As someone who has been, the topic title drew me in. Then I read 25 in the last 12 months. Even if the most heinous crime in the country only happened 25 times a year, we would be celebrating. Seems like a clickbait fear mongering article.
Yeah probably not gonna watch this then
I get that the human world thing is the basis of the paramount sonic universe, but i hate it lol
Lmao Im gonna see if its on any of my streaming services. She didnt do this to every student. She gave us about 4-5 scenarios that she would be replicating.
I dont think its common for them, but she told us to do everything we could to get the person off and subdued long enough to bring them to flat ground. She held me under for a while and I panicked.
In my lifeguard training my instructor chose me to try this on. Beforehand she told us that if someone panicking tries to climb on your head when youre attempting to save them, punch them in the nose as hard as possible.
I broke her nose and she wasnt mad at all.
It might be low-hanging fruit, but it's true. Even if it were to pass the courts as an okay thing to do, and w/ Trump being the threat he is, the Dems still wouldn't do it. The Dems, the media, and the major financial powers in this country do not care if Trump wins - and many of them probably wish for it.
I'm not gonna participate in you guys shitting up this topic w/ this. Biden sucks, Trump is worse, and I'm still not voting.
My only comment on topic would be re: if Trump wins this argument, the Dems wouldn't have the spine to assassinate Trump.
I been noticing this meme taking off on Reddit.
Anyone know why? I don't follow basketball.
He just broadly hating on people that make sex part of their personality
This is fake but also on brand for him at the same time
It was a bipartisan bill, so who exactly will TikTok be criticizing for banning it?
your elected representatives who are significantly more informed than you
Nah, Mario has WAY too much momentum in 64. Once you hit the jump button, you pretty much can't adjust that jump outside of microscopic movements to the left and right. When you land, you keep going for about 5 Mario lengths before you come to a full stop. You can dive, but that only puts you even more out of control. Mario also really likes to slide at the slightest incline, and sliding is even more uncontrollable than jumping.
No
See but in my experience pre order is basically just pre pay. GameStop didn't reserve a copy for me for Animal Crossing going back to the OP example. Interesting that it used to mean something but nowadays it feels like a relic and marketing scheme.
I pre ordered Animal Crossing 3DS and GameStop didn't even give me a fucking cart just a download code.
Imagine this AI constantly adding items to your order because you're reading the menu options to somebody who either can't see it or can't read it, and asking them if/how they want to modify the sandwich.
Huh, I always thought it was reign
"rein"
Two posts in two months. One of which I forgot lol.
Man what lmao thats silly
eh, i also don't think arachnophobia is real. much like trypophobia, submechanophobia, megalophobia, thalassaphobia, coulrophobia, etc, i think these are social phenomena exacerbated by media, internet culture, videos and pics meant to deliberately creep you out or shock you, and people tend to glom onto these things and wear them like fun badges
As it stands today, but you didn't read my whole post, but now I have time to source it so hopefully you can understand it better.
The foundation for retrial is from 1824, US vs Perez, which ruled based not on the Constitution but rather English Common Law that jeopardy does not attach until the verdict is rendered.
However, in Downum v US (1963), Crist v Bretz (1978), and Martinez v Illinois (2014), the Supreme Court has consistently held that the federal rule for trial by jury is that jeopardy attaches when a trial jury is sworn.
Should any of Donald's jury trials end in a mistrial or hung jury you can guarantee that he will take any attempts to re-try him to the SC and there is a very good chance he wins given which way they lean.
When she tried to get away, he shot her once, then there was more exchange between them," Shultz said. "Mr. Brock was at some point injured to his head, and he shot Ms. Hall a second time. There was more conversation, and then he shot her a third time. Only after he shot her a third time did he then make contact with authorities to report the incident."
In the dashcam footage, Mr Brock is heard demanding that Ms Hall give him her phone.
He also refused to allow her to leave, police said.
Seriously though, he is obviously guilty of contributing to the death of that poor women
What was it he did or didn't do?
Are you sure that is true?
Or is at a matter of the New Channel just bitching out?
Any image that is taken in a public space is open game.
They must have given to the images to the authorities.
Have they published it?
Hell, this is a public park.
She's the voice actor? I thought she was the character model. It looked like they took the same features and uglied them up a bit.
It's actively downplaying looks.
If they hired someone average to be the model for an average-looking character, that's passive. They hired someone for a role and that's the end of it. But if they hire an attractive person, and they make her average-looking, they're actively striping away that beauty to show that they only care about the person underneath.
It's like ordering at Starbucks. You could order the Caramel Macchiato with soy milk or you could order "a vegan Caramel Macchiato" so that everyone within earshot knows you're vegan.
It's weird that they made a point to capture the same eyebrows, cheekbones, chin, and lips if she's not the model.
The character doesn't have to be attractive just because the actor is, but they made a point to make the character a less-attractive version of her VA.
Defining who "the bad guys" are from a state's point of view is a political action, first of all. Saying "Nazi Germany are bad guys" is a political statement. Alternatively, if Captain America faithfully follows the orders of his government to do whatever, that is also a political action. What is more political than government decision making?
Winter Soldier and Civil War are both about Steve having to make intrinsically political decisions and stands, using his own conscience and moral compass.
When people say these movies aren't political i need to ask what do we think political means anymore? Even if it's defined as not exercising a political consciousness as your post seemed to imply, that's not true of these movies.
a guy called fucking Captain America are political, yes.
Great hero there
Except here it's worse because not only did it actually happen in the movie, but we know that peggy married another man and had a full life with him, so cap effectively erases that man.
2. Just end up getting banned/purged/warned because these people also mass report
I don't know, I'm really not that far into it. I just know that she feels vindicated by it. :v Don't shoot the messenger. People were asking why she thought she was owed an apology and I answered, it's because the cass report just came out.