Lurker > Sephiroth1288

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Board List
Page List: 1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 18
TopicAre left wing media outlets trying to turn their readers into cucks or are they
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 10:53:08 PM
#8
"I Require Validation for letting My Wife strong-arm me into an Open Relationship so she can Regularly Fuck Other Men while I can barely pull 3/10s, so Here's 10 Excuses I came up with why Cuckolding is a Good Thing to justify my Constant Humiliation."
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicWhy do liberals support hunting, but not personal defense?
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 10:46:29 PM
#41
Tmaster148 posted...
MI4 REAL posted...
I'm just going to guess it's species-ism

Killing fellow humans is forbidden

Killing non humans is OK

Killing animals usually facilitiates sustenance in hunting (but not always), as opposed to killing humans which usually does not (hopefully)


People usually have a problem with people killing dogs/cats or other common animals people have as pets.

Probably because dogs and cats were bred to be companions and are pretty much useless for food, so killing one is almost always out of malice.

Meanwhile basically every hunter eats what they kill and many species would quickly become overpopulated if humans weren't acting as a predator to keep their numbers down.
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicWhy do liberals support hunting, but not personal defense?
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 10:43:38 PM
#40
Tmaster148 posted...
Sephiroth1288 posted...
Giblet_Enjoyer posted...
Hunting =/= posing with dead animals in fetishistic manner

I swear I will never understand this hangup you guys have

Killing things is OK but taking a picture of the event?? how dare you


I'm assuming you would be okay with someone taking a picture of your dead body after you have been killed?

Because humans and deer are the same thing.

And taking a picture of me dead would be a distant afterthought to the fact of me being dead, tbqh.
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicWhy do liberals support hunting, but not personal defense?
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 10:12:29 PM
#29
Giblet_Enjoyer posted...
Hunting =/= posing with dead animals in fetishistic manner

I swear I will never understand this hangup you guys have

Killing things is OK but taking a picture of the event?? how dare you
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicWhy do liberals support hunting, but not personal defense?
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 10:04:14 PM
#27
iPhone_7 posted...
The attitude over hunting is generally that if youre gonna hunt an animal
1. Dont prolong their suffering, make it quick with a bullet to the brain

2. Make use of the body for nutrition instead of killing for sport

3. Dont be a sick pervert that takes pictures of yourself with dead bodies, holding their head up and you smiling

What makes posing with a deer you killed worse than taking a picture of your steak dinner which someone else killed for you
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicAustralians who won't unlock their phones for cops could face 10 years in jail
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 10:01:14 PM
#75
Frolex posted...
Sephiroth1288 posted...
And it also talks about strengthening existing warrants. So yes the bill does in fact affect citizens.


But not by compelling them to acquiesce to a technical assistance request which is the assertion made by this topic

Actually the assertion is what the article says, as that's all that's in the OP.
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicHow will Donald Trump be viewed by history?
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 9:55:50 PM
#19
He'll be the only president that only students 18 and up can do a report on.
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicAustralians who won't unlock their phones for cops could face 10 years in jail
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 9:53:30 PM
#73
Frolex posted...
Sephiroth1288 posted...

Interesting, because the Australian government said it strengthened warrants in that very article.

So who's wrong, you or the government?


Like I said, the bill mentions the standards used to execute computer access warrants to gain approval to seize and search computers, which is a separate power from their new proposed power to compel service providers to provide law enforcement with access to a device.

And it also talks about strengthening existing warrants. So yes the bill does in fact affect citizens.
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicI just legit texted a girl "do you like my bears?"
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 9:52:29 PM
#7
frozenshock posted...
SSJ2GrimReaper posted...
frozenshock posted...
SSJ2GrimReaper posted...
well? did she like the fuckin' bears or not?


idk

She invited me to go with her to the pride parade tomorrow

there will be plenty of bears there


Probably. I've never been to a pride parade, but I've seen on TV. I'm not gay but she goes because apparently she genderfluid now.

Does that mean she's cool with threesomes
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicAustralians who won't unlock their phones for cops could face 10 years in jail
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 9:22:13 PM
#71
Frolex posted...
Sephiroth1288 posted...
Show us where it says in here these extra powers are limited to service providers:

https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/consultations/Documents/computer-access-warrents.pdf


These aren't "extra powers", these are the currently existing guidelines for issuing computer access warrants, which are separate from the technical assistance requests that are established under the bill. Please try to stay on topic and actually cite the bill in question mal

Interesting, because the Australian government said it strengthened warrants in that very article.

