Board 8 > Avatar 2 topic (spoilers)

Topic List
Page List: 1
ChaosTonyV4
12/16/22 7:26:04 PM
#1:


Weird movie!

Visually incredible, good battle scenes. Kinda felt like a kids movie outside of the violence?

Extremely weird dialogue that felt amateurish at times? Ancillary characters had tons of irrelevant speaking lines in the background of scenes, did anyone else notice this?

spoilery examples:

When one of the Avatar soldiers is putting handcuffs on somebody, theyre not even in frame and yet you hear them say and the other one when theyre putting the cuff on the second hand.

When a bunch of dudes are abandoning ship, theres a wide-ish shot with guys running down a hall and others running down stairs, and you can hear unspecified people saying things like This way! and Watch your head!

Once I noticed it, it was all I could focus on, lol it happened in every single scene.

---
Phantom Dust.
"I'll just wait for time to prove me right again." - Vlado
... Copied to Clipboard!
masterplum
12/20/22 8:51:35 PM
#2:


One of the most contrived movies I have ever seen

There was 2 hours of good movie in there and another hour and a half of completely unnecessary content that absolutely should have been cut as it either didn't go anywhere or could have been done faster

---
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BdWiElvIQAAQpBt.jpg
... Copied to Clipboard!
TeamRocketElite
12/20/22 9:06:20 PM
#3:


Which parts did you not like?

---
My bracket looked like random picks compared to his.
Congrats to azuarc for winning the GotD 2020 Guru Contest!
... Copied to Clipboard!
colliding
12/20/22 9:11:34 PM
#4:


Feels like there was at least a half hour of deleted scenes, but it also felt like it was full of padding

obviously visually spectacular and should really satisfy the avatar perverts out there

but also, as a sequel,extremely basic. like the whole premise doesn't even make sense. the family was apparently really well holed up in the forest, and as soon as the new navi appear jake sully takes the family and runs to a place that is extremely unprotected. it's just a cheap excuse to go to water world.

---
while you slept, the world changed
... Copied to Clipboard!
masterplum
12/20/22 9:19:35 PM
#5:


TeamRocketElite posted...
Which parts did you not like?

I thought the very ending sequence was the most egregious. We just spent a third of the movie becoming one with water and yet we suddenly have drowning as the looming threat? I thought the dad was going to win the fight by being able to stay under water longer which would have been a satisfying conclusion to that arc. Instead it dragged out another 15 minutes with the entirely unnecessary children rescue.

Or how about how the one child was the scientists daughter? Completely irrelevant and completely dropped. How about how the mother cut spider and the tension between them. That really could have been interesting. No, spider was ok abandoning his biological dad and was happy with the blue people again.

Some of this probably sequel setup, but its dumb setup. The movie is already over 3 hours.


---
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BdWiElvIQAAQpBt.jpg
... Copied to Clipboard!
colliding
12/20/22 9:24:20 PM
#6:


I will say there are going to be three more of these so any "plot holes" are for sure intentional

the bad logic on the other hand - no excuses for that

---
while you slept, the world changed
... Copied to Clipboard!
Leonhart4
12/20/22 9:25:52 PM
#7:


do you remember any of the characters' names

---
https://imgur.com/WqDcNNq
https://imgur.com/89Z5jrB
... Copied to Clipboard!
masterplum
12/20/22 9:32:56 PM
#8:


Leonhart4 posted...
do you remember any of the characters' names

Of course not

---
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BdWiElvIQAAQpBt.jpg
... Copied to Clipboard!
colliding
12/20/22 9:46:13 PM
#9:


jake sully
boy child 1
boy child 2
step daughter
baby girl
gamora
the bad guy from the first one!


