Current Events > Israel bombs AP, BBC office in Gaza

(+) Yeah! (+)

King_Hellebuyck posted...

So Broseph is defending this bombing just like everyone said he was

Yeah. They could be Hamas.
---

"It's ok to bomb civilian buildings because they gave warning. Only terrorists are still there."

I guess all the dead innocent people America has killed in the Middle East are justified too. You have to crack a few eggs to make an omelette. Maybe we should just bomb literally the entire Middle East to make sure we really cover every potential hiding spot. As long as we announce the bombing beforehand, we're cool.

---

Orchestrion posted...

Are you saying that Hamas operates out of the Associated Press and BBC News offices?

Absolutely. Anything that would make a good headline is fair game to them, schools, hospitals, offices, etc. They know people like you will fall for it every single time.

sktgamer_13dude posted...

This Palestinian might be a part of Hamas so might as well bomb them all. - Broseph

No one was harmed in this bombing.

sktgamer_13dude posted...

Yeah. They could be Hamas.

I fucking hate to defend Israel, but do you really think Israel just discriminated fires missiles into Hamas?

If so, why dont they just target the most populated areas, and go for the largest amounts of destruction possible?

---

Its incredible that a real person is like this

---

Imaging defending terrorism

Posting literal Zionist propaganda to defend legitimate war crimes. This is confirming what everyone already knew...you are 100% a right winger.

---

Samurontai posted...

I fucking hate to defend Israel, but do you really think Israel just discriminated fires missiles into Hamas?

If so, why dont they just target the most populated areas, and go for the largest amounts of destruction possible?

He knows Hamas was operating out of that building dude, he just doesn't want to admit he was initially wrong about it.

This is what media sensationalism does to people.

Samurontai posted...

I fucking hate to defend Israel

I dont believe you because this is exactly what youve been doing throughout multiple topics.


---

Orchestrion posted...

Posting literal Zionist propaganda to defend legitimate war crimes. This is confirming what everyone already knew...you are 100% a right winger.

If it was propaganda you'd be able to answer the question of where Hamas operates from.

But you can't.

hockeybub89 posted...

"It's ok to bomb civilian buildings because they gave warning. Only terrorists are still there."

I guess all the dead innocent people America has killed in the Middle East are justified too. You have to crack a few eggs to make an omelette. Maybe we should just bomb literally the entire Middle East to make sure we really cover every potential hiding spot. As long as we announce the bombing beforehand, we're cool.

The Middle East countries were firing rockets over the border into America? Does Israel really have zero rights to defend itself, at all? Im incredibly confused

Like yeah, Israel mercing journalist, and sterilizing Africans is obviously horrible, but precision strikes in retaliation to attacks, with (usually) minimal casualties really isnt awful

---

Broseph_Stalin posted...

If it was propaganda you'd be able to answer the question of where Hamas operates from.

But you can't.

Can you point me to definitive proof that Hamas was operating out of the Associated Press and BBC offices? Or are you just regurgitating propaganda to defend war crimes?

---

Orchestrion posted...

I dont believe you because this is exactly what youve been doing throughout multiple topics.

This is the only topic Ive posted in on the matter lmao.

why do people say this, without actually going into actual topics? Ive condemned Israel plenty of times in the past. Its kind of hard for me to sit there and be like Just let them shoot rockets at you guys, jfc

Thats ridiculous.

---

Orchestrion posted...

Can you point me to definitive proof that Hamas was operating out of the Associated Press and BBC offices? Or are you just regurgitating propaganda to defend war crimes?

Youre asking him for government intelligence, from a country that he probably doesnt even live in

Whats wrong with you

---

Every single post Ive seen from you on this subject is Yeah I guess theyre bad but theyre also doing some good things too

---

Samurontai posted...

I fucking hate to defend Israel, but do you really think Israel just discriminated fires missiles into Hamas?

If so, why dont they just target the most populated areas, and go for the largest amounts of destruction possible?

pretty sure hes just mocking Broseph here.

a good question is why those targets though. Why the media specifically?

No one died sure but that doesnt mean theres no impact here. So why the media?

---

Samurontai posted...

Youre asking him for government intelligence, from a country that he probably doesnt even live in

Whats wrong with you

Hes doing the exact same thing. This isnt helping your Im not defending Israels actions case at all if youre not able to see the contradictions in his arguments.