So who's wrong, you or the government?
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicAustralians who won't unlock their phones for cops could face 10 years in jail
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 8:22:01 PM
#66
Frolex posted...
Sephiroth1288 posted...

The bill does indeed apply to citizens because it involves strengthening the scope and power of warrants for access to private digital information. There's nothing in there that Iimits the extra warrant powers to communications companies.


except for the fact that it lays out the specific definitions for parties that fall under the term of service providers, none of which include "person who owns a phone"

Show us where it says in here these extra powers are limited to service providers:

https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/consultations/Documents/computer-access-warrents.pdf
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicYour daily reminder that Yugi Muto is a fucking cheater
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 8:14:57 PM
#30
If you actually pay attention to the cards Yugi uses, it's really obvious his deck sucks. He has way more than 20 cards in it and very few multiples, it's like something a little kid would put together
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicAustralians who won't unlock their phones for cops could face 10 years in jail
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 8:11:33 PM
#63
FLUFFYGERM posted...
can an honest CEman read the entire bill and tell me if Frolex is lying

The bill does indeed apply to citizens because it involves strengthening the scope and power of warrants for access to private digital information. There's nothing in there that Iimits the extra warrant powers to communications companies.
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicAustralians who won't unlock their phones for cops could face 10 years in jail
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 7:53:13 PM
#53
Frolex posted...
FLUFFYGERM posted...
it's really weird how hard Frolex is trying to deflect tbqh

you Australian buddy?


"Your clickbait thread about australian citizens being forced to provide police access to their phones isn't actually grounded in reality" isn't a deflection proudclad.

He basically repeated the title of the article...
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicAustralians who won't unlock their phones for cops could face 10 years in jail
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 7:35:10 PM
#46
Tmaster148 posted...
Sephiroth1288 posted...
Do they have a right to own guns? Because if not, then they don't really have a right to defend themselves, do they?


A right to defend yourself is not tied to the right to own a gun. People are capable of defending themselves without guns whether or not you like that fact.

Sephiroth1288 posted...
"Hey grandma, you have the right to defend yourself! Now charge at the young male assailant with your bare arthiritic hands!"

---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicAustralians who won't unlock their phones for cops could face 10 years in jail
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 7:32:49 PM
#42
Tmaster148 posted...
Sephiroth1288 posted...
Tmaster148 posted...
Sephiroth1288 posted...
Tmaster148 posted...
Sephiroth1288 posted...
Tmaster148 posted...
Because a gun/taser is the only thing people can use as weapons.

What should grandma use to defend herself, a pointy stick?

Or maybe a phone to dial the police that won't be there until 10 minutes after the attacker already beat her to a pulp?


You have an odd obsession with old women. Are you sure it's just not a fetish?

Weak deflection. Can you answer the question or should we just accept that anyone naturally weaker than 25 year-old men are going to be defenseless in any altercation with them?


I didn't realize you were naturally weaker than a 25-year old man.

You do know that laws affect everyone, right? Not just us in Gamefaqs' 15-35 male demographic?


You do know people in Australia can own guns. Like it's not illegal to own a gun in Australia as much as you think. It's just weird how your first reaction is that "how can some old women or weak person defend themselves without a gun".

Do they have a right to own guns? Because if not, then they don't really have a right to defend themselves, do they?
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicAustralians who won't unlock their phones for cops could face 10 years in jail
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 7:28:45 PM
#40
Tmaster148 posted...
Sephiroth1288 posted...
Tmaster148 posted...
Sephiroth1288 posted...
Tmaster148 posted...
Because a gun/taser is the only thing people can use as weapons.

What should grandma use to defend herself, a pointy stick?

Or maybe a phone to dial the police that won't be there until 10 minutes after the attacker already beat her to a pulp?


You have an odd obsession with old women. Are you sure it's just not a fetish?

Weak deflection. Can you answer the question or should we just accept that anyone naturally weaker than 25 year-old men are going to be defenseless in any altercation with them?


I didn't realize you were naturally weaker than a 25-year old man.

You do know that laws affect everyone, right? Not just us in Gamefaqs' 15-35 male demographic?
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicAustralians who won't unlock their phones for cops could face 10 years in jail
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 7:24:47 PM
#37
Tmaster148 posted...
Sephiroth1288 posted...
Tmaster148 posted...
Because a gun/taser is the only thing people can use as weapons.

What should grandma use to defend herself, a pointy stick?

