Were they high on something before doing thisMaybe. Or drunk
Oh noIts a pretty stupid thing to do. Ruins the area for future generations
Not the... rocks
WTF are their faces blurred out?The news isn't allowed to show their faces unless they consent, which obviously isn't happening.
WTF are their faces blurred out?At the time of the news report, they haven't been charged, yet. Thus, they can't show their faces without consent.
Oh no
Not the... rocks
On one hand, it's bad. On the other hand the lake itself was formed by damming up a canyon that ultimately destroyed far more geological and archeological sites, so let's at least keep some perspective.
At the time of the news report, they haven't been charged, yet. Thus, they can't show their faces without consent.So how are they supposed to be identified?
So how are they supposed to be identified?They were already identified, but the news studio has to blur their faces as they haven't been officially charged and would require consent to show their faces.
At the time of the news report, they haven't been charged, yet. Thus, they can't show their faces without consent.
At the time of the news report, they haven't been charged, yet. Thus, they can't show their faces without consent.
Are you sure that is true?
Or is at a matter of the New Channel just bitching out?
Any image that is taken in a public space is open game.
They must have given to the images to the authorities.
Have they published it?
Hell, this is a public park.
Thats not completely true. Its why shows like Impractical Jokers have to blur out faces of people who didnt sign a release.