Current Events > Pelosi threatens to delay sending impeachment case to Senate

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
Lebronwon 12/19/19 12:27:13 PM #1:	https://www.salon.com/2019/12/19/pelosi-threatens-to-delay-sending-impeachment-case-to-senate-until-mcconnell-agrees-to-fair-trial/ Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., suggested Wednesday that she could indefinitely delay sending the two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump to the upper chamber until Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., concedes to the Democratic Partys request for a fair trial." In an historic vote, the House of Representatives voted to impeach Trump for abuse of power and obstruction of justice Wednesday. While the vote was mostly drawn across party lines, more House members voted to impeach Trump than either of the other two presidents previously impeached. But the two parties are at an impasse on how to proceed with Trumps Senate trial. McConnell wants a speedy trial with no witnesses, while Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has called for a weekslong trial with new witnesses. Democrats have also criticized McConnell, who has vowed to coordinate the trial with the White House and said he will not be an impartial juror. This is what I dont consider a fair trial, Pelosi said Wednesday. Pelosi added that she would not send the articles of impeachment to the Senate unless McConnell agrees to a fair trial. We will make our decision as to when we are going to send it when we see what they are doing on the Senate side, she continued. So far, we have not seen anything that looks fair to us. Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., told The New York Times that dozens of Democrats want Pelosi to hold off on sending the articles of impeachment to the Senate out of concern that McConnell would not conduct a fair trial. What is gained by accelerating this process? he asked, adding that Democrats should let the speaker work her magic to get some sort of assurance if its possible that there will be a level playing field. Pelosi said Wednesday that the House would not appoint impeachment managers to prosecute the case in the Senate until the Democrats conflict with McConnell is resolved. We cannot name managers until we see what the process is on the Senate side, and I would hope that would be soon, she said. But some Democrats have also urged Pelosi not to send the articles of impeachment to the Senate at all, where Trump is all but guaranteed to be acquitted. Pelosi has not ruled that out, according to The Times. The Times reported that House leaders are not seriously considering that option, but House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-S.C., the No. 3 Democrat in the House, told CNN Thursday that he would not send the articles of impeachment to the Senate at all. --- Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7 <cite>Lebronwon posted [p:931800751] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>https://www.salon.com/2019/12/19/pelosi-threatens-to-delay-sending-impeachment-case-to-senate-until-mcconnell-agrees-to-fair-trial/ Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., suggested Wednesday that she could indefinitely delay sending the two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump to the upper chamber until Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., concedes to the Democratic Partys request for a fair trial." In an historic vote, the House of Representatives voted to impeach Trump for abuse of power and obstruction of justice Wednesday. While the vote was mostly drawn across party lines, more House members voted to impeach Trump than either of the other two presidents previously impeached. But the two parties are at an impasse on how to proceed with Trumps Senate trial. McConnell wants a speedy trial with no witnesses, while Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has called for a weekslong trial with new witnesses. Democrats have also criticized McConnell, who has vowed to coordinate the trial with the White House and said he will not be an impartial juror. This is what I dont consider a fair trial, Pelosi said Wednesday. Pelosi added that she would not send the articles of impeachment to the Senate unless McConnell agrees to a fair trial. We will make our decision as to when we are going to send it when we see what they are doing on the Senate side, she continued. So far, we have not seen anything that looks fair to us. Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., told The New York Times that dozens of Democrats want Pelosi to hold off on sending the articles of impeachment to the Senate out of concern that McConnell would not conduct a fair trial. What is gained by accelerating this process? he asked, adding that Democrats should let the speaker work her magic to get some sort of assurance if its possible that there will be a level playing field. Pelosi said Wednesday that the House would not appoint impeachment managers to prosecute the case in the Senate until the Democrats conflict with McConnell is resolved. We cannot name managers until we see what the process is on the Senate side, and I would hope that would be soon, she said. But some Democrats have also urged Pelosi not to send the articles of impeachment to the Senate at all, where Trump is all but guaranteed to be acquitted. Pelosi has not ruled that out, according to The Times. The Times reported that House leaders are not seriously considering that option, but House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-S.C., the No. 3 Democrat in the House, told CNN Thursday that he would not send the articles of impeachment to the Senate at all. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 12/19/19 12:28:51 PM #2:	There's no reason to send it to the Senate since two people have already stated they won't act as an unbias judge. They were idiots admitting openly they were going do so since all it does is give weight to this move. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:931800813] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>There's no reason to send it to the Senate since two people have already stated they won't act as an unbias judge. They were idiots admitting openly they were going do so since all it does is give weight to this move. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ethosian 12/19/19 12:30:29 PM #3:	Now this is actually 5d chess. Trump is so butthurt over being impeached that not being able to be acquitted will really eat at him. Eventually he'll yank McConnells leash and make him play ball. Of course, once the evidence is allowed to be shown, it will become even more obvious how guilty Trump is and may hurt vulnerable senators in their bid for re-election if they choose to ignore the evidence and vote to acquit <cite>Ethosian posted [p:931800882] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Now this is actually 5d chess. Trump is so butthurt over being impeached that not being able to be acquitted will really eat at him. Eventually he'll yank McConnells leash and make him play ball. Of course, once the evidence is allowed to be shown, it will become even more obvious how guilty Trump is and may hurt vulnerable senators in their bid for re-election if they choose to ignore the evidence and vote to acquit </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SuperMariano3 12/19/19 12:30:37 PM #4:	Good idea cant have donny running around saying hes acquitted during presidential debates. Hold it off until they agrees to confirm Merrick Garland. --- You can take my Karma, but you'll never take......MY FREEDOM! <cite>SuperMariano3 posted [p:931800887] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Good idea cant have donny running around saying hes acquitted during presidential debates. Hold it off until they agrees to confirm Merrick Garland. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tired-Insomniac 12/19/19 12:30:43 PM #5:	I saw a comment on Reddit saying they can technically hold off on sending it to the Senate indefinitely, so say the election rolls around and Trump wins but the Senate somehow turns Democrat, then they could send it over and remove him. Can it really happen that way? --- "I like turtles" <cite>Tired-Insomniac posted [p:931800893] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>I saw a comment on Reddit saying they can technically hold off on sending it to the Senate indefinitely, so say the election rolls around and Trump wins but the Senate somehow turns Democrat, then they could send it over and remove him. Can it really happen that way? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mr_MacPhisto 12/19/19 12:32:23 PM #6:	All for show. This entire thing. --- Off with the horns, On with the show! <cite>Mr_MacPhisto posted [p:931800947] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>All for show. This entire thing. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lebronwon 12/19/19 12:32:26 PM #7:	Tired-Insomniac posted... I saw a comment on Reddit saying they can technically hold off on sending it to the Senate indefinitely, so say the election rolls around and Trump wins but the Senate somehow turns Democrat, then they could send it over and remove him. Can it really happen that way? If that situation happens. Trump wins and Senate becomes democrat. Doesn't that just mean we get Pence as President. --- Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7 <cite>Lebronwon posted [p:931800950] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Tired-Insomniac posted... </cite> <quote>I saw a comment on Reddit saying they can technically hold off on sending it to the Senate indefinitely, so say the election rolls around and Trump wins but the Senate somehow turns Democrat, then they could send it over and remove him. Can it really happen that way?</quote> If that situation happens. Trump wins and Senate becomes democrat. Doesn't that just mean we get Pence as President. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ethosian 12/19/19 12:33:38 PM #8:	Mr_MacPhisto posted... All for show. This entire thing. So salty, sorry your leader got caught being a corrupt piece of shit. <cite>Ethosian posted [p:931800988] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Mr_MacPhisto posted... </cite> <quote>All for show. This entire thing.</quote>So salty, sorry your leader got caught being a corrupt piece of shit. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Top Crusader 12/19/19 12:33:52 PM #9:	Lebronwon posted... If that situation happens. Trump wins and Senate becomes democrat. Doesn't that just mean we get Pence as President. Plus I doubt there are enough vulnerable republican senators up in 2020, they need more than just a majority. --- https://imgur.com/09qFfLV <cite>The Top Crusader posted [p:931800998] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Lebronwon posted... </cite> <quote>If that situation happens. Trump wins and Senate becomes democrat. Doesn't that just mean we get Pence as President.</quote> Plus I doubt there are enough vulnerable republican senators up in 2020, they need more than just a majority. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#10	Post #10 was unavailable or deleted.