Or maybe a phone to dial the police that won't be there until 10 minutes after the attacker already beat her to a pulp?


You have an odd obsession with old women. Are you sure it's just not a fetish?

Weak deflection. Can you answer the question or do we just accept that anyone naturally weaker than 25 year-old men are going to be defenseless in any altercation with them?
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicAustralians who won't unlock their phones for cops could face 10 years in jail
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 7:22:07 PM
#35
Tmaster148 posted...
Because a gun/taser is the only thing people can use as weapons.

What should grandma use to defend herself, a pointy stick?

Or maybe a phone to dial the police that won't be there until 10 minutes after the attacker already beat her to a pulp?
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicAustralians who won't unlock their phones for cops could face 10 years in jail
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 7:17:05 PM
#32
Frolex posted...
http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-iphones-fingerprints-20160430-story.html

"Police can force you to unlock your phone" is probably not the road you want to go down if you want to start making comparisons that are complimentary to the US. Especially since it's not even actual law in australia yet, as compared the US where it's already happening

Where in there does it say you can be punished for not unlocking your phone for the police in the US?
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicAustralians who won't unlock their phones for cops could face 10 years in jail
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 7:14:41 PM
#28
Tmaster148 posted...
SageHarpuia posted...
So Australians have no right to self-defense, and now they also have no right to privacy? They might as well walk around naked at this point....


Pretty positive Australians still have the right to defend themselves.

When is illegal for you to own a firearm, or even a taser, that basically means women and elderly people have no right to self-defense.

"Hey grandma, you have the right to defend yourself! Now charge at the young male assailant with your bare arthiritic hands!"
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicAustralians who won't unlock their phones for cops could face 10 years in jail
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 7:09:52 PM
#25
FLUFFYGERM posted...
Sephiroth1288 posted...
FLUFFYGERM posted...
darkmaian23 posted...
I'm bumping this because I just saw an article on it. Is this sort of garbage really going to pass? I know nothing about Australian politics or the basic rights you are guaranteed. 10 years sounds ridiculous, and here in the US law enforcement has been repeatedly told to fuck off when they've tried to get court orders forcing companies to develop software for them.


B-but....b-but...in America people have the right to self defense using GUNS!!!

I'm willing to bet that armed citizens is the major factor for why this shit isn't happening in the US at nearly the rate it is in Europe and Straya.


"LOL do you REALLY believe a farmer with a shotgun stands a chance against a tank and an aircraft carrier????!!!!?!?!1111"

Yeah bro I noscope tanks all the time with a Mosin Nagant in Battlefield 8!!!

Tmaster148 posted...
So you do think a single farmer with a shotgun could 1v1 a tank?

No, but there's definitely a reason dictators always disarm people before they oppress them.
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicAustralians who won't unlock their phones for cops could face 10 years in jail
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 6:53:04 PM
#13
FLUFFYGERM posted...
darkmaian23 posted...
I'm bumping this because I just saw an article on it. Is this sort of garbage really going to pass? I know nothing about Australian politics or the basic rights you are guaranteed. 10 years sounds ridiculous, and here in the US law enforcement has been repeatedly told to fuck off when they've tried to get court orders forcing companies to develop software for them.


B-but....b-but...in America people have the right to self defense using GUNS!!!

I'm willing to bet that armed citizens is the major factor for why this shit isn't happening in the US at nearly the rate it is in Europe and Straya.
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicCE, how do I attract 18 year old females
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 6:44:29 PM
#29
Be more attractive than 18 year-old men
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicTrump BLASTS Social Media Censorship of Conservatives
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 4:47:17 PM
#30
Doom_Art posted...
All I'm saying is for someone who's expressed a desire to censor the press, it's hilarious to see him complaining about censorship

I think it's more hypocritical to complain about someone talking about censoring you as you actually censor people than the other way around.

Crazy, right?
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicTrump BLASTS Social Media Censorship of Conservatives
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 4:45:47 PM
#29
FrisbeeDude posted...
But remember, folks, a restuarant refusing to serve Sarah Sanders is the real sign of incivility in political discourse...not, you know, Trump going on crazy rants, and accusing his political rivals as simply peddling fake news. BTW, remember those journalists who were killed and how we all agreed this type of inflammatory rhetoric should be scaled back? funny how we only discuss that when it's a Maxine waters or Andrew Cuomo who are "guilty" of such offenses. wonder why that is

Has Trump ever called on the media to be publicly harassed?