---
while you slept, the world changed
... Copied to Clipboard!
TeamRocketElite
12/20/22 10:00:54 PM
#10:


colliding posted...
Feels like there was at least a half hour of deleted scenes, but it also felt like it was full of padding

obviously visually spectacular and should really satisfy the avatar perverts out there

but also, as a sequel,extremely basic. like the whole premise doesn't even make sense. the family was apparently really well holed up in the forest, and as soon as the new navi appear jake sully takes the family and runs to a place that is extremely unprotected. it's just a cheap excuse to go to water world.



I believe Jake expected Spider to give up their location and this would cause a lot of danger for everyone there including his family. So he decided to run. As it turns out, Spider never breaks so the forest would have remained mostly safe. The new location isn't as well defended but the idea was to not be found in the first place.

The part I didn't get is why the sky people bothered chasing Jake. After Jake ran, the attacks on the sky people would have become far less damaging. On the off chance they didn't, that means Jake wasn't the real problem anyways.


masterplum posted...


I thought the very ending sequence was the most egregious. We just spent a third of the movie becoming one with water and yet we suddenly have drowning as the looming threat? I thought the dad was going to win the fight by being able to stay under water longer which would have been a satisfying conclusion to that arc. Instead it dragged out another 15 minutes with the entirely unnecessary children rescue.

Or how about how the one child was the scientists daughter? Completely irrelevant and completely dropped. How about how the mother cut spider and the tension between them. That really could have been interesting. No, spider was ok abandoning his biological dad and was happy with the blue people again.

Some of this probably sequel setup, but its dumb setup. The movie is already over 3 hours.




That sounds fair. The daughter thing definitely sounds like a sequel hook to me. Spider is way too forgiving regarding nearly being killed. Although, that would just be a problem with the mom not all the blue people.

Leonhart4 posted...
do you remember any of the characters' names


Just Kitty. That's not how it is actually spelt.

---
My bracket looked like random picks compared to his.
Congrats to azuarc for winning the GotD 2020 Guru Contest!
... Copied to Clipboard!
most_games_r_ok
12/21/22 3:08:11 AM
#11:


Man I hate Son #2 with a passion. Stupid decisions from him the entire time that eventually lead to his brother's death.

I went to go see it twice. Enjoyed it that much but more importantly didn't see it in 3D first time and we missed the first fucking 15 mins. Visually spectacular but some stuff was weird and definitely not explained well enough. I guess we'll find out more later though.

---
"I do because I can."
http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/Micer101.png
... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik7
12/21/22 4:05:08 AM
#12:


You guys are goofy.

First of all, Jake Sully and Neytiri are never shown really having mastered being in the water. It is why Lo'ak has to teach his father where to breathe from and how to slow his heart rate down.

The family is
Jake Sully or Toruk Makto
Neytiri
Neteyam (eldest son)
Lo'ak (younger son)
Kiri (Grace's Avatars daughter and adopted daughter of Jake's)
Tuk (youngest daughter)
Spider (Quarritch's son and "pet" of Jake)

The biggest criticism ofc should be that obviously a lot was deleted from the movie and it leaves some glaring holes. Where did the Metkayina go in the final battle? We see they didn't die at the funeral, but they were nowhere to be found at the end. The one girl appears at the rock, but that is about it.

Avatar Part 2 and Part 3 are basically one film broken up into 2 from what has been explained. A lot of what we saw with Kiri, Neytiri, Spider, and so on will likely play a larger role going forward.

I wouldn't even be surprised if Quaritch possibly comes around (mytheory would be he saves Jake in the end, but Neytiri kills him for a bittersweet end for him) in the end.

I liked number 1 much more. I like the forest setting better, and I also felt the story was more traumatic and emotional. This really missed a character like Trudy as well, who was great in the 1st.

Upon a second watch, I did feel more for the villages that refused to give up Jake and the punishment they took for doing so. The Tulkun mother being hunted was sad with the baby going with it.

