Lurker > Sephiroth1288

Kineth posted...

Just another thing for conservatives with a persecution complex to whine about.

irony
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

nicklebro posted...

So what? The fact that the dogs aren't always wrong, or even usually wrong, doesnt excuse when they are wrong.

So it means that the police are more likely to be fair and professional, even if you aren't a "sheltered suburbanite" and anyone who thinks otherwise are fools
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

Conflict posted...

If you weren't a sheltered suburbanite you'd know that there have been many instances of cops giving people shit without those people in particular being disrespectful

Meanwhile, much more often than not, bodycam footage not only reveals police were in the right in claims of bigotry/harassment but also that the civillian was being irrational and argumentative.
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

CrimsonRage posted...

Sephiroth1288 posted...

CrimsonRage posted...

this isn't supposed to be a tweet meant to discredit him. it's just another in a long, long line of lies he makes

So she never worked for him? Are you quite sure about that

she played at his venues. that's not working for someone.

Did he or one of his subsidiaries pay her for her performances?
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

A_Good_Boy posted...

Sephiroth1288 posted...

Why the hell does the media need the home addresses of the jurors...?

Thank goodness they don't. Don't need Manafort or Trump trying to Seth Rich anyone.

Media outlets including NBC News had requested the names and addresses of the jurors be unsealed.

---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

Why the hell does trump need the home addresses of the jurors...?

What article are you reading

Media outlets including NBC News had requested the names and addresses of the jurors be unsealed.

---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

CrimsonRage posted...

this isn't supposed to be a tweet meant to discredit him. it's just another in a long, long line of lies he makes

So she never worked for him? Are you quite sure about that
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

Why the hell does the media need the home addresses of the jurors...?
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

CrimsonRage posted...

@Vicious_Dios posted...

Imagine this passing as news.

it's not news. it's just a reminder that your president is a compulsive liar and narcissist. and you're okay with that.

Or maybe you're making yet another mountain out of a molehill.

Remember "TWO SCOOPS???"
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

BLAKUboy posted...

frozenshock posted...

A famous singer dies, and he makes it about himself.

I mean, most people do, it's just that usually the response is "Here's a great memory I have of them so that we can remember them" rather than "Here's how I'm better than that person just in case anyone didn't know how much I think I'm above everyone else".

Working for someone means they're better than you are? How do you figure
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

Trigg3rH4ppy posted...

Sephiroth1288 posted...

Truck that mowed down 14 people supplied by GMC

I thought it was a RAM?

isn't Dodge owned by GMC? Honestly didn't care enough to check
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

VipaGTS posted...

She was just the hired help to him apparently. Worked for him.

You've officially gone off the deep end.
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

Yet another nothingburger for lefties to get more gray hairs over.
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

Truck that mowed down 14 people supplied by GMC
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

Giblet_Enjoyer posted...

Mr_Rian posted...

What does the Net Neutrality rule have to do with where the FCC allows ISPs to operate?

DezDroppedFreak posted...

CableZL posted...

Internet speeds getting faster isn't a net neutrality issue.

These.
Maladjusted_Fatty flopix

I thought ending NN was supposed to make the internet shit though, what happened to that

---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

Which Zelda
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

JE19426 posted...

darkjedilink posted...

So?

Don't attribute it to Net Neutrality.

I thought ending NN was supposed to make the internet shit though, what happened to that
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

Lunar_Savage posted...

1. It was headed there anyway during NN.

2. Prepare for the long-term fucking when they start throttling again or dividing up Internet packages and have no competition in various regions.

Well it's been several months and it hasn't happened yet, so....
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

Webmaster4531 posted...

Speed is pretty meaningless. A rich gated community or big city apartment complex getting a fiber connection is meaningless to everyone on copper with broken and slow nodes all over the infrastructure.

What does that have to do with ISPs being less regulated though

Wouldn't they be motivated to provide their service to as many people as possible
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

LightningAce11 posted...

>dailycaller

Has the US not gotten faster internet since NN was repealed?
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

in the world for internet speed

http://dailycaller.com/2018/08/14/net-neutrality-us-ranking/

And my cable bill remains unchanged

Since the repeal of net neutrality took effect on June 11, the U.S. internet speed has gone from 12th to 6th fastest in the world.

...

This is likely due to the fact that the repeal of net neutrality rules have allowed the market to dictate itself. This, in turn, has spurred competition and innovation which ultimately creates a better product for consumers.