The media is not some special class. The media is allowed to criticize the president and the president is allowed to criticize the media. Calling out journalists who lie is not off-limits for anyone, even the president. Chill out.
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicTrump BLASTS Social Media Censorship of Conservatives
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 4:43:03 PM
#27
Doom_Art posted...
Because he's expressed a desire to do so.

Talk is cheap and actions speak louder than words. The media actually censors people as they whine about Trump talking about censoring them after they lie.

We know who the real hypocrites are here, don't we?
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicTrump BLASTS Social Media Censorship of Conservatives
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 4:40:19 PM
#20
Doom_Art posted...
Sephiroth1288 posted...
So he censored the media 0 times.

Where did I say he did Mal

He's not a king. Though I know you'd probably just love if he was

Why is seeing Trump bitch about censorship funny when he's never censored anyone
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicTrump BLASTS Social Media Censorship of Conservatives
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 4:39:11 PM
#17
Doom_Art posted...
Iunno what that has to do with anything lol

So he's not a hypocrite here.
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicTrump BLASTS Social Media Censorship of Conservatives
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 4:38:20 PM
#15
Doom_Art posted...
He's openly expressed a desire to do so on many occasions lol

So he censored the media 0 times.
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicSo it's safe to say that the Fable franchise is pretty much dead rn. Sad.
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 4:37:32 PM
#9
Doom_Art posted...
Then again the franchise only had like 1 marginally passable game to begin with

ftfy
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicTrump BLASTS Social Media Censorship of Conservatives
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 4:34:31 PM
#7
Doom_Art posted...
Funbazooka posted...
No, he's railed against

Nah, he's railed against actual journalists

The man's not a fan of the first amendment so seeing him bitch about censorship is pretty funny

How many times has Trump censored the media
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicTrump BLASTS Social Media Censorship of Conservatives
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 4:31:51 PM
#4
Funbazooka posted...
"if youre a liberal, youre supposed to be for free speech."

Poor Maher still thinks liberals care about liberty.
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicI've never had a problem with police, because I don't disrespect them.
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 4:29:58 PM
#90
nicklebro posted...
Good, you can show people how to speak about race inoffensively.

"I'm gonna reference [race of people] whenever I want, and there's not a single thing your punk ass can do about it.

Deal with it. ;)"

- nicklebro
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicDo you think the n word with an a has cheapened or empowered the slur
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 4:26:52 PM
#2
It's the same word though, just spelled phonetically by people who pronounce "er" as "a"

like, if someone pronounces "driver" with an a sound at the end, is it a new word?
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicI've never had a problem with police, because I don't disrespect them.
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 6:29:36 AM
#73
nicklebro posted...
Ok, continue making yourself look like an idiot, I don't care.

But I'm gonna keep referencing Jews whenever I want, and there's not a single thing your punk ass can do about it.

Deal with it. ;)

I'm gonna remember this exchange next time you complain about offensive race talk.
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicBRKNG SOURCE: Melania wants to divorce, but she's afraid Trump'll pull her Visa~
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 6:10:22 AM
#6
Barenziah Boy Toy posted...
Sephiroth1288 posted...
Barenziah Boy Toy posted...
Omarosa Claims

Yeah ok.

So far, many of her claims have been backed up and proofed.

But none of the salient ones

Where's the n-word tape?
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicBRKNG SOURCE: Melania wants to divorce, but she's afraid Trump'll pull her Visa~
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 6:06:30 AM
#3
Barenziah Boy Toy posted...
Omarosa Claims

Yeah ok.
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicI've never had a problem with police, because I don't disrespect them.
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 6:04:19 AM
#67
Ving_Rhames posted...
Sephiroth1288 posted...
So do you believe the police have magical hindsight powers?


Do they need magical hindsight powers when they're going into a situation with the game plan of planting evidence? Like, what are you even arguing here? I feel like you should just hold your L and dance off before you embarrass yourself even more instead of trying to move to some irrelevant goal post to try to salvage whatever dignity you think you've got left lol.

Can you or can you not show that bodycams can reliably be manipulated in such a way to fool people into drawing a wrong conclusion, or at the very least that this is a common thing?

Because if not, it seems you're the one who needs to take the L ;)
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicI've never had a problem with police, because I don't disrespect them.
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 5:47:19 AM
#64
Ving_Rhames posted...
Sephiroth1288 posted...
Can you answer the question or can't you


The second video literally answers your very stupid question.

"What he didn't know is that it records 30 seconds prior to being turned on."