---

This bombing was blatantly to reduce the ability for the press to cover events as they transpire. Or is the AP and BBC really just Hamas in disguise?

---

Idk when Sam went from good poster to "I'm going to defend Israeli apartheid and condemn people who criticize a poster who denies the Holocaust"

---

Orchestrion posted...

Every single post Ive seen from you on this subject is Yeah I guess theyre bad but theyre also doing some good things too

Ive never once even remotely came close to saying They are also doing some good things too

I think you have me confused with another poster

Zeeak4444 posted...

pretty sure hes just mocking Broseph here.

a good question is why those targets though. Why the media specifically?

No one died sure but that doesnt mean theres no impact here. So why the media?

Yeah, thats why in my original post, I said I wouldnt put it past them claiming to have a reason and just doing it lol. Israel has a hate boner for the media, so who knows really


---

Orchestrion posted...

Can you point me to definitive proof that Hamas was operating out of the Associated Press and BBC offices? Or are you just regurgitating propaganda to defend war crimes?

"Point me to definitive proof that a group that routinely operates from civilian centers was operating from civilian centers"

Orchestrion posted...

Hes doing the exact same thing. This isnt helping your Im not defending Israels actions case at all if youre not able to see the contradictions in his arguments.

hes pretty much saying he has 100% faith in the government to make the right decisions. Whew lad, thats a hell of a position.

---

Did the AP and BBC know Hamas was operating out of their buildings? Does that mean Broseph just exposed them as sponsors of terrorism? They sound pretty shocked that their buildings weren't still their buildings. You'd think the fucking news would have news that their own buildings have been taken over.

Why can't he just hate both sides like a normal fucking person?

---

SothaSil posted...

Idk when Sam went from good poster to "I'm going to defend Israeli apartheid and condemn people who criticize a poster who denies the Holocaust"

Samurontai posted...

Israel mercing journalists, and sterilizing Africans is obviously horrible

Okay


---

Broseph_Stalin posted...

"Point me to definitive proof that a group that routinely operates from civilian centers was operating from civilian centers"

So again someone 100% trusting of the Israels government.

You do you then.

---

Samurontai posted...

But I do agree that most people refuse to acknowledge that Israel does indeed warn before they strike, to give civilians time to leave

Samurontai posted...

but precision strikes in retaliation to attacks, with (usually) minimal casualties really isnt awful

Samurontai posted...

I fucking hate to defend Israel, but do you really think Israel just discriminated fires missiles into Hamas?

---

Orchestrion posted...

Hes doing the exact same thing. This isnt helping your Im not defending Israels actions case at all if youre not able to see the contradictions in his arguments.

You know what, thats a fair point lol. I retract that statement

---

hockeybub89 posted...

Did the AP and BBC know Hamas was operating out of their buildings? Does that mean Broseph just exposed them as sponsors of terrorism? They sound pretty shocked that their buildings weren't still their buildings. You'd think the fucking news would have news that their own buildings have been taken over.

Why can't he just hate both sides like a normal fucking person?

it makes you wonder eh.

---

@Orchestrion

is anything I said in any of those post actually wrong?

Israels strikes (usually) result in minimal casualties and are retaliatory strikes

and Israel does indeed give warning before they strike

What is wrong with those two statements?

---

Broseph_Stalin posted...

"Point me to definitive proof that a group that routinely operates from civilian centers was operating from civilian centers"

Its so weird how you pretended you werent defending the press being bombed

---

Accusing The Assoctiated Press and BBC News of sponsoring terrorism with no proof whatsoever and defending the bombing of their offices #JustZionistThings

---

stop feeding the most boring neolib in the universe

---

Zeeak4444 posted...

So again someone 100% trusting of the Israels government.

I trust Hamas to do what they always do. There's no reason for them not to, people like you fall for it every time.

King_Hellebuyck posted...

Its so weird how you pretended you werent defending the press being bombed

A building that Hamas was operating out of was bombed. The press was unharmed.

I have to say, if the goal was to attack journalists, it would be weird to warn them first.

So, like, from the beginning, framing this as trying to off journalists is strange.

---

COVxy posted...

I have to say, if the goal was to attack journalists, it would be weird to warn them first.

So, like, from the beginning, framing this as trying to off journalists is strange.

Broseph_Stalin posted...

He knows Hamas was operating out of that building dude, he just doesn't want to admit he was initially wrong about it.

This is what media sensationalism does to people.

