Current Events > Woman: I deserve 6 rounds of sex

(+) Yeah! (+)

https://twitter.com/xgwendyx/status/1303989114350444544

Sounds like 3 is minimum for many
https://twitter.com/Vaness__ah/status/1305975623874211843
https://twitter.com/310chink/status/1298549476483719168



---

what defines as a round of sex though?

---

---

krazychao5 posted...

what defines as a round of sex though?

One thrust

---

People are pretty sex addicted

You'll get one extended round and like it

---

krazychao5 posted...

what defines as a round of sex though?

Each time the Man cums. A lot of women dont like that the men they with does one time and is done. They are expecting several back to back.

---

She can get all the rounds she wants
---

women that need that many rounds tend to be the ones that don't experience climax through intercourse. Just go down her and finish her off and she won't need shit afterwards.

---

Yea... if I spend 30 minutes down under and another hour on myself; your knees gonna buckle after so stfu.

---

Nympho <_<

---

Back when I was like 17 and 18 I could do 6-8 rounds in an afternoon

Now I'm lucky to last three

---

This kind of entitlement is just a sad look, perhaps they should stick with their dildos and vibrators if they need 6 rounds.

---

They'll never experience post but clarity

---

why does a man need to nut 6 times if he can last all night before nutting once?


---

You deserve 6 rounds but you're getting 6 seconds then I'm going to sleep for 6 hours.

---

Based on her profile she seems like a young uneducated woman. Plus I find her even with make up on very unattractive and her tweets are immature. She's the type I'd call for an Uber once I'm done.

---

SquantoZ posted...

women that need that many rounds tend to be the ones that don't experience climax through intercourse. Just go down her and finish her off and she won't need shit afterwards.

Basically

I think theres still a big issue with women not experiencing orgasm in the bedroom, whether it's due to lack of communication, inexperienced partners, or selfish partners

Then you end up with shit like this where they're essentially saying "maybe if he fucks me long enough I'll finally get off"

Obviously not accounting for women that actually just want multiple orgasms, but ymmv there

---

XxKrazyChaosxX posted...

Hahaha was looking for it.

Is no one gonna call out that 3rd username? That's who we're dealing with.

---

If his six shooter ain't fully loaded, he ain't ready to dance.

*sarcasm by the way

---

Anything more than 10 minutes is unnecessary
---

RiKuToTheMiGhtY posted...

This kind of entitlement is just a sad look, perhaps they should stick with their dildos and vibrators if they need 6 rounds.

This just sounds like insecurity.

---

Guide posted...

This just sounds like insecurity.

Insecure about what? Hes right
---

This is the intersection of lust and gluttony.

Luttony?

---

I mean- a round of sex to a guy is him having sex til climax. Women are kind of limited to having to put it that way, too. Females tend to warm up a bit slower, so depending on foreplay or the order you do things can make a big difference. We arent always done once we come. Often for me, orgasming makes me more horny (like for penetration), while for guys, it would make them satisfied and tired/ready to be done. Also since I have the ability to have back to back orgasms or also just orgasm a few times in a sex session, yeah- I would like to do that. That can require multiple rounds from a guy, or a willingness from them to adjust when they perform foreplay, or if they are willing to help me finish myself... theres a lot of options but yeah women do deserve more than heres 5 mins of eating out and 7 minutes of jackhammering. I came, so thats it.

---

GoodOlJr posted...

Insecure about what? Hes right

The logic doesn't follow. Would you settle for unsatisfying sex?

---

2 rounds and I'm done for. 3 is pushing it. I won't even bother with round 4.

Throw in the fucking towel.

The struggles in your 30s are for real!

---

Guide posted...

The logic doesn't follow. Would you settle for unsatisfying sex?

Yeah definitely, its not an important part of life

7 minutes of missionary 3 times a month is more then enough im slightly kidding seriously

But the whole sex crazed thing is just sad, what a waste of time
---

2 rounds top, I got other shit to do besides sex.

---

Daffadilio posted...

theres a lot of options but yeah women do deserve more than heres 5 mins of eating out and 7 minutes of jackhammering. I came, so thats it.

They asked for 3+ rounds.

Guys literally start feeling pain once 3+ comes around.

---

GoodOlJr posted...

Anything more than 10 minutes is unnecessary

---

GoodOlJr posted...

Yeah definitely, its not an important part of life

7 minutes of missionary 3 times a month is more then enough im slightly kidding seriously

But the whole sex crazed thing is just sad, what a waste of time

That's just you having a low sex drive m8

Which isn't a bad thing, and I have to call myself out here. I shouldn't be shaming other people for low sex drives, just because they shamed people for having high sex drives.

---

no one deserves anything beyond their lives
shut up lady

---

I mean if she can handle it, why fellas cant do that?


---

Guide posted...

That's just you having a low sex drive m8

Which isn't a bad thing, and I have to call myself out here. I shouldn't be shaming other people for low sex drives, just because they shamed people for having high sex drives.

Id rank 6 rds way way higher than 3-5 times a week btw, I can at least understand the mindset of the latter
---

cuttin_in_farm posted...

They asked for 3+ rounds.

Guys literally start feeling pain once 3+ comes around.