What wasn't clear to me was how the flashback from Payakan showed the entire herd and warriors being slaughtered by what seemed a similar outfit that they end up fighting later, and why this outcome ended up so different during the finale. I understand it's somewhat surprise, but would they also not have had that surprise then also? Also, why do they considered him Outcast and like they are oblivious to what happened when apparently so many Na'vi went to battle and died also? Do they really think thus one tulkun murdered an entire herd of his fellows and all them na'vi as well? Surely someone can see they were mowed down by Sky People weapons. There is a disconnect here, which possibly has a greater realization hidden in deleted scenes.

The movie if anything could have probably used more scenes to flesh out the movie to keep it from feeling disjointed, not less as Plum suggested. I feel like we are missing pertinent info or explanations at times.

The Spider angle, I believe, is purposeful and will play a larger role going forward. I don't think he was useless, and I don't think him saving his father at the end was dumb. Or that it was dumb that he left him too. I believe he is slowly seeing that there is redeeming and damn qualities in life, and it is not necessarily a human thing either. Na'vi don't = good and humans = bad, despite what we have seen so far. It's probably purposeful that Spider was stationed next to the less than thrilled Marine Biologist on the ship.

The Amrita was interesting. In 13 years it seems Earth has moved on from mining unobtanium to wanting to fully colonize Pandora for human life. I think it's safe to say things went downhill on Earth very quickly. The question I have is, to what extent can the humans not just bombard from orbit? We see in their landing they scorch who knows how much land. I get its to establish a base, but it seems relatively easy to just destroy large areas quickly and just build it quickly into what destroyed Earth in the first place. Also, is 70 million for a vial of amrita even that much? For something that stops human aging alltogether?? Seems cheap to me. I don't think that price was thought or, nor do I think it in any way can be cost effective at that price to run that operation if one tulkun supposedly can only supply a single vial (I wish they showed it extracting a bunch of vials from it).

All in all, it's a good movie but not as good as avatar 1. It needs more scenes to flesh it out better and make it less disjointed and to explain more of what is going on. Not bad though. Definitely can tell the torch is being passed soon from the parents to the kids. Can't wait to see what's next and hopefully we get the 4 and 5.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)
... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik7
12/21/22 4:09:23 AM
#13:


Also speaking of which, I got huge DUNE vibes from this movie. When they talk about how vast the ocean is and how many villages there are and etc, it reminded me immensely of desert power and the Fremen in DUNE. Obviously there is a lot more than that going on and the parallels end a lot, but I I wonder if somewhere this is somewhat inspired by Frank Herbert's franchise.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)
... Copied to Clipboard!
LightningStrikes
12/21/22 8:09:59 AM
#14:


I have a question for those who have seen the film.

I will go with my family next week. Should I see it in 3D or Dolby 3D with the high framerate? I have heard mixed things about the use of HFR, so any opinions would be welcome. For what its worth this would be at the cinema Cameron and Landau tuned the film using so maybe that would give a better experience.

---
I just decided to change this sig.
Blaaaaaaargh azuarc
... Copied to Clipboard!
TeamRocketElite
12/21/22 8:49:15 AM
#15:


What happened to the Marine Biologist in the end? After I finished the movie I realized I didn't catch if he got caught up in all the people getting killed at the end.

Corrik7 posted...
Also, is 70 million for a vial of amrita even that much? For something that stops human aging alltogether?? Seems cheap to me. I don't think that price was thought or, nor do I think it in any way can be cost effective at that price to run that operation if one tulkun supposedly can only supply a single vial (I wish they showed it extracting a bunch of vials from it).


Yeah, it sound a bit cheap to me unless the dosage is something like daily. But, I don't think they collect it fast enough to support that frequency.

