimi Hendrix, and the Who were the real progenitors of hard Rock and heavy metal. And if we're being really pedantic, I'd say Cromagnon was the first true heavy metal band. --- The SBA has closed for business, we thank you for your patronage Assassins. ~there's always free cheese in a mousetrap. <cite>WhiskeyDisk posted [p:927266070] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>likehelly posted...</cite> <quote>the Beatles were far more influential than Sabbath, how is this even a debate there likely wouldn't have even been Sabbath if the Beatles didn't take off like a fuckin rocket</quote> If we're being honest, both the Beatles and the Beach Boys were basically the first Boy Bands. Then there were The Monkees... I would seriously posit that Deep Purple, Jimi Hendrix, and the Who were the real progenitors of hard Rock and heavy metal. And if we're being really pedantic, I'd say Cromagnon was the first true heavy metal band.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mooreandrew58 09/10/19 10:42:03 PM #47:	LinkPizza posted... I hunk it might be similar to our parents mentioning someone famous from their time and acting like we were weirdos when we didnt know who they were... With me at least i knew all the major ones. Thr ones i didnt know my mom understood cause they didnt play on the radio hardly anymore. I remember the look on her face though when i mentioned i had a Benny goodman song stuck in my head. She asked how the hell do you know about Benny Goodman? (He was before even her time) I have odd range in taste of music. I wouldnt say we are triggered by youngins not knowing ozzy though (i aint at least) its just ammo to mock people with and that's for better or worse human nature especially when it comes to a older gen mocking a younger gen. Been that way for a long time. --- Cid- "looks like that overgrown lobster just got served!" Bartz-"with cheese biscuts AND mashed potatoes!" <cite>mooreandrew58 posted [p:927266339] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>I hunk it might be similar to our parents mentioning someone famous from their time and acting like we were weirdos when we didnt know who they were...</quote> With me at least i knew all the major ones. Thr ones i didnt know my mom understood cause they didnt play on the radio hardly anymore. I remember the look on her face though when i mentioned i had a Benny goodman song stuck in my head. She asked how the hell do you know about Benny Goodman? (He was before even her time) I have odd range in taste of music. I wouldnt say we are triggered by youngins not knowing ozzy though (i aint at least) its just ammo to mock people with and that's for better or worse human nature especially when it comes to a older gen mocking a younger gen. Been that way for a long time.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 09/10/19 10:44:31 PM #48:	WhiskeyDisk posted... likehelly posted... the Beatles were far more influential than Sabbath, how is this even a debate there likely wouldn't have even been Sabbath if the Beatles didn't take off like a fuckin rocket If we're being honest, both the Beatles and the Beach Boys were basically the first Boy Bands. Then there were The Monkees... I would seriously posit that Deep Purple, Jimi Hendrix, and the Who were the real progenitors of hard Rock and heavy metal. And if we're being really pedantic, I'd say Cromagnon was the first true heavy metal band. Blue cheer should be in the mix. Dont forget cream <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:927266455] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>WhiskeyDisk posted...</cite> <quote>likehelly posted...</cite> <quote>the Beatles were far more influential than Sabbath, how is this even a debate there likely wouldn't have even been Sabbath if the Beatles didn't take off like a fuckin rocket</quote> If we're being honest, both the Beatles and the Beach Boys were basically the first Boy Bands. Then there were The Monkees... I would seriously posit that Deep Purple, Jimi Hendrix, and the Who were the real progenitors of hard Rock and heavy metal. And if we're being really pedantic, I'd say Cromagnon was the first true heavy metal band.</quote> Blue cheer should be in the mix. Dont forget cream</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WhiskeyDisk 09/10/19 11:29:24 PM #49:	OhhhJa posted... Blue cheer should be in the mix. Dont forget cream If we're being honest, I've never heard of Blue cheer before, and Cream was very influential, but far too busy ripping off Blues artists to rank...and as good as Clapton's Sessions for Robert J was, it hardly makes up for their past... --- The SBA has closed for business, we thank you for your patronage Assassins. ~there's always free cheese in a mousetrap. <cite>WhiskeyDisk posted [p:927268123] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Blue cheer should be in the mix. Dont forget cream</quote> If we're being honest, I've never heard of Blue cheer before, and Cream was very influential, but far too busy ripping off Blues artists to rank...and as good as Clapton's Sessions for Robert J was, it hardly makes up for their past...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PrettyBoyFloyd 09/10/19 11:31:13 PM #50:	OhhhJa posted... WhiskeyDisk posted... likehelly posted... the Beatles were far more influential than Sabbath, how is this even a debate there likely wouldn't have even been Sabbath if the Beatles didn't take off like a fuckin rocket If we're being honest, both the Beatles and the Beach Boys were basically the first Boy Bands. Then there were The Monkees... I would seriously posit that Deep Purple, Jimi Hendrix, and the Who were the real progenitors of hard Rock and heavy metal. And if we're being really pedantic, I'd say Cromagnon was the first true heavy metal band. Blue cheer should be in the mix. Dont forget cream The Kinks sometimes get mentioned. --- The Evil Republicans - Est.2004 - WoT [Government Destabilizing Branch] <cite>PrettyBoyFloyd posted [p:927268190] in Why are 30... [t:78002368]...</cite> <quote>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>WhiskeyDisk posted...</cite> <quote>likehelly posted...</cite> <quote>the Beatles were far more influential than Sabbath, how is this even a debate there likely wouldn't have even been Sabbath if the Beatles didn't take off like a fuckin rocket</quote> If we're being honest, both the Beatles and the Beach Boys were basically the first Boy Bands. Then there were The Monkees... I would seriously posit that Deep Purple, Jimi Hendrix, and the Who were the real progenitors of hard Rock and heavy metal. And if we're being really pedantic, I'd say Cromagnon was the first true heavy metal band.</quote> Blue cheer should be in the mix. Dont forget cream</quote> The Kinks sometimes get mentioned.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Poll of the Day > Why are 30 year olds getting triggered about teenagers not knowing who... (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Why are 30 year olds getting triggered about teenagers not knowing who...