Yeah, there surely has to be a middle ground between "Idc about her orgasm lol" and "our sex life needs to be a neverending triathlon".

---

@Guide

The issue is not a high or low sex drive it is these women expecting most men being able to nut 6 times or to provide them with 6 orgasms each time you have sex. They are asking for marathon sex each time and claiming 3 rounds should be the minimum each time.

Most men had that kinda stamina and rounds during puberty and high school which did not require them to do much. When most men are working 40 hour a week or more jobs with varies levels of physical activity demanding so much for sex is laughable.

I can go two to three rounds most times on my off days or when it has been a quiet day but more then not when work is over people are tired. These women must not do jack shit to think they can do these marathon sex sessions so commonly.

---

RiKuToTheMiGhtY posted...

@Guide

The issue is not a high or low sex drive it is these women expecting most men being able to nut 6 times or to provide them with 6 orgasms each time you have sex. They are asking for marathon sex each time and claiming 3 rounds should be the minimum each time.

Most men had that kinda stamina and rounds during puberty and high school which did not require them to do much. When most men are working 40 hour a week or more jobs with varies levels of physical activity demanding so much for sex is laughable.

I can go two to three rounds most times on my off days or when it has been a quiet day but more then not when work is over people are tired. These women must not do jack shit to think they can do these marathon sex sessions so commonly.

This womans like 20, going by her pics shes gunna be 250 lbs in a few years, she wont be doing much activity as an adult either
---

cuttin_in_farm posted...

They asked for 3+ rounds.

Guys literally start feeling pain once 3+ comes around.

i dont necessarily think they mean the same thing you mean- is what Im saying. Verbiage is limited by the male perspective. I really dont think In this situation they care if you come 3 times, They just know it takes them as long as it takes guys to finish three rounds for her to be satisfied.
So if she needs 30ish mins and you only take 10, Like someone up there said- find a medium between she doesnt get to orgasm and he has to triathlon it.
its Twitter, those girls are trying to be raunchy, but the point they are trying to make is there if you dont read it from the male perspective.


---

Daffadilio posted...

i dont necessarily think they mean the same thing you mean- is what Im saying. Verbiage is limited by the male perspective

No, she didnt say do better. She specifically said what the problem was. Why would you think of what they say instead of going by what they LITERALLY said?

Jesus. The correct response in this topic is this:

SquantoZ posted...

women that need that many rounds tend to be the ones that don't experience climax through intercourse. Just go down her and finish her off and she won't need shit afterwards.

It has nothing to do with duration 9 times outta 10.

---

cuttin_in_farm posted...

No, she didnt say do better. She specifically said what the problem was. Why would you think of what they say instead of going by what they LITERALLY said?

Jesus. The correct response in this topic is this:

It has nothing to do with duration 9 times outta 10.

Because, as I already said, a round of sex to a guy is him having sex til climax. Women are kind of limited to having to put it that way, too, in that since our orgasms function differently and arent always at the end of sex, there is no succinct term for how long we require to be satisfied.
you really think she is saying if my man doesnt orgasm +3 times, IM not satisfied and I deserve more?? NO why would that be what shes trying to say, thats why Im not taking it from the male perspective which is literally.
and you arent wrong about duration of actual penetration being an issue, but length of sexual encounter DOES matter because women often take more time to warm up. If you have shot already and are done right as Im starting to feel like wow ok sex sounds good.... you can see the problem.
also in my previous post I literally did say what you quoted- I said a guy being willing to change when foreplay occurs, if they are willing to help her get there once hes done, etc. So yeah. That was the right response

---

Were_Wyrm posted...

One thrust

lmfao

---

if she aint satisfied from just one round from me oh well. Im not a young buck anymore. Best I can do is 3 rounds.

RiKuToTheMiGhtY posted...

@Guide

The issue is not a high or low sex drive it is these women expecting most men being able to nut 6 times or to provide them with 6 orgasms each time you have sex. They are asking for marathon sex each time and claiming 3 rounds should be the minimum each time.

Most men had that kinda stamina and rounds during puberty and high school which did not require them to do much. When most men are working 40 hour a week or more jobs with varies levels of physical activity demanding so much for sex is laughable.

I can go two to three rounds most times on my off days or when it has been a quiet day but more then not when work is over people are tired. These women must not do jack shit to think they can do these marathon sex sessions so commonly.

This is a fair assessment, I couldn't go six rounds every day even if I OD'd on viagra.

---

Most I've went was 4 nothing is left in the tank afterwards

---

Daffadilio posted...

Women are kind of limited to having to put it that way, too, in that since our orgasms function differently and arent always at the end of sex, there is no succinct term for how long we require to be satisfied.
you really think she is saying if my man doesnt orgasm +3 times, IM not satisfied and I deserve more?? NO why would that be what shes trying to say, thats why Im not taking it from the male perspective which is literally.

I... dont get why youre trying to give these people so much credit.

The women arent satisfied with their sexual encounters. They mistakenly believe the guys theyre with just arent lasting long enough because they think their enjoyment isnt being stimulated enough to satisfaction.

Dont you think thats more believable in this scenario? That they dont actually know what the issue is? Why else would they say something so outlandish? Hyperbolic or not.

We agree otherwise... I think.

---

She deserves 0 rounds cuz she looks gross af

---