---
My bracket looked like random picks compared to his.
Congrats to azuarc for winning the GotD 2020 Guru Contest!
... Copied to Clipboard!
colliding
12/21/22 9:48:18 AM
#16:


feels like this movie really resisted exploring some of its own philosophy

what made the first film at least kind of interesting, and where it got its name, is the whole "avatar" concept. your soul piloting the blue robot bodies. now that jake sully is fully na'vi, this whole concept basically gets dropped. avatar 2 features the bad guy from the last one - who is actually dead - by having his cloud-saved soul uploaded into the blue body, x-men style. the movie never really explores this idea. I feel like the subtle theme here might be that "our children become avatars for our souls" but this is not explored deeply enough.

---
while you slept, the world changed
... Copied to Clipboard!
ChaosTonyV4
12/21/22 9:50:06 AM
#17:


Also, why do they considered him Outcast and like they are oblivious to what happened when apparently so many Na'vi went to battle and died also? Do they really think thus one tulkun murdered an entire herd of his fellows and all them na'vi as well? Surely someone can see they were mowed down by Sky People weapons. There is a disconnect here, which possibly has a greater realization hidden in deleted scenes.

They explain it: according to Tukkun beliefs, the fact that he attempted to kill/led everyone to kill is as good as killing.

---
Phantom Dust.
"I'll just wait for time to prove me right again." - Vlado
... Copied to Clipboard!
NoFInBadger
12/21/22 10:42:32 AM
#18:


Snoozefest sequel.

---
WWE Divas Era > Superstar Era
... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik7
12/21/22 1:41:46 PM
#19:


TeamRocketElite posted...
What happened to the Marine Biologist in the end? After I finished the movie I realized I didn't catch if he got caught up in all the people getting killed at the end.

Yeah, it sound a bit cheap to me unless the dosage is something like daily. But, I don't think they collect it fast enough to support that frequency.
Even if it's daily, look at the amount of tech, manpower, and etc used. That's not even counting transportation and the entire operation. There is simply no way that supports the entire operation as he stated. Either a vial has to be 70 billion a pop and that's an oopsie, or they are getting tons of vials per tulkun, or they have massive, massive, massive other ventures going on. Or there was a massive money crunch to deflate costs on earth.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)
... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik7
12/21/22 1:44:12 PM
#20:


ChaosTonyV4 posted...
They explain it: according to Tukkun beliefs, the fact that he attempted to kill/led everyone to kill is as good as killing.
Pretty sure this isn't true. I am pretty sure they thought he killed the other tulkuns. Like, Lo'ak after bonding wants to go to the chieftain and explain this and the daughter of the chieftain says her father will understand if he does, and he is not allowed to.

The whole thing was that he was wrongly outcast. In your scenario, he was appropriately outcast. Which doesn't line up with the movie. I'm not saying 100% you are wrong, but I think you are.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)
... Copied to Clipboard!
ChaosTonyV4
12/21/22 1:51:28 PM
#21:


No, the whole thing is that he was properly outcast but the son doesnt understand/agree with it.

The scene where after he bonds with him (where he sees what happened) and does try to plead his case, he says like you dont understand, he didnt actually kill anyone and the chieftain is like this proves you are the one who doesnt understand.

---
Phantom Dust.
"I'll just wait for time to prove me right again." - Vlado
... Copied to Clipboard!
Grand_Kirby
12/21/22 2:41:50 PM
#22:


LightningStrikes posted...
I have a question for those who have seen the film.

I will go with my family next week. Should I see it in 3D or Dolby 3D with the high framerate? I have heard mixed things about the use of HFR, so any opinions would be welcome. For what its worth this would be at the cinema Cameron and Landau tuned the film using so maybe that would give a better experience.
I saw it in IMAX 3D with HFR and I think it was absolutely worth it, to the point that I don't think it's worth seeing it in any other way. The best parts of the movie were the visual spectacle, so it's worth going all out. There are a few caveats though...

First, a lot of the average movie-going public generally finds high frame rates to be weird or cheap looking (mainly because it's associated with soap operas). For people who play a lot of video games and are used to high FPS it shouldn't be a problem, but if you're going with family who may not have that experience they may not enjoy it.

