Poll of the Day > Taco Bell Girl is FIRED cause a CUSTOMER saw her doing PORN online!! She Hot???

(+) Yeah! (+)

Lonna Wells from Arkansas, who described herself as DIRTY LITTLE MILF said she was FIRED from her job at TACO BELL because a CHRISTIAN CUSTOMER recognized her on a PORN VIDEO online as well as on a popular PORN site made famous by Bella Thorne!!

She started working at a fast food joint to help pay her bills during the pandemic as the porn industry was in shambles and was fired by the chain after a "God fearing customer" complained and blew the whistle on her!!.

She started working in Newport when the pandemic brought her work as an adult film actress to a halt and wanted to provide for her husband and kids so she picked up shifts

She told the Daily Beast about her career when she was hired and they assured her it was no problem..until less than a week in, a customer complained about her on that site as it's unclear how they knew her or if someone told them

She was left in the dark and said "They coudln'te ven given me a heads up or waited until i got there to say something. I just started bawling. I don't know if it was because i was upset or i ws ticked or a little bit of both"

She put in 9 hour shifts a day when she worked there but said work slowed down even in the porn industry but still had her fanpage to make extra income

Taco Bell didn't respond to dailymail for requests

Is Lonna Hot?

https://i.imgur.com/ZJ4HGxz.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/d4yJvba.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/ihE6scu.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/EVuHy3h.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/zbg1wYc.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/izgHtvr.jpg
---

This is probably more of a commentary on Taco Bell paying a wage nobody can live on... she's not hurting anybody.

Can't be much of a Christian if he's looking at porn.
---

Revelation34 posted...

Can't be much of a Christian if he's looking at porn.

He was only looking at the porn parts of the internet to get directions away from them!

Revelation34 posted...

Can't be much of a Christian if he's looking at porn.

Nah they just stow away all their energy until a kid goes to the wrong pew

---

Yellow posted...

Nah they just stow away all their energy until a kid goes to the wrong pew

It's crazy how different one church can be to another when you'd think they'd follow the same principles. Talking to a guy here, he left one Lutheran church to go to another Lutheran church because one was basically hate mongering and the replacement church was love mongering. How does this happen?! (people suck, but yeah)

She does porn, and yet ducky couldn't get a pic that actually shows her body. Can't even vote.

And that's bs, it's fucking Taco Bell, who cares if she does porn as long as it's not being filmed at Taco Bell?

It's a shame that coward didn't actually confront her directly about it. Would've been great to have her deny it and demand that he specify exactly where he found said videos. Just REALLY incriminate himself as a perv in Christian wool. Publicly.

Raddest_Chad posted...

This is probably more of a commentary on Taco Bell paying a wage nobody can live on... she's not hurting anybody.

Or more a commentary on porn's terrible pay and competitive nature where she's stuck having to take a job at Taco Bell as well. Granted, her lack of success might come down to the fact she's not terribly attractive.

Raddest_Chad posted...

He was only looking at the porn parts of the internet to get directions away from them!

tbh, I wanted to make that joke as well.

streamofthesky posted... She does porn, and yet ducky couldn't get a pic that actually shows her body. Can't even vote.

I should probably have abstained for the same reason, but I felt like I saw enough to render a tentative verdict.

streamofthesky posted... And that's bs, it's fucking Taco Bell, who cares if she does porn as long as it's not being filmed at Taco Bell?

Taco Bell cares? Many -- if not most -- companies have clauses in their employment agreements about this kind of stuff.

---

Sounds more like a self-hate kind of thing. Not sure why youd report someone for doing something that obviously entertains you.

---

zebatov posted...

Sounds more like a self-hate kind of thing. Not sure why youd report someone for doing something that obviously entertains you.

Or maybe the problem was they weren't entertained? >_>

---

I don't see the grounds for her to be fired?

BlackScythe0 posted...

I don't see the grounds for her to be fired?

Prudish people run companies.
---

BlackScythe0 posted...

I don't see the grounds for her to be fired?

maybe there's a non-compete claus in her employment contract

Not wife material, but I'd probably smash.

---

Zeus posted...

