Current Events > Post ITT and I will rate your contributions to CE

(+) Yeah! (+)

I will reduce everything you are to one objective number.
---

Post. I'm calling 0 or -1 for me.
---

Posty

I lurk a lot. So, -5?
---

Probably 1 or less
---

10 for me
---

---

I am more than a number
---

Do me, and show your work
---

Ok
---

Ok
---

Sup

---

Sure

---

80085
---

Jaded_Dragon posted...

I lurk a lot. So, -5?

---

i have none
---

:V
---

Silver_Bearings: 5/10
You seem to favor short, terse posts. A little acerbic sometimes, but not over the top. Adequate opinions, with nothing standing out for better or worse. You don't seem to post all that much, but it could just be that I don't notice them because of the lack of substance. I consider you a pretty mediocre background CEman.
---

Meganekko: 4/10
I barely know who you are, but you like boring and weird things that make me uncomfortable. On the other hand, you don't seem obnoxious about it. Could be worse.
---

Jaded_Dragon: 0.5/10
I don't know who you are. Considering the sheer quantity of information I save regarding CE, that doesn't bode well for you here.

Superlinkbro: 3/10
I know you best (which is to say barely at all) for talking about Youtubers I don't know and have negative interest in. The concept of celebrity is embarrassing to me, and it's even more absurd when it's these randoms. Or actually maybe it's equally absurd. Everyone is a random. This is the most you've ever made me think. I can't say that's a good thing.
---

hello
---

Now I'm getting nervous V:
---

is it bad that i rarely recognize any usernames?
---

If i dont get a zero, i'll be disappointed. I just post and reply to random BS.
---

vegy: 7.5/10
Kind of a complicated one, and really makes me consider my methodology. On the one hand, the sheer volume of your contributions to CE would terrify a sane man. Your dedication is supernatural. I feel like it's almost a shame you don't seem to have more productive ways to apply it than shitposting here. So on the one hand the quantity has basically made you a face of CE. On the other hand, the problem is how repetitive your contributions are. I don't know if it's always been so bad or if you're just running on fumes, but to justify a 10 ranking I'd really need more than just the same shit spammed endlessly.
---

Try me
---

Hit me.
---

Hoping for at least a 2.
---

MegaTech posted...

Hit me.

---

Kogasteelfang: 5.5/10
You certainly have your own distinct posting style. The progression of your persona from 'I hate myself, tell me why I shouldn't' to 'I hate myself, tell me why you do too' was kind of a bummer. I've never seen anyone so intoxicated by their own self-crucifixion.
---

Turbam posted...

Now I'm getting nervous V:

Don't know why you'd be worried about some random person on the internet giving you a rating for looking at like 2 posts and going "yeah that's all he does"
---

Summarizer posted...

Kogasteelfang: 5.5/10
You certainly have your own distinct posting style. The progression of your persona from 'I hate myself, tell me why I shouldn't' to 'I hate myself, tell me why you do too' was kind of a bummer. I've never seen anyone so intoxicated by their own self-crucifixion.

That's fair, but I'm doing better lately. Also posting much less, so I doubt anyone would notice. Also, I'm surprised I got that high if a score, thanks.
---

lol

---

Who the fuck is this?

---

---

Holy_Pumpkin posted...

---

Take a shot.
---

0.5 is fair.
---

ITT
---

This is actually mildly impressive.

I'm slightly curious about your data collection methods and the size of your compilation.

Especially considering your abhorrence of vegy's dedication...
---

lTT
---

Summarizer posted...

vegy: 7.5/10
Kind of a complicated one, and really makes me consider my methodology. On the one hand, the sheer volume of your contributions to CE would terrify a sane man. Your dedication is supernatural. I feel like it's almost a shame you don't seem to have more productive ways to apply it than shitposting here. So on the one hand the quantity has basically made you a face of CE. On the other hand, the problem is how repetitive your contributions are. I don't know if it's always been so bad or if you're just running on fumes, but to justify a 10 ranking I'd really need more than just the same shit spammed endlessly.

Sounds like a 10 to me
---

V-E-G-Y- posted...

Summarizer posted...

vegy: 7.5/10
Kind of a complicated one, and really makes me consider my methodology. On the one hand, the sheer volume of your contributions to CE would terrify a sane man. Your dedication is supernatural. I feel like it's almost a shame you don't seem to have more productive ways to apply it than shitposting here. So on the one hand the quantity has basically made you a face of CE. On the other hand, the problem is how repetitive your contributions are. I don't know if it's always been so bad or if you're just running on fumes, but to justify a 10 ranking I'd really need more than just the same shit spammed endlessly.

Sounds like a 10 to me

Clearly a 10 in shitposting at least.
---

Superlinkbro posted...

Turbam posted...

Now I'm getting nervous V:

Don't know why you'd be worried about some random person on the internet giving you a rating for looking at like 2 posts and going "yeah that's all he does"

This'll be on my permanent record!
---

Alpha218: 4/10

TeaMilk: 6/10
At first I thought you were a DocileOrangeCup alt, because he seems insecure enough to sockpuppet himself and your writing styles are similar. I don't like your fat guys gimmick. It jumped the shark a long time ago. Otherwise I feel like you're a strong addition to most topics. Maybe a little repetitive in that like 90% of what you say is in the same facetious tone. I do admire the art and creativity though. I've always wished I could be more like that.
---