Second it should be noted that only parts of the movie are HFR. Some of it is in 48 FPS, some of it is 24 FPS doubled, and some of it is straight up still in 24 FPS(!!). It would only be mildly jarring to see it switch frame rates throughout the the film, but there are some scenes where the FPS changes depending on the camera shot, causing it to swap multiple times in a minute, and it's really distracting. I would still say it's worth going to see it in HFR anyway, but it's important to be prepared for that because it might bother you.

---
Okay, I rolled a 14. What's that mean? Hsu
That you're a cheater. This is a 12-sided die. Chan
... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik7
12/21/22 2:47:07 PM
#23:


ChaosTonyV4 posted...
No, the whole thing is that he was properly outcast but the son doesnt understand/agree with it.

The scene where after he bonds with him (where he sees what happened) and does try to plead his case, he says like you dont understand, he didnt actually kill anyone and the chieftain is like this proves you are the one who doesnt understand.
I don't remember that scene the way you say it, but it also ignores that the entire group attacked them along with Na'vi. Just they were mercilessly slaughtered. How can he be an outcast because he survived?

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)
... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik7
12/21/22 2:48:42 PM
#24:


Grand_Kirby posted...
I saw it in IMAX 3D with HFR and I think it was absolutely worth it, to the point that I don't think it's worth seeing it in any other way. The best parts of the movie were the visual spectacle, so it's worth going all out. There are a few caveats though...

First, a lot of the average movie-going public generally finds high frame rates to be weird or cheap looking (mainly because it's associated with soap operas). For people who play a lot of video games and are used to high FPS it shouldn't be a problem, but if you're going with family who may not have that experience they may not enjoy it.

Second it should be noted that only parts of the movie are HFR. Some of it is in 48 FPS, some of it is 24 FPS doubled, and some of it is straight up still in 24 FPS(!!). It would only be mildly jarring to see it switch frame rates throughout the the film, but there are some scenes where the FPS changes depending on the camera shot, causing it to swap multiple times in a minute, and it's really distracting. I would still say it's worth going to see it in HFR anyway, but it's important to be prepared for that because it might bother you.
The people complaining the most about HFR are specifically from gaming forums. They are the ones who can actually notice the frame rate switches while the general public don't notice it.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)
... Copied to Clipboard!
TeamRocketElite
12/21/22 5:15:11 PM
#25:


Regarding the outcast

The Tukkun way is not fighting back ever. Not even against groups that are actively trying to murder you and your family. Lo'ak is not on board with this. He thinks that the outcast shouldn't be thrown out since he was doing it in self defense. The water chief does not agree with Lo'ak's view. He sees the outcast attacking the humans as no different than being responsible for killing other Tukkun itself.

I'm not entirely sure how this view make sense since the water chief is totally okay with his Na'vi people killing the attackers to protect the Tukkun. It just isn't okay when a Tukkun does it.

The outcast Tukkun then shows up during the final battles and is mostly portrayed as a hero for doing the same thing it did before and killing humans to protect its friends. In universe this leads to nothing. I don't think the movie actually addressed what the characters thought of the outcast killing more humans in violation of the Tukkun way. The outcast's role was simply done after it help saved Jake from drowning.

---
My bracket looked like random picks compared to his.
Congrats to azuarc for winning the GotD 2020 Guru Contest!
... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik7
12/21/22 5:53:53 PM
#26:


TeamRocketElite posted...
Regarding the outcast

The Tukkun way is not fighting back ever. Not even against groups that are actively trying to murder you and your family. Lo'ak is not on board with this. He thinks that the outcast shouldn't be thrown out since he was doing it in self defense. The water chief does not agree with Lo'ak's view. He sees the outcast attacking the humans as no different than being responsible for killing other Tukkun itself.

I'm not entirely sure how this view make sense since the water chief is totally okay with his Na'vi people killing the attackers to protect the Tukkun. It just isn't okay when a Tukkun does it.