tremain07 12/19/19 12:34:21 PM #11:	Tired-Insomniac posted... I saw a comment on Reddit saying they can technically hold off on sending it to the Senate indefinitely, so say the election rolls around and Trump wins but the Senate somehow turns Democrat, then they could send it over and remove him. Can it really happen that way? It actually can, yeah. So by doing this Trump really could be removed if he won again and there's nothing the republicans could do about it besides rely on on democrats in red districts to support them against removal. This is actually a great move and I hope the progressive wing understands it and don't start screaming that she isn't doing her job. The best part of it is Trump will be extremely angry at this because not only is this term in trouble but if he does manage to pull off another bullshit win but the republicans lose control of the senate he will no longer have his corrupt buddies protecting him --- IGN: Sun FC: 0061-0132-7564 <cite>tremain07 posted [p:931801020] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Tired-Insomniac posted... </cite> <quote>I saw a comment on Reddit saying they can technically hold off on sending it to the Senate indefinitely, so say the election rolls around and Trump wins but the Senate somehow turns Democrat, then they could send it over and remove him. Can it really happen that way?</quote>It actually can, yeah. So by doing this Trump really could be removed if he won again and there's nothing the republicans could do about it besides rely on on democrats in red districts to support them against removal. This is actually a great move and I hope the progressive wing understands it and don't start screaming that she isn't doing her job. The best part of it is Trump will be extremely angry at this because not only is this term in trouble but if he does manage to pull off another bullshit win but the republicans lose control of the senate he will no longer have his corrupt buddies protecting him </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Metua 12/19/19 12:35:24 PM #12:	Tired-Insomniac posted... I saw a comment on Reddit saying they can technically hold off on sending it to the Senate indefinitely, so say the election rolls around and Trump wins but the Senate somehow turns Democrat, then they could send it over and remove him. Can it really happen that way? There still wouldn't be 67 Democrats in the Senate even if they won every seat that was up for grabs. --- https://imgur.com/yKMR7 https://imgur.com/Xd4gmmR <cite>Metua posted [p:931801064] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Tired-Insomniac posted... </cite> <quote>I saw a comment on Reddit saying they can technically hold off on sending it to the Senate indefinitely, so say the election rolls around and Trump wins but the Senate somehow turns Democrat, then they could send it over and remove him. Can it really happen that way?</quote>There still wouldn't be 67 Democrats in the Senate even if they won every seat that was up for grabs. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkChozoGhost 12/19/19 12:35:47 PM #13:	The Top Crusader posted... Plus I doubt there are enough vulnerable republican senators up in 2020, they need more than just a majority. They just need 4 Republican senators to follow their conscience and do the right thing. --- My sister's dog bit a hole in my Super Mario Land cartridge. It still works though - Skye Reynolds 3DS FC: 3239-5612-0115 <cite>DarkChozoGhost posted [p:931801082] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>The Top Crusader posted... </cite> <quote>Plus I doubt there are enough vulnerable republican senators up in 2020, they need more than just a majority.</quote>They just need 4 Republican senators to follow their conscience and do the right thing. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NeoShadowhen 12/19/19 12:36:30 PM #14:	Tired-Insomniac posted... I saw a comment on Reddit saying they can technically hold off on sending it to the Senate indefinitely, so say the election rolls around and Trump wins but the Senate somehow turns Democrat, then they could send it over and remove him. Can it really happen that way? I think they can only hold it until the end of the current session, which would end around this time next year. So if trump wins re-election and the Democrats take the senate, the house would have to impeach him again. Which wouldnt really take very long considering theyre probably planning on doing this all again after re-election anyway. <cite>NeoShadowhen posted [p:931801118] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Tired-Insomniac posted... </cite> <quote>I saw a comment on Reddit saying they can technically hold off on sending it to the Senate indefinitely, so say the election rolls around and Trump wins but the Senate somehow turns Democrat, then they could send it over and remove him. Can it really happen that way?</quote> I think they can only hold it until the end of the current session, which would end around this time next year. So if trump wins re-election and the Democrats take the senate, the house would have to impeach him again. Which wouldnt really take very long considering theyre probably planning on doing this all again after re-election anyway. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Top Crusader 12/19/19 12:37:19 PM #15:	Metua posted... There still wouldn't be 67 Democrats in the Senate even if they won every seat that was up for grabs. Yeah. Maybe you get Romney and a couple other republicans to go along with it, but I don't see getting enough. I've seen the theory floating around that all they really need to do is get the vote to be made into a secret ballot then they think they would get like half the republicans on board. >_> --- https://imgur.com/09qFfLV <cite>The Top Crusader posted [p:931801147] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Metua posted... </cite> <quote>There still wouldn't be 67 Democrats in the Senate even if they won every seat that was up for grabs.</quote> Yeah. Maybe you get Romney and a couple other republicans to go along with it, but I don't see getting enough. I've seen the theory floating around that all they really need to do is get the vote to be made into a secret ballot then they think they would get like half the republicans on board. >_> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 12/19/19 12:37:40 PM #16:	Tired-Insomniac posted... I saw a comment on Reddit saying they can technically hold off on sending it to the Senate indefinitely, so say the election rolls around and Trump wins but the Senate somehow turns Democrat, then they could send it over and remove him. Can it really happen that way? Probably not, they not only need 2/3rds of the senate to vote on it and typically if the senate does not act on something within the current meeting it's not carried over to the next. --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:931801161] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Tired-Insomniac posted... </cite> <quote>I saw a comment on Reddit saying they can technically hold off on sending it to the Senate indefinitely, so say the election rolls around and Trump wins but the Senate somehow turns Democrat, then they could send it over and remove him. Can it really happen that way?</quote>Probably not, they not only need 2/3rds of the senate to vote on it and typically if the senate does not act on something within the current meeting it's not carried over to the next. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ethosian 12/19/19 12:38:01 PM #17:	67 isn't the magic number. It's 51. That's how many senators are needed for setting up trial rules and keep it from being a sham. <cite>Ethosian posted [p:931801172] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>67 isn't the magic number. It's 51. That's how many senators are needed for setting up trial rules and keep it from being a sham. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Top Crusader 12/19/19 12:38:10 PM #18:	DarkChozoGhost posted... They just need 4 Republican senators to follow their conscience and do the right thing. I'm not sure how that gets you 67 votes. But I've been saying all along Romney will save the world, so we'll see. >_> --- https://imgur.com/09qFfLV <cite>The Top Crusader posted [p:931801177] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>DarkChozoGhost posted... </cite> <quote>They just need 4 Republican senators to follow their conscience and do the right thing.</quote> I'm not sure how that gets you 67 votes. But I've been saying all along Romney will save the world, so we'll see. >_> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Top Crusader 12/19/19 12:38:26 PM #19:	Ethosian posted... 67 isn't the magic number. It's 51. That's how many senators are needed for setting up trial rules and keep it from being a sham. Ah... gotcha. --- https://imgur.com/09qFfLV <cite>The Top Crusader posted [p:931801195] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Ethosian posted... </cite> <quote>67 isn't the magic number. It's 51. That's how many senators are needed for setting up trial rules and keep it from being a sham.</quote> Ah... gotcha. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Orthopox12 12/19/19 12:38:54 PM #20:	Not suprised I figured they would drag it out until the election so their nominee has going against a president under impeachment in their favor. --- Official contributor to the Legendary "Cantina" Topic {Current clone: Orthopox 30} <cite>Orthopox12 posted [p:931801217] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Not suprised I figured they would drag it out until the election so their nominee has going against a president under impeachment in their favor. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 12/19/19 12:44:20 PM #21:	Ethosian posted... 67 isn't the magic number. It's 51. That's how many senators are needed for setting up trial rules and keep it from being a sham. The constitution literally specifies two-thirds --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:931801416] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Ethosian posted... </cite> <quote>67 isn't the magic number. It's 51. That's how many senators are needed for setting up trial rules and keep it from being a sham.