Or maybe the problem was they weren't entertained? >_>

simp got denied marriage

Average sadly.

---

How would the customer possibly know she did porn? There are thousands upon thousands of girls on that site.

---

BlackScythe0 posted...

I don't see the grounds for her to be fired?

Try reading the fine print when you take a job some time.

LuciferSage posted...

Not wife material,

She's got a kid, she works... err, worked at Taco Bell, and she does porn. It's kind of a given that you wouldn't want to marry her >_>

---

What a cheesy situation. I don't know what that customer's beef is with porn, but lettuce leave these underpaid employees alone. Otherwise it's a wrap for her income

---

Zeus posted...

Taco Bell cares? Many -- if not most -- companies have clauses in their employment agreements about this kind of stuff.

Generally speaking, people asking "who cares?" in this sort of context are not literally asking which specific entities have an opinion on this, but rather asking why anyone feels this is worth caring about to the point of compromising somebody's livelihood. The question is not "does Taco Bell have a clause in their employment agreement about this," it's "*should* Taco Bell have such a clause?".

---

Would a man have been fired?

Also, there was already enough reason to not support taco bell, but this ugly sexism and sex shaming is disgusting.

Also, not hot. Also, the reporting customer watches too much porn.

---

SunWuKung420 posted...

Also, there was already enough reason to not support taco bell, but this ugly sexism and sex shaming is disgusting.

To be fair, Taco Bell is very much not unique in this. The culture of "you did porn we don't want to be associated with you" is extremely pervasive, such that many companies will do the same thing. I feel that society is starting to get a clue in that regard, but corporations are lagging behind because they don't want to risk the potential bad PR of pissing off a customer that still cares.

SunWuKung420 posted...

Would a man have been fired?

Were the situation exactly the same aside from the employee's sex? Probably. In practice, though, hypothetically changing the sex of the employee also requires a cascade of other changes in order to keep the hypothetical situation plausible, all of which would likely amount to a different outcome. Some examples:

-If the employee were male and the customer that complained were a gay male, odds are he wouldn't have complained because the LGBT generally has a lot less of the Christian fundamentalist sex-negativity that drove the customer to complain in the first place

-If the employee were male and the customer were female, her watching porn (much less admitting to it so publicly) would be less likely because Christian fundamentalist sex-negativity is generally much less permissive of women acting on or speaking about their sexuality than it is of men doing the same thing, so the customer likely either wouldn't have been aware of the porn or wouldn't have been comfortable acknowledging that she were

-If the employee were male, regardless of the sex/orientation of the customer, because Christian fundamentalist sex-negativity is generally a lot more permissive of men acting on their sexuality than women, a fundie customer would be less likely to take issue with the fact that he did porn, making it less likely that the customer would have complained

Et cetera. It's not implausible that the dude might end up fired anyway, but it's not so simple a situation that you can just swap the sex of the employee and not expect anything else to change. Sexism is generally a lot more complex and nuanced than "men=good women=bad."

---

Cant trust those images, need full undoctored body shots

---

porn is illegal outside of CA
that's why she got fired


---

adjl posted...

Generally speaking, people asking "who cares?" in this sort of context are not literally asking which specific entities have an opinion on this, but rather asking why anyone feels this is worth caring about to the point of compromising somebody's livelihood. The question is not "does Taco Bell have a clause in their employment agreement about this," it's "*should* Taco Bell have such a clause?".

Generally speaking, "who cares?" is asked as a shitty rhetorical question because usually people clearly care and have good reason to do so. Companies have to worry about their reputation and the conduct of their employees can very negatively impact that reputation. And as you, he, and everybody else has seen in the past decades, companies are very frequently put on the hook for their employees' controversial behavior.

---

Zeus posted...

Generally speaking, "who cares?" is asked as a shitty rhetorical question because usually people clearly care and have good reason to do so. Companies have to worry about their reputation and the conduct of their employees can very negatively impact that reputation. And as you, he, and everybody else has seen in the past decades, companies are very frequently put on the hook for their employees' controversial behavior.