The United States now trails only Singapore, Hong Kong, Iceland, Romania, and South Korea in overall broadband download speed.

Is this the "end of the internet" that people were freaking out about last year?
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

mom's spaghetti
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

King_Hellebuyck posted...

Because cars arent banned. Cars are legal. They just arent allowed everywhere.

So he's banning cars near govt buildings.

Glad we cleared that up
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

King_Hellebuyck posted...

Sephiroth1288 posted...

King_Hellebuyck posted...

Sephiroth1288 posted...

King_Hellebuyck posted...

So you realize that banning traffic from an area isnt banning cars right?

If you make it so cars aren't allowed somewhere, what is the word for what you have done to cars in that area?

Please tell me youre smart enough to understand the difference between banning cars and banning traffic

Please no one should be that stupid, it would just be sad

Ok, you do know what banning vehicular traffic entails, right?

So you realize they arent banning cars? Or do you still not understand the difference here?

How does one ban traffic...

without banning cars
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

Balrog0 posted...

Sephiroth1288 posted...

Star_Spirit posted...

it's fascinating. righties are okay with spending all their money on murdering foreigners but panic at the idea of healing and educating their own citizens.

The US spends more money on education per student than any other country does and more on healthcare than most developed nations.

Right, even though other nations have much more generous social safety nets in general, with fewer means tested programs, we spend a lot more on a few functions that we do care about.

It's almost like you could argue that rather than functioning as hammocks, they work like trampolines.

Except healthcare is already a de facto right in the US as ER care is free and US schools are publicly funded except for the universities, which are the best in the world (is almost like there's a connection there)

Sure though everything is great when the government gives you free shit except for how everything is more expensive and that the government takes more of your money.

Have you ever actually been to a Scandinavian country? Everything is expensive as shit thanks to these policies.
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

King_Hellebuyck posted...

Sephiroth1288 posted...

King_Hellebuyck posted...

So you realize that banning traffic from an area isnt banning cars right?

If you make it so cars aren't allowed somewhere, what is the word for what you have done to cars in that area?

Please tell me youre smart enough to understand the difference between banning cars and banning traffic

Please no one should be that stupid, it would just be sad

Ok, you do know what banning vehicular traffic entails, right?
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

King_Hellebuyck posted...

So you realize that banning traffic from an area isnt banning cars right?

If you make it so cars aren't allowed somewhere, what is the word for what you have done to cars in that area?
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

King_Hellebuyck posted...

Sephiroth1288 posted...

King_Hellebuyck posted...

Sephiroth1288 posted...

King_Hellebuyck posted...

King_Hellebuyck posted...

Sephiroth1288 posted...

Holy shit, is actually real

http://dailycaller.com/2018/08/16/london-mayor-sadiq-khan-ban-cars/

Apparently it's a response to terrorist attacks

ban guns

ban knives

ban cars

what's next, ban pointy rocks?

How much of that article did you read?

@Sephiroth1288

Evidently more than you?

I made it past the headline. How bout you?

I read the whole thing, it's not long. What's your issue

So you know hes not actually banning cars then right?

Seems like he wants to ban cars in a ton of places to me, what article did you read again?
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

Star_Spirit posted...

it's fascinating. righties are okay with spending all their money on murdering foreigners but panic at the idea of healing and educating their own citizens.

The US spends more money on education per student than any other country does and more on healthcare than most developed nations.
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

King_Hellebuyck posted...

Sephiroth1288 posted...

King_Hellebuyck posted...

King_Hellebuyck posted...

Sephiroth1288 posted...

Holy shit, is actually real

http://dailycaller.com/2018/08/16/london-mayor-sadiq-khan-ban-cars/

Apparently it's a response to terrorist attacks

ban guns

ban knives

ban cars

what's next, ban pointy rocks?

How much of that article did you read?

@Sephiroth1288

Evidently more than you?

I made it past the headline. How bout you?

I read the whole thing, it's not long. What's your issue
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

With a spork
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

King_Hellebuyck posted...

King_Hellebuyck posted...

Sephiroth1288 posted...

Holy shit, is actually real

http://dailycaller.com/2018/08/16/london-mayor-sadiq-khan-ban-cars/

Apparently it's a response to terrorist attacks

ban guns

ban knives

ban cars

what's next, ban pointy rocks?

How much of that article did you read?

@Sephiroth1288

Evidently more than you?
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

King_Hellebuyck posted...

What article did you read?