The outcast Tukkun then shows up during the final battles and is mostly portrayed as a hero for doing the same thing it did before and killing humans to protect its friends. In universe this leads to nothing. I don't think the movie actually addressed what the characters thought of the outcast killing more humans in violation of the Tukkun way. The outcast's role was simply done after it help saved Jake from drowning.
The tulkan were fighting as a group with Na'vi against the whalers in the bonding scene and were crushed. It wasn't just Payakan that fought back. This would ignore that Na'vi, presumably Metkayina or some other ocean group fought and the other tulkan itself. Was the entire group going to be considered outcast?

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)
... Copied to Clipboard!
TeamRocketElite
12/21/22 6:03:38 PM
#27:


I don't recall the flashback scene well enough to say if the other Tulkun were helping to fight or not. But, if they were I think they all get thrown out. For what it is worth, the Tulkun losing makes more sense if they weren't really fighting back. It doesn't seem like they should lose if a herd of them got serious about defending. So are you sure you are remembering it correctly?

I also recall that the head poacher guy at one point explicitly mentioned that in all of his hunts the Tulkun never, ever, ever fight back. He is literally chasing them down and murdering them and they never fight back. So Payakan (and maybe his allies?) fighting back is definitely abnormal behavior.

---
My bracket looked like random picks compared to his.
Congrats to azuarc for winning the GotD 2020 Guru Contest!
... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik7
12/21/22 6:06:21 PM
#28:


TeamRocketElite posted...
I don't recall the flashback scene well enough to say if the other Tulkun were helping to fight or not. But, if they were I think they all get thrown out. For what it is worth, the Tulkun losing makes more sense if they weren't really fighting back. It doesn't seem like they should lose if a herd of them got serious about defending. So are you sure you are remembering it correctly?

I also recall that the head poacher guy at one point explicitly mentioned that in all of his hunts the Tulkun never, ever, ever fight back. He is literally chasing them down and murdering them and they never fight back. So Payakan (and maybe his allies?) fighting back is definitely abnormal behavior.
I assumed this was a long time ago and possibly before this specific whaler. The scene to my memory was na'vi with weapons on their warrior steeds charging towards the ship with a bunch of tulkun in a group rushing it, and they simply are unloaded on and blown up in a massacre. He survives with wounds.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)
... Copied to Clipboard!
Seanchan
12/25/22 11:03:20 PM
#29:


I saw this a few days ago, just a regular showing. Havent seen the original in a number of years, so all I remembered were the general story beats.

I enjoyed the sequel quite a bit. I was invested and found the world building to be interesting. In particular, the whale hunting scene was really well done. Then I kind of soured on it a bit with the ending parts, where it devolved, as these big budget movies tend to do, into a prolonged action sequence where lots of throwaway characters die because violence is an easy sell. Someone, please explain to me why they didnt just dive and swim beneath the burning surface?!? No, instead lets go back to the sinking ship. Where did the Chief of the seater Navi go? Where did his son go? It didnt ruin the movie, but it certainly didnt stick the landing either.

---
"That was unnecessarily dramatic". - NY Mets motto (courtesy of InnerTubeHero)
Congratulations to azuarc, the guru of gurus and winner of GotD 2020!
... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik7
12/26/22 4:31:23 PM
#30:


How could they possibly know how far that fire extended out

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)
... Copied to Clipboard!
Seanchan
12/26/22 7:12:19 PM
#31:


Corrik7 posted...
How could they possibly know how far that fire extended out

They could hold their breath a pretty fucking long time! Think about how long they were holding it to navigate the ship!

---
"That was unnecessarily dramatic". - NY Mets motto (courtesy of InnerTubeHero)
Congratulations to azuarc, the guru of gurus and winner of GotD 2020!
... Copied to Clipboard!
Forceful_Dragon
12/26/22 7:47:00 PM
#32:


TeamRocketElite posted...
I believe Jake expected Spider to give up their location and this would cause a lot of danger for everyone there including his family. So he decided to run. As it turns out, Spider never breaks so the forest would have remained mostly safe. The new location isn't as well defended but the idea was to not be found in the first place.