I think the deeper issue here is still the demonization of porn. Should this be a good reason for dismissal? Why is this such a controversy? I'm willing to bet that the people who fired her probably watch porn, which makes something about this seem hypocritical. How much can it really negatively impact taco bells business that this lady is in some obscure porn anyway?

GunslingerGunsl posted...

I think the deeper issue here is still the demonization of porn.

Being against sex work is one of the only issues both sides of the aisle can agree on.


---

Zeus posted...

Being against sex work is one of the only issues both sides of the aisle can agree on.

Eh, I doubt that. I think it's more complicated than just being against sex work. I don't think sex work, including porn, is ever something that's going to go away. So the issue becomes how we treat those who choose to work in it. Some people will look down on it and want to punish or dissuade people from being involved, and some will say that people should be allowed to do it if they want, and they should not be punished in any way for it.

Edit: basically anything that becomes a moral issue is going to have people at eachother's throats.

Zeus posted...

Generally speaking, "who cares?" is asked as a s***ty rhetorical question because usually people clearly care and have good reason to do so.

adjl posted...

Generally speaking, people asking "who cares?" in this sort of context are not literally asking which specific entities have an opinion on this, but rather asking why anyone feels this is worth caring about to the point of compromising somebody's livelihood.

I gave you an explicit challenge, and you fell flat on your face in a mud puddle and gurgled out the same nonsense I already addressed.

Zeus posted...

Being against sex work is one of the only issues both sides of the aisle can agree on.

Even ignoring the very obvious fact that it's really not (you do get people opposing it from both the left and right, but that opposition is very far from being unanimous), you're once again arguing with "that's just how it is" instead of actually justifying it. You should really try posting something with actual semantic value.

---

adjl posted...

I gave you an explicit challenge, and you fell flat on your face in a mud puddle and gurgled out the same nonsense I already addressed.

Your challenge fell flat on is face. Asking what's wrong with something people obviously take issue with is lazy and stupid. We don't live in a cultural vacuum. Companies don't want bad PR, so they won't stand by controversial. The fact that you personally don't agree with with either the outrage or the decision isn't an argument, it's your feelings.

adjl posted...

Even ignoring the very obvious fact that it's really not (you do get people opposing it from both the left and right, but that opposition is very far from being unanimous),

Which is silly since very few things are "unanimous." You don't even get unanimous support for most flagship issues on either side. You're just being pedantic

adjl posted...

you're once again arguing with "that's just how it is" instead of actually justifying it. You should really try posting something with actual semantic value.

And you're once again demonstrating that you don't understand humans or life on planet Earth.

---

Zeus posted...

Companies don't want bad PR, so they won't stand by controversial. The fact that you personally don't agree with with either the outrage or the decision isn't an argument, it's your feelings.

This firing is what gave them bad PR.
---

Revelation34 posted...

This firing is what gave them bad PR.

And keeping her would have given them more problems on a local level. Which do you think they care about more? Reactions from the community where people pay money for food, or outrage from internet denizens most of whom wouldn't even eat at a TB, let alone their location?

---

Zeus posted...

And keeping her would have given them more problems on a local level. Which do you think they care about more? Reactions from the community where people pay money for food, or outrage from internet denizens most of whom wouldn't even eat at a TB, let alone their location?

Old people don't tend to eat at Taco Bell compared to younger people.
---

Revelation34 posted...

Old people don't tend to eat at Taco Bell compared to younger people.

Which is a bizarre non sequitur. The person who complained to management was a customer, unlike the people bitching about the firing.

---

Zeus posted...

Which is a bizarre non sequitur. The person who complained to management was a customer, unlike the people bitching about the firing.

The people bitching about the firing have obviously eaten at a Taco Bell before. Unless they're from a foreign country without one.
---

Zeus posted...

Asking what's wrong with something people obviously take issue with is lazy and stupid.

Quite the contrary: Not asking what's wrong with something people take issue with is lazy and stupid. Asking such questions is not only reasonable, it's a fundamental, inextricable requirement for anyone looking to claim that they're thinking critically about the issue. That you're refusing to answer such questions speaks volumes about how confident you are in your position.

---