Lurker > FortuneCookie

nocturnal_traveler posted...

So wouldn't she be your former boss, thus removing any of the taboo?

Dude. The taboo is what makes it sexy.

<_<

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSahneOul10

There is no post nut clarity, only "Oh, God. What did I just fap to?"

DnDer posted...

These people don't exist. You've constructed a strawman.

weak bait

Batman has both.

MarthGoomba posted...

How do you know they don't enjoy making sexy character models. Maybe it was their dream to become a 3d modeller and create their ideal character, and that ended up being Eve

Many women make a living drawing sexy characters, male or female, of their own volition

If they had a problem with it they wouldn't be working for the company that made Nikke

I'm sure that they do.

For individuals who are anti-sex, there's always an excuse about how a woman who creates a sexy character is pressured by external factors, selling herself short, contributing to harmful images of women, etc.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/8/81a3688e.jpg

"There are a lot of women feeling undue pressure to design objectified characters to appease the patriarchy."

:v

Speaking of Porco Rosso, I like that three generations of Batman have now been in Studio Ghibli movies. Michael Keaton in the English dub of Porco Rosso, Robert Pattison and Christian Bale in the English dub of The Boy and the Heron.

I'm pretty sure shooting someone into space is illegal.

He did a good job cleaning up the place. What more could they have expected?

Pinocchio and Jungle Book received video game adaptations, but not Robin Hood. TaleSpin and Marsupilami received video game adaptations, but not Adventures of the Gummi Bears.

There's no justice when it comes to adaptations of Disney properties, no justice at all.

<_<

Vidal from Pan's Labyrinth almost certainly would.

Revisited posted...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/9/99102e34.jpg

Came here to post this.

Had Venom been a woman, she might have been the Catwoman to Spidey's Batman.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/e/e0cea906.jpg

pikakaeru posted...

why did he do it?

The zebra told him to.

cellus523 posted...

Iirc the baby was spared on a whim.

I'm curious if he knew that people would find the baby or if he intentionally left it to die.

Bad_Mojo posted...

Well, what's your line for kids? People seem to not seen teenagers as children unless it comes to one thing

I think he's willing to kill anyone who's reached an age at which they can voluntarily engage in sexual activity. Probably the youngest that he would kill in a movie is a 15-year-old played by a 22-year-old.

I guess it depends on the character.

I baseline don't believe Batman's motivation as an obsessive vigilante who won't take a life. On the other hand, Wolverine comes across as a chickenshit exploiting an unfair advantage when he willingly kills because he literally cannot die (until a time comes at which the plot says he needs a final fadeout).

I find it funny that Jason Voorhees in the movies refuses to kill children. But, in the NES game, it's his primary goal.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/2/243ff15e.png

GameGodOfAll posted...

Michael Myers - Might kill. Might ignore.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/0/08d122fd.jpg

Oops!
This video has been removed for violating our Terms of Service.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/b/b021c83f.jpg

the rats from Deadly Eyes

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/7/7d75edc6.jpg

I thought this was going to be about Paul Dini, the comic book / cartoon writer who married his waifu Zatanna in real life.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_-I_kiIa6g

Doe posted...

I've seen Ghostbusters 84 and i think Ghostbusters 2 is pretty good. I was very familiar with Star Wars although RotS came out when I was 5, a lot of my friends were floored by the Episode 7 trailer but I didn't really respond to it.

Is there a sequel to a film from your youth that you would be floored by or are you just not prone to nostalgia / falling for OMG We're Back trailers?

Nah. I've recently seen New Empire, Frozen Empire, and a local viewing of Flash Gordon (1980) that was done for the eclipse. I probably won't be going to any movies this weekend. I might catch it when it comes to a streaming service, but I make no promises.

Cheater87 posted...

I find this to be a terrible idea for a movie in this climate.

This climate is the reason the movie is being made. "What kind of American are you?" is topical as fuck.

Not today. I did yesterday though.

I don't want to die with Brian either.

"If Trump throws a baby off a bridge, that baby deserved it. Hail Trump!"