The part I didn't get is why the sky people bothered chasing Jake. After Jake ran, the attacks on the sky people would have become far less damaging. On the off chance they didn't, that means Jake wasn't the real problem anyways.

This was the big thing for me. Ostensibly the only reason they were concerned with Jake wss because he was causing all their problems. No Jake? No problem! Who cares if he buggered off to an island, that means he's not blowing up trains anymore!

That was the kind of faulty logic that takes me out of things.

That's completely ignoring the fact that they completely diverted away from the terrible "Unobtanium" resource which was supposed to have been their entire reason for coming to Pandora in the first place. They replaced one terrible justification for another with the cartoonishly evil space whale brain juices that somehow.prevent aging?

---
~C~ FD
http://i.imgur.com/dGDfxaw.png
... Copied to Clipboard!
TeamRocketElite
12/26/22 8:40:46 PM
#33:


Forceful_Dragon posted...


This was the big thing for me. Ostensibly the only reason they were concerned with Jake wss because he was causing all their problems. No Jake? No problem! Who cares if he buggered off to an island, that means he's not blowing up trains anymore!

That was the kind of faulty logic that takes me out of things.

That's completely ignoring the fact that they completely diverted away from the terrible "Unobtanium" resource which was supposed to have been their entire reason for coming to Pandora in the first place. They replaced one terrible justification for another with the cartoonishly evil space whale brain juices that somehow.prevent aging?



I don't think the issue was as bad as I initally thought it was. The sky people don't find out that Jake ran until a decent bit into the movie and they don't know he is done with the war itself. Like Jake could very well be visiting other villages to solicite for new allies to join the fight. Also, the sky people military aren't really comitting much in terms of resources to the search. It was a small hit team that hired out the poacher guys to help. It's mostly the poacher guys that got wrecked when the mission fell apart.

I don't really mind the magic brain juice. It's a reasonable enough justification on why people might kill. Although, they didn't have to be cartoonishly evil with the killing.

---
My bracket looked like random picks compared to his.
Congrats to azuarc for winning the GotD 2020 Guru Contest!
... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik7
12/26/22 9:23:57 PM
#34:


Seanchan posted...
They could hold their breath a pretty fucking long time! Think about how long they were holding it to navigate the ship!
The children knew how to breathe better in the water than the parents but still they were not as good as the metkayina nor as fast.

Problem with going under the fire is what if you get pretty far underneath it and realize you can't clear it. Then you're screwed cuz you can't go back up.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)
... Copied to Clipboard!
Seanchan
12/26/22 9:28:42 PM
#35:


Corrik7 posted...
The children knew how to breathe better in the water than the parents but still they were not as good as the metkayina nor as fast.

Problem with going under the fire is what if you get pretty far underneath it and realize you can't clear it. Then you're screwed cuz you can't go back up.

Yes I understand your point. From the viewers perspective, it didnt look like that fire was that extensive. It was really just one of those things that broke my suspension of disbelief, in a movie that otherwise managed to hold it together pretty well.

---
"That was unnecessarily dramatic". - NY Mets motto (courtesy of InnerTubeHero)
Congratulations to azuarc, the guru of gurus and winner of GotD 2020!
... Copied to Clipboard!
Grand_Kirby
12/26/22 9:43:53 PM
#36:


The whole "why did they spend so much energy specifically going after Jake" makes perfect sense to me.

When I was watching the movie I thought that, and then immediately decided it wasn't a plot hole. Jake's victory in the first movie was an embarrassing defeat for them and I'm 100% positive the military would waste time and countless amounts of money to hunt him down and kill him just for the revenge and the symbolic victory over him, even if it wasn't helpful strategically at all. I think Jake Sully is to them what Osama Bin Laden was to the United States. Nothing better to drive up morale for the troops than to be able to say "We got 'em!"