Do you know what that means? It means he could have, if he knew how his own equipment worked, reliably timed his action of planting drugs to not be recorded by the body cam if he had waited more than 30 seconds to start up his fake reaction recording.

Very unreliable and difficult, totally comparable to shooting a gun out of a hand!

Because we all know where and when something incriminating will occur and be able to record in such a way to conceal one's own wrongdoing.

So do you believe the police have magical hindsight powers?
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicFacebook Now Targeting Left Wing Pages As Predicted
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 5:39:57 AM
#11
DrizztLink posted...
MC_BatCommander posted...
Solid proof Alex Jones wasn't banned for political reasons then

response waiting

Show me where I ever said he was
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicTrump Sparks Backlash For Saying Aretha Franklin 'Worked For Me'
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 5:38:41 AM
#63
Kineth posted...
Anybody got any kleenex for Mal?

You guys are crying over Trump saying Franklin worked for him and are now accusing people calling you out for how dumb this is of crying

How much harder can you possibly project XD
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicI've never had a problem with police, because I don't disrespect them.
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 5:37:18 AM
#61
Ving_Rhames posted...
Sephiroth1288 posted...
like how you think they can shoot weapons out of people's hands instead of killing them?


ROFL, Mal. Fucking. Fet.

I know listening is hard for you, but pay attention in the second video. Or don't, I'm only replying to you because you wanted attention.

Sephiroth1288 posted...
Is this something you guys think cops can reliably do

Can you answer the question or can't you
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicI've never had a problem with police, because I don't disrespect them.
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 5:29:11 AM
#59
Ving_Rhames posted...
And those cops who remember to properly time their cams? This shit isn't nearly as uncommon as you cop suckups love to parade.

Lol "time their cams"

Is this something you guys think cops can reliably do, like how you think they can shoot weapons out of people's hands instead of killing them?
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicTrump Sparks Backlash For Saying Aretha Franklin 'Worked For Me'
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 5:20:19 AM
#59
YUHH posted...
Kineth posted...
Sephiroth1288 posted...
Kineth posted...
Just another thing for conservatives with a persecution complex to whine about.

irony


Cryyyyyyyy

Also, tell me more about white genocide.

Wait has Mal actually gone down that rabbit hole

No, Kineth is just trying to deflect because he knows he chose to die on a really dumb hill.
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicTrump Sparks Backlash For Saying Aretha Franklin 'Worked For Me'
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 4:59:00 AM
#56
Kineth posted...
Sephiroth1288 posted...
Kineth posted...
Just another thing for conservatives with a persecution complex to whine about.

irony


Cryyyyyyyy

Sephiroth1288 posted...
Liberals are actually crying over Trump describing his professional relationship with someone

Cry harder, it's hilarious.

---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicFacebook Now Targeting Left Wing Pages As Predicted
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 4:42:29 AM
#6
"Facebook will not tolerate racism"

Leftists: Yeah, show those dirty right wingers they don't belong here!

*Facebook bans tons of racist left wing people and pages*

Leftists: WAIT NO
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicTrump Sparks Backlash For Saying Aretha Franklin 'Worked For Me'
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 4:39:58 AM
#54
ledbowman posted...
I is smart posted...
Kineth posted...
Just another thing for conservatives with a persecution complex to whine about.


conservatives aren't the ones crying about this

Yeah they're crying about people calling Trump a dipshit.

Liberals are actually crying over Trump describing his professional relationship with someone

Cry harder, it's hilarious.
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicI've never had a problem with police, because I don't disrespect them.
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 4:38:26 AM
#51
Lathissamus posted...
Sephiroth1288 posted...
nicklebro posted...
So what? They're still far too likely to be unfair and unprofessional. What kinda idiot thinks it's fine for cops to harass innocent citizens as long as they only do it 49% of the time?

Except it's not 49% of the time, it's more like a fraction of a percent.

A fraction of a percent? lol

Oh it's you.

1.1 million police officers in the US and a couple dozen allegations of unprofessional conduct per year.

Yeah that's a tiny fraction of a percent.
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
TopicI've never had a problem with police, because I don't disrespect them.
Sephiroth1288
08/18/18 4:09:14 AM
#46
nicklebro posted...
So what? They're still far too likely to be unfair and unprofessional. What kinda idiot thinks it's fine for cops to harass innocent citizens as long as they only do it 49% of the time?

Except it's not 49% of the time, it's more like a fraction of a percent.
---
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248
Board List
Page List: 1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 18