I wasn't responding to the article...
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

Holy shit, is actually real

http://dailycaller.com/2018/08/16/london-mayor-sadiq-khan-ban-cars/

Apparently it's a response to terrorist attacks

ban guns

ban knives

ban cars

what's next, ban pointy rocks?
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

Why is it taken as a given that socialism is less prone to corruption than capitalism

If history taught us anything, it's that socialism is WAY MORE prone to corruption and tyranny than capitalism is
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

he was singing along to a 50 Cent song

Would there still be outrage? Would it depend on how good his flow was?
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

Darmik posted...

Sephiroth1288 posted...

Anteaterking posted...

But the whole point of the article is that it isn't just liberal shows with politician names flipped.

Yeah it basically is

Conservative humor in the 90's is liberal humor now.

Wha....?

"Blah blah affairs blah blah lies blah blah who cares"

*Audience claps *
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

Sephiroth1288 posted...

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

I literally told you that you would respond this way in the post itself.

*Admits to being a troll* "I bet you'll call me a troll now!"

wow dude, you totally got me.

If you were at all mentally competent, you wouldn't need me to put you on a leash and drag you to the conclusion that was more than clear in the first place.

You don't need to lead me to the conclusion that you're a troll, that has been obvious for months.
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

Anteaterking posted...

But the whole point of the article is that it isn't just liberal shows with politician names flipped.

Yeah it basically is

Conservative humor in the 90's is liberal humor now.
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

Sephiroth1288 posted...

*Admits to being a troll* "I bet you'll call me a troll now!"

wow dude, you totally got me.

---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

Darmik posted...

Damn_Underscore posted...

Darmik posted...

Hmmmm

I mean the article does argue that conservatives can't be funny, which you have to admit is pretty dumb.

It's a comedy article

If that's supposed to be a comedy article then it's all the proof anyone needs that progressive comedy isn't funny.
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

hockeybub89 posted...

Are you seriously arguing that progressivism isn't an idea of change from whatever the norm is?

Progressivism, like all political leanings, has a status quo it wants to promote. The idea that one status quo is more conducive to comedy than another one is ridiculous. It's like thinking your own shit doesn't stink.
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

Darmik posted...

Sephiroth1288 posted...

Darmik posted...

It's hilarious how much he called this.

The funny thing is that I was the one who was called a joyless asshole, by a hilarious liberal.

Poor baby

Don't you mean Seanbaby?
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

I literally told you that you would respond this way in the post itself.

*Admits to being a troll* "I bet you'll call me a troll now!"

wow dude, you totally got me.
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

Darmik posted...

It's hilarious how much he called this.

The funny thing is that I was the one who was called a joyless asshole, by a hilarious liberal.
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

hockeybub89 posted...

So the "jokes" in that article would be funny if he knew how to laugh?

I think they would be funny if the entire team at Cracked weren't kidnapped and replaced with Buzzfeed writers 7 years ago.
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

The Great Muta 22 posted...

a joyless asshole.

Sums up Seanbaby pretty well.
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

King_Hellebuyck posted...

Sephiroth1288 posted...

hockeybub89 posted...

Well the idea is that progressive politics intend to subvert,

Since fucking when

What is being subverted by saying its not ok to make fun of x y or z? Where the comedy in booing comedians who make offensive jokes? What's so funny about defending domestic terrorists? Modern-day progressives are as joyless and rigid as the religious right and they aren't any funnier either.

How do you always manage to sound so offended by literally everything when complaining about people being thin skinned?

If you think my post sounds offended then I think you might be projecting.
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

hockeybub89 posted...

Well the idea is that progressive politics intend to subvert,

Since fucking when

What is being subverted by saying its not ok to make fun of x y or z? Where the comedy in booing comedians who make offensive jokes? What's so funny about defending domestic terrorists? Modern-day progressives are as joyless and rigid as the religious right and they aren't any funnier either.

hockeybub89 posted...

Also, if less politics = more humor, then Norm is not a conservative comedian, as he is funny. He is a comedian that may have some conservative views that are separate from his humor. Like how preachy Christian music sucks, but people that go to church can make good music.

Norm does conservative political comedy well. Certainly better than just about anybody does liberal political comedy. That's not to say that his best stuff is his political comedy.
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248

hockeybub89 posted...

He couldn't be funny if he was a conservstive comedian, or rather made politically conservative jokes. You can't make jokes from the frame of conservative politics. The status quo is the opposite of humor.

Both liberals and conservatives push their own ideal status quos, what the hell is this idea that only conservatives do this
---

The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248