---
Okay, I rolled a 14. What's that mean? Hsu
That you're a cheater. This is a 12-sided die. Chan
... Copied to Clipboard!
masterplum
12/29/22 12:36:38 PM
#37:


I have a lot of issues with the movie, but why go after Jake sully isn't one of them.

Also having said that, a week later I kinda want to see the third movie for some reason. Guess I'm just invested in the blue people

---
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BdWiElvIQAAQpBt.jpg
... Copied to Clipboard!
XIII_Rocks
12/30/22 4:22:06 PM
#38:


Jesus some of this acting is awful

---
Not to be confused with XIII_Minerals.
... Copied to Clipboard!
NFUN
12/30/22 4:37:33 PM
#39:


go back to the bathroom

---
Kneel... or you will be knelt
... Copied to Clipboard!
XIII_Rocks
12/30/22 4:52:27 PM
#40:


I might

---
Not to be confused with XIII_Minerals.
... Copied to Clipboard!
XIII_Rocks
12/30/22 6:16:24 PM
#41:


Won me over a little in the third act, but if the running time on the next one is over 2:30 I won't watch. And that's being generous. What a fucking slog.

I did think however that it doesn't matter how much I like that movie because there was no way I could ever like it more than it liked itself. The sheer fartsniffery of it made me lose my mind. It hasn't been that blatant to me since The Revenant (and that was still a much better movie)

Also worth repeating that the acting was really questionable from almost everyone, didn't much care for the dialogue, and Worthington's Australian accent kept slipping through quite obviously I thought

---
Not to be confused with XIII_Minerals.
... Copied to Clipboard!
scarletspeed7
12/30/22 6:19:25 PM
#42:


Just finished it, and I don't detect anything resembling

XIII_Rocks posted...


I did think however that it doesn't matter how much I like that movie because there was no way I could ever like it more than it liked itself.

at all.

Rather straight-forward film. There was nothing bad about, nothing spectacular. Just a bog standard story, aside from the four minutes of Jemaine Clement, which I think they could have woven into something rather interesting. There was something in that character which I found fascinating, but it was cast aside pretty quickly.

---
"It is too easy being monsters. Let us try to be human." ~Victor Frankenstein, Penny Dreadful
... Copied to Clipboard!
XIII_Rocks
12/30/22 6:26:24 PM
#43:


The entire middle section was bloated by "look how good this looks" stuff imo

It just felt extremely impressed with itself. Though in fairness my feeling toward it was through the floor at that point so every bit of bloat just served to aggravate me further

I agree that the story was bog standard - and yet he wrung over 3h out of it. It's probably a good 2h movie, 2:15 if I'm being generous.

---
Not to be confused with XIII_Minerals.
... Copied to Clipboard!
XIII_Rocks
12/30/22 6:35:52 PM
#44:


TeamRocketElite posted...
Yeah, it sound a bit cheap to me unless the dosage is something like daily. But, I don't think they collect it fast enough to support that frequency.

Oh yeah this was extremely minor but that felt like a low number to me too

---
Not to be confused with XIII_Minerals.
... Copied to Clipboard!
neonreaper
01/08/23 7:25:54 PM
#45:


I thought it was a good movie, but everyone was a bit worn down afterward.


---
Donny: Are they gonna hurt us, Walter?
Walter: No, Donny. These men are cowards.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Mr_Lasastryke
01/16/23 4:43:56 PM
#46:


i finally saw this.

i may have liked it a little better than the first one? the story wasn't as paper thin. i liked how they made quaritch a bit more complex in this one, for instance.

the pacing was definitely better in the first one, though. this movie really didn't need to be over 3 hours long.

---
Geothermal terpsichorean ejectamenta
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1