She's fine.

I would prefer the character being orange though.

I watched a couple of them. I maintain that her earliest videos were made in earnest and that, after an unfortunate backlash, she realized the potential of intentionally trolling misogynistic males.

I went to a Smackdown showing and a Raw showing. Both sucked.

I live in Indiana (flyover country), so we're frequently on the go-home broadcast before the big PPV. I haven't been since Benoit was alive and I have no reason to want to go to any shows now.

Vicious_Dios posted...

Do or Do Ain't. There is no try.

As many of the staff as could were out to watch. They even rolled some of the patients out in wheelchairs to see it. "Patient in Room 23 off monitor for the eclipse."

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/5/5c432a41.jpg
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/1/114b227b.jpg

Vicious_Dios posted...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/3/36ade1b3.jpg

That's why the title is "Ninja Turtles: The Next Mutation."

They dropped the teenage part because they're adults. And they also specify that they're not related because they all wanna boink Venus.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


When people lose relevance and/or need money, they often fall back on what made them popular in the first place. And, yes, studios do often badger people to return to properties which they had eulogized.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/1/1681a7c0.jpg

Don't worry, she's 18.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


It is highly unlikely.

At the hospital where I work.

(I'll try and sneak out to the parking lot.)

DrizztLink posted...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/6/6fefb7d2.jpg

I don't get what this post is supposed to imply.

hop918 posted...

Yeah, you've been consistent because you targeted the two points in my list where he used the axe and ignored everything else. Kind of hard to not be consistent when you disregard 80% of the points you're arguing against.

I believe I've quoted you every time. Do I have to respond to every line?

Nothing says he did, a computer showed he was 88% sedated but that's all we got in the movie. The novel goes into more detail about it wearing off but I don't know if it's canon or not.

Let's say for the sake of argument that he is still sedated during the first fight. Why does he need an axe going into the second fight? Isn't the fact that he's fighting at 100% the upgrade? Why do we need to go from a half-awake Kong to a fully awake Kong with a weapon?

I brought up King Kong vs Godzilla (you never mentioned it) to point out that Kong has never been able to take Godzilla without some form of weapon or non-natural ability but it doesn't take away from his character. Seeing as how you've either misrepresented or misunderstood about 1/3rd of my points it tracks that you would miss this too.

I mentioned it indirectly when I mentioned that Godzilla and Kong had used trees and boulders as makeshift weapons before.

God forbid an ape, whose species is shown to have some decent intelligence, uses his intelligence in a big monster movie.

If they wanted to highlight his intelligence, they could have had him fashion the axe himself. He didn't even do that. He found it.

This Godzilla is meant to be part of species, until Toho told them to stop mentioning it, so yeah they're just based on the characters not following them 100%

That was a little odd. In Godzilla vs Kong, they were rival species. In Godzilla x Kong, Godzilla is the only Godzilla there's ever been and he defeated all of the Kongs singlehandedly by trapping them in the underground world.

I think Toho is the villain more so than Adam Wingard. It's gone from "Godzilla has won every fight that he and Kong ever had" to "Godzilla's species has never lost to a Kong because Godzilla is his species." Which is really weird considering that even Godzilla Minus One mentions that there is a species of underwater dinosaur that shows up from time to time and even the original movie ended with Professor Yamane stating that he refused to believe that Godzilla was the only one of his kind. Which, he wasn't. He died from the Oxygen Destroyer and a new Godzilla was found fighting Anguirus the next year. And then a baby one was found a little over a decade later.

It also begs the question where the plate came from in Kong's axe. If there are no Godzillas out there, then that's a plate from the current and only one. I guess that places G-cell regeneration in Wolverine tiers. Or perhaps Godzilla could naturally grow one back after centuries/millennia. But it's still kind of silly. "Godzilla lost one of the plates on his back when he was beaten and nearly defeated by the entire Kong species working together. It took him a long time to recover from his near-defeat."

dancing_cactuar posted...