</quote>The constitution literally specifies two-thirds </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ethosian 12/19/19 12:45:14 PM #22:	Tropicalwood posted... The constitution literally specifies two-thirds Did you read what I said? It only takes a simple majority to keep the trial from being a sham. <cite>Ethosian posted [p:931801440] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Tropicalwood posted... </cite> <quote>The constitution literally specifies two-thirds</quote>Did you read what I said? It only takes a simple majority to keep the trial from being a sham. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkChozoGhost 12/19/19 12:46:49 PM #23:	Tropicalwood posted... The constitution literally specifies two-thirds It's not about removing him (which is impossible because republican senators won't be reelected if they do what they know is the right thing), it's about actually having a trial and having the evidence and witnesses shown --- My sister's dog bit a hole in my Super Mario Land cartridge. It still works though - Skye Reynolds 3DS FC: 3239-5612-0115 <cite>DarkChozoGhost posted [p:931801495] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Tropicalwood posted... </cite> <quote>The constitution literally specifies two-thirds</quote>It's not about removing him (which is impossible because republican senators won't be reelected if they do what they know is the right thing), it's about actually having a trial and having the evidence and witnesses shown </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Deadpool_18 12/19/19 12:47:32 PM #24:	Fuck McConnell He should be on the chopping block with Trump for simply admitting to such bias. --- You go, Glenn CoCo. <cite>Deadpool_18 posted [p:931801519] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Fuck McConnell He should be on the chopping block with Trump for simply admitting to such bias. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
legendary_zell 12/19/19 12:47:57 PM #25:	Tropicalwood posted... The constitution literally specifies two-thirds He explicitly stated he's talking about the rules for the trial, not the final vote in the trial. --- I gotta be righteous, I gotta be me, I gotta be conscious, I gotta be free, I gotta be able, I gotta attack, I gotta be stable, I gotta be black. <cite>legendary_zell posted [p:931801542] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Tropicalwood posted... </cite> <quote>The constitution literally specifies two-thirds</quote> He explicitly stated he's talking about the rules for the trial, not the final vote in the trial. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 12/19/19 12:48:05 PM #26:	Ethosian posted... Did you read what I said? It only takes a simple majority to keep the trial from being a sham. You still can't convict with 51 senators, it's a two-thirds rule as stated in the constitution. --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:931801543] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Ethosian posted... </cite> <quote>Did you read what I said? It only takes a simple majority to keep the trial from being a sham.</quote>You still can't convict with 51 senators, it's a two-thirds rule as stated in the constitution. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 12/19/19 12:49:25 PM #27:	Deadpool_18 posted... Fuck McConnell He should be on the chopping block with Trump for simply admitting to such bias. Oh cry me a river, the democrats were threatening to primary their own members if they didn't vote to impeach. --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:931801586] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Deadpool_18 posted... </cite> <quote>Fuck McConnell He should be on the chopping block with Trump for simply admitting to such bias.</quote>Oh cry me a river, the democrats were threatening to primary their own members if they didn't vote to impeach. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Doom_Art 12/19/19 12:49:32 PM #28:	Tropicalwood posted... You still can't convict with 51 senators, it's a two-thirds rule as stated in the constitution. Oh my god you really can't read --- Not removing this until Mega Man 64 is released on the Wii Virtual Console. Started on: 12/1/2009 https://imgur.com/mPvcy <cite>Doom_Art posted [p:931801589] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Tropicalwood posted... </cite> <quote>You still can't convict with 51 senators, it's a two-thirds rule as stated in the constitution.</quote>Oh my god you really can't read </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
smoliske 12/19/19 1:00:21 PM #29:	Doom_Art posted... Oh my god you really can't read he can he is just in denial <cite>smoliske posted [p:931801968] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Doom_Art posted... </cite> <quote>Oh my god you really can't read</quote> he can he is just in denial </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Machete 12/19/19 1:01:03 PM #30:	donald is guilty of all kinds of treason. Oodles of treason in fact --- #TreacherousTrump #LockTrumpUp <cite>Machete posted [p:931801984] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>donald is guilty of all kinds of treason. Oodles of treason in fact</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CyricZ 12/19/19 1:01:48 PM #31:	Tmaster148 posted... There's no reason to send it to the Senate since two people have already stated they won't act as an unbias judge. They were idiots admitting openly they were going do so since all it does is give weight to this move. Bingo. --- CyricZ <cite>CyricZ posted [p:931802006] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Tmaster148 posted... </cite> <quote>There's no reason to send it to the Senate since two people have already stated they won't act as an unbias judge. They were idiots admitting openly they were going do so since all it does is give weight to this move.</quote>Bingo. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