COVxy posted...

I have to say, if the goal was to attack journalists, it would be weird to warn them first.

So, like, from the beginning, framing this as trying to off journalists is strange.

How is it strange

destroying offices and equipment still crippled the ability to report news

---

Orchestrion posted...

Accusing The Assoctiated Press and BBC News of sponsoring terrorism with no proof whatsoever and defending the bombing of their offices #JustZionistThings

I never made that claim at all, and I specifically said that I wouldnt put it past Israel to take out the media under false pretenses


---

Samurontai posted...

I never made that claim at all, and I specifically said that I wouldnt put it past Israel to take out the media under false pretenses

Im not talking about you, obviously.

---

Broseph_Stalin posted...

The press was unharmed.

People may not have been harmed but the press was very clearly harmed, as the AP already stated.

COVxy posted...

I have to say, if the goal was to attack journalists, it would be weird to warn them first.

So, like, from the beginning, framing this as trying to off journalists is strange.

Youre conflating journalists as people with the press as in the presss ability to do their jobs and report the facts.

---

COVxy posted...

I have to say, if the goal was to attack journalists, it would be weird to warn them first.

So, like, from the beginning, framing this as trying to off journalists is strange.

Ah, you must be a Zionist

/s

---

I love how broseph is ignoring the posts asking about if this means that the BBC and AP were sheltering hamas and are sponsors of terrorism because hes afraid to answer it

King_Hellebuyck posted...

People may not have been harmed but the press was very clearly harmed, as the AP already stated

Yeah but what does the AP know about the press

It also was not clear why the military took down an entire building filled with media offices and residential apartments. The military has carried out scores of pinpoint airstrikes, including in the current round of fighting, that targeted single floors and even single apartments.

In case anyone really wants to keep pulling the "Hamas was hiding there!" card to justify blowing the whole fucking building down.

---

DezDroppedFreak posted...

How is it strange

destroying offices and equipment still crippled the ability to report news

Does it though? Pretty much all the necessary equipment necessary for journalism is routinely held in the pocket now-a-days. Which is why so much breaking news is effectively disseminated through twitter. If the argument is trying to create a media blackout, they're doing a shitty job.

Like maybe you could argue that this is an attempt to demoralize them by destroying their office space and stuff, but that's a stretch?

---

Sapphrodite posted...

I love how broseph is ignoring the posts asking about if this means that the BBC and AP were sheltering hamas and are sponsors of terrorism because hes afraid to answer it

Where on Earth did I make this claim? It's an office building with multiple tenants. Hamas was one of them.

Broseph_Stalin posted...

The press was unharmed.

They have to rebuild their offices. Id call that harmed.
---

COVxy posted...

Does it though? Pretty much all the necessary equipment necessary for journalism is routinely held in the pocket now-a-days. Which is why so much breaking news is effectively disseminated through twitter. If the argument is trying to create a media blackout, they're doing a shitty job.

Like maybe you could argue that this is an attempt to demoralize them by destroying their office space and stuff, but that's a stretch?

Why do you think the AP is lying?

https://twitter.com/samya_kullab/status/1393571863889162241

---

COVxy posted...

I have to say, if the goal was to attack journalists, it would be weird to warn them first.

So, like, from the beginning, framing this as trying to off journalists is strange.

As Saudi Arabia showed, killing western journalists is the one thing that can draw actual consternation to your actions.

---

COVxy posted...

Does it though? Pretty much all the necessary equipment necessary for journalism is routinely held in the pocket now-a-days. Which is why so much breaking news is effectively disseminated through twitter. If the argument is trying to create a media blackout, they're doing a shitty job.

Like maybe you could argue that this is an attempt to demoralize them by destroying their office space and stuff, but that's a stretch?

How does destroying press equipment and space actually hinder the press? is certainly an argument


---

COVxy posted...

Does it though? Pretty much all the necessary equipment necessary for journalism is routinely held in the pocket now-a-days. Which is why so much breaking news is effectively disseminated through twitter. If the argument is trying to create a media blackout, they're doing a shitty job.

Like maybe you could argue that this is an attempt to demoralize them by destroying their office space and stuff, but that's a stretch?

Im gonna guess pretty much anyone whos against less information being available is going to disagree with this.

Its a ridiculous notion to assume the press having their phones means they can just go right back to reporting lol.

no big deal guys, we all got smartphones now.


---