Yes, because going by Toho alone there are approximately 10 different variants on King Ghidorah which include being a destructive space alien, an incorporeal planet devouring entity from another dimension worshipped by a cult that offers planets as sacrifice, the fusion of 3 genetically engineered creatures, a cyborg sent from the future to kill Godzilla, a good guy that's a relative of the Yamato no Orochi, and a quadruped that initially looks like a skeletal humanoid.

When you don't have objective standards of comparison, you have artist choice.

They chose to make Godzilla strong and Kong comparatively weak. I doubt if this version of Kong could beat Rodan without help. In fact, I'd say I'm rather certain of it. He couldn't beat the flying serpent without help. That's as open of an admission that they've selectively targeted Kong as there's ever gonna be.

If Godzilla pissed down Kong's throat in the next film, people would defend it saying that it's an animalistic display of dominance.

Umbreon posted...

*Looks at Dracula's brides in Bram Stocker's Dracula*

Yes. Yes I am.

Prime Monica Bellucci. :3

DemonicChaosXX posted...

Imagine thinking that people of the same sex can't be friends. No they HAVE to be gay!

I get annoyed at this presumption too, but...

FortuneCookie posted...

Egon's granddaughter and a ghost girl strike up a friendship while their eyes, their body language, and their hesitancy to say what they really feel suggests lesbian chemistry.

hop918 posted...

This whole conversation started because you said Kong was not allowed to be badass in the last two movies, when I provided evidence otherwise you went to well it's wasn't him it was the axe. So yes, you moved the goalposts.

I think I've been fairly consistent that using an external weapon when everyone else is fighting with what they have naturally is not what I would consider badass.

So you don't even know which fight you're referencing, huh? Godzilla only fought Kong near water when Kong was heavily sedated on a ship he could not maneuver on. So no, Godzilla did not take Kong's best shot in that fight, he took it in the 2nd one with the axe, but then struggled with MechaG and needed help. But that part doesn't count because Kong didn't do it, the axe moved on its own.

Kong came out of his sedation. In real life, that doesn't go away instantly. But that same film had him brought back by defibrillation and battling Mechagodzilla as if nothing had happened.

Adaptations do not follow the source directly, that was the point I was making about Ghidorah being weaker in the Monsterverse. But of course you'd attempt to use that to justify your weird hate boner for Kong in these movies.

I wouldn't call Ghidorah weaker. They made Godzilla more powerful (since he turned into a variation of Burning Godzilla from the Heisei series). Him beating Ghidorah because the fight is underwater seems a little iffy, but at least the argument is there that Ghidorah is an aerial monster being brought into an element that is not his own.

Kong has never been a match for Godzilla, ever, without the magical lightning in the original Godzilla wins. And again in the most recent movie he beats Godzilla's ass, who knows where it would have went if he didn't stop to try to drag Godzilla to the portal. But again it doesn't count because, 1. It's not him it's the glove, and 2. He didn't win.

I don't remember defending King Kong vs Godzilla except possibly in that I mentioned the external weapon use was fairly minimal. It's also what got Kong in trouble. He slipped and fell while throwing boulders at Godzilla. That film had Kong looking like a throw rug and carried by air balloon. And he didn't act like Kong. He acted like a wrestler named Toyonbori.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyonobori

I still like that one better than Godzilla vs Kong, but it is not the most dignified hour for either monster.

But speaking of that film, why doesn't Kong have electrical powers? Is it because Universal owns the rights to that movie? That should only be true for the distribution rights. Toho owns the Japanese original, so they could have given him his electrical powerup back.

Because they'd rather have Kong be the guy who needs to bring a knife to a fistfight to hang with the big boys. Nobody was calling for axe warrior Kong. To be fair, I have not seen the recent Planet of the Apes movies. Maybe Caesar goes around battling enemies with an axe and they were paying homage to that. I doubt it though. I think the far more likely answer is that they want Kong to seem like a chump next to Godzilla.

I'm more curious about:

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/5/5efbabdf.jpg

Seems like something pretty difficult to miss.