XplodnPnguins92 12/19/19 1:07:57 PM #32:	so they agree to keep him as president. that'll show the gop! --- https://imgur.com/Dn9vLMi <cite>XplodnPnguins92 posted [p:931802225] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>so they agree to keep him as president. that'll show the gop! </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ScazarMeltex 12/19/19 1:19:59 PM #33:	Tropicalwood posted... The constitution literally specifies two-thirds 51 isn't the number for removal. 51 is the number you need to agree on trial rules. So you can call witnesses and shit like that instead it being a sham where no one is called to testify. 2/3s is what you need to remove him, which will be more likely if you call witnesses and force people to testify under oath. Which is exactly why McConnell doesn't want it to happen. --- "If you wish to converse with me define your terms" Voltaire <cite>ScazarMeltex posted [p:931802638] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Tropicalwood posted... </cite> <quote>The constitution literally specifies two-thirds</quote>51 isn't the number for removal. 51 is the number you need to agree on trial rules. So you can call witnesses and shit like that instead it being a sham where no one is called to testify. 2/3s is what you need to remove him, which will be more likely if you call witnesses and force people to testify under oath. Which is exactly why McConnell doesn't want it to happen. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Emperorwon 12/19/19 1:37:00 PM #34:	So she wants to withhold something that the House has passed in exchange for something that will incriminate her political enemy? Interesting. --- --- --- <cite>Emperorwon posted [p:931803282] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>So she wants to withhold something that the House has passed in exchange for something that will incriminate her political enemy? Interesting. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#35	Post #35 was unavailable or deleted.
CyricZ 12/19/19 1:44:07 PM #36:	Emperorwon posted... So she wants to withhold something that the House has passed in exchange for something that will incriminate her political enemy? Interesting. Please define exactly what the bolded refers to. --- CyricZ <cite>CyricZ posted [p:931803560] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Emperorwon posted... </cite> <quote>So she wants to withhold something that the House has passed in exchange for something that will incriminate her political enemy? Interesting.</quote>Please define exactly what the bolded refers to. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Extreme_light 12/19/19 1:44:18 PM #37:	This was probably the best plan she could do. Leave it in the history book that he was impeached, but never acquitted. --- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rC7BAt96Xn0 <cite>Extreme_light posted [p:931803573] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>This was probably the best plan she could do. Leave it in the history book that he was impeached, but never acquitted. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Emperorwon 12/19/19 1:44:54 PM #38:	shockthemonkey posted... I love when people like you try to sound smart I wish people like you tried to sound smart --- --- --- <cite>Emperorwon posted [p:931803605] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>shockthemonkey posted... </cite> <quote>I love when people like you try to sound smart </quote> I wish people like you tried to sound smart </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Emperorwon 12/19/19 1:45:23 PM #39:	CyricZ posted... Please define exactly what the bolded refers to. A trial that will go her way. --- --- --- <cite>Emperorwon posted [p:931803629] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>CyricZ posted... </cite> <quote>Please define exactly what the bolded refers to.</quote>A trial that will go her way. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Great Muta 22 12/19/19 1:45:31 PM #40:	Emperorwon posted... So she wants to withhold something that the House has passed in exchange for something that will incriminate her political enemy? Interesting. Not at all? Why would you think that? --- https://youtu.be/rYy0o-J0x20?t=300 "Thank you, good night. I hope you're happy" <cite>The Great Muta 22 posted [p:931803633] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Emperorwon posted... </cite> <quote>So she wants to withhold something that the House has passed in exchange for something that will incriminate her political enemy? Interesting.</quote> Not at all? Why would you think that? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#41	Post #41 was unavailable or deleted.
Extreme_light 12/19/19 1:46:14 PM #42:	Tropicalwood posted... Oh cry me a river, the democrats were threatening to primary their own members if they didn't vote to impeach. Which we should. Considering one of them is set to switch parties lmao. --- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rC7BAt96Xn0 <cite>Extreme_light posted [p:931803655] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Tropicalwood posted... </cite> <quote>Oh cry me a river, the democrats were threatening to primary their own members if they didn't vote to impeach.</quote> Which we should. Considering one of them is set to switch parties lmao. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ethosian 12/19/19 1:46:24 PM #43:	Emperorwon posted... A trial that will go her way. Pretty telling that you acknowledge a fair trial would go her way. Trump will only get off with the sham McConnell is trying to pull. <cite>Ethosian posted [p:931803661] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Emperorwon posted... </cite> <quote>A trial that will go her way.</quote>Pretty telling that you acknowledge a fair trial would go her way. Trump will only get off with the sham McConnell is trying to pull. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Emperorwon 12/19/19 1:47:06 PM #44:	shockthemonkey posted... What a zinger IQ too low to comprehend? --- --- --- <cite>Emperorwon posted [p:931803699] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>shockthemonkey posted... </cite> <quote>What a zinger </quote>IQ too low to comprehend? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 12/19/19 2:33:33 PM #45:	Deadpool_18 posted... Fuck McConnell He should be on the chopping block with Trump for simply admitting to such bias. Along with every Dem walking around with a spring in their step this morning. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:931805362] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Deadpool_18 posted... </cite> <quote>Fuck McConnell He should be on the chopping block with Trump for simply admitting to such bias.</quote>Along with every Dem walking around with a spring in their step this morning. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Blackstar110 12/19/19 2:34:53 PM #46:	Yeah, this is the only play after McConnell and Graham ran their mouths like idiots. --- -Shred <cite>Blackstar110 posted [p:931805422] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Yeah, this is the only play after McConnell and Graham ran their mouths like idiots. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ledbowman 12/19/19 2:40:33 PM #47:	Bitch and Lindsay goofed --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:931805627] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Bitch and Lindsay goofed </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Maze_ 12/19/19 2:44:59 PM #48:	Emperorwon posted... So she wants to withhold something that the House has passed in exchange for something that will incriminate her political enemy? Interesting. A fair and unbiased trial would incriminate her political enemy? Then how the fuck can anyone oppose it. --- When the going gets tough, the tough go have a little cry in the corner. "Your mustache is crooked" ~ R.I.P Randy Savage. <cite>Maze_ posted [p:931805781] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>Emperorwon posted... </cite> <quote>So she wants to withhold something that the House has passed in exchange for something that will incriminate her political enemy? Interesting.</quote>A fair and unbiased trial would incriminate her political enemy? Then how the fuck can anyone oppose it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lebronwon 12/19/19 2:51:00 PM #49:	ledbowman posted... Bitch and Lindsay goofed Yep --- Not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7 <cite>Lebronwon posted [p:931805999] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>ledbowman posted... </cite> <quote>Bitch and Lindsay goofed</quote> Yep </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Maze_ 12/19/19 2:54:59 PM #50:	darkjedilink posted... Along with every Dem walking around with a spring in their step this morning. Are any of the dems opposed to a fair and balanced trial? --- When the going gets tough, the tough go have a little cry in the corner. "Your mustache is crooked" ~ R.I.P Randy Savage. <cite>Maze_ posted [p:931806139] in Pelosi thr... [t:78267215]...</cite> <quote>darkjedilink posted... </cite> <quote>Along with every Dem walking around with a spring in their step this morning.</quote>Are any of the dems opposed to a fair and balanced trial? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > Pelosi threatens to delay sending impeachment case to Senate (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Pelosi threatens to delay sending impeachment case to Senate